Home  >  Community  >  The Vendio Round Table  >  And the Liberals What 'Hate Speech' Laws LOL


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 This topic is 3 pages long: 1 new 2 new 3 new
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:03:31 PM new

Linda, with your constant raucous shrieking you need so much attention that the discussion of a topic here is impossible. "Childish attention" only applies it your needs. And that is why two board owners found it necessary to ban you from their forums.

Are you always so socially enept?




 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:16:58 PM new
No, as you WELL know, but PRETEND you don't...the reason I was banned from otwa....was because jim admitted he didn't want to take the time to READ what liberals were saying.

Great excuse for not having to ban them for their much worse behavior.

Then the supposedly lightly moderated packy board....were on me after I posted only a couple of times. LOL LOL

They KNEW 'what I was GOING to do'. LOL Mind readers all. Not on what I HAD done....but because they're also liberals who allow the FILTH that packy posted....where packy posted HE was going after me...where poohfan said she was going to try to get me suspended and where their SUPPOSEDLY 'conservative' moderator was posting on the ross board about how SHE was going to have to moderate me. LOL

Anything to fit in with the 'objective' animals at the ross show.

Who do you think you're fooling helen? You SO prove your LACK of credibility by posting this nonsense. Even three liberal posters there question my banning. THEY didn't like my posts, my politics/etc....but there were HONEST people who could see the 'SET UP' that I walked into.

But hey....banning any opposition speech is a LIBERAL thing to do. They're trying to pass LAWS so that they can put people in JAIL if they say anything SOME wacko decides is 'hate speech'.

I didn't do anything that should have caused me to be banned. But I would NEVER expect you and your ilk to see that. Nope, HONESTY is NOT a word that you've ever been able to grasp, sadly.

Now....run back to ross with something said on another board, helen. Report in to the hunger and the little, tiny, FAT gay boy you so adore. LOL They LOVE you. While I pity you.
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:30:32 PM new

I don't report to anyone and very seldom post there. But like you, I read there along with many other people as you can see by the number of hits on various topics. Some of your former friends from AW post there so it may be a mistake to use such a broad brush when you choose to bash the board. Why don't you go there to defend yourself if you feel maligned?

I seriously doubt that Ross would bother to ban someone as insipid as you are.

The number of honest people that you have accused of being a liar is only exceeded by the number of people who have called you a liar.




 
 kiara
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:46:54 PM new
Lindak, quit blaming others and whining over your inability to survive on other forums and answer some questions.

Why do you support the killing and crippling of more of your soldiers to bring Iraqis freedom and democracy?

Your tax money is being spent to aid the refugees from Iraq, assisting them with better health and education while many in America need help with their own lives.

Does this mean that you are slowly starting to believe there should be more equality worldwide even if it means that there may be less of an affluent lifestyle for Americans?

Are you happy to see your country take a step backwards and be deep in debt for future generations to pay off so other countries can take steps forward to better themselves?


 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:52:28 PM new
See what I mean, helen. You will NEVER get what that board represents and WHY so many are leaving/have left. You are BLIND to those reasons.

You'll hang around there until the board finally gets closed, I have no doubt. Your sad desire to be accepted by ANY one, ANY board is why you post about others...lie about others who aren't there to defend themselves.

You take the COWARDS way out, helen.

You FEED on that hatred. And I pity you.

[ edited by Linda_K on Sep 16, 2007 03:53 PM ]
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:56:33 PM new

Your good friends from Auctionwatch are there.,,probably many others.

For example Hepburn and Terri are regular posters there.

Actually, I have no problems being accepted anywhere. That seems to be YOUR problem, Linda.

This must be the kind of board that you want...your very own Me Me Me place.

http://www.arcanethings.com/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=7



 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 03:58:33 PM new
No, helen, that's just ANOTHER board you've slammed on the ross circus.

Now....head back to ross, seeking any approval you can get for your lying posts there, where you feel protected by others of your pathetic ilk.
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:07:27 PM new

Maybe DrArcane can set one up for you.



 
 classicrock000
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:09:57 PM new
Helenjw
posted on September 16, 2007 03:56:33 PM
Your good friends from Auctionwatch are there.,,probably many others.

For example Hepburn and Terri are regular posters there.

Actually, I have no problems being accepted anywhere. That seems to be YOUR problem, Linda.

This must be the kind of board that you want...your very own Me Me Me place.

http://www.arcanethings.com/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=7


PTunys own blog,why the hell did you have to bring her up>>>????





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you look like your passport photo, you probably need the trip [ edited by classicrock000 on Sep 16, 2007 04:10 PM ]
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:11:43 PM new
helen brings up ALL that she NEEDS to have to FEED on and report into at the ross board.

She's slammed ptuny on the ross show before...this is nothing new.

It's what SHE and her ilk LIVE for.


 
 classicrock000
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:18:14 PM new
yea but I dont blame her Ptuny is a freaking nitwit.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you look like your passport photo, you probably need the trip
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:21:55 PM new


How silly to call my remark a "slam".

I simply made it clear that I find nothing interesting on the Ptuny Board. Do you?


The Ross Show Forums

The New Ross Show



[ edited by Helenjw on Sep 16, 2007 04:23 PM ]
 
 classicrock000
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:29:46 PM new
well I found this interesting that was posted by PTuny...




"Gifted Parrot, 'Alex,' Dies
Sept. 11, 2007 — A gifted parrot that could count to six, identify colors and even express frustration with repetitive [b]scientific trials has died after 30 years of helping researchers better understand the avian brain.'




I know,I know,ya cant make this sh*t up




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[ edited by classicrock000 on Sep 16, 2007 04:31 PM ]
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:31:28 PM new
classic. I agree with many that ptuny has taken over Doc's board...even before he left to travel to Japan. She did run the place and he backed her always. Maybe that's why they now have only 8-10 posters.


That's not my point. My point is helen spends her day going from board to board reading what's being said and then running back to the ross circus to REPORT in. That's what that board has long been about.

helen has sought their 'acceptance' by doing just what they all feed on... Attacking others who don't even post there, stating any lie that others will FEED upon...no matter the truth of anything.

She's done the same thing with Colin's board. She doesn't care which board it is...it's how SHE seeks the attention SHE desperately NEEDS.

It's SICK, imo. And it's SO helen.

They're SHEEP running all around board-land to find any little morsel to FEED the sick addiction of others like helen who can NEVER get enough of smearing good people who aren't there to set her and her ilk straight.

Underhanded garbage board. Always has been - always will be. And now helen has lowered herself to see acceptance with those same losers.

It's helens pathetic behavior in general.....not one persons [ptuny]personality.
 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 16, 2007 04:52:45 PM new

Actually, it's you who are pathetic, Linda. Being kicked off two good boards within one year and then failing to take responsibility for the disruption that you caused is pathetic juvenile behavior. Here, you exist only because we have no moderators.

I've tried to bring your unacceptable behavior to your attention but it appears that you just don't give a dam. You insult nearly everyone who posts here and have acquired a reputation of being obnoxious and anti-social. That's YOUR problem. Not taking responsibility for being rejected by two boards is YOUR problem. And making an attempt to smear a board is YOUR problem To be accepted you need to be more considerate of other posters and their viewpoints.




 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 09:27:14 PM new
ROFLOL.....

"disruption" to YOU and your sad ilk helen means NOT agreeing with their positions....I did NOT disrupt packy's board.


AS THREE HONEST posters there noted when they questioned the mods on my suspension. They saw NO REASON, no action on MY part that THEY felt should have warranted my being banned. AND they did note the behavior of the liberals that was AGAIN totally allowed to continue on and on WITHOUT any moderation. Except the little fat boy did get a three day suspension. For unreasonable behavior towards me on HIS part.....which those HONEST posters also acknowledged.

And no one reading ANY of my posts would EVER be able to find even ONE time I acted in ANY fashion that violated ANY of their 'rules'. NOT ONE.

What I found MOST like typical liberal behavior was when they asked the mods for clarification about what they USED against me......she locked the thread...wouldn't discuss it even with them. The MOST HONEST posters they have there.

Oh such POWER they have. It's all in their little anti-free speech minds though. tsk tsk tsk

It was a total repeat of otwa....the liberals allowed to say and act in VERY disruptive ways....say anything they wanted to say...constantly go off topic to just take jabs at me.....and get away with it. It's the LIBERAL way.

Don't worry helen....no one should be expecting YOU to see it as an honest person would. I'd sure NEVER dream you'd ever be able to be anything other than what you are....just as Spaz called you on - on otwa. He quickly had YOUR number/agenda there.

But you and I know I posted NOTHING that was disruptive....they were waiting for me - just TRYING to find a reason to use their POWERS. For a place that FALSELY claimed to 'lightly moderate'....LOL...they ALL were there just waiting. But they then acted BEFORE I'd done anything except NOT agree with their liberal positions. THAT alone is what earned my banning.

And that's another thing. I think the moderator who lives on public assistance got pissed when I spoke about those on assistance. She took it personally - I didn't direct it towards her. It's HER own SHAME not mine. But sure got her using her POWER then. LOL LOL LOL I guess when one feels as POWERLESS as she must...then being a BIG MODERATOR gives one a FALSE sense of being SO IMPORTANT.

She's STILL on public assistance but has all the time to be a moderator on a chat board. She doesn't want to work, she wants to stay home and raise her children. All on the public/taxpayer DOLE. Just like all you support helen all FREELOADERS doing, helen. tsk tsk tsk
 
 kiara
 
posted on September 16, 2007 09:38:37 PM new
Holy crap!!

TEN berserk in ONE RANT!!

LOL!!



 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 09:43:34 PM new
Kiara's RANTING?????

LOL

Anything for attention, huh kiara? LOL


 
 kiara
 
posted on September 16, 2007 10:05:51 PM new
Gotta luv it, Helen doesn't post here too often anymore but she still has the ability to say a few words now and again that send you into a mindless tizzy, Lindak.

She really got you going this time and it's telling because of all the in your lengthy response. I didn't mention the 50 or 60 words you wrote in CAPS too!!

Do you still have a monitor in each room to watch for her like you once told us?

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 16, 2007 10:52:33 PM new
No, but she's sure busy SMEARING others on the ross board these days.

She can't stop...no matter where she posts. It's just so helen. tsk tsk tsk
 
 kiara
 
posted on September 16, 2007 11:44:28 PM new
If you're so upset over what you think Helen may be doing on some other boards why don't you go there and complain direct, lindak?

By the way, YOU just smeared some that don't even post here instead of going to where they post. You just can't stop, no matter where you post.

It's just so you. tsk tsk tsk

 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 17, 2007 05:39:28 AM new


It's just so Linda, tsk tsk tsk.



All that you have done to yourself on "some other boards" should be your concern.

You hide behind the lie that you have been mistreated by Liberals when the truth is that a Conservative banned you on your last foray on another board.

You call everyone dishonest who tells you the truth because YOU can't face the truth.



 
 Helenjw
 
posted on September 17, 2007 06:23:51 AM new

LINDA states..."And that's another thing. I think the moderator who lives on public assistance got pissed when I spoke about those on assistance. She took it personally - I didn't direct it towards her. It's HER own SHAME not mine. But sure got her using her POWER then. LOL LOL LOL I guess when one feels as POWERLESS as she must...then being a BIG MODERATOR gives one a FALSE sense of being SO IMPORTANT.
She's STILL on public assistance but has all the time to be a moderator on a chat board. She doesn't want to work, she wants to stay home and raise her children. All on the public/taxpayer DOLE. Just like all you support helen all FREELOADERS doing, helen. tsk tsk tsk


Yes, That is Linda in a nutshell. An insensitive, out of control poster who should also be banned from this board, just as she was banned from the last two boards.




[ edited by Helenjw on Sep 17, 2007 06:24 AM ]
 
 desquirrel
 
posted on September 17, 2007 07:35:14 AM new
I think there should be a "sensitive" box on tax returns just like the "contribute to" boxes. That way liberals could feel good and choose to contribute to able bodied people on public assistance. My mother "raised her children" and held 2-3 jobs at the same time.

I wonder what the "sensitive" threshold is. I mean if 5% of your income enables you to be "sensitive" do you become "insensitive" at say 15%? This is kind of important because I'm trying to decide if I want to work or not. I want to make sure Helen and the gang would support me at the level I'm accustomed to.

 
 profe51
 
posted on September 17, 2007 09:26:47 AM new
Just like all you support helen all FREELOADERS doing, helen.


I nominate this for the Well Turned Phrase of the Day award.

can I get a second?

 
 profe51
 
posted on September 17, 2007 09:26:47 AM new
Just like all you support helen all FREELOADERS doing, helen.


I nominate this for the Well Turned Phrase of the Day award.

can I get a second?

 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 17, 2007 10:01:29 AM new
Sure profe, I'll second that.




 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 17, 2007 10:09:28 AM new
"All that you have done to yourself on "some other boards" should be your concern."


See helen, you and I don't see life with the same life view. I see able-bodied adults as being quite capable of taking care of themselves....NOT becoming and then enjoying being on assistance and expecting me and other taxpayers to pay their way.

I believe in a 'helping hand up'.....not a lifetime of gov., cradle to grave care that you bleeding heart liberals so support.

I haven't 'done anything to myself'. I have spoken my values on liberal boards and it hasn't met with their approval. Imo, it's their problem of not being tolerant of others...even though they CLAIM they are, most are not.

But the issue is, I'm NOT seeking their approval like you are nor do I have ANY "concern" about my actions. They've been quite appropriate.


 
 Linda_K
 
posted on September 17, 2007 10:18:08 AM new
"I think there should be a "sensitive" box on tax returns just like the "contribute to" boxes. That way liberals could feel good and choose to contribute to able bodied people on public assistance[/i]."

LOL I'd really agree with that proposal.

But as I've seen during my life, they don't want to spend their own money for these entitlements, they want to force OTHERS to pay for them. Just listen to the liberal candidates now, they can't WAIT to raise our taxes and spend even more of our money FOR us. After all, in their mind-think, we aren't responsible enough to decide how we'd like it spent. [ie: SS ownership accts.]

They believe big brother government is there to take care of every social problem that ever comes up. Like big brother has unlimited funds and we should follow the communist motto as our new American directive. They encourage gov. dependence make it too easy for too many to hop on the 'FREE RIDE' bandwagon.


 
 mingotree
 
posted on September 17, 2007 10:28:30 AM new
Greenspan Faults Bush Over Spending
Updated 10:48 PM ET September 15, 2007


By JEANNINE AVERSA and ANN SANNER

WASHINGTON (AP) - Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, in his new book, bashes President Bush for not responsibly handling the nation's spending and racking up big budget deficits.

A self-described "libertarian Republican," Greenspan takes his own party to task for forsaking conservative principles that favor small government.

"My biggest frustration remained the president's unwillingness to wield his veto against out-of-control spending," Greenspan wrote.

And he weighed in briefly but pointedly on the Iraq war: "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."

Bush took office in 2001, the last time the government produced a budget surplus. Every year after that, the government has been in the red. In 2004, the deficit swelled to a record $413 billion.

"The Republicans in Congress lost their way," Greenspan wrote. "They swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither. They deserved to lose."



In 2006, voters put Democrats in charge of Congress for the first time in a dozen years.

Greenspan's memoir, "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World," is scheduled for release Monday. The Associated Press purchased a copy Saturday at a retailer in the Washington area.

The book is a recollection of his life and his time as Fed chief.

Greenspan, 81, ran the Fed for 18 1/2 years and was the second-longest serving chief. He served under four presidents, starting with his initial nomination by Ronald Reagan.

He says he began to write the book on Feb. 1, 2006, the day his successor _ Ben Bernanke _ took over. A caption under a photo of Bernanke's swearing-in has Greenspan saying he was "very comfortable leaving the post in the hands of such an experienced successor."

The ex-Fed chief writes that he regrets the loss of fiscal discipline under Bush.

"`Deficits don't matter,' to my chagrin, became part of Republicans' rhetoric."

Greenspan long has argued that persistent budget deficits pose a danger to the economy over the long run.

At the Fed, he repeatedly urged Congress to put back in place a budget mechanism that requires any new spending increases or tax cuts to be offset by spending reductions or tax increases.

Large projected surpluses were the basis for Bush's $1.35 trillion, 10-year tax cut approved in the summer of 2001.

Budget experts projected the government would run a whopping $5.6 trillion worth of surpluses over the subsequent decade after the cuts. Those surpluses, the basis for Bush's campaign promises of a tax cut, never materialized.

"In the revised world of growing deficits, the goals were no longer entirely appropriate," Greenspan noted. Bush, he said, stuck with his campaign promises anyway. "Most troubling to me was the readiness of both Congress and the administration to abandon fiscal discipline."

Greenspan, in testimony before Congress in 2001, gave a major boost to Bush's tax-cut plan, irking Democrats.

He argued then that a tax cut could help the economy deal with sagging growth. The economy slipped into a recession in March 2001. The downturn ended in November of that year.

Surpluses quickly turned to deficits after the bursting of the stock market bubble and the 2001 recession cut into government revenues.

Government spending increased to pay for the fight against terrorism and receipts declined because of a string of tax cuts.

The Bush White House defended its fiscal policies in light of the Greenspan book.

"Clearly those tax cuts proved to be the right medicine for an ailing economy," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. The 2001 recession was a mild one.

"Tax cuts contributed a portion to early deficits, but those tax cuts accelerated growth over time," Fratto said. He added: "We're not going to apologize for increased spending to protect our national security."

Greenspan said he was surprised by the political grip that Bush exerted over his administration.

The Bush administration turned out to be different from "the reincarnation" of the Ford administration that Greenspan said he had imagined. "Now the political operation was far more dominant." Greenspan was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Ford.

Greenspan enjoyed a good relationship with Bush's predecessor, Bill Clinton, "a fellow information hound."

They also were on the same economic page. During the Clinton administration, budget deficits turned to surpluses.

Greenspan recalled a conflict with the White House when Bush's father was president. The elder Bush wanted lower interest rates and challenged Greenspan's inclination to raise them because of inflation risks.

For Bush's father, the economy was his "Achilles' heel, and as a result we ended up with a terrible relationship." The economy went into a recession in the summer of 1990 and emerged from it in the spring of 1991.

Many supporters of the elder Bush blamed Greenspan's tight-money policies for the recession that contributed to Bush's loss to Clinton.

Greenspan says in the book he does not lament the loss of America's manufacturing base.

"The shift of manufacturing jobs in steel, autos and textiles, for example, to their more modern equivalents in computers, telecommunications and information technology is a plus, not a minus, to the American standard of living," Greenspan wrote.

Greenspan's memoir includes his early years growing up in a New York City neighborhood of low-rise brick apartment buildings filled with families of Jewish immigrants, his stint as a jazz musician and his decades as a Washington policymaker.


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.







 
   This topic is 3 pages long: 1 new 2 new 3 new
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2025  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!