posted on November 8, 2005 07:19:58 AM
....and then vote the 'right' way.....Republican.
--------
A manifesto of lies
Nov 8, 2005
by David Limbaugh
[b]The following is a non-exhaustive sampling of certain important precepts one must believe, pretend to believe, or advocate in order to be in the Democratic leadership fraternity, that bizarre cadre of partisan creatures dedicated to destroying President Bush personally as an alternative to devising a coherent, politically viable policy agenda:
Nazi and Communist propagandists were on to something in teaching that if you repeat a lie -- even an outrageous one -- often enough people will begin to believe it[/b].
This principle holds true even if you are guilty of precisely the same thing as those you accuse (talking up Saddam's WMDs) and your complicity is conclusively demonstrated on audiotape and videotape.
When your obvious duplicity in this affair is illuminated by reference to the uncontroverted fact that when you made similar claims about Saddam's WMDs you had access to the same intelligence as the administration, you simply say the president pressured the intelligence community to doctor the data.
When this specious assertion is contradicted by unequivocal findings of bipartisan investigative commissions, you simply demand, with righteous indignation, more investigations.
In the meantime, you also charge that President Bush cherry-picked certain intelligence and deliberately relied on other discredited intelligence in order to bolster his case for war against Iraq. And you do that knowing that it is you who are retrospectively cherry-picking the evidence and presenting it as irrefutable proof that Bush lied.
For example, you triumphantly cite a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document dated February 2002, stating it was probable that an Al Qaeda informant had fabricated his claim that Iraq trained Al Qaeda in the use of biological and chemical weapons.
You smugly point out that since this DIA document predated, by months, public statements by President Bush and his team in which they referenced the "impeached" terrorist's claim in support of their assertion of an Iraq/Al Qaeda connection, Bush had to have lied.
What neither you nor your New York Times enablers divulge is that the CIA manifestly didn't agree with the DIA's assessment.
(According to "The Weekly Standard's" Stephen Hayes, CIA Director George Tenet, a year after the DIA report, testified to the Senate Intelligence Committee that Iraq trained Al Qaeda in document forgery, bomb making, poisons and gases.)
As another example, you figure if you obfuscate artfully enough, the public will not realize that the infamous 16-word assertion in the president's State of the Union address that the Brits learned Saddam tried to buy uranium yellowcake from Niger is as true today as when he uttered it.
When confronted with the annoying detail that Bill Clinton likewise made bold assertions about Saddam's WMDs, you shrewdly calculate that this fact can actually be twisted in your favor. After all, though Clinton knew Saddam was hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons, using them against us and distributing them to our terrorist enemies also to use against us, he chose -- in his infinite wisdom -- not to invade Iraq -- apart from his cosmetic cruise missile volleys.
And, since the Iraq War has proven to be such a delightful failure in your eyes, you declare that Clinton is vindicated for having chosen not to take out Saddam. Thus, those sour lemons are converted to lemonade.
Though you insist your foreign policy is guided both by humanitarian and national security interests, you are nevertheless unmoved by the remarkably positive developments that have occurred in Iraq as a result of our intervention. You essentially pooh pooh our deposition of the murderous dictator Saddam and even more so the Iraqi people's historic progress toward constitutional self-rule. And, despite the terrorists' single-minded focus on preventing the democratization of Iraq, you still deny it's part of the War on Terror.
The fact that we've sustained casualties apparently negates in your mind any good that has accrued, giving rise to the obvious question: Is any foreign policy cause worth dying for?
You also must conveniently ignore that no matter what 20/20 hindsight may reveal after the fact, reasonable people agree that Saddam had WMDs, used them on his own people, had a legal obligation to prove he'd disposed of them and failed to meet that burden, choosing instead to submit a 12,000-page document of lies.
You must flagrantly disregard the inconvenient, but undeniable fact that Saddam could have prevented an American attack if he'd complied with his treaties, cooperated with weapons inspectors and proven he'd disposed of his WMDs as required. By flipping us off instead, he invited the War.
You must also ignore that virtually all the world's intelligence agencies believed Saddam still had WMD stockpiles. Did Bush trick all of them, too?
You must steadfastly maintain the Libby indictment directly taints Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and the entire administration, even though Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald did not issue any indictments on underlying crimes and explicitly denied the indictment speaks to the propriety of the war.
Indeed, using liberal logic you are utterly undeterred by the lack of indictments as you clamor for a presidential "housecleaning."
Such a disingenuous, nonsensical strategy might just fool people into believing your false claims that the administration "outed" Valerie Plame to punish her "useful idiot" husband and advance your fantasy of criminalizing the war and, ultimately, impeaching President Bush.
------------
David Limbaugh is a syndicated columnist who blogs at DavidLimbaugh.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 8, 2005 07:24 AM ]
posted on November 8, 2005 07:24:40 AM
I agree with you fully Linda. I've just returned from the polls and have cast my votes for the Republican party across the board.
I would have split the vote but there wasn't anyone worth voting for on the other tickets.
posted on November 8, 2005 07:29:00 AM
Yes, it sure is here today, too.
I'll be headed out soon to go vote....hope everyone does. Doesn't do any good at all to complain about the direction our country is taking...and then not go vote.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on November 9, 2005 06:09:14 PM
Hahaha Let's keep bringing linda's FAILED sicko manifesto to the top....she may want to talk about the ELECTIONS!
Ya, know like how AHNOLD got his sleezy referendums shoved right back into his sexual predator face
posted on November 9, 2005 07:43:37 PM
shag & mingo,
All LIAR-LINDA_K could come up with about Pa. is a judge got booted. The judge was booted for supporting a pay raise for the Pa. lawmakers. Yelp, greed is getting caught up with all across the U.S.A. YES!!!
posted on November 9, 2005 08:30:43 PM
OK - I can't stand Arnold but damnit, there is no logical reason to vote down a 5 year requirement for tenure on California teachers. The kids coming out of the public schools are dumb as a rock, the teachers are a joke and not only can they note be fired after two years but about every three they decide to threwten a strike. Last time it was because they were going to have to pass proficiency tests.
How the hell do you fix a school system if you don't even have time to establish whether or not a teachers will be effective before they become unfirable?
The arguement that it would make it more difficult to attract teachers is a crock... if you are telling me there are people out there that won't enter a job unless they don't actually have to prove themselves capable then who needs them anyway? Don't we have enough skating by already?
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
An intelligent deaf-mute is better than an ignorant person who can speak.
posted on November 10, 2005 09:01:02 AM
From fascistlindaa's manifesto :
"""Nazi and Communist propagandists were on to something in teaching that if you repeat a lie -- even an outrageous one -- often enough people will begin to believe it[/b]. ""
Hmmmm, didn't bush recently say something verrry similar ?
posted on November 10, 2005 09:28:33 AM
George Bush QUOTE"
"""See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."—May 24, 2005 """
See, linda , you're RIGHT!
"""Nazi and Communist propagandists were on to something in teaching that if you repeat a lie -- even an outrageous one -- often enough people will begin to believe it[/b]. ""
Think big brave "I answer every question and nobody else does" Linda will respond ?
posted on November 10, 2005 09:38:35 AM
I agree with fenix on this one.
---------------------
But I also will never understand what Californian's didn't vote the other ones in either.
I find nothing wrong with parents being notified about their teenagers seeking an abortion. I would have supported this measure.
I would have voted for putting spending 'caps' on the CA leglislature ....they're the one's that got CA close to bankruptcy. Why not limit their spending????
I also would have voted FOR the redistricting decision making process to be taken away from the liberals in CA's Congress. And put into a third parties hands. Fair to both side that way, imo.
But just remember....the CA voters voted DOWN ALL EIGHT measures....ones the dems supported too.....NOT just the 4 Arnold was pushing.
As I've said before, CA voters get what they deserve.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on November 10, 2005 09:58:40 AM
Not quite true:
""I also would have voted FOR the redistricting decision making process to be taken away from the liberals in CA's Congress. And put into a third parties hands. Fair to both side that way, imo.""
It WOULD be fair to both sides except for the FACT that the Repugs wanted to do their own line drawing...how FAIR is THAT?
Whatsa matter...don't wanna talk about how georgie is quoting nazis ?
posted on November 10, 2005 10:17:39 AM
peepa said: "All LIAR-LINDA_K could come up with about Pa. is a judge got booted."
NOPE.....again it's your lack of ability to properly read and comprehend exactly what I did say....and that WASN'T all I came up with.
WRONG AGAIN, PEEPA!!!....as usual.
The dem judge was outed, yes. But the dems made NO GAINS....they just didn't lose their position. Because YOU cannot recognize that FACT....is your problem.
They only KEPT those two positions....they DIDN'T win them....no more advantage for the dems than they had before these two elections. NONE.
Sorry that concept is SO difficult for you to understand. However the fact that you can't....doesn't surprise me at all. It's become a pattern with you.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
