posted on February 14, 2001 09:57:01 AM new
Pocono,
Please re-read your post from page 1. Then submit some proof, I'll be happy to check out any allegations that can be backed up. I have seen you offer no proof.
Also....I came to this thread to post my views and to read others' views about the site. Your input does not seem to be a pro or con.......just an attack. I do not attack sites.
Coolvette,
Feel free to email me anytime: [email protected] My ill attitude is not directed at you. If you have some evidence, proof etc. it should probably go here so all may determine for themselves if there is an issue regarding ethics or associations that may be detrimental to their valued reputation. P.S. Good to C Ya!
posted on February 14, 2001 10:05:40 AM new
So now your saying, that anyone who has someone else using their user name should slander anyone else who has the same user name. Gee reminds me of the Attitude of that other much talked about auction site here.
posted on February 14, 2001 10:10:19 AM new
Pocono,
I have never been any ID but nanabees here on AW.
I have never been any ID but Nanabees on BidBay.
I have never been any ID but Nanabees on LowestBids.
I have never been any ID but wrm555 on Yahoo!Auctions.
I will not address your negative comments towards me as a person. Those who have dealt with me know that I am only trying to reach the truth and I am an honest and caring individual.
I also beleive that the discussion of a site run by a proven fraud and scammer, as proven by the OWNER of THIS SITE, should not even be permitted to be discussed here.
The users of that site should take up a collection, and pay off the CEOs AW advertising bill, since he cannot pay it himself, before the continued "free spam advertising" here is permitted to continue.
This is so plain to so many, and I know that it takes time to check out, but this joke is getting old!
posted on February 14, 2001 10:35:00 AM new
We are all users of this site. We have the right to post about this site here just like anyone else. Just because it appears that you have a hard-on for the CEO of the site doesn't mean that the rest of us should be penalized.