posted on November 19, 2006 11:16:49 AM new
Recommends he bombs HANOI, mine HAIPHONG harbor, and then get on their knees & PRAY FOR FORGIVENESS??? (...wait a minute here...where's Gen Haig? Where's Chuck "I'd drive my car over my grandmother for Nixon" Colson? Where's Danny "I made Muskie cry" Sagretti?)
posted on November 19, 2006 11:43:05 AM new
Maybe you just TOOK that MSM article in that fashion....tom.
From what I read on a conservative site....he meant we need to do more to win than we're doing now, on the ground.
But I sure didn't take it as 'stabbing him in the back'....nope, not ONE bit. That's HYPE.
I did read that Kissinger said we probably couldn't win militarily. But for the past two years or so....he's very much been supportive of the actions this administration has taken.
edited to add: And imo, he still is saying exactly what this Presidents been saying all along would happen IF we did as the dems were insisting we do.
"But Kissinger, an architect of the Vietnam war who has advised President Bush about Iraq, warned against a rapid withdrawal of coalition troops, saying it could destabilize Iraq's neighbors and cause a long-lasting conflict."
"A dramatic collapse of Iraq - whatever we think about how the situation was created _ would have disastrous consequences for which we would pay for many years and which would bring us back, one way or another, into the region," he said."
I'm looking forward to see how the NEW dem congress handles NK, Iran and Iraq.
We're at war.
Hopefully enough of them will side with America against our enemies...and not be like the radical 'admit defeat and run away' crowd of liberals.
I fear for the future of our Nation under a congress full of dems. But from what I'm reading many of the newly elected dems are 'further right' than some of our republicans were.
So...I'm hopeful those who LOVE America....will defend her....not give the terrorist another win...like they did to the VN communists.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 19, 2006 11:46 AM ]
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 19, 2006 11:52 AM ]
posted on November 19, 2006 12:16:16 PM new
Again, peepa you show your IGNORANCE of the facts.
Just recently when the agenda of the newly in power dems was discussed....
..
it was THEY who want to take the 'border fence' out again. THEY who are discussion NOT funding it.
Just as they have OBSTRUCTED most plans this President and his administration HAVE put into place ANYWAY. They have FOUGHT most of it.
Homeland security
The Patriot Act
and yes, even when the house didn't want to give illegals ANY sort of amnesty program...the dems fought that tooth and nail also.
PLEASE get informed before you continue to show us all how little you actually know about what's happening in WA.
edited to add:
The dems have wanted to give our enemies OUR constitution rights.
The dems have fought against this administration watching for calls between muslim Americans who are calling TERRORISTS in other Nations.
They have done NOTHING to protect this Nation...they're more interested in our enemies and THEIR rights...than they are about defending/protecting America .
~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 19, 2006 12:19 PM ]
