posted on April 27, 2007 09:07:17 PM new
Eight demos flapping their jaws, with no new message or plan of their own are now empowering terrorism world wide.
Democrat debate 'victory for Iraqi insurgents'
Terrorists say anti-war statements moment of glory for global 'resistance movements'
Posted: April 27, 2007
1:24 p.m. Eastern
TEL AVIV – Democratic presidential hopefuls flashing their anti-war credentials last night at a national debate by stating they would immediately withdraw from Iraq, encouraged Palestinian terrorist leaders here, who labeled the debate a victory for Iraqi insurgents and "resistance movements" throughout the world.
The debate was widely covered today by the Palestinian and pan-Arab media.
"We see Hillary (Clinton) and other candidates are competing on who will withdraw from Iraq and who is guilty of supporting the Iraqi invasion. This is a moment of glory for the revolutionary movements in the Arab world in general and for the Iraqi resistance movement specifically," said Abu Jihad, one of the overall leaders of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror organization.
I think democrats will do good if they will withdraw as soon as they are in power," he said.
Abu Jihad said he believes if elected to the White House, the Democrats will immediately order a withdrawal from Iraq. He warned if a retreat is not carried out, the U.S. will likely be attacked on the home front.
"The (Democrat) debate showed that like in Vietnam the American people needed these thousands of soldiers killed to see that invading other people will always result in a failure. ... I think the Democrats will win and apply an immediate withdrawal, but if they don't (withdraw), the revolutionary movements in Iraq will intensify attacks, and I think you should prepare for another big attack in the U.S."
Abu Nasser Aziz, the deputy commander of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in the northern West Bank, told WND last night's Democrat primary debate proved "the invasion of Iraq was judged by Allah to be a failure. America needs to stop letting its foreign policy be dictated by the Zionists and the Zionist lobby. The Democrats understand this point and want to prevent this scenario."
Abu Aziz said it was "very good" there are "voices like Hillary and others who are now attacking the Iraq invasion."
"I think the more Americans receive the bodies of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, the more the conservatives in the U.S. will be sentenced to be thrown in the garbage," he said.
Abu Muhammad, a leader of the Islamic Jihad terrorist group in northern West Bank city of Telkerem, said he believes both the Democrats and Republicans are controlled by Israel but said he thinks the Democrats are better for his group's interests.
"They will keep supporting Israel, but, yes, I think the Democrats are preferred and have a bigger chance of withdrawing from Iraq and making deals with Iran and Syria."
Islamic Jihad and the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades took joint responsibility for every suicide bombing in Israel the past two years. Both terrorist groups regularly carry out shootings and rocket attacks against Jewish civilian population centers.
At the televised primary debate last night, Democrat presidential hopefuls heaped criticism on President Bush's Iraq war policy.
"The first day, I would get us out of Iraq by diplomacy," said New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, one of eight rivals on the debate stage.
"If this president does not get us out of Iraq, when I am president, I will," pledged Sen. Clinton.
"We are one signature away from ending this war," declared Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.
He said if Bush won't change his mind about vetoing a bill requiring troop withdrawal, Democrats need to work on rounding up enough Republican votes to override him.
In addition to Obama and Clinton, Sens. Joe Biden of Delaware and Chris Dodd of Connecticut also cast votes in favor of Iraqi withdrawal legislation.
Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, who together with Clinton and others voted to authorize the Iraq war, apologized for his earlier support and said he wanted to see a withdrawal.
In November, WND conducted a series of exclusive interviews in which prominent Middle East terrorist leaders said they hoped Americans would sweep the Democrats into power because of the party's position on withdrawing from Iraq.
The terrorists told WND an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are "tired." They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.George S. Patton
posted on April 27, 2007 09:34:31 PM new
Read several different articles and transcripts from that first dem debate.
Pretty darn sad when everyone that at this point wants to be CIC and in control of the WH is gutless....and wants to give our AQ terrorist enemies a victory.
Hard to believe that in America we've reached this position.
Hopefully when the republican debates come about....within a couple of weeks I believe....we'll see some with optimism and a positive outlook for our war against terrorism...not this liberal defeatism we're seeing from ALL their candidates.
Some articles said obama was far superior to hillary.....that she look like old baggage compared to him.
But then he has almost NO experience...and he's a radical liberal. How will America fare under his leadership? Heaven only knows.
Kucinich made a fool of himself, I read. Jumping with joy and trying to make the others look like the flip-floppers they are in regards to this war - because he didn't vote for it or for funding it like they did - and they continue to do.
Not any difficult questions asked of them really. They just tried to beat one another at putting out the WHITE FLAG of SURRENDER for America before the other one did.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on April 28, 2007 02:49:39 PM newHopefully when the republican debates come about....within a couple of weeks I believe....we'll see some with optimism
I have heard the Republicans will not even be allowing all their candidates to speak at the Republican Debate. It will just be the front runners - McCain, Romney and Rudy.
So much for free speech or do the Republicans do not even want to waste the public's time with the rest of their looser candidates.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on April 28, 2007 03:07:19 PM new
If the terrorists are ecstatic over the Democrats they must be in Nirvana over the terrorist breeding ground that bushit created in Iraq.
posted on April 28, 2007 06:56:55 PM new
ld said: "I have heard the Republicans will not even be allowing all their candidates to speak at the Republican Debate. It will just be the front runners - McCain, Romney and Rudy. So much for free speech"......
That's what you heard, huh, ld???
From what liberal source that only gave you PART of the story.
Or gave you the FULL info. but you decided to only post PART of the story.
ld....always distorting the FACTS. ====
All 10 Republican candidates will be participating in the first Republican debate next Thursday at the Reagan Library in California.
The Associated Press.
====
Now Fox News, the one the liberals always WHINE about....at least gives the FULL story.
posted on April 29, 2007 06:08:33 AM newld....always distorting the FACTS.
Did you read the entire article Linda?
You cherry picked the one sentence out of the article that fits in with your view.
I guess you need to follow the story a little more closer.
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Fox News will have a say in deciding which Republican presidential candidates participate in next month's debate in South Carolina.
State Party chairman Katon Dawson and a spokesman for the news channel said Thursday that they had agreed on a criteria, including polling numbers, for choosing which of the 10 GOP candidates will take part in the May 15 debate.
"We understand there's not room for everybody on a nationwide political stage for a Republican debate," Dawson said.
Marty Ryan, executive producer of political programming for Fox News Channel, said the polling criteria would ensure "that serious candidates were taking part in our debate."
The party sent a letter to the candidates saying they must have filed papers establishing an exploratory committee or full-blown candidacy and paid the fees associated with the state primary.
They also must have "garnered at least 1 percent in recent state and national polls leading up to the registration deadline, as determined by Fox News Channel and the South Carolina Republican Party," according to Rob Godfrey, the state party's communications director
In a variety of national and state polls, seven of the 10 candidates hover around 1 percent or less. Only Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney easily meet the criteria based on polling.
The standard has the potential to bar several candidates from the debate and anger the lesser-known GOP hopefuls.
Dawson said the criteria was jointly developed so "we wouldn't have people who were just willing to pay a filing fee and think that they could show up and be on the stage. There are a lot of people who would like to be able to vent their special interests on a presidential stage."
"If you're not in the poll number and you haven't met the criteria, no, you won't be able to get on the stage," he said.
State parties run the presidential primary balloting in early voting South Carolina. Presidential hopefuls must file with the state GOP and pay their primary entry fee by May 1 to qualify to participate in the May 15 debate in Columbia. Giuliani was the first to do so last week. McCain did so on Thursday.
All 10 Republican candidates will be participating in the first Republican debate next Thursday at the Reagan Library in California.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
Unlike what you ALWAYS do....just giving part of ANY post you make.
You were caught....once again.
I don't ever expect you to admit it....but I'll point it out each and every time to try to DISTORT what you heard. LOL LOL LOL
=================
Terrorists ecstatic with dem debate:
And why wouldn't they be. The dems let them get away with MURDER [literally] during the whole clinton administration.
carter let Iran hold our hostages 444 days...and didn't do a darn thing.
Now we have ALL of the dem candidates saying they'll ADMIT DEFEAT and take our troops out.....they can't wave that WHITE FLAG OF SURRENDER quick enough.
That's who American want in power to DEFEND our nation????
Gawd, I sure hope not.
We just need to REMIND voters what the clinton administration ALLOWED to happen because HE didn't have the courage to take action.
So much for helen and her ilk's 'diplomacy' with terrorists.
====
Terrorism Against U.S.
1993 World Trade Center bombing (1 mth into Clinton's first term)
1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia (Clinton)
1996 al-Khobar towers bombing (Clinton)
1998 bombing of US embassies in Africa (Clinton)
2000 bombing of the USS Cole (Clinton)
========
2001 attack on World Trade Center (8 mths into Bush's first term)
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on April 29, 2007 01:24:58 PM newI cherry picked?
Yes, you did.
This was my original post:
I have heard the Republicans will not even be allowing all their candidates to speak at the Republican Debate. It will just be the front runners - McCain, Romney and Rudy. So much for free speech or do the Republicans do not even want to waste the public's time with the rest of their looser candidates.
All of which was can be found in the article you gave the link to. It was the same article I based my statement above on.
My statement: I have heard the Republicans will not even be allowing all their candidates to speak at the Republican Debate. It will just be the front runners - McCain, Romney and Rudy.
From the article: In a variety of national and state polls, seven of the 10 candidates hover around 1 percent or less. Only Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney easily meet the criteria based on polling.
The standard has the potential to bar several candidates from the debate and anger the lesser-known GOP hopefuls.
Are you so stupid that you can't tell I said the same thing as the article. You avoided everything in the article except the last sentence. Furthermore, I stated a Republican debate was only going to have the top 3 candidates, not all of them. This article proved my point. I did not say it was going to be the FIRST DEBATE.
Linda: I provided the WHOLE story....unlike you.
You provided a link to an article which you obviously did not read. If you did read the entire article you would have noticed my facts were correct.
Linda: Unlike what you ALWAYS do....just giving part of ANY post you make.
The only thing you provided as proof that I was wrong was the last sentence of the article because it attempted to prove your argument. Which it did not. Again It was you that cherry picked the article to find a sentence that supposed backed your claim.
[i]but I'll point it out each and every time to try to DISTORT what you heard.{/i]
I think it is time for you to go the doctor because that brain tumor growing inside you head is effecting any reasoning you might have. You can't even take the information that was provided in the article above and process what was written.
You are the one that constantly manipulates what you THINK YOU READ and WHAT YOU THINK YOU HEARD and distorts it.
ONCE AGAIN LINDA THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES. YOU ARE DEAD WRONG
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
even when PROOF is provided you can't accept that it was YOUR WORD against the FULL STORY.
THat's your problem LD.
I gave the date of the FULL republican debate....with ALL the candidates...that came from the Assoc. Press.
Then I also gave the link so that the ADULTS here could read for themselves the FULL story.......not just the part you HEARD.
LOL
You can't admit as usual you only give PART OF THE STORY.....not all of it.
NOR did you mention that you'd HEARD LOL when they'd be having their FIRST republican debate.
NO, you DISTORTED THE FACTS - said outright the republicans must be against free speech...didn't want their 'losers' to be heard.
And all that was a CROCK and you know it.
get real for once.
AND re-read your OWN misinformation.
"I have heard the Republicans will not even be allowing all their candidates to speak at the Republican Debate. It will just be the front runners - McCain, Romney and Rudy."
"So much for free speech or do the Republicans do not even want to waste the public's time with the rest of their looser candidates."
================
And here's what the DELUSIONAL ld took for me 'cherry picking'. LOL LOL LOL
"All 10 Republican candidates will be participating in the first Republican debate next Thursday at the Reagan Library in California[/b]".
The Associated Press.
====
Now Fox News, the one the liberals always WHINE about....at least gives the FULL story.
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Apr26/0,4670,FoxNewsGOPDebate,00.html
NO distortions there from liberals.
[ edited by linda_K on Apr 29, 2007 02:21 PM ]
posted on April 29, 2007 04:28:02 PM new
"I have heard the Republicans will not even be allowing all their candidates to speak at the Republican Debate. It will just be the front runners - McCain, Romney and Rudy."
What do you not understand.
We are not talking about the debate in CALIFORNIA. My original statement were in reference to the debate in South Carolina.
Are you that retarded that you can not even follow what is stated in the article?
Fox News will have a say in deciding which Republican presidential candidates participate in next month's debate in South Carolina.
They also must have "garnered at least 1 percent in recent state and national polls leading up to the registration deadline, as determined by Fox News Channel and the South Carolina Republican Party,"
In a variety of national and state polls, seven of the 10 candidates hover around 1 percent or less. Only Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney easily meet the criteria based on polling.
The standard has the potential to bar several candidates from the debate and anger the lesser-known GOP hopefuls.
If you can not even follow the argument here, your reading comprehension skills are very poor.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on April 29, 2007 04:34:27 PM newThen I also gave the link so that the ADULTS here could read for themselves the FULL story.......not just the part you HEARD
The part I heard (read) was stated in the article and I have outlined and supported it from the article itself.
It is you that needs an adult to slowly explain it to you in some language that you understand because you obviously do not understand a word of English.
You can't admit as usual you only give PART OF THE STORY.....not all of it.
The only part of the article you focused on was the last sentence that mentioned the first debate in California. YOU IGNORED THE REST OF THE ARTICLE.
NOR did you mention that you'd HEARD LOL when they'd be having their FIRST republican debate.
Again I was not referring to the first debate so get over it. All the other information in the article backs up what I said. You still can't admit that your party doesn't even care about all the candidates running for cheerleader in chief.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on April 30, 2007 05:00:57 PM new
You still don't get it Linda
You still can't see the fact there were two debates. One in which all 10 will speak and one in which the top three will speak - all which is backed up in the article you posted.
You are so freaking dense. It is the same logic that you continue to use about the reality of what is happening in Iraq.
Once you get your brain tumor removed, maybe one day you will think straight.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
But that explains why you believe bushit....he's the biggest terrorist !
