posted on November 1, 2005 08:17:50 AM new
::you ignore my questions to you...as you did in your own thread on 'where in the constitution does it say this' thread last night.::
Could you please point out the question because I didn't see it last night and I don't see it now. In fact, the only post I can find of your s posted "last night" is still another cut and paste liberally sprinkled with your selective bolding which I have told you months ago that I don't read because I find it visually annoying not to mention condescending as hell. My reading comprehension skills are such that I really don't need you to point out the important aspects of an article. I am able to do that all by myself.
BTW - it's probably better to just not ansdwer the questions than to come back a day later and make up some ridiculous excuse. I'm not the one doing happy dances around issues here. I'm not the one that needs to find someone elses writing to express my views.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
An intelligent deaf-mute is better than an ignorant person who can speak.
posted on November 1, 2005 08:26:43 AM new
::If he gets to the Court in time, he might even have a say in the pending abortion rights case this term that will determine whether Congress can ban a certain type of late-term abortion procedure.::
Doubtful unless it is reargued. That case is scheduled to be argued before his confirmation hearings even begin. In order for him to be in on the judgement he has to be a sitting judge at the time of the arguement.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
An intelligent deaf-mute is better than an ignorant person who can speak.
posted on November 1, 2005 08:32:44 AM new
fenix - I think you're quite capable of reading MY question to you in your own thread on this subject. If you can't see it....that's your problem....it's there.
But as far as this whole issue goes....you have chosen to focus on ONE issue...and one issue only. Alito has what most describe as a history of being fair and ruling on LAW....
The fact that you and rusty choose to ignore that....and focus on one little tiny part of a whole ruling he made....is NOT what his confirmation will depend on. It will be decided on his qualifications and he WILL be our next USSC justice.
And on your sarcasm right now, fenix, I see NO reason for you to complain I'm addressing it today.....rather than when YOU were stomping your feet and demanding it last night.
It's not like I haven't stated my position on this VERY subject over and over and over again. Because I have. And the fact that my answers to your questions yesterday, didn't meet with YOUR approval... is your problem. You don't control what I say, what I post, when I post anything. Hopefully that's understood while you continue to whine about it.
--------------
and just to clear something else up....
rusty said in his opening statement...."Funny how the neocons use the term, "activist judge" when referring to any judge they disagree with."
Another case of a liberal telling others what the conservatives who support constitutionalist judges think. And, once again, it's wrong.
To us, a activist judge, be they left or right leaning.....makes up laws that NO legislator has passed....you know, the way it's supposed to be done.
A constrictionist/consitutional judge rules on on ESTABLISHED law. If there is no establised law....their decisions are that the cases are normally sent back to the LEGISLATORS to MAKE laws on.
Sad that some liberal's are so blinded they can't see that. But then their anger about their side NOT being able to appoint liberal judges....is what's blinding them to the actual facts.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
It will be decided on his qualifications and he WILL be our next USSC justice.
