posted on November 3, 2005 03:25:44 AM new
Dear Bigpeepa,
I feel compelled to comment your your last inane post you made comparing Bush with Hitler.
"The difference between Bush and Hitler is.
1- Hitler had a mustache Bush doesn't."
as far as I've been alive NO U.S. President has had a mustache(although I'm sure Monica wishes Clinton had one,so he could return the favor)..so whats your point??
"2- Hitler fulfilled his Military obligation Bush didn't"
well Clinton didn't either..so now you're comparing Hitler with Clinton?? That pansy ass ran off to England,along with thousands of scumbags who ran off to Canada in the late 60's and early 70's to avoid the draft-which in turn that as*hole Jimmy Carter let back in the country along with thousands of Haitians who brought aids to this country...no wonder the nitwit didn't get elected for a 2nd term.
"The similarity between Bush and Hitler is both were appointed to office."
so was every president we've ever had...so now you're comparing Hitler with every president that was elected??
"Sorry, I forgot to update LIAR LINDA. 4 more dead American troops today 11/2/05"
Hitler killed 6,000,000 Jews alone-your comparing this with Bush???
"Like Bush is doing now, Hitler chipped away at freedoms and liberties a little at a time"
okay bunky-what freedoms and liberties has Bush taken away?? Your still free here to make your idiotic posts..isnt that freedom enough for you??
COLIN-DO NOT, I REPEAT DO NOT, REMOVE THIS MAN FROM YOUR A-LIST-HE FITS THE BILL.
Big-I have to tell you, my mother-in-law was from Johnstown,Pa.You ever here of it? I'm sure you have, since your from Pittsburgh.She was dumber then a box of rocks.All these years I figured it was because she was Polish. Now after reading your stupid posts for over a year now,I'm convinced it was because shes from PA.How come people from Pa are so stoooopid?? Whats up with that anyway?? Has drinking that contaminated water from 3 Mile Island destroyed your brain??
luv,
classic
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beauty is only a light switch away
[ edited by classicrock000 on Nov 3, 2005 03:28 AM ]
posted on November 3, 2005 03:41:06 AM new
"What Bush & Co. do call to mind is Senator Joseph McCarthy and his cronies"
McCarthy was a senator form MINNESOTA(hear that crowfart??) who was on a witch hunt for commies in the early 50's...so BUGS can ya tell us what the similarity is here? I didn't realize the country was running rampant with communists and Bush was on the hunt for them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beauty is only a light switch away
[ edited by classicrock000 on Nov 3, 2005 03:41 AM ]
posted on November 3, 2005 04:22:42 AM new
That I am much more familar with the "connotation" (try literal definition) of any words more than you will ever be, still doesnt make these MY Words: Personally, I'd much rather be known as a b*tch. Perhaps it would help you to know what you are referencing before you type what "you'd like to be known as". But do keep slinky-sniffing along.
posted on November 3, 2005 06:38:53 AM new
Ha ha! The biggest "mouth" on here can never answer pertinent questions because they make her look like a fool
How many of these people are the highest ranking Republicans who are running our country ?
The TRUTH hurts ?
How about lies?
how have these things , these hipocrisies KILLED THOUSANDS ??? Like the bush administration has...?
linda says, ""It's only the whining wacko liberals that keep repeating that old nonsense""
And it's the whining neocons who keep bringing up Clinton and Michael Moore who does NOT run this country.
And then rather than find any defense for the corruption of CURRENT officials she always brings up Clinton
posted on November 3, 2005 09:10:02 AM new
dblfugger, the b!tch word has different meanings and it's not always bad so when you immediately chose the one you did, it shows we travel in different circles. Lapdog and asskisser bitches know much more about slinky-sniffing and snitching than most free-thinking bitches who run their own businesses successfully but don't always get approval for the way they do things so I do know exactly which one I am referencing.
posted on November 3, 2005 10:08:54 AM new
You don't have to worry about Missyturd being taken off the A-List.
Matter of fact...If some one can get me her Picture, I'll use it as the Avatar for the Page..
I too had a feeling about the water but (you know me) I didn't want to offend anyone.
BTW missyturd: an avatar is(as used here):
An icon or representation of a user in a shared virtual reality.
The original meaning is much deeper and my also relate to you:
AVATAR is a word that is commonly heard but rarely understood. In English, the word has come to mean "an embodiment, a bodily manifestation of the Divine." However, the Sanskrit word Avatara means "the descent of God" or simply "incarnation."
posted on November 3, 2005 11:14:14 AM newLapdog and asskisser bitches know much more about slinky-sniffing and snitching than most free-thinking bitches who run their own businesses successfully but don't always get approval for the way they do things so I do know exactly which one I am referencing.
Did you run out of breath stuffing it all into one sentence there? Oh my, how abstruse. Let me see if I can figure it out. Oh yeah,,how bout: I am a martha stewart's mini-me wanna-be and I will tell you all what I am, how wonderful I am, and how not-wonderful you are.
All this..elicted because I said a bit*h is a female dog in heat.
[ the b!tch word has different meanings and it's not always bad... ]
Are you even aware its considered a profanity?
As far as traveling in the same circles: Thank God for small favors. Your circle always consists of eventually winding up running behind your own tail anyway. Its quite a common occurrance. And I never did care too much for common.
posted on November 3, 2005 01:08:18 PM new
DBL,
Your last message (above) is looking a little Anal Retentive.
Amen,
Reverend Colin http://www.reverendcolin.com
posted on November 3, 2005 05:12:07 PM newMcCarthy was a senator form MINNESOTA(hear that crowfart??) who was on a witch hunt for commies in the early 50's...so BUGS can ya tell us what the similarity is here? I didn't realize the country was running rampant with communists and Bush was on the hunt for them.
Oh, the similarities are there. For instance:
After graduating McCarthy worked as a lawyer but was fairly unsuccessful and had to supplement his income by playing poker.
Bush, too, was unsuccessful in business.
McCarthy was originally a supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal. However, after failing to become the Democratic Party candidate for district attorney, he switched parties and became the Republican Party candidate in an election to become a circuit court judge. McCarthy shocked local officials by fighting a dirty campaign. This included publishing campaign literature that falsely claimed that his opponent, Edgar Werner, was 73 (he was actually 66). As well as suggesting that Werner was senile, McCarthy implied that he was guilty of financial corruption.
Bush's campaign, too, made false allegations about his opponent.
When the United States entered the Second Word War McCarthy resigned as a circuit judge and joined the Marines. After the war McCarthy ran against Robert La Follette to become Republican candidate for the senate. As one of his biographers has pointed out, his campaign posters pictured him in "full fighting gear, with an aviator's cap, and belt upon belt of machine gun ammunition wrapped around his bulky torso." He claimed he had completed thirty-two missions when in fact he had a desk job and only flew in training exercises.
Bush, too, made much more of his military service than it actually was...not to mention the infamous posing in military garb under a certain sign... Though let's be fair: McCarthy actually completed his service even if it was behind a desk.
n his campaign, McCarthy attacked La Follette for not enlisting during the war. He had been forty-six when Pearl Harbor had been bombed, and was in fact too old to join the armed services. McCarthy also claimed that La Follette had made huge profits from his investments while he had been away fighting for his country.
Bush's campaign, too, attacked his opponent's military service, and also managed to intimate that there was tricky doings involving his wife's business and family connections.
McCarthy's first years in the Senate were unimpressive. People also started coming forward claiming that he had lied about his war record.
Same with Bush.
In May, 1950, afraid that he would be defeated in the next election, McCarthy held a meeting with some of his closest advisers and asked for suggestions on how he could retain his seat. Edmund Walsh, a Roman Catholics priest, came up with the idea that he should begin a campaign against communist subversives working in the Democratic administration.
Instead of communists, Bush has terrorists. As I've said in the past, he has capitalized on 9-11, whipping up fear and concern continuously--and then he engineered a war with Iraq to distract from the fact that he wasn't actually going after the perpetrators after his gung-ho start. Bush & Co. also demonize the Democratic party, and their followers become almost hysterical about liberals, whom they make out to be emissaries of the Devil.
On 20th February McCarthy made a six hour speech on the Senate floor about how the Democratic administration had been infiltrated by communist subversives. McCarthy named four of these people, who had held left-wing views in their youth, but when Democrats accused McCarthy of smear tactics, he suggested they were part of this communist conspiracy. This claim was used against his critics who were up for re-election in 1950. Many of them lost and this made other Democrats reluctant to criticize McCarthy in case they became targets of his smear campaigns.
Sounds so familiar...
McCarthyism was mainly used against Democrats associated with the New Deal policies introduced by Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s. Harry S. Truman and members of his Democratic administration such as George Marshall and Dean Acheson, were accused of being soft on communism. Truman was portrayed as a dangerous liberal and McCarthy's campaign helped the Republican candidate, Dwight Eisenhower, win the presidential election in 1952.
Same tactics Bush & Co. used and continue to use.
After what had happened to McCarthy's opponents in the 1950 election, most politicians were unwilling to criticize him in the Senate. As the Boston Post pointed out: "Attacking him is this state is regarded as a certain method of committing suicide. One notable exception was William Benton, a senator from Connecticut and the owner of Encyclopaedia Britannica. McCarthy and his supporters immediately began smearing Benton.
Why just this week it happened to Senator Reid! And look at Democratic congressmen (& Republicans who didn't agree with Bush & Co.) who have tread on eggshells for the past few years, afraid until recently to stand up Bush & Co. when they should have for fear (with reason to be as we all recall) of being labeled "un-American," "soft on Terror", etc. etc. etc. Citizens who voice disagreement or criticism are labeled by Bush followers the same way and told over and over to either shut up or leave their own country.
In October, 1953, McCarthy began investigating communist infiltration into the military. Attempts were made by McCarthy to discredit Robert Stevens, the Secretary of the Army.
Who can forget how Bush & Co. have turned on any military leader that has dared to disagree with them? Beginning with his own used-to-be golden boy, Colin Powell.
Some figures in the media, such as writers George Seldes and I. F. Stone, and cartoonists, Herb Block and Daniel Fitzpatrick, had fought a long campaign against McCarthy. Other figures in the media, who had for a long time been opposed to McCarthyism, but were frightened to speak out, now began to get the confidence to join the counter-attack. Edward Murrow, the experienced broadcaster, used his television programme, See It Now, on 9th March, 1954, to criticize McCarthy's methods. Newspaper columnists such as Drew Pearson, Walter Lippmann and Jack Anderson also became more open in their attacks on McCarthy.
Same with Bush: a few have spoken out about him from the beginning, and now many many others have gathered the courage to do so.
Oh yes, and just as in McCarthy's day, people who speak out against Bush's activities and those of his henchmen are accused of "sympathizing with the enemy
____________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." -- George W. Bush
This cartoon also speaks to the attacks on American freedoms and rights in the sause of "fighting terror."
"Fire!"
"By 1949, the Soviets had expanded their control to cover most of Eastern Europe, and it appeared that China would soon fall to the communists as well. "The fear-filled forties and fifties were a dark period when the spread of communism abroad increased anxieties and frustration at home," wrote Herb Block. In their zeal to stamp out all signs of subversion in the United States, professional and amateur anti-communists threatened to suppress American liberties as well.
"Fire!" June 17, 1949
Reproduction from original drawing
Published in the Washington Post
"Say, what ever happened to 'freedom-from-fear'?" August 13, 1951
Reproduction from original drawing
Published in the Washington Post
edited to fix UBB
____________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." -- George W. Bush
[ edited by bunnicula on Nov 3, 2005 05:20 PM ]
posted on November 3, 2005 05:29:15 PM new
BTW - a female dog is a B*tch whether she is a 3 week old puppy or a 13 year old spay. She does not need to be in heat.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
An intelligent deaf-mute is better than an ignorant person who can speak.
posted on November 3, 2005 06:28:26 PM new
In 1992, asked why the United States was content to evict Iraq from Kuwait while leaving Saddam Hussein in power, Cheney replied: "Once we had rounded him up and gotten rid of his government, then the question is what do you put in its place. You know, you then have accepted the responsibility for governing Iraq." He asked, "How many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is, not very damn many."
The above was said by Dick Cheney in 1992. Back then it did not appear as if he wanted a regime change. Another flip-flopper.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
