posted on August 14, 2007 08:55:31 AM
Linda_K
posted on August 13, 2007 10:35:09 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This nation can never be conquered from without. If it is ever to fall it will be from within."""
Yup, it could despite having a president who claimed he was the Uniter LOL! ANOTHER one of his failures.
Fall? Yes, the bridges are falling through neglect and our "leaders" failure to put our tax dollars where they are REALLY needed.
"From within"...too true! ..How much of America does Canada, China, Saudi Arabia, and other countries own ??? LOTS!
How about a big strip of land, 16 lanes wide, right through the center of the U.S. ...owned by a foreign country ??!!!!!
How about an administration whose leader called the Constitution nothing but a $%#@!*
piece of paper and who has systematically ripped it to shreds.
How about yellow bellied citizens who are ready to roll over, expose their bellies and give up their rights because the King says it'll "save" them ???
posted on August 14, 2007 09:16:22 AMDo you guys really think linduh will answer that question ???
I think she slipped up again when she said "And he has also dealt with the threat that was in Iraq....LONG before he was ever President and long before 9-11" - even she thinks Bush planned it before being in power and now she's avoiding the questions, waiting for her boys to bail her out by changing the subject or attacking personally.
posted on August 14, 2007 09:18:44 AM
Brother....a whole post FULL of nothing but nonsense and lies.
But that's sybil for you. She never has been able to do anything but twist what happens totally out of any realm of sanity. And there isn't a thing that has ever happened the whole world over, that wasn't THIS President's/administrations fault - according to her twisted mind-think.
And if we just elect a communist supporting, military-hater, progressive socialist....all will be well in the USA. ROFLMHO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on August 14, 2007 09:27:33 AM
Read my lips, mingo. Congress voted overwhelmingly for the invasion of Iraq. They had the same information as the president. If you don't like it, talk to your congressman. That is, if you even know who he/she is. I didn't make the decision. If I did, the war would be over Harry Truman style.
Now, I am not going to tit for tat with you today either, as you just became irrelevant.
I'm off to the real world of intelligent people.
posted on August 14, 2007 09:58:20 AM
""Read my lips, mingo. Congress voted overwhelmingly for the invasion of Iraq. They had the same information as the president. If you don't like it, talk to your congressman. That is, if you even know who he/she is. I didn't make the decision. If I did, the war would be over Harry Truman style.
Now, I am not going to tit for tat with you today either, as you just became irrelevant.
I'm off to the real world of intelligent people."""
So have you learned that Clinton had nothing to do with starting the Iraq war....or you just don't WANT to believe it....
""I'm off to the real world of intelligent people."""
posted on August 14, 2007 10:11:10 AM
I haven't seen ANYONE say he did in this thread. Sybil is hallucinating again, I'm afraid.
BUT....I do believe the Iraqi's and many other muslims DID see clinton's bombing of their nation in 1998 as an act of war. And very much set the foundation for the Iraq war in '03.
And THAT was ALSO done BEFORE President Bush was elected.
But with sybil's mindthink...it's STILL Bush's fault.
=============
And I am still one that believes there were 'connections' between AQ and saddam....as do some in our intelligence agencies. They were reported visiting saddam in Iraq. The 9-11 committee verified that FACT...but they drew the conclusion they weren't working together. Doesn't mean they wouldn't have been...they both hate America and Americans and both were support terrorists against Israel and America.
But Iraq was a SEPARATE threat....long before President Bush was even elected....as I've already stated and kiara, mingo and C have tried to twist all around.
FACTS are FACTS. They're in denial. tsk tsk tsk But it won't change the FACTS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on August 14, 2007 10:14:47 AM
No, kiara. You're either too stupid to understand what you post or you're playing at being stupid.
You spoke FOR my position. And you were WRONG. Speak for yourself for a change.
"even she thinks Bush planned it before being in power and now she's avoiding the questions, waiting for her boys to bail her out by changing the subject or attacking personally.
I don't think that at all.
YOU DO. Speak for yourself for once.
What you posted is NOT an 'opinion'. You made a statement of fact on my position. AGAIN
posted on August 14, 2007 10:37:25 AMI do believe the Iraqi's and many other muslims DID see clinton's bombing of their nation in 1998 as an act of war
And Linda wonders why the Muslims hate the US after that statement.
If the Iraqi's believe Clinton's bombing was an act of war, you have to wonder what they think of Bush's full fledge INVASION AND OCCUPATION of their country.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on August 14, 2007 10:38:41 AMI don't think that at all.
The problem with Linda is she doesn't think period.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on August 14, 2007 10:45:04 AM
GAWD - You're all the same. Speaking for ME and LYING.
NO, ld. That is NOT what I wonder
"And Linda wonders why the Muslims hate the US after that statement.....never have...never will. I know how they are raised from birth. And it has nothing to do with ANY American president.
WAKE UP time for you, ld.
But I understand you don't want to put ANY blame for making the muslims angry on clinton's shoulders. After all he was perfect. LOL LOL LOL Even though HE said they had a nuclear weapon program also. Even though HE said they were a threat to the area and the US. Even though HE said and passed legislation to REMOVE saddam from power.
Nope...according to those in denial...it's ALL President's Bush's fault.
And imo, it's PROOF of why NO liberal should be elected as our CIC. They can't defend this nation when they're living in total denial. lol
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on August 14, 2007 10:46:49 AM
Linda_K
posted on August 14, 2007 09:18:44 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brother....a whole post FULL of nothing but nonsense and lies.
But that's sybil for you. She never has been able to do anything but twist what happens totally out of any realm of sanity. """
linduh, you can babble on but you have NEVER proven anything I posted was a lie....NO examples whatsoever! While I HAVE shown you, with proof, to be a liar !
Fact: You can't blame Clinton for the war in Iraq. Period. He had NOTHING to do with it just as Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. YOU can choose not to believe it but just because it occupies space in that tiny brain doesn't mean it's true...
Why don't you try, just try , to post a fact , linduh and quit telling others what to do !
Bossy neocon fascist woman !
posted on August 14, 2007 10:58:07 AM
First you say" "I'll take ANY CIC who is willing to ACT....not talk....not keep our FBI and CIA from communicating and NOT allow FIVE attacks on our interests during his admin. and do BASICALLY NOTHING about it. TALKING has done/did nothing to deal with the attacks AS 9-11 PROVED"
Then you say: "BUT....I do believe the Iraqi's and many other muslims DID see clinton's bombing of their nation in 1998 as an act of war"
One post says he bombed Iraq in 1998 and the other says he was not willing to ACT. Which is it?
posted on August 14, 2007 11:07:14 AM
"But Iraq was a SEPARATE threat....long before President Bush was even elected....as I've already stated and kiara, mingo and C have tried to twist all around."
I'm not twisting anything. You did NOT state the above in your earlier post. This post above is entirely different in meaning. You said:
"And he has also dealt with the threat that was in Iraq....LONG before he was ever President and long before 9-11"
posted on August 14, 2007 11:33:45 AMI know how they are raised from birth. And it has nothing to do with ANY American president.
So you know how every single Muslim was raised from birth? You still do not have any clue why the Muslims hate America.
And you are dam right it has nothing to do with any American President because no American president has anything to do with raising a Muslim child in the Middle East.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on August 14, 2007 11:36:08 AMNo, I have every right to post here and ask any questions I wish to, lindak. Just because you slipped up and can't explain don't expect me to leave.
It getting to the point around here where no one can have an opinion or post their opinion, without Linda interpretting it as somebody speaking for her. But yet she can do it all the time.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
It's that you FEW liberals here can't stop speaking for MY positions.
Those are NOT opinions. You're making statement of FACT when saying they are MINE.
That is NOT an opinion.
But I understand....so many liberals can't recognize the difference between facts and opinions.
That's nothing new.
==================
C - For the last time. I will say the same thing in a different way. Hopefully you'll NOT continuing twisting it.
I said that Iraq was considered a threat LONG before this President was elected. LONG before 9-11,
The dem party constantly told us so. Their words/statements are there for all to read.
THEY convinced American voters that saddam presented a threat to his neighbors and the US. They also recognized that saddam had USED womd on his own people. They supported the war under Bush1.
Read their statements....made YEARS before this President said the same thing. YEARS before he was President....and even when he WAS President and THEY supported the invasion. THEIR WORDS...C. THEIR WORDS.
That really shouldn't have been hard to grasp.
[ edited by Linda_K on Aug 14, 2007 11:56 AM ]
posted on August 14, 2007 12:12:49 PM
"C - For the last time. I will say the same thing in a different way. Hopefully you'll NOT continuing twisting it." "That really shouldn't have been hard to grasp"
You said:
"And he has also dealt with the threat that was in Iraq....LONG before he was ever President and long before 9-11"
Grammatically speaking, this sentence says that Bush dealt with the threat in Iraq before he became president. If that is not what you meant, don't blame me. Brush up on your grammar and writing skills. We are not mind-readers.
[ edited by coach81938 on Aug 14, 2007 12:20 PM ]
posted on August 14, 2007 12:30:04 PM
I think lindak said it exactly how she meant it but can't answer the question so is trying to now 'put it another way' .... aka 'duck and cover' lol
Where are her boys? Usually Stoney is in by now talking about bungholes and all is okay again.
posted on August 14, 2007 12:33:23 PM
Linda you are such an ass. People can have opinions and post their opinions. You are not the judge of whether a person is speaking an opinion or a fact. People can make a statement based on every thing that you have posted. It is you that are interpreting everything that is said as "fact" when it is the person's opinion.
Got that. It is you that has a hard time reading and interpreting what has been said SO IN MY OPINION it is you that can not tell the difference between fact and opinion.
If you are truly stupid and can not tell the difference between fact and opinion, would it help you if an opinion statement begins with "IN MY OPINION". Would that make it a lot clearer for you.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on August 14, 2007 12:52:55 PM
Not mind readers and TOO DENSE to already know what was done when and by whom. LOL LOL
Ever notice it's only you liberals that attack my grammar, spelling, etc?
Couldn't be your way of avoiding the subject being discussed now could it? YEP...it's all you have.
Can't argue that clinton didn't BOMB iraq before this President did....for exactly the same reasons. AND Bush did so AFTER 9-11 when continuing to do nothing about the threat saddam had LONG caused...could NOT be ignored any longer.
And for any liberals to EVER, EVER put any blame where it belongs....on saddams lap....nope so much better to act so un-American as to blame a US president....NEVER saddam.
That's one thing I will always find the MOST disgusting about liberals. They just don't have the ability to see that had saddam cooperated we would NEVER have invaded. But he didn't. For 13 years he DEFIED YOUR U.N...the world. And that never enters any statement made my any liberal. It's always our Presidents' fault.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on August 14, 2007 01:10:30 PM
Linda you are such an ass. People can have opinions and post their opinions. You are not the judge of whether a person is speaking an opinion or a fact. People can make a statement based on every thing that you have posted. It is you that are interpreting everything that is said as "fact" when it is the person's opinion.
Got that. It is you that has a hard time reading and interpreting what has been said SO IN MY OPINION it is you that can not tell the difference between fact and opinion.
If you are truly stupid and can not tell the difference between fact and opinion, would it help you if an opinion statement begins with "IN MY OPINION". Would that make it a lot clearer for you.
================
Again, ld, you show your total ignorance.
IF I said kiara hates gays....THAT is a statement of FACT on kiara's position on gays.
That is NOT stated as an opinion...because I did not say 'it appears/I think kiara hates gays. I am stating HER position on gays when it's NOT TRUE.
Otherwise, I too could continue going around making false statements about all your positions on everything, like YOU DO.
The fact that you're TOO DENSE to be able to tell the difference is so typical of you liberals here.
But then I've long ago stopped believing they say anything that's truthful. It's just NOT what liberals are all about.
They're about anger, hatred, mis-statements, changing the subject from whatever it is to focusing on the spelling of others.
Anything to avoid actually discussing the subject. Because by sticking to just doing THAT....they prove their IGNORANCE in so many areas. Especially the military and how it functions.
[ edited by Linda_K on Aug 14, 2007 01:14 PM ]
posted on August 14, 2007 01:29:46 PM
Their FAILED promises are all over the internet, ld. Try reading how so MANY who believed them/their LIES and now see they were FOOLED by the liberals. LOL
Think they're going to vote for them again? Really believe they'd be THAT STUPID to vote for them again? I don't.
The voters who are taking to the 'center'/Independents is growing. They're NOT staying with the liberal/dem party. tsk tsk tsk
You're congress has FAILED to deliver. But I won't be expecting to see you crying about that. LOL LOL LOL
June 28, 2007 [And they've only grown MORE angry at the lack of accomplishments....rather than being ALL TAKE. lol
NRCC highlights Dems' 'broken promises'
WASHINGTON (CNN) — The National Republican Congressional Committee came out with a new Web video Thursday that they claim highlights "the Democrat majority’s broken promises, abysmal record and rock-bottom approval rating."
The 2 minute 47 second video features Linda Ronstadt's hit "You're No Good," while highlighting several media reports on Congress' low approval ratings and the Democrats' performance since taking control of the chamber in January.
“House Democrats have failed to deliver on their campaign promises to change Washington ,” NRCC Communications Director Jessica Boulanger said in a statement announcing the video. “This Democrat team can’t get the job done and the American people are taking notice.”
The NRCC Web video comes as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee tells CNN they will target seven Republicans in a five-day radio ad buy next week accusing the GOP lawmakers of having a poor record on veterans’ issues.
– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
==================
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on August 14, 2007 01:30:58 PMAgain, ld, you show your total ignorance.
You want to bring up ignorance again Mrs there is a language called Canadian. The facts speak for themselves on that matter.
IF I said kiara hates gays....THAT is a statement of FACT on kiara's position on gays.
If she actually says that then it would be fact. Unless she herself states it, it would be your opinion based on how you interpret what is said in the posts. There is a difference.
The fact that you're TOO DENSE to be able to tell the difference is so typical of you liberals here
This coming from the one that keeps on trying to say she is right when she has been proven wrong time after time. Your to dense to realize you are wrong. There is no language called Canadian despite what you still want to believe. THAT IS A FACT.
They're about anger, hatred, mis-statements, changing the subject from whatever it is to focusing on the spelling of others.
You should quit talking about you and your palls like that. You do it as much as any one else on this board. I do not care if take that as a fact or an opinion.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
