Home  >  Community  >  The Vendio Round Table  >  Kerry Accepts $$$ From 'Benedict Arnold' Compani


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 Bear1949
 
posted on February 26, 2004 06:15:15 PM
Kerry Donors Include 'Benedict Arnolds'
Candidate Decries Tax-Haven Firms While Accepting Executives' Aid

By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 26, 2004; Page A01

Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, frequently calls companies and chief executives "Benedict Arnolds" if they move jobs and operations overseas to avoid paying U.S. taxes.

But Kerry has accepted money and fundraising assistance from top executives at companies that fit the candidate's description of a notorious traitor of the American Revolution.

Executives and employees at such companies have contributed more than $140,000 to Kerry's presidential campaign, a review of his donor records shows. Additionally, two of Kerry's biggest fundraisers, who together have raised more than $400,000 for the candidate, are top executives at investment firms that helped set up companies in the world's best-known offshore tax havens, federal records show. Kerry has raised nearly $30 million overall for his White House run.

Kerry has taken aim at "Benedict Arnold" companies as part of a much broader political and policy debate over stemming the flow of well-paying U.S. jobs overseas, a chief cause of unemployment, especially in the hardest-hit manufacturing sector. Kerry's solution, detailed in a speech yesterday in Toledo, is to enforce trade agreements, track and slow the outsourcing of U.S. jobs, and stop government contracts and tax incentives from going to companies that move operations or jobs offshore.

Kerry has come under attack from President Bush, as well as some Democrats, for criticizing laws he voted for and lambasting special interests after accepting more money from paid lobbyists than any other senator over the past 15 years. Some Democrats worry that Kerry is leaving himself open to similar attacks on the latest issue.

Given the vast sums raised during the presidential campaign as well as the growing number of companies with offshore operations, it seems almost inevitable that candidates would receive contributions from some of them.

Bush has taken exponentially more from these companies than Kerry, though the president has not made a major campaign issue out of clamping down on them.

On Monday, Kerry was asked why two of his biggest fundraisers were involved with "Benedict Arnold" companies. "If they have done that, it's not to my knowledge and I would oppose it," Kerry told a New York television station. "I think it's wrong to do [it] solely to avoid taxes."

Then he sought to clarify his position: "What I've said is not that people don't have the right to go overseas and form a company if they want to avoid the tax. I don't believe the American taxpayer ought to be giving them a benefit. That's what I object to. I don't object to global commerce. I don't object to companies deciding they want to compete somewhere else.''

David Roux, who has raised more than $250,000 for Kerry since 2002, is co-founder of a California company that helped purchase Seagate Technology Inc. four years ago and incorporated it in the Cayman Islands, one of the world's best-known tax havens. Roux described himself in an interview last fall as the "anchor tenant in John Kerry's fundraising mall."

While the State Department lists Seagate as among the companies that reincorporated offshore to save on taxes, Roux said yesterday that he works for a "global" company forced to make "thoughtful" business decisions about where to locate its offices and jobs. Roux said he does not consider Seagate or himself a "Benedict Arnold." That term, Roux said, "is, like many things in politics, a label that [is] meant to cover a lot of sins."

Stephen J. Luczo, chief executive of Seagate, has contributed $4,000 to Kerry, the maximum allowed under law, and $2,000 to the candidate's legal defense fund. Luczo was on vacation and not available for comment, according to his assistant.

Thomas F. Steyer, who said he has raised around $200,000 for Kerry, is a partner at a California investment firm called Hellman & Friedman LLC that helped set up an insurance company in Bermuda, another popular tax haven. The insurance company -- Arch Capital Group Ltd. -- stated in a 2000 Securities and Exchange Commission filing that it was sinking roots in Bermuda to reduce its U.S. tax bill.

Steyer said that it "wasn't my decision" to set up the company in Bermuda and that he now spends less than 10 percent of his time at Hellman & Friedman. "I believe American citizens should pay their American taxes," Steyer said. He said he "absolutely" does not consider himself part of a "Benedict Arnold" enterprise.

Steyer and Roux have hosted fundraisers for Kerry and are listed by his campaign as among three dozen supporters who have "bundled" $100,000 or more each, which means they get credit for packaging individual donations to reach that total.

When asked for the definition of a "Benedict Arnold" company or CEO, Stephanie Cutter, Kerry's spokeswoman, said: "Companies that take advantage of tax loopholes to set up bank accounts or move jobs abroad simply to avoid taxes." She pointed to a list compiled by Citizen Works, a tax-exempt nonprofit group that monitors corporate influence, as a source on the companies that fit the candidate's definition.

According to federal election records, Kerry has received $119,285 from donors employed at what Citizen Works describes as the "25 Fortune 500 Corporations With the Most Offshore Tax-Haven Subsidiaries." The list does not include nearly all of the companies that shave their tax bill by moving jobs and operations overseas, so Kerry has actually raised substantially more from firms qualifying as "Benedict Arnolds."

Kerry has also received $20,100 in donations directly from individuals at companies with mailing addresses offshore to avoid paying U.S. taxes, records show.

"Senator Kerry has made it crystal clear that he's going to close these loopholes, forever," said Chad Clanton, a Kerry spokesman. "Nothing will stop him. Period."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6884-2004Feb25.html





"An old, long-whiskered man once said to Teddy Roosevelt: 'I am a Democrat, my father was a Democrat, my grandfather was a Democrat.' Roosevelt then said: 'Then if your father had been a horse thief and your grandfather had been a horse thief, you would be a horse thief?'" --Will Rogers
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on February 26, 2004 06:41:23 PM

"Given the vast sums raised during the presidential campaign as well as the growing number of companies with offshore operations, it seems almost inevitable that candidates would receive contributions from some of them."

A drop in the bucket compared with your president, bear.

Compare Democratic Candidates with Bushco.

http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/money/3rdq03summary.html

Helen

 
 profe51
 
posted on February 26, 2004 07:57:52 PM
So the total of monies out of 30 million that Kerry has raised comes to less than 300,000 dollars from offshore companies? We're talking about 1% here bear.......WOW that's really BIG NEWS..
___________________________________

 
 stonecold613
 
posted on February 28, 2004 07:31:47 AM
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AMOJ_MAIN] Kerry's Campaign


The former head of the of the American Trial Lawyers Association, Fred
Barron is spearheading the Edwards Campaign. Fred and his law firm was
the single largest campaign contributor to the Clinton-Gore and
Gore-Liberman campaigns. I should know, my husband (a pilot for Fred)
use to fly Fred, the Clintons, and the Gores on Fred's plane. Fred is
now flying Edwards to ALL of his campaign stops. If Edwards loses, it
has been said that Fred AND HIS MONEY will go to the Kerry camp.

BTW, Mr. Kerry's wife has companies in 57 countries and most of the
Heinz business so off-shore, in order not to pay high American wages,
and keep their corporate taxes lower. to boot, many of Mr. Kerry's
largest campaign financiers and supporters have their companies
off-shore to also avoid high taxes and labor costs. Mr. Kerry calls the
Republican supporters Benedict Arnolds--he denies that any of HIS people
are BA's. That was reported in the Washington Post.

Also, Mr. Kerry' house was put up for a $6M dollar loan, his house
appraised for that two years ago when he financed his last Senatorial
campaign. But HIS bank allowed him to value that same home for $12M
when he began his Presidential campaign., which is and estimated 200%
appreciation in two years. I wish my house appraised that much so
quick.

Same S--- Different Day.

Diana L. Buffington, State Coordinator
Children's Rights Council of Texas

 
 profe51
 
posted on February 28, 2004 08:14:00 AM
BTW, Mr. Kerry's wife has companies in 57 countries and most of the Heinz business so off-shore, in order not to pay high American wages

I guess you could say that any company that has business overseas is trying to avoid paying taxes, right? I guess that explains why, say, Coca Cola has plants all over the world. They're trying to avoid paying high American wages..It has nothing to do with keeping production costs of a Coke lower, so that their local products will be competitive in local markets...nah...that's just silly talk...

Heinz began expansion outside the US in 1886...do you suppose taxes were their motivation then?
If you read the history of the company, you'll find that it has always been involved in international business, yet it's corporate headquarters remain in Pittsburgh. To say they are an overseas, tax dodging company to cast Kerry in a poor light is a stretch, a big stretch

___________________________________
[ edited by profe51 on Feb 28, 2004 08:14 AM ]
 
 skylite
 
posted on February 28, 2004 11:52:12 AM


"Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth. 'Neo-cons' (originally "Liberal Democrats" are the lowest form of politician." -Gen. Geo. S. Patton, Jr.

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 28, 2004 02:13:37 PM
It's the hyprocrisy that we're seeing in Kerry that is the issue here. Not who and how much was contributed by whom.
Agreed both sides get contributions from them.


But it is Kerry, not President Bush, who is running on the platform that he doesn't, when he does.





Re-elect President Bush!!
 
 
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2024  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!