posted on March 4, 2005 02:51:58 PM new
Bigpeepa, if I were you I would not respond to any more of linduh's posts ....she is so insulting....you must be really ticking her off.....
linduh:"Why don't you show all of us that you're really not stupid and I actually said any such thing. This is your biggest problem. You take what righties say and then twist them into your own propoganda speel"
libra, why would you look up the word "wackey" ? Who used that word...not me. I used the word "wakey", as in Wake Up. Rhymes with quake.
Why were you looking up wackey, which isn't a word ? Rhymes with cracky...... look under "Libra".
posted on March 4, 2005 03:18:10 PM new
LOL - That pot-kettle-black statement she is so insulting MUST have given almost everyone here a great laugh. It sure did me. CF talking about someone else insulting others.
peepa CAN'T answer it because I NEVER said any such thing. He's just turning into a liar like you've always been.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 4, 2005 03:30:23 PM new
linduhthe liar says,"peepa CAN'T answer it because I NEVER said any such thing"
Well, here it is.............
Linda_K
posted on March 4, 2005 02:38:48 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
peepa - I believe this dangerous woman and other people of her mind set want to tell other Americans what they can and cannot listen to.
Why don't you show all of us that you're really not stupid and I actually said any such thing. This is your biggest problem. You take what righties say and then twist them into your own propoganda speel.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!""""""
So,linduh, using your warped reasoning, YOU can insult because I do.....so is it right or wrong in your highly valued opinion?
posted on March 4, 2005 03:48:50 PM new
Still seeking attention I see. peepa either made a wrong assumption or he's learning to lie from the best here, YOU!
I'm not wasting another moment on you....you're one real sick person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 4, 2005 06:13:48 PM new
Linda K, your are correct about being a "rightie" you are so far to the right your left wing has fell off and you are spiraling out of control. Remember SWEET CAKES its not my problem when you expose your true-self and mind set its your problem.
posted on March 4, 2005 06:25:56 PM new
Hey Crow, I can't remember what Linda K said awhile ago. Was it something about not caring if children were killed or starving in Iraq. Or was her statement that she didn't care if children starved here in America by shutting down the Wix Program. Or did she make both statements. I can't remember can you?
[ edited by bigpeepa on Mar 4, 2005 06:28 PM ]
[ edited by bigpeepa on Mar 4, 2005 06:29 PM ]
posted on March 4, 2005 06:33:10 PM new
Can't remember, bigpeepa, but if something is bad for children she's for it.....she's a neocon.
She sure can get out of answering questions and facing the truth,,,,,slick........
GEEZZ, Bigpeepa, I'm so frustrated that you haven't heard "Big Ed Schultz's" radio program yet.....don't know if it's available in PA yet but should be soon....it's spreading like wildfire. And you love Big Ed!
Big Ed, the gun-totin', meat eatin' lefty from North Dakota!
posted on March 4, 2005 06:49:59 PM new
Lets see now....peepa can't grasp that it's not a CUT just because it didn't get MORE funding than the dems wanted, which would only increase the deficit even more. We have been through this time and time again when the lefties here want to 'twist' what is really happening. They say "xxx has been cut". But anyone, upon further investigation will find there WAS NO CUT made....the dems are just complaining it didn't get funded at a higher rate.
Just like in the border security thread ol' peepa tries to present it as this President failing to protect our borders. But one CAN read he has TRIPLED the funding for that purpose. And on HomeLandSecurity....becase this President chooses to use the funding in a different manner for controlling our borders.....that side of the story is omitted on purpose.
You don't have a clue, peepa, as to what's even going on....and your lack of knowledge shows in almost all your posts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 4, 2005 06:56:53 PM new
taken from a link, which I've already provided, from CAGW.
Bush's Proposed 2006 Budget [in part]
Department of Homeland Security:
· Discretionary spending increases by 7 percent to $34.2 billion. [gee....where might that be spent?]
·
Transportation Security Administration increases from $4.9 billion to $5 billion (+1 percent)
·
Raises maximum security fee from $3 to $8 paid by U.S. airline travelers.
·
New $600 million program for targeted infrastructure protection grant.
· Leaves out funding for mandates from last years intelligence overhaul bill, such as adding 2,000 border patrol agents to prevent illegal immigration.
· creates new $848 million Office of Screening Coordination and Operations, which would oversee the granting of credentials for transportation workers, improve transportation security technologies and manage overall policies and technologies for the border, transportation and immigration divisions.
· Creates new $227 million domestic nuclear detection office.
--------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 4, 2005 07:02:32 PM new
peepa - What was your statement about education?
This President has proposed for the
Department of Education:
New $500 million program to provide state grants to encourage top teachers to work in low-income schools. Includes $50 million for districts to implement merit pay programs.
· $1.5 billion for extending No Child Left Behind to high schools.
More education benefits:
Pell grants are being increased.
New $250 million program to provide job training for high-demand industries at community colleges.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
------
What I like about his suggestions along with his recommendation to cut government money from NPR and PBS is his:
Bushs Management Agenda
Bush asks for line-item veto.
which I think all Presidents should have
Bush proposes sunset commission to require all federal programs expire after a certain point in time unless lawmakers act affirmatively to keep them going.
[i]then we won't have the constant new programs added but never eliminated.]
Bush proposes results commissions to evaluate programs that have the same goal but are operated by different federal departments.
Bush proposes changing personnel rules to move federal government toward a pay system based on performance rather than seniority. [which I also agree with]
Bush proposes new budget point of order against legislation that would add benefits to Social Security without paying for their long-term costs.
[ edited by Linda_K on Mar 4, 2005 07:17 PM ]
If you think mothers talk to children like that your are more stupid than I thought. I hope your not a preschool teacher. Yks the poor children if you are....
posted on March 4, 2005 08:09:42 PM new
Well bigpeepa I hope you are letting your wife read what you post and who your partners are. She should be really proud of you.
Bigpeepa, if I were you I would not respond to any more of linduh's posts ....[b]she is so insulting....you must be really ticking her off
Now that is a great statement by crowfarm. Miss insulting herself.
posted on March 4, 2005 08:16:13 PM new
Bigpeepa, the screamer, keeps tell Linda and myself about our mind set. What in the world is a mind set?
I haven't figured that out yet but if someone has a good defination then maybe I can understand what he is referring to. He keeps babbling mind set, her mind set. He just keeps it up.
What I do know is that I would never vote for a traitor like many in this discussion board did.
posted on March 5, 2005 06:30:11 AM new
Sorry, L sisters Linda K and Libra, your smoke screens and twisting of words aren't working any longer. You have both become too transparent to the readers here. Looks to me like people are becoming more informed about what this White House is doing to them.
Hey middle class America, get more informed for yourselves and judge for yourselves what is White House is doing to ya. Trust your own knowledge.
Read this White House budget closely. I don't see many places where the Rich are being asked to endure any hardships like the poor and middle class. Look at the White House cuts and UNDER FUNDING of programs for the poor and middle class.
This White House already has a proven track record of catering to the rich and industry while the poor and middle class are getting less and less.
posted on March 5, 2005 07:37:04 AM new
libra says, ""Well bigpeepa I hope you are letting your wife read what you post and who your partners are. She should be really proud of you.""
YUP, if she has a brain and a backbone I bet she IS proud of him!
""Bigpeepa, if I were you I would not respond to any more of linduh's posts ....[b]she is so insulting....you must be really ticking her off
Now that is a great statement by crowfarm. Miss insulting herself.""
So why is it OK for linduh and not for others? That's alright, libra, linduh couldn't answer that either.
"""Libra63
posted on March 4, 2005 08:16:13 PM
Bigpeepa, the screamer, keeps tell Linda and myself about our mind set. What in the world is a mind set? """
It is a locked brain, never to be open to a new idea .
"""What I do know is that I would never vote for a traitor like many in this discussion board did """"
No we didn't vote for a traitor nor did we vote for a coward who was too frightened to defend his country, AND we're not pro Communist like you are.
posted on March 5, 2005 08:15:55 AM newKerry: Traitor, Not Hero
An article worth reading:
Veterans Should Politically Banish Kerry for Disgracing The Marine Corps Memorial
by Major Richard G. ("Rick" Erickson
On the cover of The New Soldier by John Kerry and Vietnam Veterans Against The War, hippies clad in a mismatch of military uniforms are pictured mocking the legendary image of Marines raising the American flag atop Mount Suribachi in the 1945 battle for Iwo Jima. Today, the Iwo Jima image is a memorial statue that sits above Arlington National Cemetery and honors all Marines killed in action since 1775. It is one of the most recognized and visited sites in our Capitol City.
The New Soldier never made it on the reading list at our military academies. In the cover photo that ridicules the Marine Corps Memorial, one of Kerry's cronies is tugging on our flag, which is hung upside down as the ultimate symbol of sedition and treachery to all veterans who rallied behind our flag in battle. On the day of that shameful photograph and with its mass circulation on the cover of The New Soldier, at least 6,821 Marines who died at Iwo Jima turned over in their graves.
Of all the reasons why John F. Kerry will not become President of the United States, the biggest reason has to be that, once he returned home from Vietnam, he betrayed his fellow servicemen who remained at war. Kerry not only allied with the likes of Hanoi Jane Fonda, but, before the United States Senate in 1971, Kerry went as far as to belittle the bravery of embattled troops by generalizing their every action in Vietnam as an atrocity.
No one questioned General George S. Patton, III, when he accused Kerry of treason in giving aid and comfort to the enemy, especially when it was revealed that North Vietnam incorporated Kerry's exploits into its communist propaganda machine. However, because of the prevalence of treason at the time and the monumental task of prosecuting Kerry and his proclaimed 'revolutionaries,' Kerry's actions went unpunished and the associated advances of communism went unhindered.
Fortunately, today's veterans and Americans who overwhelmingly support our armed forces tend to disparage those who dishonor military service and then pretend to be capable of our country's highest office. This political reality afflicted Bill Clinton, whose anti-military past kept him from winning any more than forty-nine percent of the popular vote. No wonder Kerry's presidential campaign is doing its best to subvert his estrangement from veterans and service people in general.
The tact of Kerry for President looks a lot like Clinton-Gore's approach to deceiving voters that such an obvious liability is really the opposite. When Kerry marched in the Veteran's Day parade in Phoenix last year, in tow behind him were a few people carrying 'Veterans for Kerry' placards. Some placard carriers looked like the ragtag types on the cover of The New Solider in that they were unshaven, wearing circa 1971 clothes and appeared disoriented.
The ongoing insult is that 'Veterans for Kerry' is supposed to represent the veteran community's support of Kerry, when the reality is that very few veterans support him. Most veterans cannot forgive Kerry for Vietnam Veterans Against The War and its promotion of communism when we were fighting communists. As far as U.S. Marines are concerned, we ought to ensure that Kerry is forever banished from the White House for dishonoring our Memorial on the cover of The New Soldier.
posted on March 5, 2005 09:37:43 AM new
libra, that's one person's opinion and it's certainly not what "Most veterans cannot forgive Kerry for Vietnam Veterans Against The War and its promotion of communism when we were fighting communists".
Where's his proof that it's "most"?
Besides , you're pro communist so you should like Kerry IF you think he sided with the communists.
posted on March 5, 2005 10:11:10 AM new
crowfarm, My wife knows what is happening to the poor and middle class she works with and helps them. She has read some of the L sisters posts. She said they need help in finding a better way of live. When people like Linda K and Libra expose themselves and get called on it they go crazy and blow smoke screen after smoke screen. Remember Hitler and the Taliban restricted what their people listened to. One of the L sisters wants to cut out Public Radio and the other said that as long as she and her daughter get SS she doesn't care if other people get theirs. Some people the L sisters.
posted on March 5, 2005 10:12:36 AM new
A smear? You DO have trouble seeing things as they really are. CF just lied about Libra being pro communist...and I called it as it is. He/she's lying again. Libra is NOT pro-communist.
Deny the truth helen....and protect/defend the liars...it suits you best.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 5, 2005 10:19:29 AM new
peepa - I think your wife should encourage you to return to school and take reading comprehension as your major.
One of the L sisters wants to cut out Public Radio.
Because not only don't your appear to have the ability to correctly read the proposed budget...keep calling it 'smokescreen'....but you are now delusional and lying yourself on my NPR/PBS statement. YOU'RE FULL of it....no smokescreen involved.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 5, 2005 10:59:44 AM new
LOL helen - Now you've given up trying to be board monitor...and are running for the 'morality' queen of vendio?
They've lied. I call it as it is. You appear to have a problem with that when it applies to me. Get over it. They're both lying and your tagging right along pointing out the 'truthful' one as 'smearing' them. What a laugh and OH SO speaks to your own personal character...or lack thereof.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on March 5, 2005 10:59:48 AM new
Linda I was going to ask you myself about your PBS/NPR comment? It sounded to me also, that you dont care for any funding of these programs???
I like PBS sometimes. I wouldn't want to see it choked out of operating from lack of funding.
Did you mean it should be wholly listener supported? I doubt they could do it on that. They don't have that big a market share even though they have some wonderful grantor's.
...
gremlins in the machine again
[ edited by dblfugger9 on Mar 5, 2005 11:00 AM ]
posted on March 5, 2005 11:08:45 AM new
dblfugger - How civil of you to ASK....rather than make false assumption or lie about what I said. A refreshing change for sure.
Yes, I have previously posted, on a different thread, that I do not believe the Federal government needs to support public radio. There was a time when it was necessary, imo, but that time has long passed. There are many radio shows that ARE self supporting by listener contributions. Just look at AirAmerica....clinton and daschle are major contributors to keep that on the air.
We are in a place, budget wise, where we NEED to cut to help bring down the deficit. This is one area I think can take care of itself IF there is enough support for it.
The largest problem I have trouble understanding is when the dems SCREAM about the deficit....but don't want anything CUT or held at last years spending levels. They can't have it both ways. Of course, the Congress will make the final decisions....and I doubt many on the left will like them no matter what they are. They're not in control and are dealing with the frustration that they aren't in a position to keep adding to the deficit spending. Many of them would like to cut spending to the military as the past administration did to a GREAT degree. But the world has changed and I don't believe there are many democrats in Congress that are interested in make big cuts to the military at this point in time - no matter the reaction we see here on these boards.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
just to clarify a little more:
when peepa accuses me of:
I believe this dangerous woman and other people of her mind set want to tell other Americans what they can and cannot listen to. That was a lie. I have no problem with what people choose to listen to...I just don't think the reason the government funding started is currently a factor... a reason for the Fed government to be subsidizing it. Let those who use/enjoy it pay for it.
[ edited by Linda_K on Mar 5, 2005 11:28 AM ]
posted on March 5, 2005 12:55:35 PM new
Linda K you are right we do need to cut the National Debt this White House has given America. Lets cut some tax shelter laws to the rich,drug companies and industry first. Lets not cut some kids change to go to college by underfunding programs like the Pell Grants. Maybe I missed it and other readers can show me. What budget cuts will be felt by wealthy Americans or industry? I am sure there must be several so the poor and middle class aren't enduring the budget cuts alone. Its not my intention to correct Linda K so often its my wish other people would really look into what this White House says and what it really does.
You lying old (smoke screen) when you said you were all for cutting funding to Public Radio you didn't have the overall budget in mind. We all know that. Now you are degrading yourself by trying to lie out of your statement now. You disgust me. I do not like phony people like you and never will.
.....
It sure did me. CF talking about someone else insulting others.
Erickson