posted on October 3, 2004 08:53:58 PM new
Linda, by calling everyone here a liar YOU are the only one who is obviously a liar. You know dam well that we are not liars.
posted on October 3, 2004 09:09:34 PM new
Actually crowfart I have proven you are a liar... you can try to deny that all you want and call it what ever you want... you are a liar pure and simple.
Linda is just smart enough to be able to see that...
posted on October 3, 2004 09:17:03 PM new
No helen, you're wrong once again.
Not everyone just those mentioned....like you....saying you didn't say what you had said.
I post your own words...and I'm the liar? No, it's not me that's having a 'mental' problem.
editing to add:
I notice when you are unable to answer a question that you disappear or use an excuse like the one you just mentioned.
This is another statement that you and others, those copy-cat. game players seem to enjoy repeating. I have said I'm NEVER unable to answer a question...but your accusation is I 'disappear'. Then I'm accused of posting too much and I'm told I need a rest. But when I break away to do other things....I'm accused of disappearing. Can't you see the humor in that? I sure do. Again, it's another false accusation. You and others have absolutely NO way of knowing if I'm lurking or I gone out. ALL your little crystal balls appear to be broken. Try ebay...might get a good buy on a new one.
Anyone who's read here for a while knows I answer all the questions posed to me - like you do 'when I want to'. So to make such a totally false accusation is VERY humorous to me.
But then even with humor....oh so many get all upset and start badgering me about using too many smilies. Like it's a BIG CRIME.
Today rusty advises me to take medication.....why? Now to smile and laugh at all the ludicris statements you guys post when you're playing your little childish games...means I need Prozac? LOL I think people who feel there's something wrong with finding humor in a LOT of what's said here.....are the one's that need the drugs. Not I.
posted on October 3, 2004 09:29:48 PM new First sign is denial..........Thy name is crowfarm
Hey, hey Ho, ho Kerry - sign the 1-8-0
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The person who has nothing for which he is willing
to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
--John Stuart Mill
posted on October 3, 2004 09:32:11 PM new
First, linda you had my words incorrectly transcribed and then I discovered that my comment made months or years ago was a joke....
If we are using that sort of misunderstanding as a basis for calling someone a liar, you are a liar too.
What dispicable lie did crowfart tell...that she was leaving and then she changed her mind. That's a lie???
posted on October 3, 2004 09:35:55 PM new
And then there's crowfarm. Such a wonderful addition to our board. So many appear to me to think she's just the cat's meow.
To me she's a liar and she harasses almost every post I make. Are you guys blind to that harassment. No. You see it. Everyday. Doesn't it bother you that she continues to LIE about low I feel. Do you honestly believe I want to see children murdered/killed as she continue to say? Probably not. But you excuse her totally outrageous behavior to me and to others. And YOU judge I'M the one that needs medication? Her behavior meets YOUR standards of being civil. You see ME constantly antigonizing HER? I don't think so.
A well respected poster, with a TON of guts posted crowfarms lie. Two posts felt cf should apologize to me. Did she? No. And I didn't expect her to. I can easily see what type of person someone is by their posts. But not only would she not apologize....she to this day says she didn't lie.
And you believe her. But I'm the one that needs to start taking drugs?
I'm beginning to see why you're all kerry supporters. You can't see reality at all. You remain in constant denial about what's going on around you. And that's YOUR problem...not mine.
posted on October 3, 2004 10:05:53 PM newFirst, linda you had my words incorrectly transcribed and then I discovered that my comment made months or years ago was a joke....
Do you see your own denial helen? Obviously not. There was no incorrect transcription...I copied and pasted YOUR exact post...the whole thing...with the date and hour and second on it that you posted it. It wasn't years ago...it was this January. And I've posted it as proof at least twice...maybe three times.
So you remain in denial...I call it lying. But we each have our own standards about even the subject of lying.
posted on October 4, 2004 06:46:51 AM new
Yes, Linda there was a false transcription. You took my original statement intended as a joke -- elaborated on that statement to suit your slanderous intent and when under pressure months later finally posted the statement that I actually made. You are the liar ,
I said to Nearthesea in an attempt to be funny..."Don't ever take what I say here as an indication of how I really feel." followed by a smiley face. That statement can be found in this thread, Janurary, 2003. It was intended as a joke to Nearthesea.
You gave my remark a defamatory spin as follows...
You said, "Gee helen...I don't know which of your previous posts to use here...the one where you say only righties call names....or the one where you tell us never to believe anything you say/post here
So, you twisted my simple, innocuous statement in an attempt to discredit any thing that I might say or post here. What you attempted to do in July, 2004 and continue to do now is worse than a lie.
posted on October 4, 2004 08:55:40 AM new
To be more clear, helen.
When I paraphased your words [that you've posted above] those are NOT the two or three times, [the most recent two or three times] I was referring to.
I was referring to the two or three times where I actually took your post and copied and pasted them on threads - this one:
Helenjw [i]posted on January 30, 2003 06:07:07 AM
NeartheSea
Don't ever take what I say here as an indication of how I really feel.
Helen
rememberthat!
Helen
And in one of the threads I did post that you had previousy said you were joking. And then in another post I gave you a hard time saying I guess you weren't from a statement you made in THAT [new] thread.
I hope this clear this up and that you will find the ability to let this go. I'd sure hate to see what reaction a crisis in your life would bring since you find this silly exchange between us, one of probably hundreds we've had between us so important. You've given me zingers and I have to you too, over the years.
Maybe it would be better if you just do as you've promised to do, over and over which is pretend I'm not here and just ignore me. Especially since you appear to me to be able to hand out your own sarcasim/jabs but can't take it being returned to you very well.
You're not going to change me and I'm certainly not going to change you. So best you stop trying.
And I do hope you are able to see the second statement you made over and over, that I couldn't choose between, about 'righties' not being able to post with insults/name calling.....because I believe THAT one's been proven over and over not to be the case too.
posted on October 4, 2004 09:15:21 AM new
Can I say something here?
Yes, you both sure keep this board entertaining!!!
Maggie, I thought of you when I hit this site how you like play on words and LiT-ART -- have you ever seen or heard of it?
http://www.heelstone.com/meridian/ ....Some neat stuff on there!
This is Helen and Linda back in the day!!
Ok, so which one is wearing the bats?!! LOL!
posted on October 4, 2004 09:24:20 AM new
LOL, you're welcome, Linda. I thought it was cute...I shouldnt have prefaced it with bats...because if you dont look carefully you could almost easily miss it. I almost did! And its funny, I really did see you two there when I saw it!
Today, I am listing like a banshi and just needed to come over here for a break!
It's good to take a breather and have a laugh
edited to add: I would have figured you you for the brunette. Heres the caption of the picture by Helen Adams:
"As in all of the collages of Helen Adam, the true desires of women are fulfilled not by mortal men, but by highly charged encounters with unhuman beings."
[ edited by neroter12 on Oct 4, 2004 09:32 AM ]
posted on October 4, 2004 09:50:32 AM new "I hope this clear this up and that you will find the ability to let this go."
I'm not bringing this up, Linda. I'm responding to the fact that you keep bringing it up. Why you are so obsessive over it is a mystery to me especially when it makes you appear so disturbed.
Anyway, I have copied and pasted my reply and located all of your references to it so that next time, I will be able to deal with it.
posted on October 4, 2004 09:55:57 AM new
The "linda Runs into Her Own Butt and Gets Backed into a Corner Post #8,182:
In another thread , LINDUH posts that SHE ""can easily see what type of person someone is by their posts.""
Then linduh posts,
"I am just so impressed. Between yesterday and now today we have what? five different posters who must be psychiatrists or psychologists from the way they hand out their medical diagnosis and recommendations to others. Be careful if you're not"
AND
"And on your evaluation of me. LOL - It's worth what I paid for it I guess. absolutely nothing"
proving for the millionth time that reasoning and logic are not her strong suits.
AND,of course, she won't answer this post because that nasty old crowfarm wrote it and that's her excuse everytime I back her into a corner and prove her wrong.
posted on October 4, 2004 10:20:20 AM new I actually took your post and copied and pasted them on threads
Still you are backpeddling, linda. BEFORE you "actually took my post and copied and pasted them on threads" you were misquoting my comment, twisting it into a false and derrogatory statement to suit your purpose to demean and defame me.
Get out and improve your emotional outlook. Your input on this board will not influence the election of George Bush.
posted on October 4, 2004 02:26:38 PM new
You know, I was thinking this morning that we have 3 debates left. GW's strongest support was for his strength with war and the fight on terror. He obviously lost that debate.
Anyhow, I am really looking forward to Tuesday night's debate between Edwards and Cheney. I can't wait to hear Dick's circle of lies to cover his role with Halliburton. Have they resolved whether they are going to stand or sit for this debate? Someone one mentioned that they agreed to let GW sit on Cheney's lap, but I wasn't sure if that was finalized. lol.
One thing is for sure, Tuesday will be entertaining. What will Dick pull out? Will he mention Edwards addiction to Diet Coke? Will he claim that Edwards files frivilous lawsuits for accident victims? What will Edwards say that would be so difficult for Dick to respond to? This is going to be fun. My prediction for Tuesday is too close to call. I just can't wait to see the two of them go at it. It will much more interesting than the last VP debate between boring Cheney and ultra boring Lieberman. I thought I heard crickets in the background during that debate.
Friday, I predict more Bush @ss kicking is in store, especially now that Kerry jumped that Bush "stronghold" hurdle of foreign relations.
posted on October 4, 2004 03:56:26 PM newHe obviously lost that debate. Not in a lot of people's minds. Some polls show kerry winning on style....but President Bush winning on substance.
But, of course, all the left-leaning media is going to go for kerry....they've been clearly 'for' him all this time.
posted on October 4, 2004 04:51:04 PM new
"But, of course, all the left-leaning media is going to go for kerry....they've been clearly 'for' him all this time."
Another neocon lie administered by none other than Linda.
The truth of the matter is that most major media outlets, particularly those on television, have been favoring Bush more so than Kerry. However, I do believe, even in my very "ultra-liberal" views that many of the television channels that generally lean towards the conservatives, even ever so slightly have been giving a little more balanced view on Kerry. My personal opinion is that they are starting to see Kerry starting his down the stretch pull away from GW, and they want to make sure they are fair as the election draws near. You can be guaranteed that right after the election, no matter who wins, the media will give the winning candidate all of their attention, and will talk about the losers downfalls that led to their defeat. As I have said numerous times, it is all a game. The media is just another part of that game, and they are going to favor whoever is in their best interest. Up until last Thursday, their best interest was Bush, but we may start to see the table turning.
posted on October 5, 2004 11:22:54 AM new
That whole idea of winning on style vs. substance is a joke. It is another neocon way of covering up the fact they lost. A distraction against the truth. A way to cast light on the "big city" Senator who has always been portrayed as a stylish individual vs. a President who stayed course. I'll admit Bush stayed course, the problem with it, and many Americans saw it, is that staying course may not necessarily be the right thing to do if it isn't working.
posted on October 5, 2004 12:25:58 PM new
OK, I waded through most of this thread, except for the trolls that I am ignoring(cowflop, bigpoopa, and mangledpluggins), and I have reached a conclusion. My shoes are now liberally brown.
I am surprised, I always thought that if liberalism was a color it would be yellow. But, brown does make sense if you think about it.
posted on October 5, 2004 01:16:45 PM new
All good artists know that atmosphere affects color....could be why everything appears shitty brown when you are around.
posted on October 5, 2004 02:43:45 PM new
parklane uses his ignore feature only because he can't handle the truth. leave it to a neocon to ignore more than his side of opinion. Reminds me of last Thursday's debate. Bush's message of staying the course. Yep, the best strategy is no strategy.
This topic is 8 pages long: 1new2new3new4new5new6new7new8new
