posted on August 3, 2007 12:34:50 PM new
"how are these comments meant to be interpreted if they do not imply that you find the information irrelevant since it is 7 years old?
Read the above statements. Where does it say irrelevant or not valid? You can interpret what you want till you turn blue for all that I care. Your interpretations don't mean a hill of beans.
posted on August 3, 2007 12:38:31 PM new
"No, you didn't mention the bible.
because you didn't respond to the opening post or article, only the repeatedly comment that was from 2000."
Uh yeah, you just said that you interpret what that statement implies. What statement, as you say, I didn't respond.
posted on August 3, 2007 12:43:34 PM newI haven't mentioned the Bible, and the statement being discussed here is about Dr. Laura.
It is? I thought it was more about this but that's just my opinion.
"The key to this essay is its premise, not the pedantic details of it of how it is defended. Simply put, the letter points out a logical flaw in the "homosexuality is wrong because the Bible says so" argument: if homosexuality is wrong because it goes against God's law as outlined in the Bible, why aren't any number of activities now viewed as innocuous but once regarded as unacceptable also offenses against God's law? How can one part of Leviticus be deemed as etched in stone when other parts have been discarded as archaic?"
posted on August 3, 2007 12:53:51 PM new
Whatever you wish to believe kiara.
The article starts off telling who Dr. Laura is and then goes on to give a response to Dr. Laura.
It is from June, 2000 and that is all that I pointed out. I made no statements about the validity or what I believe about the Bible, as some have tried to "interpret" it. You followed up with your comment that you have read it also.
Are we going to be horse-whipped for reading it long ago??
posted on August 3, 2007 12:58:46 PM new
The person posting here under the ID 'etexbill' is just a little uptight troll trying his best to rule the forum in support of lindak who always clings desperately to him. He has been around before always with the same phrases and agenda and control issues. Topics of discussion can only go one way - his way or he angers.
Don't take him serious, he's always been a bit of a joke. He angers very easily when women speak their own thoughts and he only respects doormats - he favors the ones who agree with him, those who find it hilarious when he puts down other women here and calls them names like pigs or idiots.
posted on August 3, 2007 01:05:38 PM new
Hit a nerve did it kiara. Not nice being proven a liar is it?
Not nice being proved wrong as helen was last evening, is it.
Sputter and advise till you drop, the proof is in what you post and where you are proven wrong.
OT. BTW, You are from Canada aren't you?
There is a post here about your country that I don't see you making any comment at all. Russia is going to take your artic area (not if, but when). Any comment on your own country's affairs. Excuse this, if you are not Canadian.
[ edited by etexbill on Aug 3, 2007 01:06 PM ]
posted on August 3, 2007 01:22:40 PM new
Quote kiara: The person posting here under the ID 'etexbill' is just a little uptight troll trying his best to rule the forum in support of lindak who always clings desperately to him. He has been around before always with the same phrases and agenda and control issues. Topics of discussion can only go one way - his way or he angers.
Don't take him serious, he's always been a bit of a joke. He angers very easily when women speak their own thoughts and he only respects doormats - he favors the ones who agree with him, those who find it hilarious when he puts down other women here and calls them names like pigs or idiots."
Quote etexbill. The person posting here under the ID “kiara” is just a lib who can’t think for herself but has to follow up her leaders comments with her approval whether they make sense or not. She has been here with the same lib phrases for quite awhile and the topics of discussion can only go one way-her or her leaders way or she flusters and makes dumb comebacks.
Don’t take her seriously, she’s the butt of jokes here on this forum. She angers very easily when proven a liar and tries to hum and haw her way out of it, but can’t. She favors the ones who agree with her.. those who prove her wrong, male or female and calls them names like “troll“, and “a bit of a joke“
Works both ways, doesn’t it kiara?? If the shoe fits, you should wear it.
posted on August 3, 2007 01:30:31 PM new
Don't worry etex,
Kiara is really a sock puppet. She says everything under the covers, but when it comes to reality, she is no better than mingopig or even bigdopa.
I still wonder which Canadian would be stupid enough to allow mingopig to rent them for a night. Do you know if they make full body condoms? If so, we better send them to the Canadians.
.
.
.
If it's called common sense, why do so few Demomorons have it?
posted on August 3, 2007 04:23:09 PM new
you're opinion means so much, etex, thank you for wisely calling it to my attention that I am, in your worldly opinion, an idiot.
so...
"do you feel the bible (any version thereof) is also invalid because it is a few years old?" that was a direct question
(but I'm the idiot???)
You just said I didn't mention the Bible. Religion was not being discussed here till Mingo brought it in. religion wasn't being discussed but the article mentions the bible how many times???
(but I'm the idiot)
I don't care how many husbands, kids, or jobs, you have. Don't put your words in my mouth.
(no room in there, your big foot takes up so much space)
troll
posted on August 3, 2007 04:49:26 PM new
"troll" Takes one to know one, zoomin.
"You just said I didn't mention the Bible. Religion was not being discussed here till Mingo brought it in.
religion wasn't being discussed but the article mentions the bible how many times???"
As I said, I don't care how many times it mentions the Bible.
Read my lips, I did not discuss religion or the Bible and will not discuss religion on a political board.
Your question is as irrelevant as you are.
If you don't like the heat in a political board, stay out of it.
Have a good evening and Namaste.
[ edited by etexbill on Aug 3, 2007 04:55 PM ]
[ edited by etexbill on Aug 3, 2007 04:58 PM ]
posted on August 3, 2007 05:01:51 PM new
"you're opinion means so much, etex, thank you for wisely calling it to my attention that I am, in your worldly opinion, an idiot."
You are quite welcome.
As I said, I am tired of being insulted by a bunch of mouth breathers. From now on I give it back whenever I get it. and I certainly was not the first to give it.
posted on August 3, 2007 05:08:38 PM new
someone please let me know when etex grows a brain.
consider yourself blocked as you add nothing relevant to threads other than to insult other posters.
posted on August 3, 2007 05:20:02 PM new
They do that etexbill because they can't do anything else. They expect that when a 7 year old article is posted it should be addressed. LOL It's important to THEM. lol
Most likely because they don't want to or can't address the subjects that ARE current. It's too embarrassing because of the 3% poll rating their leaders were just given.
=========================
Linda:
I ask questions that you don't answer.
Not true. And you didn't address that question to anyone. Yet you expect us to respond to it? lol That's usually the way you post....not to anyone in particular.
"Of course, I could just keep talking to myself like others do"........
Don't go hurting mingo's feelings. She's very sensitive about how many of her threads/posts go with no response.
"sorry you feel that I post and run, I have four kids, a husband, a house, three dogs and a job ~ I do not hang out here on a full time basis.
No need to be sorry...I was just pointing out what you normally do here. Who knows if you even return to read the answers to the questions you post and run from.
"As I have stated previously, the lack of respect on this board can be offensive. It is immature, unnecessary, and takes away from many topics that could be shared."
I agree. But you only control your own actions....not those of any one else.
Maybe YOU should clean up your own act...before you expect others to do so.
Your most recent 'lack of respect' = "(no room in there, your big foot takes up so much space)troll."
"Call me a liberal, but part of that is being openminded."
LOL Imo, there is no such animal. NO liberal is open-minded. lol
"I do not have to agree with you in order to understand your perspective.
Never said you did. Are you hearing voices again? Where you've come up with that statement I have no idea. I would NEVER expect any liberal to agree with my positions. lol They're at two distinct ends of the earth.
posted on August 3, 2007 05:25:56 PM new
'someone please let me know when etex grows a brain.'
I don't have to prove anything about you zoomin. Your misuse of the English language and your failure to use capital letters in your posts says enough.
"you're opinion"
It is "your opinion".
Let me know when zoomin gets a brain and some smarts.
posted on August 3, 2007 05:33:02 PM new
Now, now, etex - that must have been what zoomin meant when she posted about respect.
After all zommin said: ""As I have stated previously, the lack of respect on this board can be offensive. It is immature, unnecessary, and takes away from many topics that could be shared."
It's funny how they chastise others for the EXACT SAME BEHAVIOR that comes from their own mouths. LOL LOL LOL But they just can't see that about themselves - their OWN actions. tsk tsk tsk
posted on August 3, 2007 05:41:16 PM new
Yep, all this from calling mingo's attention to the fact that the event happened in 2000.
She didn't even deny that she thought it was new when I mentioned it.
And then poor kiara, kisses up after posting that she had already read it too.
Quote kiara: "Mingo
I remember reading this once before, I'm not sure but maybe during a discussion here with Logansdad about the laws in Leviticus, and I thought it was funny.
But do they hop on kiara. No.
Does she jump on hwahwa for posting worse things that anyone here has said about Hillary?? No.
posted on August 4, 2007 04:53:33 AM new
profe, uhhh..and YOUR posts have been... what???
We are so lucky to be blessed with two crusty antique old ranchers who think they can pop in , order posters around and then think it'll happen! LOL!
Must be those big hats pressing on their brains !
posted on August 4, 2007 05:38:17 AM new
It was more like a suggestion than an order, and I don't customarily wear a hat. Crusty though, I've been called crusty more'n once.
Hey, I've got 2 new foals, want to see pics? I'll have to go out and take them first...
"tex and mingo, your go-rounds are boring, cut the crap."
Yes! Take off your dunce hat, Mingo and cut the boring crap so that Etex may exit, reinvent himself and come back as a man without need of a moonbat's skirt to hide behind.
posted on August 4, 2007 07:07:30 AM new
OK, OK, I'll quit picking on ol' Dukey....sheesh, you guys don't want me to have any (cheap) fun! But I always wanted my own John Wayne doll to stick pins in.....
posted on August 4, 2007 09:11:43 AM new
They're coming, The horses are down by the creek with the goats and the dogs so I have to ride down there after we get done with chores, unless they cooperate and come home, which is unlikely given that they're in the coolest possible spot for miles around .
posted on August 5, 2007 09:38:21 AM new
profe51
posted on August 3, 2007 08:20:12 PM
tex and mingo, your go-rounds are boring, cut the crap.
mingotree
posted on August 4, 2007 04:53:33 AM new
profe, uhhh..and YOUR posts have been... what???
We are so lucky to be blessed with two crusty antique old ranchers who think they can pop in , order posters around and then think it'll happen! LOL!
Must be those big hats pressing on their brains !
Helenjw: "tex and mingo, your go-rounds are boring, cut the crap."
Yes! Take off your dunce hat, Mingo and cut the boring crap so that Etex may exit, reinvent himself and come back as a man without need of a moonbat's skirt to hide behind."
Mingo: "OK, OK, I'll quit picking on ol' Dukey....sheesh, you guys don't want me to have any (cheap) fun! But I always wanted my own John Wayne doll to stick pins in."
“profe51
posted on August 5, 2007 07:43:12 AM
“Mingo, I didn't make it down there yesterday. Maybe today…”
Or maybe not, but at least you got back on her good side for awhile.
Thought I’d just stay back for awhile, and let Prof see where the insults started from and still continued to come. It is boring, but I wasn’t the first and I will fight back when insulted by the name callers. And now, I’ll be glad to have some discussion (and disagreements) if others can, and stop the insults.
Thought we should also throw this one in as it was a doozy.
"Helenjw
posted on August 2, 2007 06:40:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Etex..so you edited out your statement that you had hopes for me???
LOLOL! You ARE a wimp.
________________________
My statement was still there in black and white and unedited. After I called her attention to it, Helen couldn't see fit to say, excuse me I didn't see it. Insulted again and then backed out.
posted on August 8, 2007 12:17:59 AM new"...cut the boring crap so that Etex may exit, reinvent himself and come back as a man without need of a moonbat's skirt to hide behind."
posted on August 8, 2007 09:52:54 AM new
To the top for mingo and all the other insulters. See you are still up to your old tricks on the other threads. Prof will be so disappointed.
[ edited by etexbill on Aug 8, 2007 09:53 AM ]
Are YOU a Bunghole?
