posted on June 3, 2005 10:58:45 AM new
Thanks for the link, Kraft, but you have to realize ...this WHY the neocons love Annie Fanny.
They worship nasties like her and Limbaugh, and O'Riley, and Williams.....every one a hate-filled criminal....they LIKE that in a person.
posted on June 3, 2005 11:37:59 AM new
She's neither evil nor stupid. Using those words to describe her only proves to me the left has no true understanding of the definition of either word because they're not based in reality.
But no surprise there.
But she certainly is a 'fantastic voice' for the right if her words can get the left so riled up.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on June 3, 2005 12:25:30 PM new
Thanks Bigpeepa. I go for your posts too.
You're right, Crowfarm. I know that being a junkie, a liar, a pervert, a war-worshiper and a dumbbell is a far better and more religious way of living than getting a b.j.
Linda, did you read some of her statements?? How can you not laugh your head off? If you think the left is upset at what she says, you couldn't be further from the truth. We're laughing AT her because she's so simple. Her views are dumber than Bush's bushisms. She should be a poster child for the dumbing down process, imho.
posted on June 3, 2005 12:26:05 PM new
So there's the question. Ann Coulter: Evil or Stupid? First, it's rather odd that Coulter has the nerve to put things quite that way. Her recent book--admittedly published after the above quote, but not saying anything new--spends a great deal of time complaining that liberals are always accusing conservatives of being evil (much of the rest of the book, not surprisingly, accuses liberals of being evil). Or to quote from her recent (June 2002) appearance on the Today Show:
"Political debate with liberals is basically impossible in America because liberals are calling names while conservatives are trying to make arguments...It's really all the same lie [that liberals tell], that conservatives are either stupid or scarily weird and therefore you don't have to deal with their ideas."
So it's ok for conservative Ann Coulter to call liberals stupid or evil, but it's darn mean for liberals to call conservatives stupid or evil? If this is Coulter's idea of starting a "political debate" she's better off sticking with invective. I don't know if she is blind to the hypocrisy of her position or if she just doesn't care (or perhaps she uses the old schoolyard claim "they started it first!". Whatever her internal rationalization, her words make her look pretty, uh, well, you know. Stupid.
posted on June 3, 2005 12:34:13 PM new
Yes, Kd, I did look at your link.
What I saw was it was a site that's anti-Ann Coulter. The article is written by a FAR LEFT liberal, Carl Skutsch...who writes for the Nation...another FAR LEFT liberal site.
Do his comments bother me? No....doesn't censor her voice nor keep her from earning a very good living...being blunt in how she see's liberals. And it's bother HIM enough to take the time to set up a website about it.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on June 3, 2005 01:45:24 PM new
""This, in the end, is Coulter's most serious flaw as a pundit. She believes that there are really only two kinds of people in the world: those who agree with her and those who are evil and stupid liberals. Only she, and those who agree with her, has a monopoly on goodness and truth. If not stupid, at the very least this makes her very, very blind. And her blind hatred of liberals makes her a bitter and nasty voice on the political landscape. Dare I say, a force for evil?""
posted on June 3, 2005 01:52:53 PM newis a far better and more religious way of living than getting a b.j...
How simplified you have made it for yourself,kraft. Of course, you dont seem to remember at the time he was a married man. How convenient for you that you cannot recognize infidelity as character flaw in a democrat quite as easily as you recite out those of republicans you list.
posted on June 3, 2005 01:57:02 PM newAnd her blind hatred of liberals makes her a bitter and nasty voice on the political landscape. Dare I say, a force for evil?"
crowfarm, you and that op ed writer do not even know what you are talking about. Bill Maher has said himself they consider each other friends.
But you prefer to buy into the most stupidest stuff out there because it makes you feel like somebody. pffsst!
posted on June 3, 2005 02:25:42 PM new
Double, I didn't say what Clinton did was right or wrong. It's just it's the only excuse you guys can come up with to justify your own bad behavior.
posted on June 3, 2005 02:57:27 PM new
Dble hisses,"But you prefer to buy into the most stupidest stuff out there because it makes you feel like somebody. pffsst!"""
More total illogic..... disliking Annie Easy makes me feel like who ?
So Bill Maher calls her a friend....what has THAT got to do with anything ????
We are dealing with direct quotes from Annie Quicklay herself....I don't buy into her crap.
posted on June 3, 2005 03:24:47 PM newFor some of you that think she's really sharp, maybe you should read up on the crap she spews before reaching your conclusion
What as opposed to the crap Dean, Kennedy, Potosi & Kerry spew?
You can always tell when a conservative hits a demorat's soft spot. They start the insults and name calling.
"This is the essence of the modern Democrat Party, polished to perfection by Bill Clinton: They are willing to insult the intelligence of 49 percent of the people if they think they can fool 51 percent of the people." --Ann Coulter
A word to the wise ain't necessary, it's the stupid ones that need the advice."
- Bill Cosby
posted on June 3, 2005 03:57:18 PM new"You can always tell when a conservative hits a demorat's soft spot. They start the insults and name calling."
The name-calling, Bear? A "demorat"? What about Miss Coulter calling Democrats evil or stupid? Or do you agree with her simply because she's a Republican?
posted on June 3, 2005 04:29:22 PM newWhat about Miss Coulter calling Democrats evil or stupid?
When she's right, she's right. Nothing the demorats have done lately have proven her wrong. Especially when you look at Al Franken, Michael Moore and Howie Dean.
A word to the wise ain't necessary, it's the stupid ones that need the advice."
- Bill Cosby
[ edited by Bear1949 on Jun 3, 2005 04:31 PM ]
posted on June 3, 2005 04:44:41 PM newDouble, I didn't say what Clinton did was right or wrong..
Lol, no kraft, not at all. But me thinks your statement just reflects what he did was a little less wrong than the others.
I can forgive the infidelity, as I have always said its not me who the offended party of it. But I will never forgive that schiktzer for the pulling his lawyerly "what is is" out of his hat and expecting the American public to buy it. What dont you see there? Or what do you suppose I am missing?
posted on June 3, 2005 05:14:53 PM new
Double, you're the one that likes to put things into neat spaces marked good or bad, not me. What Clinton did was up to him to decide whether it was right or wrong.
What I was pointing out was the right feel what he did is/was far worse than their own (usually Christian) beliefs of "being a junkie, a liar, a pervert, a war-worshiper and a dumbbell", because that's all they can think of.
posted on June 3, 2005 05:21:01 PM newyou're the one that likes to put things into neat spaces marked good or bad, not me...
hello? do you know who you are even talking to?
In case you havent noticed, I live in the gray, kraft. I think you got some projection thing going on when you say I am the one who likes to put things marked as good or bad. I recall many threads where you've said something is, "a good thing" or "a bad thing" - think I even kidded you about it with a Chris Issak song in your honor.
And yes I understand what you were pointing out. I counter-pointed that to you.
.
[ edited by dblfugger9 on Jun 3, 2005 05:22 PM ]
posted on June 3, 2005 06:07:12 PM new
lol...nope it was up to the laws of the US to decide...and they did.
He was convicted of lying under oath...and convicted of obstructing justice. But I agree...he wasn't convicted of getting many bj's.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy. -- Ann Coulter
posted on June 3, 2005 06:33:37 PM new
A couple more...but she really should write a book with all of her quotes in it...
oh wait...she has...she's written several books too.
I don't know. Have liberals seen our guys? Engaging in mind-boggling acts of heroism makes our brave servicemen happy. Camel-riding nomads may excel at the sucker punch, but wait until they see Western Civilization's response. As pilot "Elvis" said on MSNBC the other night, "We'll do the job." So I wouldn't worry too much about the redoubtable Taliban forces. We're sending in men, not Washington Post columnists. -- Ann Coulter
Not exactly smashing stereotypes of liberals as mincing pantywaists, the left's entire contribution to the war effort thus far has been to whine. -- Ann Coulter
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on June 3, 2005 06:40:59 PM new
Sooooooo Krafty, thanks for agreeing with us.
And in Ann's words:
COME BACK, LIBERALS!
by Ann Coulter
March 9, 2005
Liberals have been completely intellectually vanquished. Actually, they lost the war of ideas long ago. It's just that now their defeat is so obvious, even they've noticed. As new DNC Chairman Howard Dean might say, it's all over but the screaming.
In an editorial last week, The New York Times gave President Bush credit for democracy sweeping through the Middle East or, as the Times put it, "a year of heartening surprises." Yes, the Middle East's current democratization would come as quite a surprise to anyone who puts his hands over his ears and hums during the president's speeches.
Rolling Stone magazine is making fun of "moveon.org" for having no contact with normal Americans. Their Bush-hating cause has become so hopeless that moveon.org is on the verge of actually moving on.
Marking the first time Walter Cronkite and I have agreed on anything, Cronkite is ridiculing Dan Rather, saying he should have retired a long time ago.
No one, not even Chris Matthews, is defending the Italian Communist who claims American forces intentionally shot at her in Iraq. (But to be fair, Keith Oberman has been on vacation this week.) She may have lost some credibility when she backed her claim that Americans were targeting her by quoting her kidnappers. She said her kidnappers had warned her to stay away from the Americans because they would only hurt her. And then my rapist said, "Whatever you do, don't cry out for the police! They won't help you!"
Consider that less than 20 years ago, ABC's Peter Jennings and CBS' Mike Wallace announced at an "Ethics in America" panel that they would not intervene to prevent the slaughter of American troops while on duty as journalists — especially during sweeps. As Wallace said: "You don't have a higher duty. No. No. You're a reporter!" It almost makes you wonder if U.S. troops have ever targeted American journalists in the field during wartime. Maybe Eason Jordan would know something about that.
Now liberal journalists are pretending to support the troops. They hardly ever call them "baby killers" anymore, at least to their faces.
Democrats are even pretending to believe in God — you know, as they understand Her.
The only people liberals can find to put up a fight these days are ex-Klanners and other assorted nuts.
There's former KKK "Kleagle" and Democratic Sen. Bob Byrd, who compared the Republicans to Hitler last week. Byrd having been a charter member of a fascist organization himself, no one was sure if this was intended as a critique or a compliment.
Aspiring first lady Teresa Heinz claims the election was stolen through the machinations of a vast conspiracy involving Republican polling machine manufacturers. We eagerly await a Michael Moore documentary to flesh out the details. It's only a matter of time before Heinz announces that anti-Bush insurgents control most of the Red States, and that the sooner the U.S. pulls out of those quagmires, the better.
Howard Dean — chairman of the party that supports murder, adultery, lying about adultery, coveting other people's money, stealing other people's money, mass-producing human embryos for spare parts like an automotive chop shop and banning God — has called the Republican Party "evil." One Democrat in the audience, a preschool teacher no less, complained that Dean was soft-pedaling his message.
Teddy Kennedy's big new idea is to wheel out his 18th proposal to raise the minimum wage. He's been doing this since wages were paid in Spanish doubloons (which coincidentally are now mostly found underwater). Kennedy refuses to countenance any risky schemes like trying to grow the economy so people making minimum wage get raises because they've been promoted. Kennedy's going down and he's taking the party with him! (Recognize the pattern?)
I keep expecting the real Democrats to appear and drag these nuts out of the room, saying, Oh sorry, he's escaped again — don't worry, he does this all the time, and then Howard Dean will stand up and have no pants on.
So now, the entire country is ignoring liberals. I'm the canary in the coal mine. Twenty-six congressmen have signed a letter denouncing me for a column I wrote two weeks ago; for the past two weeks, I've been attacked on MSNBC and CNN, in The Detroit Free-Press and on every known liberal blog and radio show. (I especially want to thank Pacifica Radio in this regard.) I personally have shouted their complaints from the rooftops. Liberals had fallen into my trap!
But there was no point in responding because no one had heard about the liberal denunciations in the first place. It was like explaining a joke: OK, and then they said, "Call me a cab," and then I said, "Okay! You're a cab! Are you following this? ... Sorry, let me start over again."
This is like beating Dennis Kucinich in an untelevised presidential debate. That and $8.50 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbuck's. I'm tired of helping liberals publicize their attacks on me. Liberals are going to have to do better than that if they want a response from me.
It's not just that we're a divided nation, with liberals watching only CNN and conservatives watching only Fox News. I'm pretty sure liberals are aware of me, and I haven't appeared on CNN for months. It's liberals the country is ignoring. No one knows or cares what they're carrying on about in their media outlets. Liberals can't get arrested. They're even letting Martin Sheen off with a warning now.
I hate to sound selfish at such a great moment for the country, but this is nothing short of calamitous for completely innocent right-wing polemicists. Liberals are too pathetic to write about. I have nothing to do; my life is over. Where have all the flowers gone?
I'm confident they'll stage a comeback someday. In lieu of common sense, liberals have boundless energy. But I'm getting bored waiting. In the interest of good sportsmanship, I have some proposals for liberals. I think Democrats might want to drop the contract all Democrats apparently have to sign pledging to pretend to believe insane things. Also, if you could just get the base of your party to not participate anymore and maybe be a little less crazy, people might listen to you. Barring that, you're just going to have to scream a little louder.
A word to the wise ain't necessary, it's the stupid ones that need the advice."
- Bill Cosby
posted on June 3, 2005 06:42:21 PM new
Boy, linduh , you sure are in the hate mode....what exactly are you trying to prove....how nasty you are.... we KNOW that.
And , your girlfriend, Annie Looslegs is pretty stupid if she doesn't know (like YOU) that there are women and Democrats fighting and dying and being blown apart in Iraq.
And whining? You are the biggest, most prolific whiner here! Al you do is whine about the Democrats...you and your latest love are both equally two-faced.
[ edited by crowfarm on Jun 3, 2005 06:50 PM ]
posted on June 3, 2005 06:44:33 PM new
Can't spell , can't read but still argues ..sheesh!
"Political debate with liberals is basically impossible in America because liberals are calling names while conservatives are trying to make arguments...It's really all the same lie [that liberals tell], that conservatives are either stupid or scarily weird and therefore you don't have to deal with their ideas."
So it's ok for conservative Ann Coulter to call liberals stupid or evil, but it's darn mean for liberals to call conservatives stupid or evil? If this is Coulter's idea of starting a "political debate" she's better off sticking with invective. I don't know if she is blind to the hypocrisy of her position or if she just doesn't care (or perhaps she uses the old schoolyard claim "they started it first!". Whatever her internal rationalization, her words make her look pretty, uh, well, you know. Stupid.
posted on June 3, 2005 06:45:45 PM new
Double, you counter-pointed by talking about Clinton instead of all the other people I listed. If you're going to discuss wrong-doings, shouldn't all the wrong-doers be included?
. Whatever her internal rationalization, her words make her look pretty, uh, well, you know. Stupid.
