posted on January 5, 2006 07:25:05 PM new
This thread reminds me of a debate I saw on Buckley's "Crossfire" show years ago. He had on David Dellums and the crowd was packed with Dellums cohorts. Every sentence Dellums made brought forth great choruses of praise AND a instant correction by Buckley about Dellums' fractured "facts". This guy could barely spell his name right. He told Buckley almost half a dozen times in response to Buckley's corrections that he "didn't have his facts and figures with him".
The next day I overheard some people talking about how Dellums took Buckley to the woodshed.
It is natural for most people to operate on the principal of "it sounds good, it must be true", or to support the stupidest utterrances of someone sharing their views. But even if Chairman Mao was scoring, Buckley won the debate by a country mile.
It always makes me laugh when certain posters here yell at me for not being "nice".
Well, they must have been revered in their college political science course, or in some cases 8th grade study hall, but to someone whose education is engineering, etc, the absolute leaps of illogic joined together are indeed incredible.
posted on January 5, 2006 11:43:29 PM new
linda who doesn't believe in reading or hearing, which explains a lot of things says,
"" Linda_K
posted on January 5, 2006 06:19:06 PM new
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bear - Yes, while mingo calls him an UNPROVED sexual preditor....notice she doesn't mention that this woman was trying to scam millions and millions of dollars out of him. No, no crime there. THEN he files a suit, she files a suit and it's my bet the reason they settled out of court, with NONE of the facts being told is because of the time and money involved. """
First, I NEVER called him an UNPROVED sexual preditor...that is an out and out lie....surprise, surprise, surpise....linda LIES.
I called him a "sexual predAtor" which he has proven to be.
Linda, the evidence was a TAPE of him committing a crime...kind of hard to deny when they got ya on TAPE....hence , the out of court settlement
posted on January 7, 2006 01:13:42 PM new
Lindumb@ss says, "the more we know O'Reilly is doing a GREAT job."
So she applauds O'Reilly for twisting a story, making it out like there is a war on Christmas, when in fact, the song O'Reilly refers to was created by this man, a person who is a dedicated Christian musician who simply wrote a play and changed some lyrics. Talk about a hypocrite supporting a hypocrite.
http://delrich.home.mindspring.com/dwah.html
I guess its ok in Lindumb@ss' world to bash other "christians" for the war on Christmas. In her book that is considered doing a "great job" kinda like "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job." Pure BS from the queen of fascism.
posted on January 7, 2006 01:39:31 PM new
linda's kinda non-existent in this thread since I caught her in another lie and mentioned the TAPE that fried O'Reilly
posted on January 7, 2006 02:08:07 PM newAnd to the leftie who snitched on piinthesky.....why aren't YOU reporting the foul mouths and words that davebruan and rustygumbo call me?
Showing some sad form of favoritism here are you by NOT doing the same with them?
posted on January 7, 2006 02:19:42 PM new
Where shall I start, let me count the ways....
""""Linda_K
posted on January 7, 2006 02:05:38 PM new
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL....sure mingo/crow
sure....that's it. We ALL heard a COURT rule that tape to be made public for all of us to hear. right...
...it's called living in a world of delusion. That's your world...not mine."""
linda, who's "we all' ? Got a turd in your pocket? The Tape is a reality...just not in your world Since you can't read or hear the facts try a psychic who can channel the information into your little brain
"""Linda_K
posted on January 7, 2006 02:08:07 PM new
And to the leftie who snitched on piinthesky.....why aren't YOU reporting the foul mouths and words that davebruan and rustygumbo call me?
Showing some sad form of favoritism here are you by NOT doing the same with them?"""
Accusing a lefty again , linda?
You forgot about the time you accused lefties and it turned out to be your friend Dble ? Where's your famous PROOF it was a lefty? Watch out! You were made to look like a fool last time and it can happen again(so easily)
AAAWWWW, you think somebody's playing favorites...you mean like in grade school....gee, I thought you were older than that! Sorry your feelings are so easily hurt
posted on January 7, 2006 02:26:38 PM new
Sure am, mingo. And YOU'RE the most likely suspect since his post was TO YOU.
And this woman tries to EXTORT $65 MILLION dollars from HIM. HE sues HER for extortion....THEN she files her 'so-called harassment suit'.
hmmmmm....sure....it wasn't BECAUSE HE filed against her first....nope couldn't be. OF COURSE YOU'D defend an extortionist....no surprise there for me at all.
LOL
go away...you're stinking up the joint again. pee U
posted on January 7, 2006 02:37:36 PM new
Since you specifically make mention of the "foul mouths and words that davebruan and rustygumbo call me" I should point out that I for the most part ignore you LindaK no matter how absurd your rant gets.
Please do not seek any response from me as I do not wish to engage you in conversation as it is pointless.
I hope I my meaning is clear and concise regarding this.
posted on January 7, 2006 03:06:07 PM new
OK linda ...here goes a heavy dose of logic so hold your ears.
You accuse me , with NO proof whatsoever, of turning in Piinthesky...then you want me to turn in dave and rusty because they insulted you ! DUH!!!!!!
You stupid twit, if we all turned in everyone who insulted us and anyone else...NO ONE would be here!
Well, it looks like you've got a new way to weasel out of ansering questions...just start accusing posters with NO PROOF whatsoever.
YOU, the harpy who always DEMANDS proof .
WHERE is your PROOF, linduh?
And: Isn't THIS just a tad childish...
"go away...you're stinking up the joint again. pee U ""
posted on January 7, 2006 03:27:38 PM new
davebraun - Be very clear here. YOU have done just as rusty does...and I've called you on it.
There won't be any of this garbage of you telling me I won't be mentioning it again. I might...my choice. You watch your mouth...THEN it won't be mentioned. YOU don't...I'll mention it as often as you continue to call me names rather than address the topic.
Hope YOUR clear on THAT.
-----------------------
proof mingo How extremely funny. You mean PROOF like that you didn't provide when YOU were going around here accusing twelve of messing with your auctions? OH yes....that NON-Proof. LOL LOL LOL
I said you were the most reasonable person to believe did just that.
posted on January 7, 2006 04:04:57 PM new
Oh look, Profe, linda knows Spanish ..."comprende'"
or is that Italian which linda would pronounce EYEtalian.
Poor linda , throws out the lies and accusations and then can't EVER back them up !!!
No proof of anything ever!!!!
As to your threats to Rusty and Dave, who I'm sure are quivering in fear, I thought you didn't care what other posters thought
Guess you lied about THAT, too!
You just can't stop lying...
More lies,
"" OF COURSE YOU'D defend an extortionist....no surprise there for me at all.""
No, there is NO place where I defended an extortionist but YOU have defended a sexual predAtor....no surprise there
But Hey Rusty and Dave better not mess with the "Mother of a Marine"!!!!!!... Seems linda thinks having a child join the military gets mom's muscles pumped
posted on January 7, 2006 04:07:47 PM new
It seems the Pink Tide (gay left) is rising on this board too.
They must have closed another bath house.
Amen,
Reverend Colin http://www.reverendcolin.com
posted on January 7, 2006 06:42:36 PM new
there's no accent mark on comprende. A better way to put it would be żme entiendes? 'comprende' is like something out of an old western or something. Gabachos using the language all wrong. As with English, there are two verbs; comprehend (comprender) and understand (entender). Comprender means to grasp and have basic understanding of a concept or idea, an abstraction. Entender, on the other hand, means to understand a direct communication. Butcher your own language, not somebody else's.
____________________________________________
posted on January 7, 2006 08:51:04 PM new
I'll tell you the same thing profe....you write what you want and I'll do the same. Seems you're so small a man that such a little thing gets on your nerves.....drinking again are you?
This isn't the first time you want to argue with someone who posts even one word of Spanish. Guess what....you don't own the board NOR the language.
posted on January 7, 2006 09:00:30 PM new
"" Seems you're so small a man that such a little thing gets on your nerves.....drinking again are you?
So...stuff it, profe. comprende'?""
No insults here
My new tagline :
""look at all the name calling insults.....so unlike most of the liberals""
posted on January 7, 2006 09:06:28 PM new
Gee....seems to me it must be about time for you to sneak in on that 'inflatable husband' of yours that you brag about all the time.
Be sure he's sound to sleep so he won't see you coming.
------------
Yes, helen said that before....didn't turn out to be true at all.
I'm done with your vomit for tonight.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 7, 2006 09:12:25 PM new
linda's definition of "vomit"
"Whenever Mingotree makes a fool out of me, points out my blatant lies, bad spelling and numerous insults, that's "vomit"."
You wouldn't be trying to get rid of me now, would you linda?
Can't take it can you?
Please don't be jealous of Inflatable Irving, I'm sure someday, maybe down at the shelter, you, too will find someone and won't have to spend every night ALONE
Linda_K
posted on January 7, 2006 08:36:17 PM
.....look at all the name calling insults.....so unlike most of the liberals here.
posted on January 8, 2006 05:51:41 AM new
Well, profes, if you went after her for something other than spelling/grammar/English/Spanish/Slashes, (coma, coma, coma,) - it might be more challenging for you!
posted on January 8, 2006 08:01:08 AM new
Prof,
Let me guess....you graduated from a teachers college? It was free, am I correct?
Amen,
Reverend Colin http://www.reverendcolin.com
posted on January 8, 2006 07:15:11 PM new
You're not correct Colin. After graduating with an International Baccalaureate High School Diploma from the Instituto Monterrey in Monterrey, Mexico, I earned scholarships and paid the rest of my way by working while going to school through 1) a bachelor of science degree in Anthropology at the University of New Mexico, 2) A Master of Science degree in Anthropology at the University of Arizona. My Master's thesis was on the cultural basis of religion. I then took a dual Master's in Elementary and Secondary Education from Arizona State University in Tempe. Since then I have completed an Education Specialist's degree (Ed.S.) in curriculum and instruction, with emphasis on T.E.S.O.L., Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. I completed this coursework online through the University of Arizona, due to the constraints of running a full time family business and also serving as head teacher, Dean of Students and curriculum chairman for my school for the last 20+ years. The only degree I ever received that I didn't pay for was the same one you got free, my preacher's license.
edited to change an 'a' to 'an'. It's important/necessary/required, dbl.
____________________________________________
[ edited by profe51 on Jan 8, 2006 07:22 PM ]
Noone. Like..Peter Noon? Noon'ie-Dune-Buggy Family? What is that? When did they start running that together instead of writing no one? I see that all over the internet.
But you never correct fenix, professor. She is the worst offender, too. When she types chacrkters, I imagine its like crackling around in her jaw to get it out.
[ edited by dblfugger9 on Jan 8, 2006 08:01 PM ]