hjw
|
posted on December 17, 2001 11:19:30 AM
I don't really care what I look like from your perspective. Obvioulsy it's not a flattering picture. 
I love dogs, as you probably know and I am happy that at least we have made it clear that ammonia is not an appropriate spray. Even if you aim for their nose, it's very likely to get into their eyes and cause severe damage.
Helen
|
kraftdinner
|
posted on December 17, 2001 11:31:40 AM
uaru, here in Canada, bikers use cayanne pepper mixed with water and a bit of soap as an animal repellant. You can also use black pepper and soap. Dogs hate pepper. It ruins their sense of smell for awhile but doesn't harm the animal. Just a suggestion to try. 
|
chococake
|
posted on December 17, 2001 11:34:53 AM
Oh my, just finished catching up on this thread.
I have to agree with Helen, spraying ammonia in a dogs face can cause injury or even blindness. It would be OK if it was the smell that would run the dog off, but for the odor to be strong enough it would have to be more ammonia than water. There is no way it could be aimed at the nose without getting it in the eyes.
|
rawbunzel
|
posted on December 17, 2001 11:43:18 AM
Wasn't going to say anything but what the he**.
Uaru, You are a pompous as*. You seem to think it's ok to treat women like children. Most of us read at other places as well as here and I can tell you that if you think Helen is "sleazy " for bringing your words here then you'd better take another look at the company you keep elsewhere. Words spoken here are taken there and to AC by those you post with . I guess that you feel your board mates are sleazy too? No? Well why not? They do the same. You sir ARE sleazy. You only come her to pick and pick not to discuss but to tell us what we should be thinking.
I'm not your wife so don't talk down to me. TWIT.
FOR THE RECORD
I do not think it is sleazy to take words from one place to discuss them at another. It's been the way of the boards for years and years.
It's bad if your enemy is quick. It's worse if he is patient.
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 11:56:14 AM
rawbunzel I'm not your wife
Something I'm extremely grateful for. I wasn't in looking for a road whore when I got married.
Don't you just looooooove that old 'qui pro quo' 
|
rawbunzel
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:01:30 PM
Uaru? A road whore? What exactly is a road whore?
Never having been a whore and never having hung out with whores I have no idea the extent of your seeming insult. Do clarify.
It's bad if your enemy is quick. It's worse if he is patient.
|
chococake
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:03:13 PM
urau what the hell is your problem?
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:08:52 PM
urau what the hell is your problem?
None at the present. Thanks for asking though.
|
KatyD
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:12:04 PM
I wasn't in looking for a road whore when I got married.
That was totally uncalled for, Uaru. A gentleman would apologize. We are waiting.
KatyD
|
enchanted
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:12:08 PM
Rawbunzel is simply not a woman I would refer to as a "road whore" or any kind of "whore" uaru.
Referring to women as b'tches and whores, uaru? I am surprised and very disappointed.
you might want to consider an apology. They might not have moderators anymore but as far as I know it's still against the CG's to use those words to refer to posters here.
As far as repeating posts from one message board on another message board... whether repeated in or out of context, it's been happening for at least the last several years that I've been around the auction chat boards. It's not that unusual or even unexpected. It's happened at the other board you post at, and at every other board I've been at I think. In fact I've noticed most recent posts in every thread here in the AW RT has been commmented on lately at another board (AC), usually within the same day or by the next day at the latest. Everything here seems to be under some kind of microscope, why, I don't know and don't care. So count on it, your words will probably get repeated over there, you might want to start checking there pretty soon for whatever juicy quotes someone has chosen to display from your posts in this very thread.
Smile and wave, you're probably on candid camera right now, uaru.
|
BittyBug
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:15:38 PM
uaru...you ugly ignorant moron...no one gives a crap what you think...here, there or anywhere.
Please call me Charlotte so I don't have ta change my ID.
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:19:29 PM
Katy D That was totally uncalled for
I apologize to those that I may have offended with the exception of Rawbunzel. Actually it I felt it was called for. I don't feel she has the information or experience to evaluate my domestic situation in the manner she did. I wouldn't do it to such a thing and I expect the same of others.
|
saabsister
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:20:37 PM
Uaru, I respect your knowledge of film. The drive- by "kumbayas" and insults to posters make me think I may have over-estimated your contributions to RT discussions.
|
enchanted
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:21:21 PM
He's hiding. Quite free with the dog-related insults and then hides when strong women speak up.
I'm giving him a chance to delete and apologize ... for a little while.
On just this one thread... he's referred to women as ... a cute little cur, b'tch and road whore. I don't care what ANYONE thinks of the particular women it was aimed at. EVERY woman should object to men using language like that to and about them. Any woman that condones it toward's another woman .... well, just imagine how low I think that is.
|
stockticker
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:21:30 PM
Uaru:
I agree 100% with Rawbunz's post. Your post that followed just confirms what sleazy as* you really are.
Irene
[ edited by stockticker on Dec 17, 2001 12:22 PM ]
|
KatyD
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:28:56 PM
Uaru, when you post intimate details on a public chatboard about your domestic situation you invite opinions and evaluations of such. Do you always call women who don't agree with you derogatory names? I'd hate to hear what you call your wife.
KatyD
|
BittyBug
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:31:37 PM
KatyD...I am not sure I would want to.
Obviously he cannot support his thesis so resorts to name calling and abuse thinking it will cover up for stupidity.
Please call me Charlotte so I don't have ta change my ID.
|
rawbunzel
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:36:10 PM
Uara "I don't feel she has the information or experience to evaluate my domestic situation in the manner she did. I wouldn't do it to such a thing and I expect the same of others. "
Even though my remarks were aimed at the way you speak to women on the boards it may well relate to your real life as well.Only you know for sure.I do wonder why you would even make a statement such as the one I placed here, in my post. You take many of your personal problems out for public evaluation. Don't you realize that you are not posting in private? There are lots of lurkers everywhere. If you don't want your words tossed back at you or evaluated it is best not to even say them.
It's bad if your enemy is quick. It's worse if he is patient.
|
mybiddness
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:47:46 PM
uaru, you have been crossing the line a lot lately, imo when it comes to your comments about and to women. I think Rawbunzel was showing great restraint when she only called you a pompous ass and a sleeze... oh and a TWIT.
You've been flaunting it - now she's just calling you on the obvious.
Not paranoid anywhere else but here!
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:49:42 PM
make me think I may have over-estimated
I understand, I feel I've made some errors in over-estimations.
when you post intimate details on a public chatboard about your domestic situation you invite opinions and evaluations of such.
That was poor judgement on my part perhaps. I had counted on some degree of decorum involving such matters and not have them exaggerated to their highest level of misunderstanding and to be thrown in my face as a rebuttal to a political comment on another message board no less.
Yes, very serious over-estimation on my behalf.
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:53:23 PM
Do you always call women who don't agree with you derogatory names?
Have you seen me practice such behavior as a rule? No I don't call people names normally, I got a bit tired of Helen's games and Rawbunzel came at the wrong time with the wrong attitude to the wrong person.
(added)
It also didn't help for Rawbunzel to be evaluating my relationship with my wife in the most demeaning of terms... Damn right I lashed out and I'd do it again. So would you.
[ edited by uaru on Dec 17, 2001 12:56 PM ]
|
rawbunzel
|
posted on December 17, 2001 12:56:31 PM
No,no Uaru. You were the right person.I wouldn't have had reason to say that to anyone else.
It's bad if your enemy is quick. It's worse if he is patient.
|
rawbunzel
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:03:35 PM
Uaru? Please let me know exactly where I said anything derogatory about your relationship with your wife? As I stated my remarks were meant to show the way I see you talking to women here.
Did saying I wasn't your wife anger you? Was it asking you to not talk down to me as I've been watching you do all morning to Helen?
It's bad if your enemy is quick. It's worse if he is patient.
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:10:45 PM
Rawbunzel, you seemed suggest that I talk down to my wife and that I treat women like children. That's a lot of painting there and I don't feel you know me that well, nor have I supplied information anywhere that validates your statement. You formed an opinion of a very personal nature.
If you feel I'm doing the things you suggest from other posts why don't you broach the matter on those posts instead of throwing something out of context in my face here. Wrong place, wrong time, wrong subject.
|
snowyegret
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:13:08 PM
Uaru, the lack of civility seems to be in your court. Acting out is for the sandbox.
I don't like coming in and seeing that crap. 
You have the right to an informed opinion
-Harlan Ellison
|
plsmith
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:15:02 PM
|
rawbunzel
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:22:02 PM
Uaru. My statement were made in direct relation to your statements to Helen in this very thread. Perhaps you should re-read your words and then try to see why anyone ,especially another woman, might have a problem not only with your words but with you.
You say the most horrible things to Helen.She does not deserve to be treated in such a degrading manner. Nor do I.
I could ,of course, say things about your relationship with your wife, after all you have laid out plenty to comment on. But deary, that isn't my way. If I were going to do it there would be no pussy footing around.
It's bad if your enemy is quick. It's worse if he is patient.
|
stockticker
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:26:31 PM
Uaru, I'd be interested in hearing where you think Rawbunzel "supplied information anywhere that validates your statement" that she is a whore and then why you, in a subsequent post, said "actually it I felt it was called for".
Irene
|
stockticker
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:29:31 PM
Or do you think that someone's opinion that you might talk down to your wife is as much of an insult as calling a woman a whore?
Irene
|
uaru
|
posted on December 17, 2001 01:34:39 PM
Rawbunzel,
Lets see if we can reach some sort of agreement, I honestly think we can.
1) My disagreement with Helen was initiated because of a comment I made in regards to here political comment. Nothing more, nothing less. Helen then choose to get nasty about the matter and when she choose to start manufacturing dirt accusing me of animal cruelty. My disagreement with her was never a gender thing.
2) When you entered the dialog you promptly called me a Pompus A$$, that didn't bother me. What sent me ballistic was this.
You seem to think it's ok to treat women like children.
That's reading a lot into me that isn't there, I assure you. Then you really crossed lines with this remark.
I'm not your wife so don't talk down to me. TWIT.
I don't talk down to my wife, and your suggestion of such really pisses me off, you have no call to make such personal observations. Calling me a TWIT is fine, I'll give you that right, but to define the relationship I have with my wife isn't your call. You don't have the information or experience to make such a call.
If I'm making myself understood great, if not then at least I can't be accused of not trying. Can you understand where my anger is coming from?
|
