By Andrew Walden
FrontPageMagazine.com | September 19, 2006
In a clear sign of the deepening Unholy Alliance between the Democratic Party Left and Islamist extremists, Minnesota's Democratic Party has nominated for U.S. Congress a "former" member of the Nation of Islam who has defended membership in the Bloods street gang, and called cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal and leftist terrorist Sara Jane Olson "freedom fighters."
Voters in the Democratic Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), the Minnesota state affiliate of the national Democratic Party, elected Keith Ellison Hakim as their candidate to replace Minneapolis's outgoing 14-term DFL Congressman Martin Sabo in the 5th Congressional District.
"Encompassing Minneapolis and its near suburbs, the Fifth is the state's most liberal urban district and the DFL's greatest stronghold," writes the Minneapolis St. Paul City Pages. Rejecting three other well-funded and highly qualified DFL candidates, the DFL endorsed Ellison, who has dropped his Islamic name, Hakim, for the race.
The DFL is now handing its "greatest stronghold" over to a candidate with long ties to Louis Farrakhan's anti-Semitic Nation of Islam and who has already accrued at least an estimated $20,000-$35,000 in funding from the terrorist-connected Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), including the maximum personal donation from CAIR chief Nihad Awad.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
posted on November 11, 2006 08:56:24 AM new
Shut up Helen. Linda's right. Ellison has supported all of those extremists in the past.
However, one thing I would like to add in Ellison's defense, He isn't the stereotype towel head Muslim. He does come across like the typical Demomoron. The biggest problem with this guy is the fact he is a criminal. And in that district, there are more crimes in the state of Minn, than in any other area. Especially murder and drug crimes. And like the bigdopa, they do nothing but whine about why no one does anything about it. IT'S simple. You keep voting in these dopy liberal crooks.
.
.
.
"Unfortunately there are levels of Stupid that just can't be cured!!" The new Demomoron motto.
posted on November 11, 2006 09:40:08 AM new
Thank you Stonecold.....how refreshing.
You said: "And in that district, there are more crimes in the state of Minn, than in any other area."
And imo, the REASON for that is that district is the MOST LIBERAL one in all of Minn. They ALLOW it to continue because they're soft on crime.
======================
Another example for those who don't believe muslims are teaching their population and children to HATE the west, HATE America, HATE Americans.....WAKE UP...read the facts.
Read it...INFORM yourselves...learn what our Nation is fighting against.....this is some REALLY SICK stuff/belief systems.
This ISN'T ONLY the radical muslim terrorists.....it how they, AS A SOCIETY, encourage HATRED for US. We don't do that with them. And those who can't reconize the difference....are BLIND.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 11, 2006 09:56 AM ]
posted on November 11, 2006 09:58:28 AM new
And that he had CAIR financially supporting his election......when the leader of CAIR was convicted of supporting TERRORIST organizations....speaks LOUDLY to me.
Even IF it doesn't to the dems who want us to believe...they're the 'religion of peace'.
posted on November 11, 2006 10:00:55 AM new
Good link, Helen! Ya, he sounds just like O'Reilly.
Linda, no intelligent person can become informed by reading rag sheets except to realize where some like you get your wild ideas and hatred for others. No matter how many links you dig up please stop and think for a moment in time. Not all Muslims are as you portray them. For once just stop the hatred that you feel towards them all and try to take a breather.
Have you ever considered why you wish for the troops to stay in Iraq when you hate Muslims so passionately? What are the troops dying for? Why in the world would you want to bring most of the Iraqis freedom when you are so terrified of them?
posted on November 11, 2006 10:19:22 AM new
Just for the record.
kiara is the one that continually REPEATS HER LIE...that I believe it's ALL muslims.
NO WHERE have I EVER stated ALL.....it's just MORE of HER DECEPTION.
======
And the Palestinian TV, STATE OWNED station is the one putting out this hatred to ALL their citizens....encouraing THEM ALL to be suicide bombers....telling them what GREAT deeds they'd be doing.
kiara, as usual is just misinformed.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 11, 2006 10:26:37 AM new
You never distinguish, that's why Lindak. All you do is preach hatred towards them all and never once say anything good about any of them.
Anyways, it's Remembrance Day here and I have to run. More children show up each year and they learn about loving others and living together on this planet without hatred. They are our hope for the future and we should all teach them well.
posted on November 11, 2006 10:57:44 AM new
LOL....why don't I kiara....because as you have continued to mention THAT FALSEHOOD...I've repeatedly told you time and time again....you're LYING and that I've never said any such thing.
YOU however continue to imply or out and out LIE about it over and over again. I get TIRED of repeating it to you....you who can't even tell the difference between the current date and the date an article was actually WRITTEN.
It's YOUR problem....and YOUR continuing LIES that is why I don't answer.
What you see me doing is NOT hateful acts, kiara, I'm posting THEIR ACTIONS....THEIR THREATS....the HATRED they're teaching THEIR CITIZENS.
You know....the actions YOU continue to have a BLIND EYE towards....and DEFEND this SICK muslims.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 11, 2006 11:42:01 AM new
Liberal support for groups like CAIR should concern ALL Americans....not just one party. Because they're NOT working against/coming for just republicans...but rather they're working against ALL Americans.
===========
"John Conyers And The Muslim Caucus," from Investor's Business Daily, with thanks to all who sent this in:
Congress: The likely new chairman of the House Judiciary Committee says he's just fighting bigotry in leading a Democrat jihad to deny law enforcement key terror-fighting tools. But he is in the pocket of Islamists.
John Conyers, son of a leftist Detroit union activist, represents the largest Arab population in the country. His district includes Dearborn, Mich., nicknamed "Dearbornistan" by locals fed up with cultural encroachment and terror fears from a steady influx of Mideast immigrants.
Conyers, who runs an Arabic version of his official Web site, does the bidding of these new constituents and the militant Islamist activists who feed off them.
They want to kill the Patriot Act and
...prevent the FBI from profiling Muslim suspects in terror investigations.
They also want to end the use of undisclosed evidence against suspected Arab terrorists in deportation proceedings.
And the 77-year-old Conyers has vowed to deliver those changes for them.
"The policies of the Bush administration have sent a wave of fear through our immigrant communities and targeted our Arab and Muslim neighbors," he growls.
He'll soon be in a position to act on his promises. And he has the full backing of the expected speaker of the House. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wants to criminalize FBI and Customs Service profiling of Muslim terror suspects.
"Since Sept. 11, many Muslim Americans have been subjected to searches at airports and other locations based upon their religion and national origin," she said. "We must make it illegal."
Conyers, a lawyer by trade, last decade pushed through a bill to help stop what he called "DWB," driving while black. He dubs post-9/11 profiling "flying while Muslim."
Pelosi has also promised Muslims she'll "correct the Patriot Act," one of the most valuable tools the FBI has in ferreting out jihadist cells lurking in Muslim communities.
Conyers is one of the top recipients of donations from the Arab-American Leadership PAC.
And not surprisingly, he has a long history of pandering to Arab and Muslim voters.
During the first Gulf War, for instance, Conyers fought FBI outreach efforts in the Arab and Muslim community in Detroit that were designed to gather intelligence on potential cells and protect the home front.
Conyers and other Detroit-area Democrats at the time, David Bonior and John Dingell, threatened to hold hearings unless the FBI stopped counterterrorism interviews.
The FBI met with them privately to explain the national security benefits of outreach, but could not allay their concerns. In the end, the FBI backed off. Today, Hamas, Hezbollah and the al-Qaida-tied Muslim Brotherhood are all active in the area.
Expect Conyers and Pelosi to kick open the doors of Congress to Islamists from the Council on American-Islamic Relations and other militant groups.
They will have unfettered access, even though many of their leaders have been tied to terrorism (some CAIR officials have landed in the big house).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 11, 2006 11:49 AM ]
posted on November 11, 2006 12:41:44 PM new
While I don't have my head in the sand and realize there are terrorist in this world who want to harm Americans, I do not believe that we have to hate/be afraid of everyone who is of Muslim faith. History has shown that all nationalities, faiths, ethnicities have their "fanatics"--there's the KKK, Nazi's, Spanish Inquisition,Idi Amin---I could go on forever. Does this mean we have to get rid of all Germans, Catholics, Southerners, Africans? What I am trying to say is, we need to be mindful of danger, but whipping people into a frenzy of hate results in the Holocaust, the genocide in Darfur and the like.
posted on November 11, 2006 04:52:54 PM new
There are those who say in words that they hate, and then there are those who show it in their actions and attitudes towards others. Linduh, you would fall under the second group.
posted on November 11, 2006 05:34:13 PM new
Speaking for myself, I have a fine grasp of the English language, thank you. You don't have to actually use the word hate to show your hatred. If an American of Muslim faith wins an election, why is his religion even discussed? I know it is tiresome, talking to all us idiots, but in AMERICA there is room for all religions, opinions and political affiliations.
posted on November 11, 2006 05:41:42 PM new
You live in a constant state of confusion, rusty.
You're in denial of the world around you. And you're confused about just who the 'hateful' people are. It's not me...and it's NOT Americans. It's muslims.
Just like it WAS Germany that wanted to destroy...just like it was Japan that bombed us...just like it was AQ that gave us 9-11...and all the previous bombings and murders of our countrymen.
Yep....they dont 'hate' at all. Least we never hear that coming out of YOUR mouth.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 11, 2006 05:45:12 PM new
LOL why is it even discussed????
Oh...have you not been reading ALL the mention of our Presidents beliefs. LOL LOL Have you not been hearing him being SLAMMED by the left for his belief in God?
Or are you like most at otwa....freedom of speech is NOT allowed?
In this muslims case...because HIS campaign was FUNDING but CAIR....whose LEADER was CONVICTED of supporting terrorism.
That's ONE great reason to discuss HIS religious ties.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 11, 2006 06:59:04 PM new
Linda- The President's religious beliefs are not an issue and are "slammed" only by idiots----except when they bleed into his Presidential decisions and influence. That's a no-no. Regarding Ellison,there are more things about him that bother me than his religion.
posted on November 11, 2006 08:38:30 PM new...and it's NOT Americans. It's muslims.
So I guess this means if you're Muslim, you're by definition not American. I thought you had to be American to get elected to Congress.....silly me.
Now Linda will accuse me of saying she said something she didn't say. Watch.....
____________________________________________
Grow your own Dope. Plant a Republican.
[ edited by profe51 on Nov 11, 2006 08:38 PM ]
posted on November 12, 2006 03:22:29 PM new
coincoach -
Linda- The President's religious beliefs are not an issue and are "slammed" only by idiots
then you are calling most ALL our liberal posters here...and on several other OAI boards..."idiots". Because that's exactly what they've been doing for the past 6 years. ALL THE TIME.
----except when they bleed into his Presidential decisions and influence. That's a no-no.
No, I don't agree. Show me where in our Constitution it says ANY American, including our Presidents can't mention their personal religious convictions...or CAN'T/aren't allowed to make their own decisions on their own personal ethics/religious beliefs. It doesn't say it anywhere in there.
Freedom of religion ALLOWS us to speak out about our religions anywhere and everywhere we please. NO restrictions on it in our Constitution.
IF you disagree please show me where it is LIMITED in ANY way, shape or form.
Regarding Ellison,there are more things about him that bother me than his religion.
Well...that what's so nice about living in a diversified Nation. We can ALL feel and form our OWN minds. I don't have to agree with the fact it doesn't bother you MORE....and you don't have to disagree with me that it bothers ME MOST.
Other things about him bother me too. But him being a RADICAL MUSLIM...whose campaign was FUNDED by CAIR, an organization KNOWN to be led by TERRORIST SUPPORTERS.....bother ME most.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 12, 2006 03:29:25 PM new
Yes, profe, silly you. Just as YOU said.
I think most thinking adults KNOW that not all immigrants are American's.
So...maybe you can prove all or most of the muslims, muslim radicals like the hamas and other known terrorists groups living in this newly elected muslim's district ARE American's?????
I seriously doubt it.
And besides that....when I said to rustygumbo, "And you're confused about just who the 'hateful' people are. It's not me...and it's NOT Americans. It's muslims.".....I was talking about the muslims in the ME....like the article I posted on the Palistinian TV stations preaching HATE towards us....and encouraging their men, women and CHILDREN to become PROUD to be suicide bombers....MURDERERS, profe.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 12, 2006 03:34 PM ]
posted on November 12, 2006 04:04:46 PM new
Linda, The President's religious beliefs are not the problem. Few people would criticize his personal religious beliefs. I am talking about when his religious beliefs are the basis for his governmental decisions or for influencing legislation---I think you knew what I meant. We are supposed to have separation of church and state in this country in order to have the freedom to believe what we wish. Suppose we had a Jewish President and he/she decided that governmental offices would be closed on Friday and Saturday according to his religious beliefs. Would that be ok? Suppose we had a Mormon President and he decided to tithe 10% of every American's income, according to his religious tradition. Would that be ok? As long as religion does not affect the workings of our government, we are free to worship in whichever way we choose.
posted on November 12, 2006 07:01:26 PM newI think most thinking adults KNOW that not all immigrants are American's.
Most thinking adults also KNOW that not all Muslims are immigrants Linda. You'd be hard pressed to prove that even MOST Muslims are immigrants.
Far as the "silly me" goes...facetiousness completely escapes you doesn't it? You'll use whatever you can get your bigoted hands on against anybody, won't you?
____________________________________________
Grow your own Dope. Plant a Republican.
posted on November 12, 2006 07:50:40 PM new
coincoach - AGAIN....you have not provided me with any proof of where it says in our Constitution ANYTHING about 'separation of church and state'.. We ALL know the history of jeffersons LETTER...and it was NEVER made part of our Bill of Rights...NOR our Constitution.
It's a LIBERAL concept....that even jefferson COULDN'T convince the signers of our Const. to put it in there.
And most ethical people DO make life decisions according to their own personal/ethical/religious or not views on life.
To say differently is to not live in reality. It's a fact of life. Not all politician are like the phoney kerry....who pretends he believes he abides by HIS catholic faith....when he doesn't. His own church as scolded him several times. He's a joke to other catholics who DO follow their religious beliefs....as MOST honorable people do.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 12, 2006 07:55:11 PM new
And when YOU call yourself/say you are silly to me....why get upset with me?
You could have chosen to not be sarcastic....you didn't.
So...I'll admit I think you're MUCH worse that silly.
I believe that you and other liberals who are constantly calling those of us who point OUT to others....the ACTIONS/plans/goals of OUR ENEMIES names....are blind/stupidly blind.
So....defend away....call me all sorts of names. Tell me what a 'hater' and a 'bigot' I am.
I couldn't care less what ANY liberal/progressive/socialist calls me...because I know it's not true.
I know I'm ONLY pointing out the THREAT that people with their EYES open can see their goals for us....for our nation.
So you all defend them all you want. The news will continue pointing out those who ARE WORKING AGAINST Americas best interests.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on November 13, 2006 08:09:04 AM new
coincoach - THESE are YOUR statements to which I have been referring:
"Linda- The President's religious beliefs are not an issue and are "slammed" only by idiots----except when they bleed into his Presidential decisions and influence. That's a no-no."
And - "I am talking about when his religious beliefs are the basis for his governmental decisions or for influencing legislation---"
Am I'm taking the position that ALL our Presidents cannot help but have their own personal religious beliefs form the decisions they make.
Of course, I would NEVER expect an atheists, agnostic or any secular person to be able to grasp that concept.....but just as president carter said....they do....he did. He still does.
Just as the muslim faith believes this is a RELIGIOUS war....against the western Christians....and they include ALL Americans in that. Not just republicans...or republican presidents.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
This topic is 6 pages long: 1new2new3new4new5new6new
