posted on July 11, 2004 05:52:16 AM Oh girls, aren't you all atwitter now that yellowstone has very patronizingly called you all gorgeous????
No.
When I see that yellowstone includes Linda in the group as gorgeous or as dazzlingly beautiful, I doubt that he is a true connoisseur of feminine beauty since such beauty is determined not only by physical looks but inner beauty as well such as character, intelligence and especially the ability to see that George Bush is a miserable failure. Therefore, I find that by including Linda in the group, Yellowstone's criteria and his discrimination of true beauty is obviously flawed either because he is a poor judge or because he simply wants to be a diplomat. I suspect the latter.
posted on July 11, 2004 05:56:51 AM
Yellowstone said the women here were gorgeous? Just look at helen's venomous post to see she is a very ugly person inside... and most likely on the outside as well.
posted on July 11, 2004 06:07:03 AM
Twelve, you're hardly the one to talk since all you've ever posted is nastiness and insults...go back to bed or I'll talk about the cheney/bush communist support team.
Helen, you're right of course but my point was the pomposity of men thinking women actually want or need men approving of their looks.
posted on July 11, 2004 06:50:29 AM
Look into the eyes of a woman in love and see an infinite beauty!
Look into that same beautiful woman's eyes after someone has harmed one of her children and see a determination to see the offender pay! This is beauty as well, as long as it is not all consuming. The beauty of love is still there, as she loves her own.
There is something wrong with anyone who bases the beauty of a woman on outward appearance only, their bank account, profession, religion, race or political party. The beauty is in the entire "package".
My "package" may not be wrapped as pretty as others.....but it's still a gift worth being thankful for receiving!...lol!
posted on July 11, 2004 07:06:00 AM
Well said, TerryAnn. I guess you have to be an adult to understand that there is more to beauty than what lays on the surface.
posted on July 11, 2004 07:09:14 AM
LOL... yeah right.
Both sides... girls want guys that look like Tom Cruise or name a male star and guys want girls that look like Pamela Anderson or name a female star...
posted on July 11, 2004 08:19:56 AM
TerryAnn and Cheryl
What you both said was right on, it was absolutely gorgeous.
Perhaps in your case Helen, because you feel it is a valid criteria for recognising beauty to see GWB as a failure I probably should have said that you were georgeous not gorgeous.
I would be lying if I said I wouldn't contemplate "doing" Harrison Ford, Tom Selleck or Mel Gibson if the opportunity presented itself...lol! I'm not dead!!! But I don't think they would make a good life partner. Just a nice diversion.
I LIKE having my husband around me! I like having him here, at home, having a glass of wine and watching TV, or eating dinner on the lanai, or sitting out front and watching the neighbor's horses or deer or lightning bugs. I like hunting and fishing with him. I like watching him work on his sculptures, or the car. He is a beautiful person, mellow (balances me out), soft spoken (again, balances me out), and recognizes me for the goddess that I am! We have had 2 arguments in 11 years, once over my daughter and once over his. We don't sweat the small stuff and refuse to fight over stupid sh!t. (You have to know our "exes" to know why!)
I don't agree Twelve. The most attractive guys I know (to me) are usually not that good looking but they have the best insides & brains. I'd be 10 times more attracted to Einstein than Cruise.
So Nadeeyeh, do we get anymore clues, or what? Like Maggie, I need closure too.
posted on July 11, 2004 02:40:31 PM
Yellowstone said: Maggie, I just met you not too long ago but underneith your rough and tough exterior I have to beleive that there is some inner gorgeousness in there somewhere. Now don't go and prove me wrong ok.
Hey Yellow.. You are right! I am absolutely gorgeous on the outside.. and that has always served me well.. it lures in my prey and then I snap their head off..chew them up and spit them out.. I guess I never had to work on the inner beauty thing.. much more fun the way it is. Just living up to a mean, hot tempered, Redhead reputation.
posted on July 11, 2004 11:16:37 PM
more clues...hmm...the best I can think of, which will lead you in a vaguely circuitous route to my "real" ID, is to pursue this ID's possible meanings...
fenix is one of a very few here (but not the only one, I daresay ) who might be able to help with that, after a bit of phonetic experimentation...don't worry bear, phonetic experimentation will not endanger heterosexual marriage
My boyfriend hardly looks like Tom Cruise. He's overweight and losing his hair. But, he is kind, funny, intelligent, hard working and best of all he willingly puts up with me. LOL! He's a liberal, but not as far right as I am. It's sometimes causes squabbles, but it never creates a real problem.
I've had the Tom Cruise type. Threw them back in less than a week. I don't go for "pretty" boys who spend an hour on their hair, buy expensive clothing and then gawk at every pretty girl that goes by. I don't go for men that women constantly hit on. It's bad enough Ken is a musician and women hit on him while he's playing, if he were fit and trim with gorgeous thick hair - I'd be in real trouble. I once dated a race car driver. He was fantastic looking. Spent every race night worrying about who was going to try to pick him up. Not worth it!
posted on July 13, 2004 07:21:06 AMTell us who you are so the bickering will stop!
That's a good one! This place exists because of the bickering. At least in this thread, crowfarm didn't attack linda with incredibly rude personal insults, and linda didn't copy paste entire effing webpages, carefully bolded to make her points to those of she thinks too obtuse to get it.
Thanks for playing, but I've decided to hang on to this ID for a while.
