mingotree
|
posted on July 20, 2007 08:09:43 PM new
If one of the Republican candidates performs a miracle(or more voter fraud) and gets elected....
will the present wife be the "First Lady" and the 1st wife be the "Second Lady" or does that go to the 2nd wife ?
Do ALL those excess wives get Secret Service protection ...or won't there be enough money in the U.S. to pay for that?
Just wondering....?
|
hwahwa
|
posted on July 23, 2007 06:50:48 PM new
Did MM get secret service protection??
*
Lets all stop whining !
*
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 23, 2007 11:51:05 PM new
If you mean Marilyn Monroe, I don't know. If she did have it they weren't very good at protecting her.
But I'm sure if someone like Rudy was elected(fat chance) then he'd want his many wives, girlfriends, hookers all protected 
|
classicrock000
|
posted on July 24, 2007 03:57:40 PM new
yea mean like John F Kennedy and Bill Clinton???
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 04:32:54 PM new
If a Republican is elected....at least we will have a CIC who isn't doing all he can to admit defeat to our enemies.
We would have a CIC that takes his job description SERIOUSLY and KNOWS his # 1 job is for him to DEFEND American and her interests....not stand by while we continually are attacked and nothing is done about it.
====================
And Newt calls it like it is. The US and all our citizens had better wake up quickly and start realizing that 'working with/giving into our enemies' is not the answer to the muslim problem.
As Newt says, we have TWO choices.....make nice and surrender to our enemies....or stand up and defeat them.
I hope he throws his hat into this race. We need someone like him in these times when too many Americans support our enemies...or want to RUN from them....surrender to them....etc. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN9cqtJTvF4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 24, 2007 04:38 PM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 04:43:09 PM new
"yea mean like John F Kennedy and Bill Clinton???"
Now we ALL know whenever one speaks about the sex life of a democrat.....it's OFF LIMITS. GET out of their bedrooms. LOL LOL LOL
But the same does NOT apply when they want to discuss a republican.
Those darn old double standards and those HYPOCRITES on the left. They don't like the 'game rules' to be EQUAL....only salaries - take from the workers give to the ones who don't wish to work. 
|
kiara
|
posted on July 24, 2007 04:58:51 PM new
We would have a CIC that takes his job description SERIOUSLY and KNOWS his # 1 job is for him to DEFEND American and her interests....not stand by while we continually are attacked and nothing is done about it.
Hopefully it will be someone who takes his or her job seriously and is knowledgeable enough to do a bit of research, not like the incompetent one now in power who attacked a country that never attacked his, killed numerous innocents there and displaced them from their own homes and country after destroying it, a man who continues to send young men and women to Iraq to die needlessly while increasing terrorism worldwide - a man who has now lost respect worldwide so even little countries sneer and laugh at him.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:02:47 PM new
Again you post nonsense. NO PROOF EVER .....just more LIES from the anti-war cowards.
Anyone with two brain cells KNOW all the world leaders, democrats also, ALL said the same thing about saddam/Iraq.
Only the truly ignorant, like kiara, continue spewing these LIES. UNPROVEN LIES.
And their opinions aren't worth the post they're written on...because they're so ignorant of any FACTS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
|
kiara
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:11:43 PM new
No proof that Bush invaded Iraq?
No proof that any American troops died?
No proof that American troops were injured?
No proof that innocent Iraqis are dead or injured?
No proof that water, electricity, etc are huge problems in Iraq?
No proof that families including little children have fled or are fleeing Iraq?
No proof that terrorists are now operating and have training camps in Iraq?
Deny it all you wish, Linda_K - it won't make it all go away.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:22:04 PM new
What....only that SHORT list of complaints, kiara. LOL LOL LOL
So much you forget.
The dems VOTED FOR this war. They are now using it for their own political gain.
It's more important for them to allow our enemies to believe they've won....by SAYING, but not meaning, 'lets withdraw'. LOL LOL
So you obviously think they were stupid enough to not review what their previous administration had said....ignored what the would body was saying...the UN didn't ever receive any proof of.....and then in an administration they totally were AGAINST....they voted with this President.
LOL LOL
And since liberals LOVE polls....read the most recent one on the NYT which says support for the war is INCREASING. They support waiting for our military leaders to get their report in September.....so they're NOT listening to the cowards who only want to surrender and then have NO BACK UP PLANS to deal with the ME nor the terrorists.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/23/poll-american-support-for-war-inches-up/
That is what the liberal/dem party has to offer....NOTHING. Just as clinton didn't defend our national interests even though we were attacked 5 times during his sorry leadership.
Newt is right...we'd better take the muslim threats seriously or we're going to be in some SERIOUS trouble. THAT is all the dems have to offer America.
You think the death rates in Iraq are bad....just wait until the attacks start on the US homeland. We'll be like the UK in short order IF the 'surrender' dems ever get in the WH.
I'll stick with what our commanders on the ground are saying. We're doing a lot better than our liberal press is report...which is NOTHING positive at all.
And I'll agree with the UN officials and all the others who say pulling out before Iraqi's can defend themselves will lead to nothing but another genocide.
So NOW, you're supporting a HUGE genocide of Iraqi's. tsk tsk tsk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 24, 2007 05:24 PM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:26:03 PM new
This NYT blogger sure hit the nail on the head about the liberals/dems.
====
Deny any of this is true. You can't...because it is.
===============
The fact of the matter is that Americans realize that the Democrats voted for the war and that they ran their campaigns under a false promise of ending the war. They did this solely to gain power.
They influenced the public opinion of the war thru the constant bombardment of the public through their liberal media buddies. This bombardment failed to report any good news from Iraq. The coverage from the liberal media of Iraq is all bad, hence the American public never hears of military victorys and jihadists captured. The American public is being deprived of the FULL picture of the war, and the word is out!
Soon after the Dems gained power, they fully funded the war and then set up a few phony media fiascos to put up a facade of trying to end the war.
What a sham!
|
kiara
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:27:50 PM new
Just a couple of links for those who insist I lie about there being a war in Iraq.
http://costofwar.com/
http://www.icasualties.org/oif/
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:33:53 PM new
See what I mean?
The costs of war is always expensive.
And one does not stop fighting for freedom and from the evil muslims who have PROMISED to destroy us because it's costing too much. GET REAL. We ARE paying it, kaira. NOT canada. We are suffering most of the losses and causalities NOT canada, kiara.
There never has been a war where there weren't deaths and causalities.
GROW UP - wake up to the REALITIES of life. Think the liberals/dem didn't KNOW deaths were going to take place when they VOTED to send them. Think they don't know that NOW each and every time they APPROVE/SUPPORT funding the war further?
Get real. It's like you're some CHILD who thinks those that represent us didn't KNOW the chances they were taking when the sent our troops to war.....and while they continue funding it.
AND they'd like to re-deploy our troops to Dufar. LOL Think there'll be NO causalities there do you, little 'peace at any cost' child.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:42:50 PM new
And another thing I failed to point out to the 'peace at any cost', kiara.
She and other anti-war yo-yo's need to READ just who is KILLING whom. It's the terrorists who are killing MOST of the Iraqi's. NOT AMERICAN SOLDIERS.
A FACT the left often chooses to IGNORE....totally. They're the BAD guys, murdering even the Iraqi children. NOT American troops.
READ....learn and quit blaming America for what the terrorists have created...what THEY continue to do.
You're totally confused. We're the good guys....the terrorist are the EVIL ones kiara. Those YOU support giving a victory to are the EVIL ones...doing MOST of the killing of the Iraqi's.
Like I've recommended to all....read http://www.jihadwatch.org - where you will see on almost a DAILY basis how easy it is for THEM to kill the Iraqi's who only want their freedom and liberty. Who are willing to kill the CHILDREN also. But I NEVER see you anti-war people saying ONE NEGATIVE word about THEIR actions.
Nope, to you, in your fantasy world...it's America who's the bad guy.
You couldn't be MORE confused if you were making a career out of trying.
=================
Suicide car bomb kills 26 at Iraq children's hospital
Jihad against sick children in a mostly Shi'ite town. Will this attack provoke any moral outrage from Sunni Muslim states?
From Agence France-Presse:
HILLA, Iraq (AFP) - A suicide car bomb exploded across the street from a children's hospital in the Iraqi city of Hilla on Tuesday, killing at least 26 people and wounding 69, police and medical officials said.
"Most of the wounded were women and children, and the blast destroyed 15 vehicles and about 20 nearby shops," said Lieutenant Eid al-Shammari of the local police.
Doctor Mohammed Dhia, head surgeon at the Hilla hospital confirmed the casualties, adding that 25 of those wounded had serious injuries, including severe burns.
Medical officials earlier confirmed that bodies had been evacuated to two hospitals in the area.
The bombing in a mostly Shiite town came hours before the US ambassador to Iraq and his Iranian counterpart met in a second round of face-to-face talks aimed at controlling Iraq's spiralling violence.
It was not immediately clear who was behind the bombing, but in the past such attacks have been blamed on Sunni insurgent groups such as Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which is trying to overthrow Iraq's US-backed government and foment unrest.
===
THIS is what we're fighting, while also fighting the progressive liberal left who think there are NO real threats from these murderers.
WE'RE there to defend these innocents...and for that the radical wacko's fight us.
And you want to elect those who want to allow this insanity to be allowed because they're too SCARED to fight it?
I hope not.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 24, 2007 05:46 PM ]
|
etexbill
|
posted on July 24, 2007 05:56:26 PM new
Where is Harry Truman when we need him?
He stopped it all in one week. (And he was a democan't)
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 06:22:04 PM new
I wish I knew. But at least Newt, with all his warts, IS speaking out about how America had better wake up. Thank God for that. Maybe some will begin to listen.
And FDR/Truman were Americans FIRST....before being a democrat. That's what the political left no longer has....political gain has become their FIRST priority.....and our national safety/security is who knows where on their list - but it's certainly NOT as important as gaining power.
I've often said that JFK was the last democratic president who was willing to protect America. And imo, that's the sad truth of it. Since then we've had NOTHING but wimps. Those who believe terrorists/madmen can be 'talked' out of their life long religious beliefs against westerners.
Now those who support an unpopular war....are almost assured of not winning the elections. Look to McCain and Lieberman. We're supposed to 'lead/rule' by popular opinion...when the general public doesn't have the info. they need to even make those important decisions.
Obviously too many Americans are NOT paying attention.
I personally believe that's also why most democrats/liberals won't stop funding the war. They KNOW the consequences of allowing the terrorists to win. They just can't admit that's why they voted the way they did....or that that is why they continuing funding them.
And imo, IF there was a democrat who had the backbone to do what needs to be done.....he WOULD be elected. But there are NONE. Not one....only cowards who SAY they want us to withdraw/surrender to our enemies....and let the Iraqi people be damned. That's how much they care about those they pretend to care about.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 24, 2007 06:36 PM ]
|
kiara
|
posted on July 24, 2007 06:22:04 PM new
People worldwide give opinions on all kinds of different topics, Linda_K..
Whenever I venture any opinion here (as I did in my first post above) you are waiting to rear your ugly head and call me a liar and then you lose all control and continue with wild tantrums and rants nonstop.
How is it that a mere opinion is almost always considered a lie by you if it isn't in agreement with your opinion? Can't you recognize the difference?
Or is it that you are incapable of controlling your emotions when a differing word is spoken because you desire everyone here to believe as you do and agree always with you?
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 24, 2007 06:35:18 PM new
ROFLOL.....still haven't figured out how your ignore button works, it appears.
Quit whining about my posts and stop telling me what to say or not.
You lied...I called you on it again. And you have no proof to offer of your 'opinion's that are based on LIES. LOL LOL LOL
You won't EVER stop me from calling you on that old mantra...that has been proven false. Just because you and a couple other nutcases here keep repeating something....doesn't make it true.
They're STILL lies and I'll ALWAYS call you on them. Get used to it....or get help to find your ignore button.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
|
MINGOTREE
|
posted on July 24, 2007 08:41:51 PM new
Sweet jesus! You righties sure got your knickers in twist over this one!LOL!
Same old , same old, linduh gurgling on and on and on on her same old theme and etex bringing up dead presidents...neocons have all the humor and originality of a tape recorder.
Keep on repeating yourself linduh, I'm sure you're changing the course of human events....
|
kiara
|
posted on July 24, 2007 09:16:16 PM new
Quit whining about my posts and stop telling me what to say or not.
Poor Linda_K - such a silly old woman thinking that I was telling her what to say or do when all I did was express an opinion which she was unable to handle.
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 24, 2007 11:49:15 PM new
Then classless drools down his chin, "How 'bout dem guys..ya know, Kennedy and Clinton"
Oh it sure didn't take long to trot that OLD OLD boring predictable refrain out.
Hey guys ! Like you're so fond of saying about bushit...they AIN'T running for office.
...and Rockin' Rudy thinks he is.
AND you forgot to mention George Washington ...he screwed his slaves ...and ya forgot a whole slew of DEAD presidents who screwed around and guess what ???
NONE are running for office ...RUDY IS.
AND linDUH, I have posted YOUR out and out LIE about not responding to my posts....PROOF that you lied so maybe you should stop calling everyone else liars when it's very obvious YOU have NO proof
All this proves once again that the neorepugs can slam everybody but sure have a REALLY hard time bragging up THEIR candidates!
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 24, 2007 11:59:35 PM new
Posted by linduh ....and it's soooooo relevent to the thread topic :
""Suicide car bomb kills 26 at Iraq children's hospital
Jihad against sick children in a mostly Shi'ite town. Will this attack provoke any moral outrage from Sunni Muslim states?
"""
And this has WHAT to do with Rockin' Rudy's sordid love life ?????
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 25, 2007 08:59:10 AM new
There's a website called political humor. If ya type in "Rotten Rudy Ed Schultz" you can hear a hilarious version of Rockin' Robin called Rotten Rudy ....
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 25, 2007 11:57:08 PM new
Just wondering ....would the neocons be this quiet about HILLARY if she was a bed-hopping cheating slut like Rudy and Newt????
|
