posted on June 3, 2005 01:35:19 PM "And you're tell me that with that HUGE amount of mind boggling files you've saved, you can't find ONE where you were actually against more government spending for social programs? I don't believe it for one minute."
There you go again with another lie, Linda. And I have to wonder where did it come from. That topic has not been mentioned on this thread.
When exactly have I told you that I'm against more government spending for social programs?
Does anyone here besides linda remember such an incident?
posted on June 3, 2005 02:02:50 PM
Linda, I'm seriously concerned about your reasoning and I think that you should take a rest. In my opinion, you are not making good sense right now. First, you call me a socialist and then you tell me that I am agaist government spending on social programs....Both statements are false in my case... besides being incongruous.
posted on June 3, 2005 02:35:38 PM
LOL....well I'll place my bet that MOST rational people would be MUCH MORE concerned for one who finds it necessary for you to have kept a record of all 11,511 posts you've made in the last THREE years...and god only knows how many thousands MORE under your other userid from approx. 2000 - 2002 recorded. Especially on a chat board.
That's the HUGE file I was talking about.
And that doesn't make sense to me. But to you....it's normal behavior I guess. Bet if we took a poll here...no one else keeps those kind of records/files.
Your problem linda is that I remember EVERYTHING that I have said here and have a record of every word.
And with all that....still can't find ONE statement.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on June 3, 2005 04:22:38 PM She says she in her 30's and has read some left leaning book and she just KNOWS what she's talking about. While we, all of us old enough to have actually been adults while this whole thing went down, don't have a clue about anything.
That one makes me smile.
Some are still living now too and clueless about whom was responsible for 9/11 or what’s happened in Iraq. Proves that ‘being an adult when it went down’ has nothing at all to do with having a clue.
posted on June 3, 2005 04:29:59 PM
Fenix it wasn't a 30 minute interview. It was squeezed in betweens speaker. at the Democratic National Convention. It was a spur of the moment interview. I tried to find it last night but c-Span didn't record the interview.
The retired FBI person said he was wrong what he did but he was also right.
Whether Felt took documents or quoted documents is the same thing. He still revealed FBI documents to outsiders what is wrong. It was stated in an interview that he could have resigned his post. Then reported it.
BTW Felt was so anxious to reveal everything he knew it was like he couldn't stop talking. He couldn't stop giving information. It was like he was getting revenge for not getting the job. Now, do you think if Nixon had appointed him head of the FBI he would have done it?
They would have caught them anyway but Felt had to put intrigue into the breakin and give all the praise to the news reporters and the Washington Post. But now he is having second thoughts. Why give them all the glory, why not let them focus on me.
posted on June 3, 2005 04:36:37 PM....well I'll place my bet that MOST rational people would be MUCH MORE concerned for one who finds it necessary for you to have kept a record of all 11,511 posts you've made in the last THREE years...
LOL Linda. Did anybody else find it curious when the whole thing went down with yellowstone and maggie and doo-dirt, that thread was pulled so fast and yet Helen had it? hahahahaha!
"LOL Linda. Did anybody else find it curious when the whole thing went down with yellowstone and maggie and doo-dirt, that thread was pulled so fast and yet Helen had it? hahahahaha!
posted on June 3, 2005 05:01:09 PM "They would have caught them anyway but Felt had to put intrigue into the breakin and give all the praise to the news reporters and the Washington Post. But now he is having second thoughts. Why give them all the glory, why not let them focus on me."
The burglars were caught before Felt became involved. They were carrying identification which linked them to the Nixon White House.
posted on June 3, 2005 05:04:30 PM
Oh, but you'd be so wrong again, our Northern neighbor.
Us old foggies that were adults during the 60's and 70's are the ones who KEPT KERRY from winning this past election. We were there during the VN war...WE saw and lived through those times and didn't need some anti=war, left leaning book or paper to tell US what a hero kerry was. We KNEW differently....we lived it.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on June 3, 2005 05:21:25 PMLinda, I'm seriously concerned about your reasoning and I think that you should take a rest
Now do we have a resident Dr. Phil in the house. So Helen you can predict when someone needs help. Well I don't see you saying anything to a liberal poster in here who comes in screaming, suggesting how to donate to stem cell that they are in need of a rest. I guess you can say that about both sides if you are going to say it at all.
posted on June 3, 2005 05:30:24 PM
Helen I think you have something wrong. Evidently you chose to use the word foggier or maybe you chose the word fogged but fogies was also a suggestion for foggies. This is from the Miriam Webster dictionary. So I looked up the word fogies and the defination follows this excerpt for the word foggies.
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search box to the right.
Main Entry: fo·gy
Variant(s): also fo·gey /'fO-gE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural fogies also fogeys
Etymology: origin unknown
: a person with old-fashioned ideas -- usually used with old
- fo·gy·ish /-gE-ish/ adjective
- fo·gy·ism /-gE-"i-z&m/ noun
posted on June 3, 2005 05:39:41 PM "Now do we have a resident Dr. Phil in the house. So Helen you can predict when someone needs help. Well I don't see you saying anything to a liberal poster in here who comes in screaming, suggesting how to donate to stem cell that they are in need of a rest. I guess you can say that about both sides if you are going to say it at all."
Libra...When someone from the left tells a lie about me, I reserve the right to check out their reasoning. LOL.
Kiara is responsible for coining the new word from linda's post...not me. Incidentally, I think it's more descriptive that the original word.
posted on June 3, 2005 05:51:20 PM
lol Libra - I think she's a Dr. Phil wanna be, myself.
And just can't see that her personal problems are far greater than most who post here.
But then...she's bi-polar on this issue too. While she refers others to get help, etc....she has also stated that they don't do any good when she's used them. So...with her....it can be taken both ways.
"Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy. This is their essence." --Ann Coulter
And why the American Voters chose to RE-elect President Bush to four more years. YES!!!
posted on June 3, 2005 05:52:02 PM
::Fenix it wasn't a 30 minute interview. It was squeezed in betweens speaker at the Democratic National Convention. It was a spur of the moment interview. I tried to find it last night but c-Span didn't record the interview.::
It was a 33 minute 44 second segment.
It was played at 3 times yesterday.
If you go to CSPAN.org, hit search and search for June 2005 and Skip Brandon you should be able to bring up the same RealMedia video file that I checked to confirm existed before originally suggesting that Linda check it out.
I think you may be referring to a completely different segment.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
No, I'm saying -- I'm merely -- I'm saying what I'm saying. I don't know why I'm always having people say, are you trying to say -- you know what you can do if you want to know what I'm saying is listen to what I'm saying. What I'm saying is what I said ...
- Ann Coulter
[ edited by fenix03 on Jun 3, 2005 05:52 PM ]
posted on June 3, 2005 05:59:24 PM
FOUL FELT By William F. Buckley Jr.
2 hours, 28 minutes ago
Mark Felt has made it clear that he wants to cash in on this whole Watergate business, and why indeed not? It was thought for some 30 years that Deep Throat did as he did to preserve the honor of his country. Perhaps that was the precipitating motive of Mark Felt. But to agree on that point requires that you agree that getting Richard Nixon out of the White House was the supreme national concern, in which event it would have been OK to shoot him.
What Mark Felt loosed was a series of explosive newspaper stories that bound public opinion and overwhelmed policy-making and policy-makers. It is indisputable that Watergate doomed South Vietnam, and accounted for the Republican defeats of 1974 and 1976.
It can certainly be argued that Mr. Nixon dug his own grave by making the mistakes he made. Presidents do that all the time. They make fateful mistakes. But the judicial arbiters of history tend to come up with appropriate punishments. Monica Lewinsky came close to tossing President Bill Clinton out of office. Yet it does not follow that because the president dallied with Ms. Lewinsky he should have been impeached and tossed out. Nixon's overreaction to the publication of the Pentagon Papers didn't mean that his mandate to govern was for that reason forfeited.
No, what ejected Nixon was the accumulation of crossed stories. It is well-documented that beginning about November 1973, life at the White House centered on Watergate. The series of lies and evasions and misrepresentations finally caught Nixon up in a direct lie taped by his own machinery. On June 28, 1974, Gerald Ford was on "Firing Line," and I asked him directly whether President Nixon would successfully persevere. He answered that there was no doubt about the survival of Richard Nixon as president. Six weeks later, Ford was sworn in as president.
Now Mr. Felt steps forward and says that it was he who in effect staged the end of the Nixon administration. What he did, over a period of months, was to report to two industrious journalists at The Washington Post, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, everything that came to his attention through the fish-eye lens. Mr. Felt wanted to know everything about the traffic of dollars to and from the Committee to Re-Elect the President, and everything about the background and the activities of everyone associated with the White House, from the attorney general down to the plumbers. As evidence accumulated of wrongdoing and crime, he reported not to the director of the FBI (his immediate superior), not to the Justice Department, but to the two journalists.
Bob Woodward is thoughtful enough to have recounted, the day after the news about Felt broke, his first meeting with Deep Throat back in 1970, two years before the Watergate break-in. There they both were, waiting, in the West Wing of the White House, Woodward to deliver a message from the chief of naval operations, the assistant director of the FBI on a mission of his own. "I could tell he was watching the situation very carefully. There was nothing overbearing in his attentiveness, but his eyes were darting about in a kind of gentlemanly surveillance. After several minutes I introduced myself. 'Lieutenant Bob Woodward,' I said, carefully appending a deferential 'sir.'
"'Mark Felt,' he said."
Mark Antony, meeting Brutus, deserved no greater headline in history.
Such things happen. On Jan. 5, 1973, Howard Hunt, an old friend and my sometime boss in the CIA, came to see me, accompanied by one of his daughters (my goddaughter, as it happened). He told me the appalling inside story of Watergate, including the riveting news that one of the plumbers was ready and disposed to kill Jack Anderson, the journalist-commentator, if word came down to proceed to that lurid extreme.
I took what I thought appropriate measures. I do not believe Jack Anderson's life was actually imperiled, but meanwhile, in an adjacent theater, Mark Felt, posing as an incorruptible agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, was advancing his own drama. And now he wants some money for it.
posted on June 3, 2005 06:17:05 PM
What nonsense, linda. In an effort to understand that gobbledegook, I'll just refer to one of your latest posts....explains why so many have difficulty understanding you.
And linda says, .. "LOL....no need to pretend...I'm the one who KNOWS what I say, what I don't, and how I feel. No one else....even though they try."
Keep working on it and maybe one day you can write and think like Ann, who says,
"No, I'm saying -- I'm merely -- I'm saying what I'm saying. I don't know why I'm always having people say, are you trying to say -- you know what you can do if you want to know what I'm saying is listen to what I'm saying. What I'm saying is what I said ..."
posted on June 3, 2005 06:18:22 PM
""Oh, but you'd be so wrong again, our Northern neighbor.
Us old foggies that were adults during the 60's and 70's are the ones who KEPT KERRY from winning this past election. We were there during the VN war...WE saw and lived through those times and didn't need some anti=war, left leaning book or paper to tell US what a hero kerry was. We KNEW differently....we lived it."""
FOGGIES ! FOGGIES????
DUH STUPID you ARE very FOGGY. An evil fog surrounds you .....
posted on June 3, 2005 06:56:01 PM
OK linduh , who's the WE in your statement ?
SPEAKING FOR OTHERS AGAIN?
"""Us old foggies that were adults during the 60's and 70's are the ones who KEPT KERRY from winning this past election. We were there during the VN war...WE saw and lived through those times and didn't need some anti=war, left leaning book or paper to tell US what a hero kerry was. We KNEW differently....we lived it."""
Well, this WE lived in it, too....so quit speaking for me and everybody else.
posted on June 3, 2005 07:06:20 PM
OK linduh , who's the WE in your statement ?
SPEAKING FOR OTHERS AGAIN?
"""Us old foggies that were adults during the 60's and 70's are the ones who KEPT KERRY from winning this past election. We were there during the VN war...WE saw and lived through those times and didn't need some anti=war, left leaning book or paper to tell US what a hero kerry was. We KNEW differently....we lived it."""
Well, this WE lived in it, too....so quit speaking for me and everybody else.
[dbl]
