posted on October 27, 2004 01:59:41 PM newToo much booze and coke goin' through those veins
So that explains your problem.
Hey, hey Ho, ho Kerry - sign the 1-8-0
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The person who has nothing for which he is willing
to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
--John Stuart Mill
posted on October 27, 2004 04:01:59 PM new
What is so hysterical is the neocon attempts to smear Kerry, when it is their candidate who dodged Vietnam (at least Kerry volunteered and served our country in the line of fire). Kerry speaks up about some of the atrocities in Vietnam, the neocons attack that. Ironic that they attack someone who had the dignity to speak out about rape, torture, and the other atrocities that happened. Kerry simply wanted these things to end. I find it amusing that neocons attack him for this, yet, have a problem with the genocide of Jews by the Nazi's. So, can anyone tell me what the difference is here, beyond that one was done by Nazi's and the other was done by Americans? Any humane American would understand there is no difference. There is no difference between the atrocities at Abu Graib and those at concentration camps. A human being trying to stop an atrocity should be commended, not crucified.
Then we have dipsh!ts like Bear and Stonecold who can come up with nothing to defend their moron in charge, and then take stupid little personal jabs at RTers or people that happen to be standing on a stage. My point... They have nothing to stand on when it comes to defending GW and they have nothing on John Kerry.
