Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:27:24 PM
Sure.....let's see you PROVE it.  I want to have you verify that my sons are 40 or older as you said. LOL LOL LOL
edited to add kiara's latest LIE:
kiara - posted on November 17, 2006 01:44:52 PM
Linda has sons in their 40's so she must have been birthing babies at about 10 years old then?
Linda_K - posted on November 17, 2006 01:52:34 PM edit
ROFLMHO at that one.
At that ASSumpsion. LOL LOL LOL
Prove I ever said that.
I NEVER would tell a lie...I'm not a liberal who posts falsehoods all the time and who makes all sorts of FALSE assumptions.
But you do...and you're GREAT at it.
My sons are not near 40. Maybe YOU can prove differently? I will come as a SHOCK to all three of us. LOL LOL LOL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 17, 2006 07:32 PM ]
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:30:37 PM
When I said you gave birth at about 10 it was a joke but I forgot you don't have a sense of humor. But I do remember you saying that your sons were born in the 1960's. If they aren't yet 40 they are most likely nearing that age.
Do you want me to find where you said that?
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:35:51 PM
I SURE do.
You're the one that LIED AGAIN, kiara. NOW PROVE it.....like I've asked you to do THREE times now.
I won't hang around waiting..I have other things to do.....but the main reason is because you're NEVER going to find where I said ANY SUCH NONSENSE - because I NEVER did.....they aren't "IN THEIR 40's" which is what YOU falsely claimed.....it's NOT TRUE[/i].
AGAIN....it's all in that FAULTY memory of yours. You know the one you apologized for just yesterday. lol lol lol lol
BUT I will come back to this thread later tonight or tomorrow EXPECTING you to go into you phoney apologitic mode again....so you can repeat MORE lies tomorrow. Seems to be a new pattern with you. No sooner do you get though admitting you were WRONG...than you pull this crap again and make up ANOTHER LIE.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 17, 2006 07:40 PM ]
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:38:15 PM
No need to C & P what I said, Linda. Perhaps you didn't really notice the QUESTION MARK and the  either? Besides momentarily forgetting that you have no sense of humor I also momentarily forgot that you have to be the pickiest person to ever post here. 
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:42:13 PM
Linda_K posted on May 17, 2004 02:39:36 AM
Even back in the late 60's when I was delivering my sons....all knew you didn't go to deliver your baby at a Catholic hospital IF you wanted your tubes tied following the birth. You just chose to go to a hosptial that didn't have those same rules.
http://www.vendio.com/mesg/read.html?num=28&thread=210974
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:44:12 PM
ROFLMHO.....BACK PEDDLING ALREADY huh, kiara????
How funny. Your question was about me being 10. Just more sarcasum on your part. But you weren't questioning my son's ages...you make a statement of FACT.
And you lied.
NO....don't embarrass yourself....go FIND your PROOF that you aren't LYING AGAIN.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:48:36 PM
My youngest son just turned 35 THIS month. My oldest son just turned 37 the 29th of last month.
NOW kiara...how old was **I** when they were born?
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:48:45 PM
Kiara: Anyways, I remember you mentioned here that you gave birth to them in the 1960's
Linda_K: but the main reason is because you're NEVER going to find where I said ANY SUCH NONSENSE - because I NEVER did
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:50:41 PM
The FACTS are NEITHER are near forty...unless 35 is 'near' 40 in YOUR mind.
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:50:47 PM
NOW kiara...how old was **I** when they were born?
I dunno...... maybe 40?
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:54:20 PM
Kiara SAID FALSELY...
Linda has sons in their 40's
And if you can remember that long ago....you and chocolate are just SO sure I'm close enough in age to collect SS.
BUT ....you haven't a clue on that or the other questions I addressed to choco.
Because that's what you do best here....YOU LIE. YOU assume - always.
And you admit you don't know just how young I WAS when I gave birth to my sons.
That's what happens when you continue to LIE about others when you haven't a CLUE.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
|
mingotree
|
posted on November 17, 2006 07:56:23 PM
See, Kiara, linda's litter is no way NEAR their 40'sLOL!
I can't believe you actually tried to JOKE with linda of all people...you know she has no idea what a sense of humor is! She can't even spell sarcasmHa ha!!!
Now you know why she's totally unaware of being the biggest joke to ever post and why naughty people like you and me have fun pulling her chain!!!
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 08:01:25 PM
I can't believe you actually tried to JOKE with linda of all people
|
profe51
|
posted on November 17, 2006 08:12:16 PM
While the case can be made that 35 is no closer to 40 than it is to 30, the rules of mathematical rounding require that 35 is 40 when rounded to the nearest 10.
____________________________________________
May 1, 2003, America brings "democracy" to Iraq. November 7, 2006, Iraq brings democracy to America.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 08:19:46 PM
LOL profe.
Her ORIGINAL LIE was that they were in their 40's.
They AREN'T.
THEN she backpeddled as I asked her to PROVE her lie.
Your sign...right back at ya.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
|
chococake
|
posted on November 17, 2006 08:39:52 PM
Thank you Helen, I really appreciate what you said. It's a shame what Linda says to other people because she thinks she's a better American than anyone else.
Linda I didn't see where you asked me a specific question that you wanted me to answer. You did say I didn't have a clue about several things about you, but, I do. Like... you don't have a college education, you held mostly office jobs, and you didn't work all the time during your marriage. So, that brings me to the conclusion that your husband made more money than you did.
Oh, and I got the information about no changes in SS benefits if 55 and older from the Gov SS site.
I have stuff to do, so I can't play any more. I'll leave you in the good hands of Helen and the others here.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 09:03:38 PM
choco - I'll repeat WHAT YOU DON'T have a clue about AGAIN.
Maybe reading it over and over it might sink in ....but I doubt it will. You're slow to understand most anything.
"But you continue to make ASSUMPTIONS about my life....and you've done it again...right here in this thread."
You have NO CLUE as to how much money I made when I worked.
You have NO CLUE if my husband made more money that I did.
You have NO CLUE how many quarters I worked to earn my own SS benefits.
You have NO CLUE as to how old I am.
AND you certainly have no WAY of knowing that the age 55 you mentioned would EVER be agreed up - made law.
Do you NOW get my point, choco....or are you REALLY THAT dense?
I personal believe you ARE just that dense.
The age 55 issue was a SUGGESTION....a proposal that the GOP made. But since the dems wouldn't even come to the table to discuss it....COWARDS that they are....it NEVER became anything more than a SUGGESTION. lol
I'm sure at some point you've been told suggestion have to be written as bills. Bills have to be voted upon. The votes have to win with a majority.
NONE of those things happened with this recommendation. So that YOU are using it as IF it had passed.....it's YOUR ignorance showing itself once again.
Along with ALL your assumptions. NO FACTS....NO PROOF...just what you 'game playing liberals do'.....ASSume.
How sad for you. Can't have any civil conversations...nope....just continue to post those assumptions and LIES.
Kiara's still queen on doing that. But you and hellen run a very close second/third.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 17, 2006 09:22:18 PM
Chococake, you're very welcome. I'm sorry that the situation with Linda has become so untenable. Every day she accuses posters of lying when they are not and her insulting, mean spirited name calling has made posting here an unpleasant experience.
Linda, your efforts to keep your story straight here and at OTWA are amusing. Someone there concluded, based on your posted comments that you must have been married very young. I'm sure that you were not really married at age 9 but that is what the data that you posted would suggest.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 09:33:18 PM
The problem with LIARS is they can say anything....doesn't have to be true at all....but IF they accuse someone of 'it' then many believe their lies.
Just as kaira just KNEW I'd reported rusty to the FBI yesterday.....they LIE and LIE. then sometimes they'll admit or back down on their lies...but no, usually they don't.
NOW, if I were to say I'd seen kiara or helen admit they have HERPES of both the mouth and the genital area.....guess what kind of a hissy fit they'd throw.
But honest people....civil people don't do that to one another. Just jerks, creaps and LIARS do. And I've long known these ladies rarely state ANY thing factual.
Kiara, had she chosen to COULD have pull up any of several posts where I've stated my sons EXACT ages.
Because I've posted that many times.
Did she choose to do that? Nope...wouldn't have worked for her agenda...her game SICK playing...that she and helen LOVE so much.
I truly pity them. They've been this way for years....and they're never going to change it appears.
New day...new lies from them - all for attention. tsk tsk tsk
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 17, 2006 09:56:32 PM
Also....I'll point out to those with TERRIBLE memories....who can't see things as they REALLY happen....that old' chococake came HERE....looking for me.
How long had it been since she posted here.....years??? but she came to stir up the crap....as most liberal women LOVE doing. Seek out their prey....like vultures....pecking away at the flesh of others. Sick vultures.
But of course, helen, sees it as it being MY fault. LOL LOL LOL LOL NOW, IF I'd wanted to seek chococake aka chocolate aka choco....then I'd have registered at the gossip board....where choco LOVE being....tearing other people apart each day. It's her LIFE.
chococake - posted on November 16, 2006 06:38:04 PM
Hi Helen, it took me three tries to remember my password. But, I had to come here since Linda is banned at OTWA.
Hey Linda don't be such a poor loser. It's too bad your neo cons lost and your war is getting worse everyday.
Hold on to your money Linda we're coming to get it. Pay up dear so we can get our budget under control after the repubs spent and borrowed beyond what anyone would have ever imagined.
Over throw the government? Now, now, go change your Depends and go and play cards with your friends. I can see you and your neocon partners talking as you play, about how your little world has been damaged.
Well, bye for now, it's been fun!
-------
"Bye forever, hopefully".
|
kiara
|
posted on November 17, 2006 10:20:11 PM
Don't tell me what I could have chosen to do, Lindak. All I remember is that you said your sons were born in the 60's and then I posted proof where you said it in your own words (though now you claim one is 35 and was born in 1971 and the other is 37........ which is no where nearing 40 of course. 
Just so you know, I'm clean and always have been so you can shove your herpes right back where it belongs and keep it there. After all, it was you telling everyone here how you were looking for men and dying your hair purple and all they wanted was sex and how you were discussing bj techniques with your girlfriends. What happened, put your lips on the wrong one?
|
cblev65252
|
posted on November 18, 2006 07:33:56 AM
one is 35 and was born in 1971 and the other is 37
My oldest is 25. I'm 50 (and proud of it). So, Linda, you have to be older than I am and closer to SS age than I am unless you were a baby when you had your sons. You did say you were retired. So, assuming you are close to SS age is only a natural assumption.
Cheryl
http://www.kcskorner.com
|
mingotree
|
posted on November 18, 2006 07:41:26 AM
linda loses a stupid argument so then tries to start rumors that other posters have herpes ???
That is just so sick....
I guess everyone has to agree with her now so the vicious drooling lonely old bat doesn't start slanderous rumors....well, she's a neocon through and through...a great advertisement for her party of sick old perverts.
|
kiara
|
posted on November 18, 2006 07:50:01 AM
Rusty says: "My first opportunity to vote came in 1988 when I turned 18."
Linda_K posted on October 5, 2004 08:10:52 AM
"I have two sons...both older than you and Rusty."
http://www.vendio.com/mesg/read.html?num=28&thread=232577
That statement alone means her sons were born before 1970. Do you wish to continue, Liar_k?
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 18, 2006 08:04:33 AM
cheryl, I ALSO have posted that my husband and I retired at age 50. Is that, in your opinion, close to receiving SS benefits? LOL
kiara continues LYING day after day....assuming day after day...she just can't help herself. It's her LIFE. And her sad, sick 'beat' goes on.
=============
I've also posted my age on this board...several times. But it appears their memories are ONCE AGAIN FAULTY.
So much easier for the game players to post LIES....post their FAULTY conclusions....than to just ask in a civil manner.
Nope....their INTENT is very clear for all who follow their day to day sandbox games. tsk tsk tsk
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
|
bebeboom
|
posted on November 18, 2006 08:07:00 AM
I think we discussed this once, Linda is either 57 or 58... probably about the average age of most who post here, a little older or a little younger, but around average. Truth be told, we're all getting past the spring chicken stage..
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 18, 2006 08:22:09 AM
lol...yes, we are, maggie.
===================
Can someone help me understand kiara's reasoning to say I'm LYING.
she posted:
Rusty says: "My first opportunity to vote came in 1988 when I turned 18."
Linda_K posted on October 5, 2004 08:10:52 AM
"I have two sons...both older than you and Rusty."
http://www.vendio.com/mesg/read.html?num=28&thread=232577
That statement alone means her sons were born before 1970. Do you wish to continue, Liar_k?
According to MY math, that make rusty and superfrogmom or whatever her userid was....18 IN 2004.
But kiara says that PROVES they were born before 1970.
lol
Which in the case of one....I've ALREADY stated he just turned 37 at the end of Oct. - so GOSH....what a revelation that he could have/would have been born before 1970. Yes, he was. According to what I POSTED, just turning 37 would MEAN he was born in 1969. lol...but she's more than a little slow on the draw with MOST math.
Guess kiara didn't have the ability to catch that STATED fact either.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 18, 2006 08:25:22 AM
oooops....sorry....I see what I did now. I was incorrect. Sorry...it's my math that's not so hot this morning.
I apologize to all.
|
kiara
|
posted on November 18, 2006 08:45:06 AM
You've already mentioned before that your sons were born in the 1960's, Lindak which makes them both older than 35.
If you would have allowed a tiny silly joke go by yesterday without howling for the rest of the day about it you could have avoided all this.
BTW, there are other things that didn't add up here or on OTWA so do you wish to continue or just put a stop to calling me a liar because I do have more. I suggest you keep a cheat sheet next to your computer from now on when you're screaming LIAR at me...... and to everyone else in your path.
|
mingotree
|
posted on November 18, 2006 08:56:58 AM
Linda_K
posted on November 18, 2006 08:25:22 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
oooops....sorry....I see what I did now. I was incorrect. Sorry...it's my math that's not so hot this morning.
I apologize to all."""
A FIRST!
Now, linda, was it really worth slandering people, starting rumors about VD ?
Was it, oh CHRISTIAN!!!!?????????
|
