Home  >  Community  >  The Vendio Round Table  >  Senate Rejects Bill To Cut Off War Funds


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 Linda_K
 
posted on May 16, 2007 08:32:05 AM new
As I've said before....they're gutless. All talk no action. They continue to make promises they won't support. Not enough radical liberals willing to sell America out.


Senate Rejects Iraq Funding Cut Off Bill

May 16 11:13 AM US/Eastern
By ANNE FLAHERTY
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate on Wednesday rejected legislation that would cut off money for combat operations in Iraq after March 31, 2008

.
The vote was a loss for Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., and other Democrats who want to end the war. But the effort picked up support from members, including presidential hopefuls previously reluctant to limit war funding—an indication of the war's unpopularity among voters.

The proposal lost 29-67 on a procedural vote, falling 41 votes short of the necessary votes to advance.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a Democratic presidential front-runner, previously opposed setting a deadline on the war. But she said she agreed to back the measure "because we, as a united party, must work together with clarity of purpose and mission to begin bringing our troops home and end this war."

Sen. Barack Obama, another leading 2008 prospect, said he would prefer a plan that offers more flexibility but wanted "to send a strong statement to the Iraqi government, the president and my Republican colleagues that it's long past time to change course."

The proposal had been expected to fall short of the 60 votes needed to advance under Senate rules, but was intended to gauge the tolerance of members on anti-war legislation. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid staged a series of war votes Wednesday to inform negotiations with the House on a war spending bill.

"We stand united.... in our belief that troops are emeshed in an intractable civil war," said Reid, D-Nev.


"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"

"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."

Ann Coulter
 
 ST0NEC0LD613
 
posted on May 17, 2007 10:23:41 AM new
The proposal lost 29-67 on a procedural vote, falling 41 votes short of the necessary votes to advance.

So what you are saying is, there are 12 Dems that actually understand what war is really about?

.
.
.
If it's called common sense, why do so few Demomorons have it?


Are YOU a Bunghole?

Take the bunghole quiz here.
http://www.idiotwatchers.com/bunghole/index.html
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on May 17, 2007 10:26:56 AM new
We can only hope.
 
 
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2026  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!