posted on February 24, 2007 04:06:10 PM new
linduh , do you have to keep proving how vulgar you really are ?
"""Linda_K
posted on February 24, 2007 03:09:46 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because 'doing it up the butt' is what you like """""
"""when they DEFEND this aggression/ABUSE against women."""
WHO are THEY ?
WHERE is this action defended?
Oh I know linduh won't answer the questions but I will keep asking to point out that her rantings have no point and no logic. She keeps veering away with things that were never said...she IS definitely on mind altering drugs and obviously has no control of what she types...poor old pathetic creature can't answer one simple question...let this be a lesson to us ...Don't Do Drugs as linduh so frequently advocates....
[ edited by mingotree on Feb 24, 2007 04:09 PM ]
[ edited by mingotree on Feb 24, 2007 06:55 PM ]
posted on February 25, 2007 08:07:09 AM new
Colin, I still find it difficult to believe that a dozen women over a period of 15 to 20 years would randomly accuse Heir Klinton of rape without justification.
As for sleeping with Hill, that mouth is only good for one thing.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.George S. Patton
posted on February 25, 2007 09:11:41 AM newI still find it difficult to believe that a dozen women over a period of 15 to 20 years would randomly accuse Heir Klinton of rape without justification.
Most of them are "Jane Does", dug up by Ken Starr, world class waster of taxpayer dollars. Anita Broderick (sp?) was the most famous and even she recanted her story a time or two. How come none of them went to the police? No charges have ever been filed. As for why, well gee, ya really think it's "random"?? Could the fact that he's rich and famous have anything to do with it? Money? Fame? Limelight? Encouragement and payment from the Republican machine?
posted on February 25, 2007 11:27:44 AM newBecause 'doing it up the butt' is what you like.....doesn't mean you can SLANDER this President with that garbage.
Once again when Linda doesn't have anything to say she sinks to the homosexual comments just like all here other so called friends. How original. Since you calim, I like "doing it up the butt" would you care to share how you know that information. WERE YOU WATCHING ME AND MY HUSBAND MAKE LOVE TOGETHER. Does the thought of you watching two guys "do it" turn you on? You must know alot about what homosexuals do in the bedroom because you needed that information for your gay match making servcie. So how is that business going for you.
Wasn't it Linda that claimed others were vulagr and vile.
Slandering, I was just repeating what was stated in the accustations that were made by Margie Schoedinger. Did you not read what was posted?
In 2002, Margie Schoedinger of Missouri City, Texas filed a pro se lawsuit against George W. Bush alleging that Bush had raped her in October 2000.[9]. The complaint also claims that she had been harassed, that she had been drugged and sexually assaulted numerous times by Bush and two other men purporting to be FBI agents, that her bank account had been interfered with, and that she had been threatened and beaten. There was no substantiating evidence for any of her claims. The suit also claimed Bush raped her husband, Christopher.
Now when was the last time you heard of Clinton raping someone's husband.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
Heck even the feminists who USUALLY are ALL for not abusing women....turned a blind eye to clintons abuse of women....and of his marriage vows...which obviously mean NOTHING to him.
And I believe they lost a lot of support from other women who saw no reason to ignore all these charges.
And there are hundreds MORE sites that speak to ALL the women that have come forward with their accusation of sexual harassment/abuse/attacks/rapes.
But liberals don't like living in reality....dealing with TRUTH. No...they're big into denial....sticking their heads in the sand....can't ADMIT the truth of their beloved, corrupt, slime bag, clinton
That anyone defends a repeated, self-ADMITTED sex addict like clinton....is no better, imo, than those who believe the 'man' had a right to beat his women up....she did something to DESERVE it. So therefore that gives HIM an EXCUSE for his totally unacceptable, REPEATED abuse.
WRONG
===============
And when speaking about how much clinton's made in speeches.....2/3 of it has been earned overseas....where they're much more willing to listen to the 'anti-America', blame America first, draft dodger...etc. etc. etc.
[ edited by Linda_K on Feb 25, 2007 02:09 PM ]
posted on February 25, 2007 02:13:41 PM new
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
linduh , do you have to keep proving how vulgar you really are ?
"""Linda_K
posted on February 24, 2007 03:09:46 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because 'doing it up the butt' is what you like """""
"""when they DEFEND this aggression/ABUSE against women."""
WHO are THEY ?
WHERE is this action defended?
Oh I know linduh won't answer the questions but I will keep asking to point out that her rantings have no point and no logic. She keeps veering away with things that were never said...she IS definitely on mind altering drugs and obviously has no control of what she types...poor old pathetic creature can't answer one simple question...let this be a lesson to us ...Don't Do Drugs as linduh so frequently advocates....
posted on February 25, 2007 03:11:32 PM newAny how many times was Clinton accused of raping someone's husband compared to the number of times Bush was accused of the same thing
Since Linda can not comprehend ENGLISH, I guess I will have to explain it to her in CANADIAN - a language only spoke by her and bear.
The number of times Bush was accused of raping someone's husband - 1
The number of times Clinton was accused of raping someone's husband - none
Linda why don't you share you email address with everyone since only intelligent people do that.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on February 25, 2007 03:16:07 PM newThat anyone defends a repeated, self-ADMITTED sex addict like clinton....is no better, imo
But it is OK to defend a self admitted drug addict and alcoholic like Bush.
Linda is the real reason you like Bush so much because he has a hairy butts. We all know how much you like men with hairy butts.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on February 25, 2007 03:37:46 PM new
Again.....he who believes this President doesn't approve of the war.....can't recognize a man who had a problem with alcohol 20 some years ago....and gave it up.....THEN has been elected gov. of TX and TWICE elected as President.....vs a sexual addict who is still practicing his illness.
tsk tsk tsk
And also I haven't seen ONE republican DEFEND the Presidents drinking problem.....from 20 years ago....but we sure see all those liberals who are just so willing to overlook ALL the sexual accusations of rape, sexual harassment and sexual ABUSE at the hand of their president.
posted on February 25, 2007 03:44:13 PM newThat anyone defends a repeated, self-ADMITTED sex addict like clinton....is no better, imo
Ok for Republicans to defend a sexual predator who worked on the Bush campaign
Bill Donohue Defended Bush Catholic Outreach Staffer Who Was Outed As Sexual Predator
During the 2004 presidential campaign, George Bush’s Catholic outreach coordinator, 54-year-old Deal Hudson, was outed as a sexual predator for taking advantage of a drunken 18-year old while he was a professor. The National Catholic Reporter reported:
According to documents obtained by NCR, Hudson invited a vulnerable freshman undergraduate, Cara Poppas, to join a group of older students for a pre-Lenten “Fat Tuesday” night of partying at a Greenwich Village bar. The night concluded after midnight in Hudson’s Fordham office, where he and the drunken 18-year-old exchanged sexual favors. The fallout would force his resignation from a tenured position at the Jesuit school, cost him $30,000, and derail a promising academic career.
Following the report, Hudson resigned from the Bush campaign, withdrew as a White House adviser, and was forced to step down as publisher of Crisis magazine, a D.C.-based conservative Catholic monthly.
Yet at least one prominent right-wing figure came to Hudson’s defense: the Catholic League’s Bill Donohue, who has spent the last several days calling for the heads of two John Edwards bloggers. Donohue ardently defended Hudson in a statement, even invoking the Virgin Mary in downplaying his sexual assault:
In a press release, Bill Donahue, president of the Catholic League, minimized the charges against Hudson and attempted a joke at the Virgin Mary’s expense. “Effective today,” Donohue wrote, his organization had “a new requirement for all future employees: all candidates must show proof of being immaculately conceived, that is, they must demonstrate that they were conceived without sin.”
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
