posted on October 3, 2004 12:59:56 PM
LOL - Good twist it back to me now, rusty. It's really VERY simple to name names...YOU'RE the one who made the accusation...no need to do a search for it...with only a handful of righties here...should be very easy for you to name the names. If it's not...then you didn't know what you were talking about when you made that statement.
----------
reamond - Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
It didn't have to. What I believe some here can't see is that Iraq was considered a threat WAY before we thought binladen was. There were two threats..one was binladen and the other the 13 years ordeal we'd been thought with saddam. Very simple really....even IF there was no connections between the two.
posted on October 3, 2004 01:10:55 PM
kerry knows where bin Laden is. Linda, don't you remember during the debate kerry saying bin Laden was in Afghanistan.
Hey, hey Ho, ho Kerry - sign the 1-8-0
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The person who has nothing for which he is willing
to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
--John Stuart Mill
posted on October 3, 2004 01:12:55 PM
Rusty don't get upset when Linda doesn't answer a question. She is famous for doing that when she gets backed into a corner and can not provide proof for her statements.
I am surprised she didn't say "This will be my last post on this thread." That is becoming one of her favorite ways of backing out of a thread.
DICK CHENEY SUPPORTS MY RELATIONSHIP: People ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to
Let's have a BBQ, Texas style, ROAST BUSH
------------------------------
YOU CAN'T HAVE BULLSH** WITH OUT BUSH.
------------------------------
posted on October 3, 2004 01:18:16 PM
I know what you mean Logan. Linda loves to attack those on the left, but when one of her neocon buddies on the right says something that completely conflicts with a view of hers, she is no where to be seen.
She knew exactly what I meant when I posted that. She knows she would choose the same as the rest of us, but she simply can't admit it because in her view, it will make her look bad.
It didn't have to. What I believe some here can't see is that Iraq was considered a threat WAY before we thought binladen was. There were two threats..one was binladen and the other the 13 years ordeal we'd been thought with saddam. Very simple really....even IF there was no connections between the two. ""
Here's ANOTHER question a coward wouldn't answer:
If there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11(and there wasn't) then WHY did the Rove administration do everything in their power to convince the American people that it did?
No, they didn't come right out and say it...blatant honesty is not the way of Republicans.
But they did use STRONG implications and innuendo.
If THEY believed Iraq was a threat why didn't they announce their plans to invade Iraq BEFORE 9/11?
We know they had planned on it long before bush was even appointed....why did they need to USE 9/11 as a reason?
Now, since linda won't answer(as yellow as her president)....I've got work to do.............
posted on October 3, 2004 01:28:41 PM
February 2001 (7 months prior to 9/11) Colin Powell, while visiting Cairo, Egypt quoted as saying, "We had a good discussion, the Foreign Minister and I and the President and I, had a good discussion about the nature of the sanctions -- the fact that the sanctions exist -- not for the purpose of hurting the Iraqi people, but for the purpose of keeping in check Saddam Hussein's ambitions toward developing weapons of mass destruction. We should constantly be reviewing our policies, constantly be looking at those sanctions to make sure that they are directed toward that purpose. That purpose is every bit as important now as it was ten years ago when we began it. And frankly they have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. So in effect, our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbors of Iraq."
So, it seems as though the Bush Administration either lied before 9/11 about Iraq, or they lied afterwards.
posted on October 3, 2004 01:35:25 PM
Yea, bear, like you think I believe anything that comes out of that traitors mouth? No...way. kerry doesn't even know where kerry is half the time.
------------------
logansdad - Rusty don't get upset when Linda doesn't answer a question. She is famous for doing that when she gets backed into a corner and can not provide proof for her statements.
LOL does the same statement apply to rusty for not answering my question? LOL didn't think so. And just what corner do you incorrectly believe I'm backed into? He asked a question - he didn't challenge me on a statement I'd made. Why you can't see the double standard you profess is beyond me.
I am surprised she didn't say "This will be my last post on this thread." That is becoming one of her favorite ways of backing out of a thread.
And I didn't reply to anymore statements about gays....I only felt it necessary after saying that because YOU decided to make all kinds of false accusation/statements that I felt I wanted to clear up. Maybe you did that intentionally to bring me back to post more. But you will notice I after defending myself from your FALSE statements/assumptions I didn't answer you continuing questions.
Be clear here. I'm NEVER backed into a corner. I never feel like there's not a question I can respond to. NEVER!! It's just another one of the little cliches', games, you lefties use [most of you repeatedly] to make yourselves look better. Even though it's clearly seen through as being false.
I know what you mean Logan. Linda loves to attack those on the left, but when one of her neocon buddies on the right says something that completely conflicts with a view of hers, she is no where to be seen. More false claims or can you back up THESE statements too.
She knew exactly what I meant when I posted that. She knows she would choose the same as the rest of us, but she simply can't admit it because in her view, it will make her look bad. Look bad??? LOL To whom? All those who have already decided I'm a nut case?
And I don't have a clue to what you are referring to. So NO,
'I don't know exactly what you meant.' You don't even give any hints to what in the heck you're talking about now.
posted on October 3, 2004 01:46:55 PM
And clinton said how we didn't know if we, under his administration that ALSO believed saddam had womd, had destroyed the womd when he bombed Iraq in 12-98 or not. And he also said right up until we went to war with Iraq he TOO thought saddam had womd.
And hillary's been quoted as saying she checked with her own trusted security sources [from their administration] before voting to give war powers to the President.
And of course, kerry, he made SEVERAL statements about the threat saddam was and how he too believed he had womd.
LOL - But the dems like to continue implying that ONLY this President felt it was a threat. What hypocrites.
Linda says,
"Be clear here. I'm NEVER backed into a corner. I never feel like there's not a question I can respond to. NEVER!! It's just another one of the little cliches', games, you lefties use [most of you repeatedly] to make yourselves look better. Even though it's clearly seen through as being false.
""""I never feel like there's not a question I can respond to.""""
What the hel..does THAT mean?
Ok, linda, what is bush's plan for Iraq....
I mean besides "stay the course" and "hard work" which are meaningless.
posted on October 3, 2004 02:34:30 PM
Linda can't debate herself out of a paper bag. Falling on blind eyes Linda. You list your neocon buddies like GW lists countries willing to help him.
Poland!!! lol. That is hysterical. Poland. "you forgot Poland!" OMG, I about peed myself laughing so hard when Bush pulled Poland out of his butt.
May, 2004:
"Naturally, one may protest the reasons for the war action in Iraq. I personally think that today, Iraq without Saddam Hussein is a truly better Iraq than with Saddam Hussein," Polish President Kwasniewski told the European reporters. "But naturally I also feel uncomfortable due to the fact that we were misled with the information on weapons of mass destruction,"
Wow, Poland sure sounds like another strong ally in Iraq. Jesus H. Christ! Bush is dumber than a bag of hammers and Linda, well, I really don't need to say anything else... you just keep supporting W. LOL... Poland.
posted on October 3, 2004 02:48:01 PM
Oh Mr. stater of untruths...who calls himself rusty here.....
you must have missed his MOST recent comments. The one's about how he felt kerry's statements were immoral during the debates. The laugh's on you, who won't back up his claims.
posted on October 3, 2004 02:56:14 PM
"Kerry's stance during debate immoral", says President of Poland
Onet.pl ^ | 2004-10-01 7:30 PM CET
Posted on 10/01/2004 2:31:55 PM PDT by Matthew Paul
In the interview for a Polish channel TVN, President of Poland, Alexander Kwasniewski expressed his admiration and full support for President George Bush for his leadership in the war on terror.
As a comment to the Bush-Kerry debate, President Kwasniewski said that "President Bush performed like a truly Texan gentleman who was able to notice and fully appreciate the presence and sacrifice of the Polish ally in the war on terror in Iraq. "
"I find it kind of sad that a senator with 20 year parliamentary experience is unable to notice the Polish presence in the anti-terror coalition.", Kwasniewski commented John Kerry's stance.
"I don't think it's an ignorance.", said Kwasniewski.
"Anti-terror coalition is larger than the USA, the UK and Australia. There are also Poland, Ukraine, and Bulgaria etc. which lost their soldiers there. It's highly immoral not to see our strong commitment we have taken with a strong believe that we must fight against terror together, that we must show our strong international solidarity because Saddam Hussein was dangerous to the world.
"That's why we are disappointed that our stance and ultimate sacrifice of our soldiers are so diminished", President Kwasniewski commented Kerry's speech during the debate.
-----------------
Just like you rusty, who doesn't want to see ANY allies help us out, no matter WHO gets elected. That's pretty un-American as it was of kerry to totally discount the 25,000 soldiers our allies have provided to support us in this war.
Think of it 25,000...and you guys are always complaining we've lost over 1000 of our own now. So like 25,000 is no big deal ....you just laugh at those numbers. oh brother
posted on October 3, 2004 03:54:53 PM Maggie, well I think I've been living down south too long now...maybe we are related somewhere! lol!!!
btw, did you know WVA was one of the first states to start charging sales tax? Weird right? I was looking up some pottery which I still cant friggin find - maybe you know -it says McNeil (something) Co., West Virginia - anyway, I came across all these interesting facts about West Virginia. Oh boy-I am starting to become one of these people that know all this dumb sh** about nothing that never means anything in life! Look what ebays done to my song, ma! How will I ever save me from myself?! ha-ha-ha!
..
.. Go'wan and row yer boat. And try to do it merrily, merrily, cause this life IS but a dream...
posted on October 3, 2004 05:09:15 PM
I remember Kerry (in the debate that he kicked GW's butt repeatedly) saying 90% of the cost, and 90% of the casualties. Just because these countries contributed people to the cause doesn't mean they are soldiers fighting in Iraq.
It really is a waste of time to argue with you Linda. You love to twist facts, don't answer questions, etc. You've not only done it today, but everyday.
Face it Linda. You lost the debate, your candidate Georgie boy lost the debate, so you can go back to the drawing board and come up with a new strategy of lies.
posted on October 3, 2004 05:16:18 PMkerry knows where bin Laden is. Linda, don't you remember during the debate kerry saying bin Laden was in Afghanistan.
That is good news for Bush. Now Bush can hunt Bin Laden down in Afghanistan instead of looking in fox hole in Iraq. Why has Bush been spending the past three years looking in the wrong place for Bin laden.
If it wasn't for Kerry pointing that out to Bush, Bush may have started looking for Bin Laden in Iran or North Korea.
DICK CHENEY SUPPORTS MY RELATIONSHIP: People ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to
Let's have a BBQ, Texas style, ROAST BUSH
------------------------------
YOU CAN'T HAVE BULLSH** WITH OUT BUSH.
------------------------------
posted on October 3, 2004 05:24:17 PM
ya know crowfart you keep asking Linda what is President Bush's plan, but you have failed time and again to post kerry's... is it because kerry has no plan or is using the same plan that President Bush has already stated he is doing...
Sort of like kerry couldn't think of anything original so is jumping on President Bush's ideas...
President Bush has laid out a plan, he is training Iraqi security forces to take care of themselvs... cleaned out Sammara this weekend, Is going to stand by this government through the elections, is not backing anyone up for election to distance the US from it.
200,000 forces by the end of the year, continue building, rebuilding infrastructure, these electoins are important and if by some miracle kerry gets elected I predict there will be no elections in Iraq come Jan.
posted on October 3, 2004 05:52:27 PM
That is pretty funny Linda, especially considering all of the lies you have managed to cast over the last few days. It seems your going over your normal quota for lies today.
posted on October 3, 2004 06:00:31 PM
No, Rusty has been around long enough to know that you never admit defeat. But hey! Linda. There is a big audience out here who can see the winner and it's not you...no matter how much you Lol or how many smiley faces you scatter about.
You should thank twelvepole for answering that question for you.
posted on October 3, 2004 06:08:41 PM
helen - That question has been answered again and again....she's just likes to be redundant and keep repeating herself. Haven't you been sharp enough to notice that?
And you've also not noticed I don't answer ANY of cf's questions. She's not worth my breath.
Yes, Linda...I notice everything. I notice when you are unable to answer a question that you disappear or use an excuse like the one you just mentioned. Remember me -- I've been arguing with you for years???
posted on October 3, 2004 08:41:57 PM
Maggie - Yep, you hit that one on the head. There's lots of dems/lefties here that lie a lot. You listed the ones I see. So I called them on it. No problem for me with those who state things I've never said, or make assumptions about me, without asking..continue to make false statements that aren't true...but the dems mentioned seem to have a higher level for being liars. That's not my fault. It's their's.
And I'm not just calling crowfarm a liar....she was [in a thread] PROVEN to be a liar. Not an opinion...a FACT.
I've got broad shoulders and I'll deal with whatever I have to deal with. You take care of maggie...and I'll take care of Linda.
No...way. kerry doesn't even know where kerry is half the time.
Maggie, well I think I've been living down south too long now...maybe we are related somewhere! lol!!!