posted on July 14, 2007 05:43:48 AM new
LOL.....you can't even come close to desquirrel, helen.
And quit telling me what to do, you bossy liberal. The Doc's board suits you well. You won't be allowed to be your normal self there. You're much better suited for TRB.
edited to make that ptuny's board.
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 14, 2007 05:44 AM ]
Look who is determining where someone is well suited...a poster who was not able to stay on OTWA, not able to stay on the Doc's board and only grudgingly tolerated here.
posted on July 14, 2007 06:07:13 AM new
duh helen....no one is on otwa....they finally were shut down.
docs is pretty much run by ptuny...and she posts approx 97% of all posts made there.....she's another liberal just like you. You two will do well together, UNTIL.....
And I can post there....ptuny just has docs protection against anyone disagreeing with her liberal, canadian slants.
So who wants to? Not I. I like freedom of speech....not a board where liberals can say what they want and conservatives are forced to agree or be considered a trouble maker.
Kind of like your party is working towards now....limiting free speech. It's a liberal position.
posted on July 14, 2007 07:21:07 AM newSo who wants to? Not I. I like freedom of speech....not a board where liberals can say what they want and conservatives are forced to agree or be considered a trouble maker.
posted on July 14, 2007 07:45:05 AM newThere is, imo, a difference between those who don't even HOLD those moral positions at all....but rather just live by the lifestyle of 'do whatever makes you happy' sort of thinking and one who does work towards more moral behaviors but fails at being perfect.
It doesn't matter what their political beliefs are, it seems as if these guys don't work towards 'more moral behaviors' until they get caught and only THEN they start to worry about their families and public image - and their standing with God, of course.
And I'll say it again, usually the ones pointing the fingers and judging the morals of others should really be looking closely at their own actions. Seems as if these guys are judging morals of completely innocent strangers and secretly imagining all kinds of nasties while they are the ones that are really doing it. That's what's so amusing each time another hypocrite is caught with his pants down.
posted on July 14, 2007 07:49:17 AM new
linduh, ""and still fail as a human being to be able to live up to that same moral standing. ""
OH the EXCUSES for the neocon politician who isn't responsible for his own actions!
That's OK according to linduh, but everybody else right down to the poorest of the poor and disadvantaged makes one mistake it's , according to her, a horrible crime ....
"""There is, imo, a difference between those who don't even HOLD those moral positions at all....but rather just live by the lifestyle of 'do whatever makes you happy' sort of thinking and one who does work towards more moral behaviors but fails at being perfect."""
So if a rich privileged NEOCON REPUBLICAN screws up it's OK...but let some poor person who has nothing make a mistake and it's "they should be responsible and not make mistakes or they should be PUNISHED.
posted on July 14, 2007 09:27:58 AM new
"Yes, and you had to C&P it. That isn't a crime, etex, and I can't imagine why you think it is"
You are a hoot, mingo. Where have I said that it is? I have stated that most of your posts are C&P's with no comment. Prove that's not true. I'm looking at your posts as we speak.
Your logic is pitiful. Reminds me of my high school debating class where Betty would always jump up and say, "I won that debate, didn't I Miss------. And Miss ------ would say no Betty, you didn't. Shut up and sit down.
posted on July 14, 2007 09:57:26 AM new
Quote: "It doesn't matter what their political beliefs are, it seems as if these guys don't work towards 'more moral behaviors' until they get caught and only THEN they start to worry about their families and public image - and their standing with God, of course.
And I'll say it again, usually the ones pointing the fingers and judging the morals of others should really be looking closely at their own actions. Seems as if these guys are judging morals of completely innocent strangers and secretly imagining all kinds of nasties while they are the ones that are really doing it. That's what's so amusing each time another hypocrite is caught with his pants down."
posted on July 14, 2007 10:04:08 AM new
That said, I'll be taking care of family obligations today, unlike some of you who seem to have none and stay here 18 hours a day. Till later.
posted on July 14, 2007 10:42:41 AM new
ROFLMHO at you helen.
clue phone....the site has been open for almost two years now. The respected posters from otwa appear to not trust the board owners/administrators enough to join the ' how site'. Seems there's been some good reason for that too. AND packy is too busy explaining himself for past misdeeds [now that posters can speak freely] .....it's a great place to read....always good for a laugh...but packy as a moderator.....that's a joke in itself.
posted on July 14, 2007 11:44:57 AM new
Helenjw
posted on July 14, 2007 05:58:20 AM
LOLOL!
Look who is determining where someone is well suited...a poster who was not able to stay on OTWA,
yea because all you dirtbags complained-hey the sh*thole is shutdown,and the world is better for it.Ya gotta wonder where all the scumbag commies who hate America, scattered to.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
posted on July 16, 2007 10:35:03 AM newyea because all you dirtbags complained
Not sure who complained except for Linda_K who did it loudest and longest each time the dirtbag old guys who followed her there got booted for foul and sexually retarded comments while dumping their filth and garbage over there.
The respected posters from otwa appear to not trust the board owners/administrators enough to join the ' how site'.
Linda_K, it's unfortunate that you didn't recognize until one year later that they are 'respected posters' and that you didn't treat them as such when you displayed such rude and obnoxious behavior there.
When the site closed and some were looking to relocate, besides the CC rule here, they cited you as the main reason they don't want to post here. Too bad as many of them have interesting and intelligent input and would have been an asset here, including Spaz. At least personal info seems to be protected by Vendio, which is a reputable business that has been around for awhile.
posted on July 16, 2007 11:28:40 AM new
I know what I am talking about as I was there when they closed down because I promoted the Vendio EO for auction discussion and I read some of the responses and even answered some. You weren't posting there because you weren't allowed to, Linda_K. Enough said.
Now because I spoke my mind and you don't like it, why don't you run off and bash Canada again like the predictable fool you are.
posted on July 16, 2007 11:51:26 AM new
Linda_K
posted on July 16, 2007 11:26:27 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"More than the other Democratic candidates for president, Obama has made faith a centerpiece of his campaign."
Linda_K
posted on July 14, 2007 04:27:43 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't like what you're hearing so now want to change the topic/title of YOUR thread to make it about McCain?
So typical of you when the thread doesn't go as you hoped it would. LOL LOL"""
Don't like what you're hearing so now want to change the topic/title of MY thread to make it about Obama?
So typical of you when the thread doesn't go as you hoped it would. LOL LOL"""
What has Obama got to do with your Republican sex pervert Vitter???
posted on July 16, 2007 12:04:59 PM new
I was there too, kiara.
And as I said....the most highly regarded posters on otwa are NOT choosing to go to How.
get a grip. The respected ones do NOT include those like you who rarely post to ANY topic of discussion....but rather ONLY wish to make their posts all personal.
Grow up.....all can read. And because less than a handful have said they don't wish to come here because of me....LOL >LOL...LOL
THAT only proves they're just like you. They have nothing to add to ANY discussion except talking about others panties, how wet they are, etc.
That's the group YOU may respect....but they're NOT the highly respected posters from otwa. They NEVER lowered themselves to YOUR level, kiara.
posted on July 16, 2007 12:27:13 PM newI was there too, kiara.
I doubt you were posting under your Linda_K ID when otwa closed because you were banned.
For the record, everyone on otwa treated me just fine, back years ago when I posted there and then again during the last year when I made a few posts, mostly on the health topic. No one treated me with disrespect there and there were posters from all walks of life.
I wasn't in any wet panties discussions there either so you most likely once again have me mixed up with someone else in your mind or on another board like you usually do. I don't post on other boards.
posted on July 16, 2007 02:23:27 PM new
Being treated with respect there had nothing to do with wanting to be loved though you may not see the difference, Linda_K.
An opinion is not trolling, you made insinuations about the discussions I was supposedly in and your motives for doing so are clear to me.
I'm not ashamed of any of my behavior there nor do I have to try to cover it up by shifting blame to others as you are doing one year later. You lack the ability to accept responsibility for your actions which resulted in being banned from a respectable site and it haunts you. Move on.
posted on July 16, 2007 02:27:09 PM new
good. NOW maybe we can get off your trolling - making this all about kiara, once again - and back to the actual topic.
LOL try it occasionally you might like it. But then you have to be the center of attention every chance you have.
It's not about YOU kiara.....get with it....or at least TRY to focus. LOL
posted on July 16, 2007 02:46:34 PM new
I was focused on the topic, Linda_K. It was you that kept talking about the other boards for several days now, mentioning some of them by name. Since I am focused on all discussion, I posted an opinion and once again you don't approve of free speech unless it comes at you in full slurp mode with back pats and praise.
posted on July 16, 2007 02:58:57 PM new
You're BORING, kiara and have nothing to offer except this continuing juvenile blathering.
It may be what YOU live for...but it's NOTHING but more trolling and baiting for attention from me. Get your attention from someone who thinks you have something to offer to these threads other than more and more of your nonsense.
=====================================
Now back to elected officials finding God....or using God to help 'buy' some votes.
Especially when the liberals here have done NOTHING but RANT about how religious President Bush was. LOL LOL No hypocrisy's on their part.
On obama:
Fancy footwork
After law school, Obama returned to Chicago to register low-income voters for the 1992 presidential election. He worked as a civil rights lawyer and as a lecturer at University of Chicago Law School before his election to the Illinois state Senate in 1996.
From the moment he took the national stage, at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, Obama, then running for US Senate, made no secret of his spiritual bent. "We worship an awesome God in the blue states," he said in a keynote address credited with launching his stardom.
But for a liberal Democrat and former constitutional law instructor, the plea for a broader public role for religion has at times required some fancy footwork.
He has called for both "a politics of conscience" based on ecumenical religious values and a clear line between church and state. He has both invoked God in his denunciations of the Iraq war and criticized President Bush for using religious terms like "good" and "evil" to justify it.
"The danger of using good versus evil in the context of war is it may lead us to be not as critical as we should be about our own actions," he said at a candidates' forum on religion last month, calling the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and the treatment of suspected terrorists at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp "unjust."
Obama and his advisers have said that his faith has motivated legislation meant to benefit the poor, the uninsured, and minorities. In the Illinois state Senate, Father Pfleger recalls, Obama sponsored measures to clamp down on high-interest "payday loans" in poor neighborhoods and to require Illinois police agencies to record the race of motorists they stop as part of a state effort to monitor racial profiling. He also pressed for a bill requiring police to videotape interrogations of murder suspects, as a safeguard against coerced confessions.
At a speech last month at the annual Hampton University Ministers' Conference in Virginia, he offered his most detailed list to date of programs he said should spring from "our faith, the Word, and His will." They range from a new service corps for disadvantaged youths and a program to have nurses teach low-income mothers good parenting to more jobs programs for ex-convicts and more venture capital for minority-owned businesses.
So I guess since it's obama, rather than a conservative candidate, it's okay to use his religion to make political/social decisions. LOL LOL LOL
Kind of like when helen quotes Bible verses even though she's a self-admitted atheist. LOL LOL
Or like the other liberals here, who also have presented themselves as secularists at the least, who then ask what Jesus would do. LOL LOL LOL
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 16, 2007 03:01 PM ]
posted on July 16, 2007 03:05:29 PM new
Linda_K, so let me get this clear. You can blather all you wish and go off topic whenever you wish, and insinuate all kinds of garbage about others but if anyone else dares state an opinion you get extremely upset and offended.
posted on July 16, 2007 03:43:42 PM new
posted on July 16, 2007 11:51:26 AM edit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linda_K
posted on July 16, 2007 11:26:27 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"More than the other Democratic candidates for president, Obama has made faith a centerpiece of his campaign."
Linda_K
posted on July 14, 2007 04:27:43 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't like what you're hearing so now want to change the topic/title of YOUR thread to make it about McCain?
So typical of you when the thread doesn't go as you hoped it would. LOL LOL"""
Don't like what you're hearing so now want to change the topic/title of MY thread to make it about Obama?
So typical of you when the thread doesn't go as you hoped it would. LOL LOL"""
What has Obama got to do with your Republican sex pervert Vitter???
posted on July 17, 2007 12:20:11 AM new
Again you bring up the fact that you don't think atheists should quote the bible...you wouldn't be trying to squelch free speech would you ????
The Doc's board suits you well. You won't be allowed to be your normal self there. 