Home  >  Community  >  The eBay Outlook  >  VERO suing Producer


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 Crystalline_Sliver
 
posted on June 29, 2001 01:48:50 AM
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010628/en/music-osborn_1.html

Nice to know that at least one VERO is doing what she's entitled to do...I think.

:\\\\\\\"Crystalline Sliver cannot be the target of spells or abilities.
 
 monkeysuit
 
posted on June 29, 2001 03:09:14 AM
Sounds to me like she's just being anal.

It's not like someone is going to buy the karaoke version INSTEAD of her licensed official recording. I just don't see where this is causing her to lose any money, unless she also has a karaoke version of her song for sale.

I would hope that she wouldn't be able to sue unless she could prove that somehow this company has harmed her by producing a karaoke version of her song.

Of course, I personally think that anyone who actually sings karaoke should be locked up, but that's just me.

 
 Crystalline_Sliver
 
posted on June 29, 2001 04:04:54 AM
The way the DMCA is "worded," she will get her lawsuit regardless.

Who's the next artist to do such a move like this??

:\\\\\\\"Crystalline Sliver cannot be the target of spells or abilities.
 
 reamond
 
posted on June 29, 2001 10:24:20 AM
She'll win the suit. The copyright is not just for the original song as performed by the artist, but there is also publishing rights to the song in any form or even its performance by another artist. Remember Whitney Houston's hit "I Will Always Love You"; Dolly Parton, the writer of that song was paid for the use of her song. Even using a part of a song requires permission and fees, as many rappers learned when they "sampled" other music and incorporated it into their songs, and had to pay.

Before recording technology, the publishing rights to music was where the money was made. Instead of buying a record, one would buy the sheet music.

There is an organization called ASCAP that collects license fees for music creators for any public performance of the creators songs. It is paid by Jukebox companies, radio stations etc.. Net broadcasters tried to say they didn't have to pay the license fee but found out differently.

 
 kidsfeet
 
posted on June 29, 2001 10:47:45 AM
monkeysuit, of COURSE it is hurting her. She is not getting paid for the use of her MUSIC. It is not just song lyrics that are copywritten. It is the music as well.

No one should have free use of the music in a sellable format, such as Karaoke. They SHOULD pay fees.

On another note, when you go to a restaurant, and the waiters/waitresses sing happy birthday, why do you think they do not sing the happy birthday song? Because it is copywritten, and is not yet in the public domain. They would have to pay FEES to sing that song in their restaurant, so they make up their own.

 
 
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2025  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!