posted on June 17, 2001 05:32:57 PM
I upgraded my Sony Mavica FD75 three months ago with a Kodak DC215, which offers 1 megapixel. I was afraid of getting a 2.1 megapixel or higher camera because I didnt want the picture files to be too large to pull up quickly on eBay (even though I crop all of my images). Well, I am not very happy with the clarity of my pictures and am wondering if I should upgrade to a 2.1 or 3.34 megapixel camera. What are your thoughts? What models are the best?
posted on June 17, 2001 05:53:04 PM
Sony is supposed to be better than Kodak. I've heard a lot of dissatisfaction with Kodak cameras, none with Sony. Sorry I can't give you better news.
posted on June 17, 2001 05:54:54 PM
I was very unhappy about the quality with my FD75--its not even one megapixel. The Kodak has much better quality, and it extremely easy to use, but it still seems to be lacking.
posted on June 17, 2001 06:29:39 PM
I have a Fuji MX1200 and really like it. It is 1.3 mega pixels, I believe. The more pixels, the better quality picture though.
The Fuji is very easy to use. No disc to plug into computer. Just plug camera in and upload.
posted on June 17, 2001 11:40:06 PM
I have a DC215 and love it.... got rid of my Mavica. What kind of help do you need? If you'd email me I'll try to walk you thru it.
