posted on June 20, 2007 10:02:55 PM newDale Hutchings was arrested Tuesday and charged with 305 counts of raping a child, 356 counts of aggravated indecent assault against a child under 13, and 356 counts of indecent assault against a child under 13.
So if Dale were a member of the group in Arizona, what he did would be okay by you, Linda?
I find a flaw in your logic.
If sexual molestation is wrong when committed by Dale Hutchings, it is wrong regardless ~ can't hide it behind religion.
Again, your post: there are too many that support that sickness by supporting that 'whatever feels good do it' lifestyle. They've walked away from morality....away from common sense and away from seeing perverts as perverts...and wanting to force others to accept their abnormal behavior as normal.
You have identified yourself as one of those who accepts 'abnormal behavior as normal' if you accept the initial post of incest, child abuse, and sexual abuse as acceptable.
Have you 'walked away from your morals' because you approve of the 'whatever feels good do it' inbreeding?
Why can't you see the 'perverts as perverts' as you put it?
posted on June 21, 2007 09:03:38 AM newI find a flaw in your logic.
Don't you know this is how all Republicans think. They do not use logic when they make their arguments.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on June 21, 2007 03:05:20 PM new
Linda, I cannot grasp what you do not write!
again, for the third time I am posting the same words:
Please explain why THIS is a bedroom you stay out of, Linda!
I am trying hard to understand your point of view.
I know how you feel about gays and feminists and your views on marriage.
Please tell me that you find this rape and incest unacceptable.
posted on June 21, 2007 03:20:13 PM new
I have already answered it, zoomin.
Again, show ME where I've ever supported any abuse of any child by anyone. Just because a couple of your liberal buddies continue posting LIES about my positions....make false insinuations about the same...doesn't mean I need to follow along and PROVE anything to any of you.
You can't because I never have. But this is the BS the liberals continue to bring up.
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) - Australia's prime minister announced plans Thursday to ban pornography and alcohol for Aborigines in northern areas and tighten control over their welfare benefits to fight child sex abuse among them.
Some Aboriginal leaders rejected the plan as paternalistic and said the measures were discriminatory and would violate the civil rights of the country's original inhabitants. But others applauded the initiative and recommended extending the welfare restrictions to Aborigines in other parts of the country.
Prime Minister John Howard was responding to a report last week that found sexual abuse of children to be rampant in indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. The report said the abuse was fueled by endemic alcohol abuse, unemployment, poverty and other factors causing a breakdown in traditional society.
[ edited by Linda_K on Jun 21, 2007 04:33 PM ]
posted on June 22, 2007 07:15:12 AM new
zoomin : Please tell me that you find this rape and incest unacceptable.
Linda: Again, show ME where I've ever supported any abuse of any child by anyone. Just because a couple of your liberal buddies continue posting LIES about my positions....make false insinuations about the same...doesn't mean I need to follow along and PROVE anything to any of you.
Zoomin, it just more of Linda's double standard and lcrazy ogic that she loves to use on others. She is the first to shout out that anyone that doesn't support Bush or the troops is Un-American. Those that do not speak out against and condem Saddam were his supporters.
Now when the shoe is the other foot she accuses everyone else for speaking lies and make false insinuations. A simple statement from her saying she doesn't support this or that would have solved this dilema for her, but she didn't.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on June 22, 2007 04:02:29 PM new
In the Republican Mark Foley scandal thread linduh said that it wasn't child abuse...that when a child reaches puberty , or "puberity" as linduh spells it, that they are no longer children and anyone can have at them. Some chhildren reach puberty as young as 10 and 11 soooooo ...linduh feels that if they're molested it's OK no matter what the LAW states.
posted on June 24, 2007 06:06:33 PM new
again, sybil VOMITS what she falsely believes are MY positions.
They're not. Hope sane people know that by now.
But she has NOTHING in her life except to continue to stalk me and state falsehoods about MY beliefs.
Pretty pathetic...but oh so mingotree/crowfarm/sybil. Twisted minds tend to do that rather than just speak their OWN position. But her insanity knows NO limitis.
posted on June 24, 2007 06:19:37 PM new
Helenjw
posted on January 7, 2007 11:04:18 AM
I've always considered Mingo is a weak poster who relied too much on personal insult....
Her opinions are of no concern to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
[ edited by classicrock000 on Jun 24, 2007 06:20 PM ]
posted on June 24, 2007 07:48:52 PM new
linduh again you prove what a coward you are...YOU did defend child molesting and now you're crawling backwards.....YOU POSTED that when a child reaches "puberity" (YOUR spelling) that they were no longer children.
In your words, "they're your words , YOU own them."
P.S. Is it hard to walk with classic crawling up your assall the time?
posted on June 24, 2007 10:32:48 PM new Only Eight States Left in the Jessica's Law Campaign
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
By Bill O'Reilly
Congratulations to Connecticut, which just passed Jessica's Law, the strict mandatory prison legislation for adults who molest young children. Now that leaves only these yellow states that haven't passed Jessica's Law.: Idaho, Illinois, Wyoming, Colorado, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Hawaii and of course Vermont.
Utah governor John Huntsman says he's working toward tough mandatory so Utah now becomes a gray state — Jessica's Law in progress. The green states on your screen have something close to Jessica's Law.
Now why are these eight states holding out? Well, in Idaho, Governor Butch Otter needs to step it up. The Idaho legislature would pass Jessica's Law if the governor would show some leadership.
Illinois is a mess. Governor Rod Blagojevich doesn't seem to care that his state has very lenient penalties for child molesters. A woman named Kara Smith in the attorney general's office in Illinois, is actively opposing Jessica's Law.
Wyoming is a complete mystery. This conservative state only mandates five years for first degree sexual assault on a child. Governor Dave Freudenthal doesn't care, and has even attacked "“The Factor”" for advocating Jessica's Law. The good people of Wyoming deserve much better than Freudenthal.
Colorado, as we've seen in the Boulder High School, scandal is a state in trouble. The House Judiciary Committee there voted down Jessica's Law. And Governor Bill Ritter could not care less. Bad things are happening in Colorado, I am sorry to say.
In New Jersey, Assemblywoman Linda Greenstein is blocking Jessica's Law. She is the villain there. Governor Jon Corzine doesn't seem to care.
In Hawaii, Governor Linda Lingle is not opposed to Jessica's Law, but the ultraliberal legislature isn't acting.
And finally, Massachusetts is making some progress, but it's slow going. The ACLU is opposing Jessica's Law in the bay state. And Governor Deval Patrick has no interest at all in protecting the kids. But there is legislation pending.
Vermont, you know about. The legislature there actively opposes tough measures against child predators.
Now of all the things we've done on “The Factor”, I am most proud of the Jessica's Law campaign. Not only does it punish predators in a fair way, but it sends a message that American society will not tolerate adults abusing children. There are no excuses.
“Factor" viewers have been in the forefront of pressuring politicians to pass Jessica's Law. Remember, about a year ago, there were only a few states. Now there are 42.
No other broadcast has taken on this cause. We're almost there. And if the good people in the eight hold out states contact their governors in no uncertain terms, we may advance Jessica's Law even further.
And that's "The Memo."
==========================
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on June 25, 2007 07:27:52 AM new
You are such a joke Linda. You post all these clippings about protecting children from child molesters, but yet you still have not spoken out against protecting the abused children in the original post. It would make it appear that when it is an organized religion that abuses chidlren you are OK with it. How Sad. What kind of Christain are you?
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on June 25, 2007 07:35:53 PM new
Dumsquirrel you just don't get it. I guess it has to spelled out for you. It is your party that made such a big deal about family values and marriage a few years ago. Your party was the one that kept saying marriage needed to be between ONE man and ONE woman. This was the only proper environment to raise children some went on to say.
Now you are basically saying that this group of polygamists can do whatever they please because they are doing as part of a religion. This is being very hypocritical.
Here you have a group of people that because of there actions is harming kids and yet you approve of it. Some moral values you have. But that doesn't surprise me from the party that is all talk and no action. You have really shown your lack of intelligence on this issue and how much of a bigot you really are. Maybe if you didn't have your nuts in your mouth you would see the matter more clearly.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on June 26, 2007 10:38:45 AM new
Again, you clueless fool, I have no "party" and what I'm saying is that the collection of dimwits here who define themselves as "liberals" have no reservation about violating people's rights and liberties as long as it is "bad" people.
We have to mount a campaign and investigate Mormons to "protect the children" because there is a handful of "Mormon polygamist child abusers". Pointing out that you could "protect" far MORE children much more cheaply by simply hunting down serial killer promiscuous AIDS carrying gays who knowingly infect their victims wreaks havoc in the liberal psyche.
You live in a very strange world. OJ murders 2 people and you intone "the jury has spoken". The jury speaks in the case of the Rodney King cops and you go out and find another rope. People who chose to snub the Dixie Chicks are "un-American", but you have to "fix" Talk Radio. We cannot screen Muslims or their organizations because "not ALL Muslims are terrorists" and "they have rights" yet most terrorists are Muslims.
You post this partisan drivel, heaping praise on each other seemingly based on the number of contradictions you can have in a single paragraph.
