Linda_K
|
posted on June 3, 2007 10:54:18 PM new
lol.....that ought to irk a few liberals here.....who have often claimed we AREN'T any safer.
just remember when voting....hillary disagrees with YOU.
from the WApost:
Blog | Meet Chris Cillizza | RSS Feed (What's RSS?)
Clinton and Edwards Disagree on U.S. Security
The Democratic debate opens with former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) disagreeing about whether or not the United States was safer than we were on the day of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Former Sen. John Edwards answers a question during the Democratic presidential primary debate. (AP Photo)Edwards reiterated his allegation that the global war on terror was nothing more than a "bumper sticker" adding: "What this global war on terror bumper sticker was intended to do was for George Bush to justify everything he did."
Clinton referenced her experience as a senator from New York during the terrorist attacks before politely disagreeing with Edwards. "I believe we are safer than we were. We are not yet safe enough."
-- Chris Cillizza
===================================
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack." 
Ann Coulter
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 3, 2007 11:06:00 PM new
Then today there was also disagreement on just 'whose' war this is. LOL LOL LOL
Even your own party candidates don't agree that it's Bush's war.
from reuters:
This war belongs to the Democratic Party because the Democrats were put in charge by the people in the last election with the thought that they were going to end the war," said Kucinich.
Gravel said: "It's the Democrats' war also" and argued that anyone who had originally voted to authorize the conflict ought to get out of the race. "That disqualifies them for presidenthe insisted.
Then according to the same reuter's article....
Edwards found himself defending an argument he has been making that the war on terrorism is simply political propaganda, a bumper sticker slogan pushed by the Bush administration.
=================
Yep any idiot who believes we are not at war with terrorism should NEVER be elected CIC. They need HELP.
============
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
|
classicrock000
|
posted on June 4, 2007 05:01:37 AM new
Being this A-hole was a former ambulance chaser,its funny that he used the term "bumper sticker"....I've bet he's seen a lot of those his his time..........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 07:34:06 AM new
with his OWN name on them. yep.
|
mingotree
|
posted on June 4, 2007 07:35:28 AM new
linduh, just remember when voting....YOU agree with Hillary 
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 08:00:29 AM new
Loved this statement on
Power Line:
"Edwards got the first crack at telling the audience what he'd do in his initial 100 days as president. He replied that he would tour the world in order to re-establish America's moral leadership, by talking about our values such as diversity.That's a good answer if you're running for Miss America, but not if you're running for president as an anti-war candidate."
==================================
LOL...maybe THAT'S why he's always fussing with his hair. LOL
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 09:09:50 AM new
The beginning of the 'gloves coming off' between the different democratic candidates.
http://www.washtimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20070604-123002-6666r
And we're still 17 months away from the election. Like they did in 2004, I expect the dems vs the wacko liberals will really get down and dirty with one another in the not too distant future.
It has already begun...and this quickly too. tsk tsk tsk
==============================
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
|
classicrock000
|
posted on June 4, 2007 10:59:41 AM new
yea but its nice watching them tear the sh*t out of each other LOL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
|
Helenjw
|
posted on June 4, 2007 11:06:51 AM new
" Clinton was very much the Party unifier last night. She refused to allow Blitzer (or her colleagues) to define the issues in ways that would divide the party — with one major exception, which I’ll come back to. But first look at this framing:
Everybody on this stage, we are all united, Wolf. We all believe that we need to try to end this war. In two nights you’re going to have the Republican candidates here. They all support the war. They all support the president. They all supported the escalation. Each of us is trying in our own way to bring the war to an end. . . .
And I think it’s important particularly to point out; This is George Bush’s war. He is responsible for this war. He started the war. He mismanaged the war. He escalated the war. And he refuses to end the war.
And what we are trying to do, whether it’s by speaking out from the outside or working and casting votes that actually make a difference from the inside, we are trying to end the war. . . .
The differences among us are minor. The differences between us and the Republicans are major. And I don’t want anyone in America to be confused.
|
Helenjw
|
posted on June 4, 2007 11:12:27 AM new
Democratic Debate
[ edited by Helenjw on Jun 4, 2007 11:13 AM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 11:16:11 AM new
I'm loving it too, classic. Just as I did in 2004 when they attacked each other. And it will ONLY get worse as their, [currently] three front runners go after each others blood as we get closer to the election.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 11:17:59 AM new
lol
well....helen shows us the link for her site.....crooks and liars. LOL LOL
Feel right at home there, do you helen????
I;m surprised they let you join their group.
lol lol
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 11:30:25 AM new
video of edwards and his sorry answer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3xycNwLLG8
He also attacked hillary and obama for voting FOR funding the war....when they're supposedly against it. lol
What they are is typical liberal politicians....say one thing to the voters....but actually vote differently. lol
====================
obama SMACKS edwards.....with a wonderful previous video of edwards supporting the war
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4x_KnWEDjs
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jun 4, 2007 11:33 AM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 4, 2007 04:54:56 PM new
Also wanted to mention that ONLY ONE democratic candidate thinks we should make English our official language.
Even though an overwhelming majority of American's want to see it that way.
The LONE dem who does believe English should be our official language:
Mike Gravel
How American.....NOT!!!
===============================
And I agree with Newt's statement on this issue:
"Restoring 'Government of the People': Making English the Official Language of the United States
The opposition in Congress to making English the official language of the United States is a near perfect example of the failure of the current leadership in Washington to adopt a deeply held value of the American people. Eighty-five percent of Americans want the federal government to join with 30 states in making English the official language of the United States, and yet our elites consider the adoption of this value as a distraction or worse.
Consider last night's Democratic presidential debate. When asked for a show of hands, former Alaskan Sen. Mike Gravel was the only candidate to express support for English. Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said that the question "is designed precisely to divide us" and that "when we get distracted by those kinds of questions, I think we do a disservice to the American people." If 85% of Americans support English as the official language of government, the only division is between Sen. Obama and the American people.
New York Sen. Hillary Clinton responded that she supported English as the "national" language but not the "official" language of the United States, since making English the official language would prevent the printing of foreign language ballots for U.S. elections.
It seems that only liberals can possibly see 85% support for a deeply held American value as divisive and only liberals think it is acceptable to express support for English as long as it does not actually have any meaning, such as ending the printing of foreign language ballots for U.S. elections.
"
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jun 4, 2007 05:08 PM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 5, 2007 12:12:16 PM new
hillary explains that her faith got her through old slick willies long run of girlfriends during their marriage.
edwards speaks of his faith.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070605/D8PIHNN81.html
I'm just so sure that their professions of their faith, to their God, will not get all the negative, liberal MSM attention that that of this President's have.
lol
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
|
MINGOTREE
|
posted on June 5, 2007 04:43:42 PM new
classicrock000
posted on May 25, 2007 07:55:40 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paybacks are a #*!@.
Now...back to talking to yourself in SEVERAL threads.
LOL LOL LOL
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 5, 2007 06:30:40 PM new
I've often stated I'd love to just post and be left alone.....as opposed to you who shrivel up and die without the attention you seek with such obsession.
So...it's NOT the same at all.
Now SCAT....don't keep giving me your attention....I love it when you're not here following me around like a lost puppy. 
|
MINGOTREE
|
posted on June 5, 2007 07:14:46 PM new
I bet you love to have no one around to point out your lies !
And,of course, it would be wonderful for you not to have anyone around asking those pointed questions that you never seem able to answer
"lost puppy"? What do you call when YOU can't refrain from addressing my posts ????
That's Ok, I know you can't answer
You're " left alone"....Ya, aren't you just ...verrrryy alone
LOL!!!
|
classicrock000
|
posted on June 6, 2007 02:35:48 AM new
Helenjw
posted on January 1, 2007 03:56:17 PM
Oh, cut the crap, Mingo. Here, like at OTWA your clinging attention to Linda exacerbates the problem. If you want to continue it's certainly your prerogative to do so
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on June 6, 2007 06:58:15 AM new
At the Republican debate, last night, I loved McCain's statement in regards to what hillary had said during the last dem debate:
"McCain drew loud applause from the partisan debate audience when he turned a question about the war in Iraq into criticism of the leading Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.."
"When Senator Clinton says this is Mr. Bush's war, President Bush's war," she is wrong, he said. "When President Clinton was in power, I didn't say Bosnia was President Clinton's war," the Arizona senator said."
""Presidents don't lose wars. Political parties don't lose wars. Nations lose wars," he added."
=================
hillary is SUCH a 'divider'. lol lol
|
