Home  >  Community  >  The Vendio Round Table  >  Anti-War Dem Supporters Upset Dems WON'T ACT


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 This topic is 3 pages long: 1 new 2 new 3 new
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 21, 2007 06:32:02 PM new
If you 'hear' 'waco' then you have more problems than I ever thought you do.

Have you already forgotten that I apologized to you when I posted incorrect info.?

It appears all liberals have faulty memories.

I have no problem admitting mistakes....but you're just as delirious as 'waco' and 'sybil' if you think I've made any in this thread.



 
 bigpeepa
 
posted on February 21, 2007 08:19:32 PM new
I am very glad you hear me loud and clear LIAR_K.


So listen to this, its just a matter of a few months until Congress's plan to protect our brave troops and bringing them home at the same time kicks in.

Remember LIAR_K its the peoples will.


Clue me in on something LIAR_K, why do you enjoy getting beat up so badly by so many people on this board. Its like almost every time you come out someone here just chews you up and spits you out.

Is that like (please beat me up) behavior from you a normal thing?

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 21, 2007 08:32:06 PM new
'waco' - imo, you are nothing but a very delusional person.

Just remember as your party continues grandstanding....it will change NOTHING.


"Whatever message Democrats hope to send Mr. Bush, he doesn't plan to get it."

ROFLMHO

They don't have the GUTS to do what they SAY they want done - do the ONLY thing they can do......which is stop funding the war.

So you continue posting your childish nonsense....the CIC is in charge.


"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"

"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."

Ann Coulter
 
 coincoach
 
posted on February 21, 2007 08:51:01 PM new
I do remember that you apologized in a previous thread and it was appreciated. I said so at the time. Which illustrates my point with Quatermass. You and I certainly do not agree on most things, but we express our opinions freely, I hope. In the course of these discussions, people from both sides give their opinions, sometimes, or even often times inserting an insult or two in the heat of the argument. We are all guilty of this. Quatermass is a whole other animal--a juvenile just trying to shock. I am telling you that I would have the same opinion of him if he agreed with everything I ever said. I've said that 3 or 4 times, but you choose to ignore it or you don't believe me. That's fine, but I've wasted too much of my time on QuaterMESS and his ridiculous posts. He's probably loving all the attention.

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 21, 2007 09:36:52 PM new
Well....now you say you do remember my apology.

But that's NOT what you implied by agreeing with 'waco' that I don't ever admit to my mistakes.

He has referred to be as LiarK for a long time. Yet he has never shown ONE thing I've ever lied about, in HIS opinion.

By your posts one can tell, imo, that you are much more informed AND intelligent than 'waco' would ever hope to be. I was surprised that you aligned yourself with one of this stupid/false statements.

And you DID agree with his false statement...you will admit to that at least?????


 
 mingotree
 
posted on February 21, 2007 11:41:23 PM new
Linda_K
posted on February 21, 2007 06:16:15 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
take your meds, 'waco'""


Ever notice how linduh is always telling people to "take their meds". Her answer to everything is take drugs??? Maybe that gives some insight into her babbling nonsense...


besides being a "bossy neocon woman"...


Oh and linduh, you never admitted you were wrong about the "baby raping" as opposed to the "baby murdering" ...and really, the list of times you've been wrong is pretty lengthy so I don't think admitting it once really makes you honest ...not even close

[ edited by mingotree on Feb 21, 2007 11:53 PM ]
 
 mingotree
 
posted on February 22, 2007 12:09:32 AM new
Thanks Logansdad , for mentioning the shameful treatment of vets at Walter Reed UNDER BUSH'S WATCH!
My how the repugs talk and lie and talk and lie about how THEY support the troops !!!!!

Snow: President Bush ‘Certainly’ Was ‘Aware Of The Conditions In The Wards’ At Walter Reed
In today’s press briefing, a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Tony Snow about the Washington Post’s two-part series over the weekend, highlighting the Walter Reed hospital’s dilapidated conditions. Snow stated that “the president certainly has been aware of the conditions in the wards where he has visited, and visited regularly.” Snow also affirmed that the administration was aware of Walter Reed’s conditions “before the articles appeared in the paper.” Watch it:


The Army began repairs on the facilities yesterday, only after the media reports and intense public criticism. Apparently, Bush is fine with U.S. troops living in squalid conditions — as long as no one else knows about it.

(The Progress Report has more on the state of veterans under the Bush administration. Read it and sign up to receive the newsletter HERE.)

Digg It!

Transcript:

QUESTION: You responded to me a moment ago that the administration was aware of this before the articles appeared in the paper.

SNOW: That is my understanding.

But, again, this is something that’s an action item over at the Department of Defense and in particular the Department of the Army. I am not fully briefed on the activities of who knew what, when. And I suggest…

QUESTION: Was the president aware of it? Was the White House aware of it?

SNOW: I am not certain when this — when we first became aware of it.



 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 07:57:14 AM new
lol....is President Bush also responsible for not knowing you drool?

http://www.defenselink.mil/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3892

Then TRY to keep INFORMED

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"

"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."

Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Feb 22, 2007 08:00 AM ]
 
 coincoach
 
posted on February 22, 2007 08:48:22 AM new
Linda, Perhaps I posted that response to Peepa out of frustration. I find it difficult to communicate my opinion to you as you seem to pull out certain phrases or words you want and ignore the rest of the post. But, that's my problem.

As for Peepa, I do not agree with you. He is very passionate about his opinions, and seems to be able to research the heck out of issues. His posts are influenced by his opinions, but that is the case for all of us here. Your posts are influenced by your opinions too. I happen to agree with most of his opinions, so I am certainly biased.

 
 mingotree
 
posted on February 22, 2007 08:55:22 AM new
"""I find it difficult to communicate my opinion to you as you seem to pull out certain phrases or words you want and ignore the rest of the post."""


Yup! It's called "truth avoidance"....

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 01:24:56 PM new
Sorry to hear that coincoach. 'waco' often bases his opinions on totally FALSE information.

In this thread I was bringing up the issue of the profe's double standard. You didn't agree....fine....but then you wanted to bash quartermass...and I wasn't interested in doing that.

So...I guess that's what you mean by I only focus on certain things I'm willing to discuss. ??? Because you bring something NEW into the discussion....doesn't mean I have to discuss that issue.

But for you to have FALSELY stated/agreed with 'waco' that I never admit my mistakes, just is NOT true. And that's WHY I chose to focus on your FALSE statement and chose to address THAT rather than your desire to turn the thread into a bashing quartermass issue.


"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"

"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."

Ann Coulter
 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:23:31 PM new
'waco' often bases his opinions on totally FALSE information.

And your agreement with quatermass about the democratic party raping babies is based on what information, Lindak?


 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:29:30 PM new
kiara....I know it's difficult for you when you're hallcinating to notice that I DIDN'T agree with 'raping babies'.

Try to comprehend what you read....don't continue adding things I NEVER say.


 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:31:37 PM new
I have noticed however that not ONE of the liberals have even tried to address the topic/opening post.

LOL LOL How typical.
 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:37:01 PM new
You actually quoted his whole message word for word and then said you agreed with it, Lindak.


 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:42:56 PM new
play your idiotic games with someone else, kiara.

I KNOW what I posted and ANY adult that hasn't lost their mind...can read what **I*** said.

I'm SURE no one but you will see where I posted a THING about raping babies.

Have ALL liberals lost their minds??? It sure appears that way to me when you come up with this nonsense.


 
 bigpeepa
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:45:24 PM new
Karia asked LIAR_K this question,"And your agreement with quatermass about the democratic party raping babies is based on what information, Lindak?"

Since quatermass called me a "baby raper" I also would like your answer to Kiara's question. Are you just a COWARD along with being a BOLD FACE LIAR?







 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 02:50:29 PM new
Linda_K:Take for example....what quartermass said:

Then Linda_k copies word for word what quatermass said.

"The Dem party is a gutless bunch of baby raping bastards who have never done anything in thier pathetic lives but take from productive people while they sit on their fat asses and watch tv."

Linda_K: I agree with the message, although it's not my style to present it in that manner.

Now Linda_K denies she said she agreed with the message.


[ edited by kiara on Feb 22, 2007 02:51 PM ]
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 03:04:03 PM new
kiara....you really need mental help, imo. Maybe stop taking the mind altering drugs....whatever.
But you can twist with the best of the liberals.

Always WRONG....but you still get your jollies out of misrepresenting what other say.

Pathetic....

And I challenge you to show anyone where **I** spoke of raping babies. As those with a couple of brain cells can easily see.....I changed that to 'abortion'....murdering babies.




coincoach - Well we've found another area where we'll just have to agree to disagree.


Because although YOU and the profe see his posts in the same manner I see those whom I have mentioned...and while you overlook the vile posts of others....I see it as you not agreeing with what quartermass' message is also. Because you appear to be to be excusing their posted vulgarities while announcing that they bother you when they come from someone you don't agree with.


Take for example....what quartermass said:

"The Dem party is a gutless bunch of baby raping bastards who have never done anything in thier pathetic lives but take from productive people while they sit on their fat asses and watch tv."


I agree with the message, although it's not my style to present it in that manner.


The dem party supports the murder of babies....and wants no restrictions on abortion.


The dem party DOES believe, very strongly, in income redistribution.


And the dem party supports all sorts of 'ENTITLEMENT' programs for those who don't want to do for themselves.


So...in that way, I agree with quartermass' opinion....I just wouldn't have put it in the same manner he/she did.


Doesn't mean he/she's not entitled to share his/her opinion....as do all the vulgar posters on the left.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
 

 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 03:27:08 PM new
I don't take drugs, Lindak. But it's interesting it's usually your first response to most who question what you've written here.

Either you agree that the democrats are raping babies or you lied when you copied his statement and said you agreed with his message.
You can't have it both ways.


Unless the far right is now referring to abortion as 'baby raping'.... is that a new acceptable term for it among you now and if so how did you decide on that one?

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 03:32:31 PM new
kiara


It's YOUR problem, not mine, that you can't comprehend what I DID say.


Maybe you have a brain disfunction. I dont know what your problem is. But you are one of the MOST dishonest posters on vendio, imo.


 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 03:39:52 PM new
I questioned a statement and your follow-up response to it when you agreed with it, Lindak. Now that you are unable to explain yourself you are calling me dishonest? What do you think I am being dishonest about?


[ edited by kiara on Feb 22, 2007 03:41 PM ]
 
 mingotree
 
posted on February 22, 2007 03:43:34 PM new
Hee hee, Kiara, you got the Supreme Liar, linduh, back into a corner again !!!

She can't backpedal fast enough!

I also agree that one of linduh's defenses is

to bring up drugs....must be a big part of her life

 
 coincoach
 
posted on February 22, 2007 05:06:33 PM new
Oh boy, Linda. There you go again, taking out the words and phrases you want. I acknowledged that you admitted one mistake. Get off it already. My one and only problem with QuaterMESS is that he has no purpose but to spew vulgar, disgusting and incorrect accusations. According to him, every member of the Democratic party is a baby raper. What a ridiculous statement. I'll repeat for about the 5th time, I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANY OTHER POSTER, say such vile things and for no other reason than shock value. How do you take anyone seriously who makes such generalized statements like ALL Dems are baby rapers, ALL liberals are liars, ALL Republicans are tight asses? No only are statements like these inaccurate, they are probably used because the person has nothing useful to say.

 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 05:17:10 PM new
Mingo, though most things play out here with no need to comment sometimes I question opinions or responses to statements made so I have a better understanding why those who contribute here believe the way they do, especially when their views seem somewhat radical to me such as a regular poster saying she agrees with a statement from a troll with the term 'baby raping bastards' in it.

When someone can't stand behind their beliefs or statements and when politely questioned about them can only accuse me of being on drugs, or mentally unstable or dishonest and then runs off as they have in the past I can only assume they are a coward and/or another troll like the one who made the foul comment.


 
 Linda_K
 
posted on February 22, 2007 05:30:18 PM new
lol.....you can repeat it as often as you wish, coincoach.

You want to rag on a poster you don't agree with....don't like their posting style....but I've NEVER seen you do so against ANY other posters from the left.


davebruan

rustygumbo

logansdad

sometimes sybil


So...continue to ignore the SAME behavior from them.


But I'd sure like to know why you CAN'T address the topic question....when you EXPECT your non-topic related statements to be addressed.




 
 coincoach
 
posted on February 22, 2007 06:08:56 PM new
Linda, Quatermass has never posted any kind of opinion for me to agree or disagree with. Wait, I stand corrected. Quatermass, I disagree that all Democrats are baby rapers. How's that, Linda? Some of the people on your list have used vulgar language at times, as have Stone and Classic and many others. However, they also post civilized (mostly) opinions and information, regardless of which "side" they are on. I enjoy a good cuss word or dirty joke as much as anyone. I don't like Quatermass's MO, his warped mind (not talking about his politics) and his mean-spiritedness. I don't believe he gives a rat's ass about the world condition, just about getting attention through his posts. You don't believe my motivation for my posts---I'll try to get over it.

P.S. You think my post bashed Quatermass, but see nothing wrong with calling a signifant portion of the population baby rapers? Now that's warped.

 
 logansdad
 
posted on February 22, 2007 06:12:56 PM new
You want to rag on a poster you don't agree with....don't like their posting style....but I've NEVER seen you do so against ANY other posters from the RIGHT.

Linda_K

Colin

Linda_K

Clasicrock000

Linda_K

Stonec0ld613

Linda_K

Pieinthesky

Linda_K

quatermess

Linda_K

Bear1949

Oh, do I mention Linda_K






Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
----------------------------------
The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
 
 coincoach
 
posted on February 22, 2007 06:32:27 PM new
Touche LD

 
 kiara
 
posted on February 22, 2007 06:41:02 PM new
And then there was that body excrement talking guy that Linda_K really enjoyed and she used to encourage him as well as the other guy that called women the C word and she would lol even more at his posts.

 
   This topic is 3 pages long: 1 new 2 new 3 new
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2026  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!