posted on March 15, 2001 01:41:33 PM new
agreed, sgtmike. however, sellers using AuctionWatch to manage their auctions are paying a fee to be screwed.
some people have to pay for it, others get it for free....
IMHO, I get more than my share!
If AW wants a piece of me, they should have asked first . No more AW for me!
posted on March 15, 2001 03:02:09 PM new
Hello sgtmike and everyone,
One thing I would just like to mention is that if you launch through AuctionWatch.com you get a better placement in the Universal Search.... not sure if you find that relative, but I did want to point it out.
This thread will be allowed to continue but just let me warn you ahead of time that AuctionWatch pays the bills here and they don't like paying for some Members to continually 'dis' them. Constructive criticism is always acceptable.
Try a little common sense and common courtesy and this thread will stay.
posted on March 15, 2001 03:41:05 PM new
Customer-oriented and progressive companies pay close attention to criticism and use it to evaluate their services, the customers' preferences, and make changes in accordance with complaints that are valid or in the majority.
Apparently, you call criticisms and opinions, "dis," a term I find unprofessional when addressing clients who put the numbers on the AW site.
If you and AW do not agree with my opinion in this thread, then counter it by showing that my hypothesis is (100%) not valid. I find your response to be one of "Take it and swallow it."
Additionally, AW does not print their own currency, so where does AW obtain their money to "..pay the bills."?
If AW is now going to assume an adverse posture regarding criticisms (opinions) of their service, the moderators are going to be quite busy.
Do what you have (want) to do. I have closed out everything but my registration; and once I settle in elsewhere, I doubt I will be interested in revisiting AW for any purpose.
In the WWW, AW would be wise to understand the value of "containment."
. No more AW for me!
chepistar