Home  >  Community  >  The Vendio Round Table  >  Jimmy Carter on Larry King


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 This topic is 4 pages long: 1 2 3 4
 mingotree
 
posted on November 5, 2005 09:14:57 AM
And here's Queen linduh telling posters what they can and cannot and should and shouldn't do RIGHT AFTER TELLING FENIX that anyone can say anything they want on these boards.

Well, with a cavernous mouth it's so easy to talk out of both sides at once


Now linda be quiet and go away.
[ edited by mingotree on Nov 5, 2005 09:15 AM ]
 
 maggiemuggins
 
posted on November 5, 2005 09:33:46 AM
[ edited by maggiemuggins on Feb 9, 2006 08:40 PM ]
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 11:17:52 AM
KD - Linda, thank-you for the article on abortion. Obviously, he's against it, but at least he acknowledges that abortion isn't the real issue, it's what leads up to it... lack of education, lack of birth control, etc. Until these things are addressed, abortion will continue.


Sure abortion is the real issue and has been the reason many don't vote the democratic ticket.

Here's another article on the abortion issue that I'd appreciate you reading. Speaks to the issue of how IF roe vs wade hadn't been declared by the USSC to be legal...when there was NO previous mention of abortion in our National Constitution....things would have gone differently and probably would have ended this fighting between pro-abortionists and anti-abortionists that we are now still seeing 'blamed' ALL on the religious right.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/weekend/hottopic/?id=110007510


"[i]We have no idea whether a Justice Alito would vote to overturn Roe. But notwithstanding the scare tactics of the left, the right to an abortion would not vanish if Roe were overturned.


The issue would return to 50 state legislatures, nearly all of which would quickly make it legal with some restrictions. In short, the country would arrive at the position favored by most Americans, voters would be less polarized over cultural disputes, abortion would stop dominating Supreme Court nominations, and our politics would be a lot healthier[/i].
---------

I agree with this op-ed 100%.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter

And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 5, 2005 11:21 AM ]
 
 mingotree
 
posted on November 5, 2005 11:21:40 AM
""the right to an abortion would not vanish if Roe were overturned""


No, you're right, rich women would have access to safe abortions.

And, then why overturn it?
And, why do the Repugs make an issue of it?
[ edited by mingotree on Nov 5, 2005 11:22 AM ]
 
 profe51
 
posted on November 5, 2005 12:37:49 PM
...if you'd be willing to do so. When you were on vacation and emailing maggie privately, did you ever say to her [about me] that it 'sucks to be her'? Maggie implied on this board you had...

Wait a second...am I to understand that people on this board actually get so personally involved in what happens here that they email each other privately about it??

YOU'RE KIDDING, RIGHT??

good god almighty...sure doesn't take much to entertain some folks...
____________________________________________
Habla siempre que debas y calla siempre que puedas....
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 12:49:03 PM
lol profe.....if you think this hasn't been going on, almost since the time this board started, you are sadly mistaken.


It has....some even decide their 'war' plans against the oposition in private email.

Yep...that's the truth.
Nothing different now.


Besides when a women posts a picture of her breasts on a public chat board....no one should be surprised she'd get much, obviously needed, attention.



 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 12:59:46 PM


I don't believe it either. Why would anyone need a "battle plan" to tackle someone who has to use Lol as an address and smiley faces as her only defense because she has nothing else to offer? A battle plan??? against what???

And with that pitiful defense along with reams of copy paste she thinks that she is "debating".

Who needs email to discuss that?




sp.ed
[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 5, 2005 01:08 PM ]
 
 bigpeepa
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:01:41 PM
The political issue about abortion is over its finished. The present abortion law will either stay or be over turned with the new Supreme Court.

I saw Jimmy Carter on CNN. Carter pointed out how the Republicans for 18 months did not finish a investigation and report. The investigation and report is about what Bush/Cheney and Powel told America and the World about WMD in Iraq.

Now LIAR-LINDA_K wants to draw attention away from that part of the interview with Carter.

LIAR-LINDA_K, we all know your tricks and cover-ups. Your tricks and cover-ups don't work any longer.

PEOPLE LIKE LIAR-LINDA_K IS JUST ONE MORE REASON THE CON-SERVATIVE FORM OF GOVERNMENT IS CRUMBLING. YES!!!

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:09:00 PM
LOL helen....our QUEEN hyprocrite.


"I don't believe it either."


Then you are deaf, dumb and blind AND LYING....just like you are/do in the political arena. You CHOOSE to ignore their posts saying so themselves.


Why would anyone need a "battle plan" to tackle someone who has to use Lol as an address and smiley faces as her only defense because she has nothing else to offer? A battle plan??? angainst what???


Oh but helen....we're NOT speak about me....but what other lefties have always done here. You've got your head stuck in the sand AGAIN. LOL



And with that pitiful defense along with reams of copy paste she thinks that she is "debating". Who needs email to discuss that?



Again.....you TRY to blame me for what you and other lefties totally accept when the lefties do it.


But I was speaking to personal 'issues' with other posters...not the political debate issues. Once again...it's YOUR INCORRECT way of taking a post I've made. Not surprising at all.


Now helen....please tell us you and other's here HAVEN'T been emailing each other privately.....I LOVE watching you tell lies.


You, yourself, have posted information about others ...what was going on with them....when they weren't here. News YOU received via email. LOL


Lie away helen....it sooooo suits your character.


Oh....and ask maggie IF she doesn't email other posters privately. Maybe IF she can tell the truth SHE can set you straight.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter

And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 5, 2005 01:15 PM ]
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:19:15 PM

Again, linda you are crystal ball gazing.

And you responded just as I described.

Nothing new.

Nobody here needs an email hatched battle plan to answer your silly comments and for you to think that only serves to illustrate your delusions of grandeur. Get real! You are nothing but a flaming fanatic.

That is indeed FUNNY.




[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 5, 2005 01:21 PM ]
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:23:21 PM
LOL.....I see you choose NOT to deny you have and do email others here.


Think the profe will think less of you IF you just answer the question?


He won't. Many have always done it....doesn't surprise me you REFUSE to admit YOU'RE one of them.



"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter

And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
 
 mingotree
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:25:18 PM
The smokescreen won't work

""""the right to an abortion would not vanish if Roe were overturned""


No, you're right, rich women would have access to safe abortions.

And, then why overturn it?
And, why do the Repugs make an issue of it?""


 
 mingotree
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:26:55 PM
Oh, and linduh, I don't think Profe mentioned your name...quit butting in like you warned Maggie not to do

 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 01:36:53 PM


"LOL.....I see you choose NOT to deny you have and do email others here."

I choose to keep my email PRIVATE. You will NEVER see a word that anyone wrote to me by email or know who sent me an email. Having said that, I make it a policy to NEVER write anything in an email that I would want to conceal.

Furthermore, You are NUTS if you think that you are a topic of my email messages.

And about the profe. He knows, as you should know that pleasing any individual here is not my primary goal.

Get a grip, linda. you are in my opinion just a MAJOR Pissant Pain in the Ass. You make normal conversation here impossible.

That's unfortunate for everyone on this board.















[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 5, 2005 01:38 PM ]
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:15:32 PM
GOOD FOR YOU, helen



You FINALLY admitted you do email others here. We only disagree on what you discuss. lol



But now you too have informed the profe that people here, just like you, do just what he appeared to be surprised by.


No biggie helen....but boy it's so hard to get you to stay 'question-focused' and actually get an answer out of you.



 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:27:17 PM


In addition to being a Major pissant, pain in the ass, you are also a Liar. Where did I say anything that you have just fabricated?

As I said how many times???? I have never discussed battle plans and you are not the topic of anyone's email that I know.

In addition to being deluded with grandeur, you are also paranoid.

Scat pissant. You aren't worthy of a reply.




[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 5, 2005 02:28 PM ]
 
 mingotree
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:33:01 PM
Got a huge chuckle out of this ....

""....but boy it's so hard to get you to stay 'question-focused' and actually get an answer out of you. ""


Can you believe that's LINDA..commenting on someone ELSE !!!???








[ edited by mingotree on Nov 5, 2005 02:34 PM ]
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:42:02 PM

Mingo, I answered her question four times.

She's just unhappy that she didn't get an answer that she can lie about.



 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:44:03 PM
LOL.....there you go again helen.


You are adding things I never said....in order to make others wonder IF you do or don't email other posters here.


I'll stop your game playing.....by saying that YOU WON'T DENY [his only]...THAT YOU HAVE....YOU DO....email other posters here. And yet you haven't the 'gut's to admit it.

How funny.



"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter

And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
 
 logansdad
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:50:41 PM
And, why do the Repugs make an issue of it?

Mingo, I read this the other day and wanted to post it because it raises some valid concerns on how the Republican party is trying to use morality as their basis for everything.



In re the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982, I was struck by one part in particular.

(a) SPOUSAL NOTICE REQUIRED.--In order to further the Commonwealth's interest in promoting the integrity of the marital relationship...

What exactly is the "Commonwealth's interest" here, and since when is it the government's job to promote the "integrity of the marital relationship"? If it's in the Commonwealth's interest to promote the "integrity of the marital relationship," then maybe the Commonwealth should give me and my wife a big pile of money to live on so we won't have to work - that way we could focus our efforts on the "promoting the integrity of the marital relationship." While I agree with the principle that fewer abortions would be a good thing, I have serious issues with the conservatives' preferred means to this end - restricting or outlawing abortion. To me, this is treating the symptom, not the problem. The only reason for a woman to seek an abortion is because she is faced with an unwanted pregnancy. If there were no unwanted pregnancies, there would be no need for abortion. And yet, some of the most vociferous opponents to abortion are the so-called "moral" crusaders who also vehemently oppose comprehensive sex education in schools, distribution of birth control, and other methods that would prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place. When one realizes this hypocrisy, the real issue involved becomes clear. While the rhetoric of the political right is couched in such a fashion as to make it appear as though they are taking the "moral high ground," the debate is not so much about morality as it is about power. Specifically, who should have the power to make complex moral decisions - the individual or the government?

As a male of the species, I will never be pregnant, will never be faced with that decision, will never have to live with the consequences of that decision, and will never have to justify that decision to my Maker. Therefore, what is my basis for making that decision for someone else? What justification do I have for imposing my view of morality on another individual? How is it in society's best interest for the government to make moral decisions of this nature? As a respondent yesterday put it so well, "The purpose of laws, any laws, is to protect people's rights, NOT to uphold morality." A law that would strip away the individual's right to make moral decisions is not in "the Commonwealth's interest," nor anyone else's.


Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
----------------------------------
The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 02:53:59 PM


"You FINALLY admitted you do email others here. We only disagree on what you discuss. lol"

WRONG I said,I choose to keep my email PRIVATE. You will NEVER see a word that anyone wrote to me by email or know who sent me an email. Having said that, I make it a policy to NEVER write anything in an email that I would want to conceal. Furthermore, You are NUTS if you think that you are a topic of my email messages.



"But now you too have informed the profe that people here, just like you, do just what he appeared to be surprised by.

I have NOT. In fact, I was as surprised as he was! If anyone here needs to formulate a battle plan it's certainly not anyone on the left. There is no challange here.



[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 5, 2005 02:56 PM ]
 
 dblfugger9
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:07:10 PM
Therefore, what is my basis for making that decision for someone else?

Well, as far as this spousal notice required goes - you forgot one thing logansdad. Marriage is a legal contract in this country. Valid as any other 'legal' contract between two people. You cannot enter into a legal contract with say, a business partner, and then willfully set out to deceive them. More than likely the aggrieved partner will win the suit. You of all people should be aware of what a partnership entails. Sounds to me like you've been begging to have a 'legal' marriage, but you dont really give a sh* what that means in the law. Maybe you should be asking why should the laws of marriage and the legal ramifications of one be any different than other contractual laws.






 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:08:32 PM
lol....WRONG ANSWER helen. \


You need to re-check your vast 'FBI wanna-be files' you keep.


THERE you will find when YOU made an announcement to all of us ...that you would have ONLY know if something who was suspended HAD emailed you that info.


In your wish to be FIRST at SOMETHING you made the announcement to the board THEY had let you know THEY'D been suspended.....




"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter

And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:11:51 PM
Here helen....this should make it much easier for you to comprehend....


just sign on the dotted line.


I, helen, being honest will all posters here, do SWEAR that I have NEVER emailed any poster here, past or present, for any reason.



X--------------[sign here, helen]

helenjw [aka hjw]







 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:21:54 PM

You would have only know????

if something who????



Linda you are losing it. IF I was in fact the first to learn of this suspension it is none of your business by what form of communication that information was made apparent to me.

As I said before, I choose to keep my email PRIVATE. You will NEVER see a word that anyone wrote to me by email or know who sent me an email. Having said that, I make it a policy to NEVER write anything in an email that I would want to conceal. Furthermore, You are NUTS if you think that you are a topic of my email messages.




 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:33:33 PM
LOL...okay well SINCE you won't sign the sworn testimony here....

then I believe many will know you just don't want to admit to doing so. Your refusal to so state and yes or no to a VERY simple question....is an answer all on it's own...that speaks LOUDLY to one and all.


No guts....
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:40:59 PM
Wrong again, loonie lunda

Maybe if I repeat my policy enough times, you will read it.

I choose to keep my email PRIVATE. You will NEVER see a word that anyone wrote to me by email or know who sent me an email. Having said that, I make it a policy to NEVER write anything in an email that I would want to conceal. Furthermore, You are NUTS if you think that you are a topic of my email messages.

What about that do you not understand?




[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 5, 2005 03:46 PM ]
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on November 5, 2005 03:50:50 PM



Now, you can tell me your policy or would that take "guts".





 
 Linda_K
 
posted on November 5, 2005 04:04:10 PM
NOW??? helen.


Now...after what? You NOT admitting what every single poster here that YOU HAVE emailed already knows?



funny liberal....ha ha ha



 
 bigpeepa
 
posted on November 5, 2005 04:09:05 PM
LIAR-LINDA_K IS OVER THE EDGE. LOL

LIAR-LINDA_K must enjoy being dominated. YES!!!

For months now every time LIAR-LINDA_K opens her BULL ROAR mouth she gets beat-up big time and still comes back for more. YES!!!

LIAR-LINDA_K you need to calm down and not take yourself so seriously. You have posted LIES,SMOKESCREENS AND TWISTED OTHER PEOPLES WORDS HUNDREDS OF TIMES.

All that has changed is the CON-servative form of government your kind supports is CRUMBLING. YES!!!

 
   This topic is 4 pages long: 1 2 3 4
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2025  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!