posted on October 4, 2002 06:48:24 AM new
When you post an article regarding someone, you should see if their name is listed. Meg's name is not on the list, only the co-founder of ebay is.
posted on October 4, 2002 07:02:08 AM new
yo DUFUS COPY AND PASTE
Among those most at risk because of the report from the House Committee on Financial Services are eBay Inc.'s (NasdaqNM:EBAY - News) CEO Margaret Whitman and Yahoo Inc. (NasdaqNM:YHOO - News) co-founder Jerry Yang. Others named included Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F - News) Chairman and CEO William Clay Ford, who is the great-grandson of Ford founder Henry Ford, and Barry Sternlicht, CEO of Starwood Hotels & Restaurants Worldwide Inc. (NYSE:HOT - News).
posted on October 4, 2002 07:08:34 AM new
Can you explain better yet why I have my own ecommerce sites with good ratings with the BBB with no record of insider trading? WOW I am honored to be cancelled from ebay with the allegations coming out out on the insider trading YOU GUYS have been robbed by corporate greed...... Guess what I cant be robbed. I dont get a ebay bill anymore ))))))))) We shall see who does the best. You go the road on a ship under criminal investigation now and I will stay mine
posted on October 4, 2002 07:10:57 AM new
We will see, since I have forwarded your list of people selling illegal movies off to an U.S. Attorney for Copyright violation, we will see how goes to Jail First. Meg, or you.
posted on October 4, 2002 07:12:46 AM newsnoopnetdogI refused to inside trade hahahahahahhahahahahahahhahha
Oh, come now snoopnetdog, I think you're selling yourself short. Given your spamming practices, and the crap you sell, and the fact you've been banned from just about everywhere but here seems to indicate you do anything to make a nickel.
posted on October 4, 2002 07:28:16 AM new
I agree that I never try to agree with you either, but his guy is the acception of the rule. Used Paypal once, had problems and got a judgement and then used them again. Had problems the second time. There is a little saying that I heard once, and it applies to this guy. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Any creditability that this guy had with his first problem was lost when he had the second problem.
Also, his 5000.00 judgement was probably won not because the judge got to hear both sides of the story, but because PayPal didn't show up.