posted on July 23, 2007 06:55:09 PM newCould it be because of the scores of C&P's that you continue to post ad nauseum, because of their liberal slant??
Yep you have no problem with all the copy and pastes from the google queen when they all have her Republican slant. You are just another big old hick from the south who doesn't understand the word hypocrite.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 23, 2007 08:45:35 PM new
Oh gawd....LD's whining again. How typical.
==================
From the WA Times editorial - speaks the truth about hillary and most liberals/dems:
Yet Mrs. Clinton is apparently so invested in defeat that she has been trying to browbeat the Defense Department into publicly discussing contingency plans for withdrawing from Iraq.
After she sent a letter on the subject to DoD, Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman responded by warning bluntly that premature discussion of withdrawal "reinforces enemy propaganda" that the United States will abandon our allies in Iraq — as we previously did in Vietnam, Lebanon and Somalia. Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Kerry responded by introducing legislation requiring a Pentagon briefing on an Iraq pullout — in other words advertising U.S. willingness to abandon another ally.
For the record, here's the way Osama bin Laden characterized Mrs. Clinton's husband's ignominious withdrawal from Somalia in an October 2001 interview with CNN: "America exited dragging its tails in failure, defeat, and ruin, caring for nothing. America left faster than anyone expected."
Now, Mrs. Clinton is apparently hoping to stage a repeat performance in Iraq.
=========
And all the time the liberals/dems DEMAND we do as the UN tells us to....or only act IF the UN gives us their permission....but on the subject of the genocide that will happen should we just leave Iraq before they can defend themselves.....the liberals/dems turn a DEAF ear. tsk tsk tsk
They not even willing to listen to what the UN and others have warned us about should we withdraw too quickly. So....guess that proves they only want us to listen to the UN WHEN the UN agrees with their position - not when they don't.
=====
Again, from the WA Post article:
One of the more heartening developments has been the willingness of persons not associated with the Bush administration or the Republican Party to speak candidly about the disastrous humanitarian consequences of prematurely withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. Last week, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged American policy-makers to exercise "great caution" in considering any rapid withdrawal of U.S. forces. "It is not my place to inject myself into this discussion talking place between the American people, government and Congress," Mr. Ban said. "But I'd like to tell you that a great caution should be taken for the sake of the Iraqi people...Any abrupt withdrawal or decision may lead to a further deterioration."
Here's what Joost Hilterman, an analyst with the liberal-leaning International Crisis Group, said about the same subject: "I hated the Iraq war, [but] a hasty withdrawal would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for U.S. interests." After Sen. John McCain warned a few months ago that a U.S. pullout from Iraq would lead to genocide, Newsweek correspondents Christopher Dickey and John Barry wrote: "He could well be right. In the Middle East, aid workers, regional leaders, Iraqi officials and ordinary civilians agree that if Americans leave quickly, Iraq's disastrous condition could be made much worse. They warn of a massive flood of refugees heading for the borders, of massacres as Sunnis and Shi'ites cross paths, of a proxy war funded by Iran and Saudi Arabia within Iraq itself."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 23, 2007 08:50 PM ]
posted on July 23, 2007 10:03:19 PM new
coincoach writes:
"Bill Clinton is responsible for his own behavior. Hillary is his wife, not his mommy. Don't dump his misbehavior on her."
Apparently she couldn't take care of him.
coincoach writes:
"I don't think anyone here has even suggested you should vote for Hillary because she is a woman. If you do not like her voting record or politics, don't vote for her. Not voting for her because she is a woman, is the same as voting for her because she is a woman."
You must be reading a different post.
coincoach writes:
"What politician does not have a big mouth? It is part of the job. They make speeches, give their opinions on everything and many even tell us with whom to sleep, what to do with an unwanted pregnancy, how to raise our children and when to send our loved ones to war. Tell me something new."
I have no idea what this paragraph means, please explain.
coincoach writes:
"The comments being made here and on other threads have more to do with gender than capabilities. Again, if you don't like her voting record or her politics or her character, don't vote for her. If her gender is your main concern, you need to evaluate your values"
When and if the right woman came along,,,, I would vote for her. HILLARY ISN'T THAT WOMAN.
You didn't expound on these statements...you still have time.
She’s flip flopped her stand on the war and several other issues in the last year or two. Public opinion is guiding light. That’s not a good thing. She will lose more of her parties support before the election.
I pity anyone that thinks she is presidential material. It only shows your lack of reality and intelligence.
posted on July 24, 2007 06:24:39 AM new
"Funny how etexbill can complain about how the time Mingo is on here, but Linda is on here and here other posting boards just as much, but yet doesn't saying anything. Another hypocrite from the right."
posted on July 24, 2007 07:42:59 AM newI could say what you are "from the north" but I won't.
You could but your feeble brain can't think of anything. It doesn't surprise me. It must be from all the toxic air from the oil refineries.
Isn't it time for your prostrate exam??
Nope, not old enough for that. Why are you jealous that Bear is getting his twice a year and you are not. Since you and him are in the same general area, why don't you have Bear dress up as a "trained medical professional" and you can get one from him. Afterwards you can him can play horse and cowboy. You like to be ridden like a horse don't you.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 24, 2007 07:44:51 AM newOh gawd....LD's whining again. How typical.
Not whinning Linda, just point out how you and your fellow Republicans are big hypocrites. I will leave the whinning to you since you have been whinning for over a year now since your were KICKED OFF THE OTWA. Do you still have enough cheese left to go along with all that wine you have stored up?
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 24, 2007 07:48:24 AM new
Hillary's request supposedly helps the enemy, but when members of the Republican party make a similar request it does not. Go figure.
A July 21 New York Post editorial and a July 23 Washington Times editorial criticized Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) for, respectively, taking actions that "undermin[e] their [the U.S. troops'] mission" and "advertising U.S. willingness to abandon another ally" because of her request that the Pentagon brief Congress on "what current contingency plans exist for the future withdrawal of United States forces from Iraq." The editorials echoed a letter responding to Clinton's request sent by Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman, asserting that "[p]remature and public discussion of the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda."
Neither the Post nor the Times acknowledged that, as the Associated Press reported and Media Matters for America previously noted, Republican Sen. Richard Lugar (IN) shared Clinton's concerns.
At a July 19 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Lugar said:
The future of that policy increasingly appears to depend on the Administration's report due in September. Regardless of what that report says, however, we must begin now to prepare for what comes next. It is likely that there will be changes in military missions and force levels as the year proceeds. If U.S. military leaders, diplomats, and, indeed, the Congress, are not prepared for these contingencies, they may be executed poorly, especially in an atmosphere in which public demands for troop withdrawals could compel action on a political timetable. We need to lay the groundwork for alternatives, so that when the President and Congress move to a new plan, it can be implemented safely and rapidly.
[...]
We know the task of initiating even a partial military redeployment from Iraq will be an extremely complicated and dangerous undertaking. I am hopeful that [U.S.] Ambassador [to Iraq Ryan] Crocker will shed light not just on prevailing conditions in Iraq, but also on what is being done to prepare for a post-surge strategy. I appreciate the time he is making for us, and I look forward to our discussion.
In a July 13 floor statement upon the introduction of the Warner-Lugar Iraq Amendment to the Defense Authorization bill, Lugar said:
Senator [John] Warner [R-VA] and I have tried to approach the current situation by asking "what should happen now, even if the President does not change course." As such, our amendment is not an attempt to bring final resolution to the disagreement between advocates of the surge and advocates of withdrawal. Rather, we are attempting to ensure that U.S. military and diplomatic policy is prepared for change when the Petraeus report arrives in September. We are hopeful that regardless of where Senators stand on surge versus withdrawal, they will find our amendment to be a constructive bipartisan attempt to prepare for whatever policy follows in the coming months.
With this goal in mind, our amendment mandates that the Administration immediately initiate planning for post-September contingencies, including a drawdown or re-deployment of forces. It requires those plans to be presented to Congress by October 16 of this year, and it states that the plans should be designed to be executable beginning not later than December 31. The surge must not be an excuse for failing to prepare for the next phase of our involvement in Iraq, whether that is withdrawal, redeployment, or some other option. We saw in 2003 after the initial invasion of Iraq, the disastrous results of failing to plan adequately for contingencies.
Nor did the editorials note that, in response to Edelman's reaction, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said on July 20: "I have long been a staunch advocate of Congressional oversight, first at the CIA and now at the Defense Department. ... I have said on several occasions in recent months that I believe that Congressional debate on Iraq has been constructive and appropriate." Despite Gates' statement, the Post editorial asserted that "it's hard to see why Gates would take issue with" Edelman's criticism of Clinton's request.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 24, 2007 07:57:45 AM new
"Not whinning Linda, just point out how you and your fellow Republicans are big hypocrites. I will leave the whinning to you since you have been whinning for over a year now since your were KICKED OFF THE OTWA. Do you still have enough cheese left to go along with all that wine you have stored up?
Not one, but three times. It's whining, not whinning. Thought you were supposed to be educated. At least Linda knows how to spell.
posted on July 24, 2007 08:00:55 AM new
"You could but your feeble brain can't think of anything. It doesn't surprise me. It must be from all the toxic air from the oil refineries."
Well again, a lack of education. There is one oil refinery within 300 miles from me. Nothing but lakes, pine trees and clean air. Texas is a big state. I'm nearer Birmingham, Alabama than to El Paso, TX.
[ edited by etexbill on Jul 24, 2007 08:03 AM ]
[ edited by etexbill on Jul 24, 2007 08:16 AM ]
posted on July 24, 2007 08:47:01 AM new
etex, ""Not one, but three times. It's whining, not whinning. Thought you were supposed to be educated. At least Linda knows how to spell. ""
LOLOLOL! LINDUH??? LINDUH knows how to SPELL??LOL!
Uh, etex, how do you spell "puberty" ? linduh spells it "puberity"....and that's just ONE example of her total lack of education.
Oh, and etex...it's "prostate"....
NOT "prostrate"
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!""Boy did that come back to bite you.""
posted on July 24, 2007 08:56:52 AM new
etexbill
posted on July 23, 2007 03:05:47 PM new
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I wonder why it would bother or concern anyone about how much time anyone else did or didn't spend on their computer ????
Could it be because of the scores of C&P's that you continue to post ad nauseum, because of their liberal slant?? """"
So you, etex, are concerned about the time I spend on the Internet because of the liberal slant of my postings. ??? Etex, there is NO logic in that whatsoever.
"Could it be they don't have much to say otherwise?"
I'll put the number of my comments and answers against your C&P's with no comment any day, mingo. I rest my case. ""
The number of posts you make don't necessarily mean you have anything to say...."get a hobby" isn't even an opinion
There is no law or rule that says you can't post a C&P without a comment.
Poor etex, just hasn't got that "World Ruler" crown yet ......
posted on July 24, 2007 09:42:21 AM new
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!""Boy did that come back to bite you.""
You get so excited about your own posts, mingo. So easily entertained. I know how to spell prostate. Fingers got carried away, but at least I didn't spell it wrong 3 times in a row.
Maybe if all your posts weren't C&P's, you would make a few typing errors.
To quote you: "LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!""
posted on July 24, 2007 10:53:15 AM new
Again, we can clearly see the IGNORANCE of those who are just SO uninformed.
Time after time they WHINE about there being NO PLAN. LOL LOL LOL And of course, they offer no plan except to admit defeat, surrender to our enemies.
But as most intelligent people KNOW, there are always plans for everything. That's what millions/billions of our tax dollars are spent on. Analyzing all options and most especially by our military leaders/our Pentagon.
But, UNTIL their own liberal press informs the uninformed that those same plans are CLASSIFIED....then they whine and complain and still offer no 'plan's of their own.
And they think the America public will elect THEM to defend our Nation from terrorism? Gawd, I certainly hope there aren't THAT many Americans who are THAT dumb.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on July 24, 2007 11:04:04 AM new
"""But as most intelligent people KNOW, there are always plans for everything."""
No one has ever accused bushit of being intelligent. The bushit administration had NOT made plans for the aftermath of invading Iraq. IF they had there wouldn't be the horrible deadly mess there is now.
The bushit administration hasn't done one thing right with this whole bloody mess.
posted on July 24, 2007 11:17:29 AM new
YOU are definitely one of the IGNORANT ones.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on July 24, 2007 12:01:26 PM new
Great answer , linduh...BOY! What great "proof" I'm "wrong"
And you are not only ignorant but uneducated and a PROVEN liar
Linda_K
posted on July 21, 2007 04:58:48 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's another great example of why I gave up responding to her. """
posted on July 24, 2007 12:11:54 PM newUS Military PLANS on a Presence through '09
And since as even dennis kucinich points out to all Americans, the liberals/dems don't have the GUTS to stop funding the war....and since our CIC has repeatedly said we will be there as long as we need to be.....your party will actually have to DO something, rather than continue WHINING about everything. They'll have to find a backbone and TAKE ACTION. Not the game playing they continue doing to pretend they're trying to stop the war.
Only fools can't see through THAT charade. LOL LOL LOL
Try reading once in a while, sybil, you might actually LEARN something.
Then maybe, just maybe you can add more to these threads than your juvenile garbage.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 24, 2007 12:14 PM ]
posted on July 25, 2007 08:41:06 AM newNot one, but three times. It's whining, not whinning. Thought you were supposed to be educated. At least Linda knows how to spell.
So sue me if I didnt use a spell checker. At least I know the what language the people of Canada speak. At least I know not to post my email address on a public board if I don't want people writing to me. All of these smarts come from Linda. So go ahead and believe she is the intelligent one around here.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 25, 2007 08:47:12 AM newWell again, a lack of education
Why because I don't know where you live in relation to oil refineries. What a joke. You want to talk about the lack of education, why don't you look to the president for an example of someone with a lack of education - he may have went to college but it is apparent that he didn't learn much.
Texas is a big state
Did Bush have to teach you that? It sounds like something Bush would have said.
“Wow! Brazil is big.”– President Bush, 11/6/05, after being shown a map of Brazil by President Lula da Silva. November 7, 2005 11:00 am
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 25, 2007 08:59:01 AM new
"You want to talk about the lack of education, why don't you look to the president for an example of someone with a lack of education - he may have WENT to college..."
You mention lack of education and then follow it up with a grammatical error.
Hilarious. Don't try to put it back on someone else.
posted on July 25, 2007 09:05:00 AM new
No matter what words Logansdad used it doesn't change the fact that bushit is an uneducated boob. Ya ya ya, he got to be president but that was hardly through his own initiative...if it hadn't been for the bushit family and other powers behind the scenes he'd be drunk in a gutter somewhere.
BTW SLANG is NOT a language. There is NO Canadian LANGUAGE. The Brits speak English...they have many words that they use that are different than ours, like lift for elevator, but we ALL speak the English language
posted on July 25, 2007 09:10:37 AM new
Well, mingo chimes in. Apparently you didn't read the language post either. You have posted nothing new or earth shaking. As stated in that thread, we all know that.
posted on July 25, 2007 09:13:47 AM new
Have I mentioned Bush?? Give it a break, mingo, you are fascinated with Bush. Not only do you need to get a hobby, but you need to see a shrink about your Bush fascination.
