posted on July 26, 2007 12:09:14 AM new
Kiara, "Mingo, he pretended he just figured out who you were when he came back here again near the beginning of the month but Helen's link from two years ago shows that he already knew all along.
posted on July 26, 2007 12:27:51 PM newAgain, read my lips, as I stated, we all know that. There is no Canadian language, right??
At least etexbill has some common sense. Now only if Bear and Linda can learn from him since they still want to believe Canadian is a language.
For the record French Canadian and English Canadian is not the language. I guess you two morons will insist the folks in Britain/UK speak British and the people in Mexico speak Mexican. What language do we speak in the United States? We speak English not American English. Do the Canadians refer to our language as American, no. This is how stupid your logic is.
All you two do is continue to make jacka**es of yourself.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 26, 2007 12:57:48 PM newAll here do know that with LD specific orientation, its favorite language is "French".
Bear, French is one of the romance languages. French is spoken in 54 countries and by over 300 million people. What other languages do you speak? You wouldn't know how to romance anything because you speak a language that doesn't even exist. I bet your "wife" loves when you romance her by mumbling and drawing her pictures with crayons.
We've been all over this, but they get bored and have NOTHING else to continue bringing up. LOL
It needs to be brought up because you and your fellow village idiot still want to insist that "Canadian" is a language. If it was a real language as you insist it is, it would appear in the list of offical languages.
they're STILL whining about the Canadian languages There are many....clearly acknowledged by their gov.....and with only two being their 'official' languages
How can a government acknowledge a language that does not exist? Canadian English and Canadian French are variations of the English and French language. They are not languages themselves despite what you want to believe.
I think you and Bear both suffer from Nifong syndrome - the mind virus that causes otherwise intelligent people to embrace likely falsehoods because they validate a preconceived belief.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on July 28, 2007 11:33:33 AM new
While hillary and obama are duking it out....lol....funny to watch.....hillarys trying to collect money for showing her cleavage to everyone. lol lol lol
Even old left leaning reuters is report it.
Clinton campaign insulted by cleavage article
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Insulted by a fashion article about Hillary Clinton's cleavage, her presidential campaign is trying to use the incident to raise money.
Such a 'follower' hillary is....copy catting old pretty boy edwards methods of whining for money.
posted on July 28, 2007 12:40:29 PM new
will Hilary continue to fight for the poor now that she has her million dollars WORK done to her face ,her thigh ,her ass?
Does it make her a better fighter like Ed getting a 1200 dollars haircut?
posted on July 28, 2007 01:33:52 PM new
hwahwa - It's my opinion that hillary has NEVER really cared a bit about the 'poor'.
But rather advancing her Marxist agenda...one she's held since her college days. She's a socialist - through and through....and even further left than that in some political positions.
They have to pretend to be less of an activist than they really are. bill was a liberal who 'became' a more moderate dem in order to get elected. hillary is a falling off the far left - Marxist believer and the 'poor' aren't those she wishes to RAPE.
Income redistribution so all can have equally.....taking profits from privately owned companies and putting them under gov control....is PURE communism. THAT'S hillary's agenda. She tries to pretend differently...but as her last couple of public statements have proved.....at times her REAL agenda slips out.
Then we have the issue of her willingness to actually protect our nation. She voted for the war....told the journalists that she checked with her husbands OWN intelligence people....and that's why she voted to go to war.
Now she like so many other cowards have changed their position for NO OTHER reason than their own politican gain.
You want a woman President in office who wouldn't even be acknowledge by the arab/muslim leaders who support their women staying covered up - having no say in anything....UNLESS hillary was giving THEM what they wanted....as she appears to be willing to do now. tsk tsk tsk
I sure don't. Right or wrong....whether, in HINDSIGHT, it was best to invade Iraq or not...at least I expect ANY person I vote for to actually BELIEVE there is a HUGE threat from the muslim terrorists...and a willingness to fight them....not conceed to them. Not to sell America out, first chance they get by running away from ANY problem - like the liberals are now suggesting we do
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on July 28, 2007 03:33:17 PM new
For hillary it supposedly takes a socialist village to do everything.
That's because she supports taking AWAY parental rights/responsibilities and wants to put the children at younger and younger ages into the GOV care....you know BIG BROTHER indocrination.....she feels that can't be started early enough. tsk tsk tsk
posted on July 28, 2007 03:38:32 PM new
My family left China after the Communist revolution,but we kept in touch with relatives and friends who stay under the Communist regime.
Putting all the resources under the govt just spell one big Bureaucracy,it makes every one poor!
It makes the poor feel better,now everyone is equally poor!
During famine,the folks sent us sample of what they ate,peeled tree barks.
Some were so desperate they went to the beach and ate sand !
China has always been poor,thats how they discovered swallow saliva used to make bird nest is good to eat and sharks washed ashore rotting on the beach,their fins are edible.
Same goes for duckweb,chicken feet,pig brain,water cockroach,snails,turtle shells,eels,sea cucumber,kelp!
Why does Hilary spend that kind of money to look good when she knows it aint going to last long,she could have used it to stock up her food pantry for the coming Famine ??
We all know how much Bill likes to eat!
*
Lets all stop whining !
*
posted on July 31, 2007 11:42:51 AM new
Etex, Haha!! Got your butt soundly kicked so now you're going to segue into something else....trying for sympathy when bullying doesn't work?
Ya, you'll be gone until Sunday like you were gone 8 hours before(didn't happen).
#1 mingo, again the butt kickin is in your mind only, such as your statements "I won" and "Was I right, or was I right". Nope. Sit down and shut up.
#2 Sunday was not mentioned in the post. You are so busy trying to think of a smart azz comeback when you read a post, that you can't even comprehend what you read.
#3 I wouldn't ask for sympathy from you if you were the last lib left. You don't even have a good word for the government that protects and feeds your vulgar azz.
posted on July 31, 2007 12:02:00 PM new
Quote: "Maybe you will develop a sense of empathy and understanding for those poor people from New Orleans who lost their children and grandchildren along with their homes and friends. Maybe you will cease to think of these good people as criminals and unwanted refugees."
Oh, is that the same "poor people" who fired on my church group as they tried to come in to help them?
posted on July 31, 2007 12:04:27 PM new
Quote helen: "Etexbill, Nobody here on the left is heartless. I'm sure that everyone wishes your grandaughter all the best".
Helen, I almost thought that you were on the up and up and then in the next breath, you had to follow your leader again with
"I replied, "Etex, Take YOUR chain, wrap it around your neck and yank it UNTIL I ask you for your opinion. "
Nice "lady".
You betcha I come and go. I get to where I figure I am wasting my time here looking for intelligent life from the left.
And the post that you went to so much trouble to look up proves nothing. I don't remember what took place here a year or two ago or what person changed her ID then. Why waste time on such trivia. No, anybody could recognize mingo's drivel in an instant.
I thank you all for being so "sympathetic", which I wasn't asking for. I posted that to let you know I wouldn't be keeping you on the right path for a few days. But let's use the word "pathetic". That fits you better.
posted on July 31, 2007 12:34:48 PM new
Etexbill--I am very happy to hear that your granddaughter will be ok. I do not wish anyone ill will, whether they agree with my politics or not. That's why I can't understand why, instead of debating points, some of the neocons have to resort to calling all liberals ignorant, stupid, etc. Why, because we disagree? Can't we disagree without being stupid? Being intelligent means thinking for yourself, not letting someone tell you how to think. We have different goals---maybe your way will be better for this country and maybe my way will be better for this country---or maybe a combination of philosophies will be better for the country. This is more important than people calling each other childish names with such venom.
Oh dear, CC, you're going to have to get out more. lol
Just as I pointed our that helens favorite site the daily kos allows the posting of the most VILE/VULGAR pictures....and just because moveon.orggers have gone over the top....and just because your own leaders have called others terrible names.....you apparently don't SEE any of that.
And here's another great example of the poor actions/behavior coming from the left - in regards to our Chief USSC Justice, Roberts.
With LOVE from the left to him.
WAKE UP. It's getting ugly. And your side is just as responsible for it as anyone. Don't preach until your own 'house' is in order. And whine to your leftie comrades here on their own posts for a change.
posted on July 31, 2007 01:07:42 PM new
Thank you coach.
"That's why I can't understand why, instead of debating points, some of the neocons have to resort to calling all liberals ignorant, stupid, etc. Why, because we disagree?"
I agree. I have never attacked anyone unless I was attacked first with much worse words. I try to discuss a post but discussion is not possible here for the insulting attacks made by some of the libs. It works both ways.
[ edited by etexbill on Jul 31, 2007 01:09 PM ]
[ edited by etexbill on Jul 31, 2007 08:24 PM ]
posted on July 31, 2007 01:46:22 PM newJust as I pointed our that helens favorite site the daily kos allows the posting of the most VILE/VULGAR pictures....and just because moveon.orggers have gone over the top....and just because your own leaders have called others terrible names.....you apparently don't SEE any of that.
Anyone can post a comment or a picture to KOS. Just because another person reads there and agrees with some of the content it doesn't mean they support everything posted on the site.
LindaK, there are those who have the ability to judge things for themselves and don't see things 'one way' as you tend to do - meaning they can filter content according to their own beliefs, seeing good and bad and right and wrong.
posted on July 31, 2007 02:05:20 PM new
"LOL Oh dear, CC, you're going to have to get out more. lol"
I was talking about some neocons here, not anywhere else---specifically, you. Because we are on different sides of the fence politically, you feel the need to write hate-filled, nasty posts--just because we disagree about politics. Is that a cause for the hatred you show in your posts? Is that a reason to call all liberals stupid, anti-American and all those other lovely names you use? That technique is not going to get people to listen to you seriously. In your eyes, only conservative journalists and politicians are worthy of attention, just because they are conservative. I am a liberal, but do have a mind of my own--don't think much of Harry Reid; liked Clinton in general but was disappointed with his behavior; Hillary is not my first choice for president, although if she gets the nomination I would vote for her; have voted for Republicans in some elections--mostly local. There are good people on both sides. Being a neocon does not make you good and being a liberal does not make you evil---and vice versa. Those qualities are inside of you and have not much to do with politics.
posted on July 31, 2007 02:20:03 PM new
"And here's another great example of the poor actions/behavior coming from the left - in regards to our Chief USSC Justice, Roberts."
Linda, this is a blog and the people who are posting these terrible things are morons. No one in his right mind would take that seriously. The vast majority of "normal" people feel sympathy for anyone who is ill. Don't you realize that, in general, only the complainers or sickos make these types of posts---left or right? Liberal bloggers aren't the only ones who do this. Their conservative counterparts were brutal when Elizabeth Edwards announced that her cancer had returned. They do not represent me or my opinion, nor most of the voters in this country.
posted on July 31, 2007 03:06:34 PM new Etex, In response to your insults above...I suppose I should let you know that I do not follow a leader as you suggest and frankly can't imagine who that leader might be.
I believe that your posts have been consistently trivial and tedious without substance such as your silly tit for tat exchanges with Mingo. I see you as an integral part of the ignorance and mediocrity that you say causes you to leave.
Good luck this time with your effort to change your posting style. Maybe we should all consider Coach's good suggestions.
posted on July 31, 2007 07:55:21 PM new
"I believe that your posts have been consistently trivial and tedious without substance such as your silly tit for tat exchanges with Mingo. I see you as an integral part of the ignorance and mediocrity that you say causes you to leave. "
Then you also believe that mingo's posts are also trivial and tedious, as we are answering those.
As I stated, I have never attacked or posted tit for tat unless it was done to me first.
I post my beliefs and from my knowledge of some things as my posts on the toll road, with emphasis on Texas. Mingo could not let it rest with comebacks and trivial and tedious comments. You can't have a simple discussion without her rude comments. But for some reason, apparently you and kiara and others can't see that. She picks certain people to spew on. For instance, she has yet to attack hwahwa for expressing the same comments against Hillary and Edwards as others have done. Where is the difference and why?
posted on July 31, 2007 11:54:34 PM new
The lie and the liar:
Linda_K
posted on July 21, 2007 04:58:48 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's another great example of why I gave up responding to her. ""
posted on August 1, 2007 12:20:24 AM newI post my beliefs and from my knowledge of some things as my posts on the toll road, with emphasis on Texas. Mingo could not let it rest with comebacks and trivial and tedious comments. You can't have a simple discussion without her rude comments. But for some reason, apparently you and kiara and others can't see that.
Ya, Mingo posted about the toll roads and Etexbill took offense and his first comment to her was:
Do you spend your time looking up articles that tickle your little lib mind?? Get a hobby.
Then when the discussion continued with input from others he told Mingo to 'get a hobby' five times in a row and then threw a tantrum the rest of the topic.
But for some reason, apparently you and kiara and others can't see that
posted on August 1, 2007 08:45:46 AM new
Oh no, it wasn't kiara, read the thread.My first comment was:
"Go worry about your own state roads, crow. Has it entered your little mind that Texas may want the toll road. It will free up state money to maintain the over 72,000 miles of Texas Highways."
Not the comment you posted as my first words. Keep throwing your stuff against the wall and some of it might stick.
Then I went on to try to discuss the facts. I presented the facts from a Texas standpoint and that is because the article kept mentioning Texas.
The comments were true and served to refute the statements made. But you and mingo both need to get a hobby, and not one of trying to put down someone else with untruths. Or as mingo says "lies". In other words, what you posted and the truth are two different things. Because you and your leader post something does not make it true.
Why are you not posting to http://forums.canadiancontent.net/canadian-politics/
They need all the help they can get.
[ edited by etexbill on Aug 1, 2007 08:53 AM ]
This topic is 10 pages long: 1new2new3new4new5new6new7new8new9new10new
Not for repugs...they have no morals...
Or if for some strange reason the NYT is going to air hillarys dirty laundry. lol
