posted on January 23, 2007 07:00:23 AM
"Thanks for the correction. I never could spell very well 2 things, first I have dyslexia, second the school system I went to was more or less run by Cornell University they tried a lame experiment in spelling."
well.......I guess that explains his lame posts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
posted on January 23, 2007 07:41:11 AM
In addition to those Americans killed in Iraq during the last few days, the Sunni's killed over 100 Shiites in Baghdad and Khalis on Monday during a sacred time for Shi'a Muslims devoted to mourning and commemoration. One hundred and thirty were killed and over 200 were wounded in that carnage on one day.
Bigpeepa, note, the correct spelling...die, died, dying. Here is a link to spellcheck which may be useful since Cornell University allegedly failed to teach you how to spell. http://www.spellcheck.net/
posted on January 23, 2007 09:09:37 AM
'waco'peepa is CONFUSED again.
"Linda would like us all to believe its only us Democrats that want out of Iraq. She seems never to deal with reality so I wanted to point out that there is a ever increasing number of republican that want out also."
TWO separate issues yo-yo.
Pulling out of Iraq AND
NOT increasing troop levels.
Try to grasp THAT FACT.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 23, 2007 09:13 AM ]
posted on January 23, 2007 09:38:45 AM
Helen thanks for the link but frankly I don't care if I spell something wrong. The new-cons get my point.
If the new-cons don't care about their being constant liars and the damage they do to America why should I care about my spelling?
Yes,Ithaca N.Y. High School was (indirectly) run by Cornell U way back when. After all if not where would the Cornell Professors and staff send their kids?
It could be different now its been years since I have been back to Ithaca but I am betting its still the same.
Yes,the Ithaca school system did try an experiment in teaching spelling for a few years and yes it did not work. Nothing allegedly about that Cornell played a big part in the failed experiment.
posted on January 23, 2007 10:22:26 AM
"Bigpeepa, note, the correct spelling...die, died, dying. Here is a link to spellcheck which may be useful since Cornell University allegedly failed to teach you how to spell.
http://www.spellcheck.net/"
Helen,why would he have to do that?Theres a spell check button right on the reply field.
Hees jist a fatt laizy asss demicrat whoose tooo dumb tou cleck on the abc butown beefore his sends out a message........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you dont want to hear the truth....dont ask the question.
posted on January 23, 2007 12:06:53 PM
classic said,
"Helen,why would he have to do that?Theres a spell check button right on the reply field.
Hees jist a fatt laizy asss demicrat whoose tooo dumb tou cleck on the abc butown beefore his sends out a message."
I am far from a fat lazy ass Democrat. It wasn't me that hung around donut shops all my working life. I am betting if you tried to keep up with me I would have worn you out before you 9AM donut break. I lived fast and enjoyed every minute. I am betting you counted the years until retirement one slow year at a time.
Classic how about a few of your learned words about BUSHY'S IRAQ INVASION.
Like I pointed out its far more important then how I spell.
I am betting classic is going to watch his GREAT LIAR and FAILED chief tonight? After he might be seen doing a war dance saying GRUNT,GRUNT,GRUNT.
Not me I have had a belly full of NEW-CON LIARS and the bad effects they have had on America.
The good news all a guy like classic has left is BLAH,BLAH. The new-cons have lost power and my side plans to keep it that way.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 23, 2007 12:24 PM ]
posted on January 23, 2007 12:59:37 PM
AHAhahaha! linduh keeps posting about how divided the Democrats are....but she fails to notice how more and more reps are turning away from bush's failed policies...
posted on January 23, 2007 02:49:43 PM
Liar_k is trying to take over a post with her poop. She doesn't want people to know that America now has 3,059 dead troops because of BUSHY's INVASION OF IRAQ.
Liar_K and other new-cons doesn't want people to know that on 01/23/07 AP: U.S. official: 5 Americans killed in copter crash
Five civilians died Tuesday in the Baghdad crash of a helicopter owned by the private security company Blackwater USA, according to a U.S. military official.
That rag the Washington Post Liar_K quoits from isn't worth being used and thrown down a hole in an old fashion out house.
Once again I challenge LIAR_K, Bear, Classic and The GRUNTER to prove me wrong on any update news I post here about BUSHY's invasion of Iraq and the suffering of our troops.
If you want to bash me fine start another post.
Don't try to cover up the truth about the suffering our troops are going through in Iraq. Many on their 2,3,or even 4th tour.
posted on January 26, 2007 07:51:42 PM
Bigpeepa, I think it's great that you keep posting these deaths to keep reminding people of the horrible sacrifices our troops have made.
It's too bad though that when people like linduh hear about more deaths it makes them so happy...they love war so much....
posted on January 26, 2007 07:57:40 PM
Navy helicopter crashes into Pacific
1 dead in accident; fate of remaining 3 on board unknown
SAN DIEGO - A Navy helicopter with four crew members aboard crashed Friday into the Pacific Ocean about 50 miles off the California coast, killing at least one person, a Navy spokesman said.
It was unclear whether the other three crew members survived.
"We remain optimistic that we'll find the remaining three and that they'll be in good shape," said Cmdr. Jack Hanzlik.
The helicopter, based at Naval Air Station North Island, was on a training mission when it crashed at 2:45 p.m., Hanzlik said.
The MH-60S, commonly known as a Seahawk, was on a mission off the USS Bonhomme Richard near San Clemente Island.
Navy search-and-rescue efforts were under way as darkness fell. Rescue crews arrived at the crash site within minutes, Hanzlik said.
The name and rank of those aboard were not being released, Hanzlik said.
Hanzlik said he did not know what type of maneuver the helicopter was performing when it crashed.
"They didn't crash into another aircraft or anything like that," Hanzlik said.
The USS Bonhomme Richard is an amphibious assault craft that took Marines to Indonesia after the 2004 tsunami.
The ship was training with two other Navy ships, the destroyer USS Chung-Hoon and the cruiser USS Chosin. Both were also participating in the rescue mission, Hanzlik said.
posted on January 27, 2007 01:23:11 PM
Mingotree, America has been loosing Troops almost everyday in IRAQ for years now and even BUSHY has said Iraq has gotten worse.
The new-cons can't really defend BUSHY'S failures so they either GRUNT or post off subject copies and pastes. Its pathetic and sometimes down right scary to watch the new-con mind work.
How about our government going to European countries looking for Troops for Iraq? So far these countries have not sent one solider as far as I know.
New-cons say its the democrats that want our troops out of BUSHY's Iraq invasion.
Hells Bells in 2003 BUSHY had over 85% of the people backing him. Now after all the lies and failures his backing is down to something like 30 something percent.
1/27/07 update on BUSHY'S IRAQ INVASION.
3,070 Dead American Troops in Bushy's Iraq invasion up 3 since yesterday.
3,070 GOOD AMERICAN LIVES GONE ALL BECAUSE OF OUR COMMANDER AND FAILURE BUSHY's INVASION OF IRAQ.
America is spending nearly 2 billion a week in Iraq JUST think what that money could do to restore New Orleans or towards health insurance FOR ALL or to REALLY CLOSE off our southern border to terrorist.
01/27/07 Xinhua: All Slovak soldiers withdrawn from Iraq
All the Slovak soldiers have moved from Iraq to neighboring Kuwait, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico told Slovak Radio on Saturday. "I have good news that all soldiers are out of Iraq, they are in Kuwait," Fico said.
posted on January 28, 2007 03:17:46 PM
Jan 28 (Reuters) - Following are security developments in Iraq at 2015 GMT on Sunday:
* denotes new or updated item.
* NAJAF - U.S. and Iraqi forces killed 250 gunmen from a Muslim cult in a battle involving U.S. tanks and helicopters near the Shi'ite holy city of Najaf, Iraqi police, army and political sources said.
* NAJAF - Two U.S. soldiers were killed when their helicopter crashed north of Najaf, the U.S. military said. A Reuters reporter saw a U.S. helicopter come down after a burst of machine gun fire during the fighting north of the city. He saw a trail of smoke from the helicopter before it came down. I
* BAGHDAD - Police found 29 bodies in various parts of Baghdad, a police source said.
JURF AL-SAKHAR - A mortar strike on a residential area of the town of Jurf al-Sakhar, 85 km (53 miles) south of Baghdad, killed 10 people and wounded five, Iraqi police said.
BAGHDAD - A U.S. soldier was killed on Saturday by a roadside bomb north of Baghdad, the U.S. military said.
KIRKUK - A suicide car bomb killed eight people and wounded 19 in the mainly Kurdish Almas district of Kirkuk, police and hospital officials said. A second car bomb killed eight and wounded 15 in a market frequented by Kurds, police said.
RAMADI - Tribal leaders said their security forces clashed with insurgents in central Ramadi, killing three gunmen.
RAMADI - Iraqi police manning a checkpoint in Ramadi opened fire on a suicide car bomber as it sped towards them on Friday, causing the vehicle to detonate, the U.S. military said, adding that it had caused little damage and minor injuries.
BAGHDAD - A U.S. soldier in the military police died on Saturday from wounds suffered when a roadside bomb hit his vehicle in northern Baghdad, the U.S. military said.
KIRKUK - A roadside bomb killed a man and wounded two others in Kirkuk, police said.
FALLUJA - A U.S. marine died on Saturday from wounds suffered in combat in Iraq's western province of Anbar, the U.S. military said.
ZUBAIYR - British forces found a weapons cache on Saturday that included 400 to 500 mortars as well as rockets and bomb- making equipment, a British military spokesman in Basra said. The cache was found in Zubayr, a mixed town of Sunni Arabs and Shi'ites in the mainly Shi'ite south near Basra.
NEAR KIRKUK - Police found the bullet-riddled body of a man in a town near Kirkuk, police said. The victim's body showed signs of torture.
BAGHDAD - A bomb planted in a minibus killed one person and wounded five others in Habibiya district in eastern Baghdad, police said.
BAGHDAD - A bomb planted in a car killed two people and wounded four others near al-Nidaa Sunni mosque in Qahira district in northern Baghdad, police said.
BAGHDAD - A bomb in a minibus killed five people, including two women a child, and wounded 35 others near a crowded market in Sadr City district in eastern Baghdad, police said.
BAGHDAD - A roadside bomb killed five people and wounded 20 in a commercial street in the southern Bayaa district of Baghdad, police said.
BAGHDAD - Five female pupils were killed in a mortar strike on a secondary school in the predominantly Sunni Adil district of western Baghdad on Sunday, the school's principal said.
BAGHDAD - Gunmen ambushed the director general of Iraq's Industry Ministry in Baghdad's western Yarmouk district as he drove to work, killing him, his daughter, and two others, police and the ministry said.
BAGHDAD - Gunmen attacked an Iraqi army patrol, killing two soldiers and wounding three on a road south of Baghdad.
RAMADI - The brother of Saad Hussein al-Alwani, a tribal leader whose body was found in Ramadi on Saturday, disputed police accounts that Alwani was a member of the Iraqi National Congress. He said his brother had no political affiliation.
posted on January 29, 2007 10:33:26 AM
Today: January 29, 2007 at 8:45:5 PST Iraqis: At Least 200 Insurgents Killed
By SINAN SALAHEDDIN
ASSOCIATED PRESS
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -
0128dv-iraq Iraqi officials said Monday that U.S.-backed Iraqi troops had targeted a religious cult called "Soldiers of Heaven" in a weekend battle that left 200 fighters dead, including the group's leader, near the Shiite holy city of Najaf. Two U.S. soldiers were also killed when their helicopter crashed during the fighting.
The Iraqi government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, said the raid on Sunday in date-palm orchards on the city's outskirts was aimed against a group called the Jund al-Samaa, or Soldiers of Heaven, which appeared to have had links to Saddam Hussein loyalists and foreign fighters.
Officials said the cult was hoping to force the return of the "hidden imam," a 9th-century Shiite saint who Shiites believe will come again to bring peace and justice to the world.
Both Mohammed al-Askari, the defense ministry spokesman, and an Iraqi military commander in charge of the Najaf area said 200 terrorists were killed and 60 wounded,
lowering previous estimates for the death toll. Maj. Gen. Othman al-Ghanemi, the commander of the 8th Division that is in charge of Najaf, said 150 had been captured, while al-Askari put that figure at 120.
[the rest of the article can be found on LasVegasSun.com]
====================
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
And those lives weren't lost in the fight against radical muslim terrorists - who have promised their goal is to destroy Israel and the U.S.
Try and put our soldiers deaths in PERSPECTIVE for once. AND acknowledge that our soldiers, who you SAY you support, ARE making progress against our enemies. Even thought the democratic party does all they can to aid and abet our enemies.
------------------
Tehran's useful IDIOTS
WA Times
TODAY'S EDITORIAL
January 29, 2007
As President Bush works to find strategies for victory in Iraq and dealing with the Iranian threat, the Democratic Party seems determined to send every possible signal to our enemies that they have nothing to worry about when it comes to the projection of American power in wartime.
Prominent Democrats are increasingly behaving as if their primary mission is not to defeat Islamists determined to destroy Western civilization, but to do everything they can to ensure that they can turn Mr. Bush into a lame duck for the next two years regardless of the consequences for our national security.
This irresponsible behavior manifests itself on an almost daily basis as anti-war lawmakers are divided into two camps on Iraq: a small but increasingly vocal group that demands withdrawal whatever the consequences, and a larger, more intellectually dishonest group that is afraid to act on its convictions and cut off funds for operations in Iraq.
Instead, members of the latter group maneuver to put themselves in a politically advantageous position where they can say "I told you so; it's Bush's fault" after Iraq collapses.
Right now, both groups are focused on passage of a resolution sometime this week denouncing the president's efforts to send more troops to protect Iraqis from marauding Sunni terrorist insurgents and Shi'ite militias in Baghdad.
But aside from undermining Mr. Bush's ability as commander in chief in Iraq, arguably no issue unites the president's foes in Congress more than Iran --
specifically the need to ensure this rogue regime that it has nothing to fear when it menaces its neighbors.
Earlier this month, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden threatened Mr. Bush with a "constitutional crisis" if the United States crossed the Iranian border in search of terrorists who send improvised explosive devices (IEDs) into Iraq to kill and maim American soldiers.
In his "prebuttal" to the State of the Union address, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid accused Mr. Bush of "saber-rattling" on Iran. After stating that the president needed congressional authorization to take military action against the rogue regime, Mr. Reid made clear that he didn't think this was a terribly good idea. The real problem, Mr. Reid indicated, is that the Bush administration "has no strategy for connecting with" Iranians under 30, who he called a "generation of potential reformers."
While we wait for the mullahs to act on Mr. Reid's enlightened vision and cede power to Iran's reformist generation, however, there are more pressing problems back in the real world -- like Tehran's role in smuggling IEDs into Iraq.
In response to the IED problem, Mr. Bush has granted authority to U.S. troops to to use all necessary measures to protect themselves and Iraqi civilians from harm; to make this a reality, Mr. Bush is reported to have given U.S. troops the authority to kill or capture Iranian operatives inside Iraq.
Until now, U.S. forces have tried to avoid conflict with Tehran by using a policy called "catch and release" (not entirely unlike the failed policy for combatting illegal immigrants in the United States) in dealing with Iranian operatives in Iraq, who would be detained for a brief period by U.S. forces, then sent on their way.
Unsurprisingly, the program was a failure that emboldened Tehran to continue its subversion.
On Friday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates (who less than three years ago had joined with Zbigniew Brzezinski in calling for U.S. engagement with Iran) delivered a compelling, impassioned defense of the new U.S. policy. Mr. Gates emphasized that under the program, U.S. troops would not cross the border into Iran. But American soldiers, he said, are not "simply going to stand by and let people bring sophisticated IEDs into the country that can disable an Abrams tank and give them a free pass."
Noting that the IEDs are causing 70 percent of U.S. casualties in Iraq, Mr. Gates stated bluntly that "if you are in Iraq and are trying to kill our troops, then you should consider yourself a target."
Iranian officials reacted by denouncing the new American policy as "terrorist" in nature. As for Mr. Reid, when asked about Mr. Bush's lethal force order, he graciously agreed that U.S. troops may defend themselves. The majority leader then appeared to suggest that the president needed to do more to engage the Holocaust-denying regime in Tehran, stating that Mr. Bush should be working with other countries in the region to prevent hostilities with Iran from escalating, instead of "sending battle carrier groups" to sit near the Iranian coast.
Unfortunately, Harry Reid, with all his childlike geopolitical innocence, symbolizes all too well the Democratic Party leadership in the current Congress.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also, just ONE month ago....old flip-flop reid was saying he WOULD support sending more troops into Iraq.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 29, 2007 12:19 PM ]
posted on January 29, 2007 12:25:12 PM
And what then do we read in the NYT this morning????
That Iran plans on continuing/increasing it's presense IN Iraq.
So, you just want to allow MORE American soldiers deaths....since you don't want to allow MORE troops being sent to fight off the Iranian military now entering Iraq.
Oh, I know....according to the terrorist SUPPORTERS....we should leave their numbers as they currently are. That way they'll have MORE American soliders DEATHS to whine about.
===================
Iranian Reveals Plan to Expand Role in Iraq
NYT
By JAMES GLANZ
Published: January 29, 2007
BAGHDAD, Jan. 28 — Iran's ambassador to Baghdad outlined an ambitious plan on Sunday to greatly expand its economic and military ties with Iraq — including an Iranian national bank branch in the heart of the capital — just as the Bush administration has been warning the Iranians to stop meddling in Iraqi affairs.
Iran's ambassador to Iraq, Hassan Kazemi Qumi, said his country hoped to bolster financial and military ties.
The Reach of War
Iran's plan, as outlined by the ambassador, carries the potential to bring Iran into further conflict here with the United States, which has detained a number of Iranian operatives in recent weeks and says it has proof of Iranian complicity in attacks on American and Iraqi forces.
No Surge??? Then you're just ASKING for the deaths of MORE American soldiers.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 29, 2007 12:29 PM ]
posted on January 29, 2007 01:05:05 PM
I don't believe we ARE in the 'tiny minority' of Americans.
We're in the majority of Americans who say they'd like to see American WIN this war. [56%]
Then we have approx. 16% undecided - on which road to take.
Then the rest are like you and your ILK.....they want to see American LOSE.
More important is we have the power of our CIC behind us. He is still willing to fight against those who wish to destroy America.....while your 16% want to see our enemies succeed, by giving a victory to our enemies.
So...I feel just fine.
Let your party 'talk' all they want. Let our enemies see the support they have from some Americans.
When the have the GUTS to actually DO something instead of JUST talking.....then I might be upset.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 29, 2007 01:09 PM ]
People like you are firmly in the minority that is getting worse for your kind everyday. Its called the POLITICAL DEATH of the NEW-CON BUSHY IRAQ INVASION supporter.
WE ARE ALL AROUND YOUR KIND WATCHING EVERY MOVE YOU MAKE. If you don't believe look at the poll results below
PollingReport.com
PRESIDENT BUSH – Overall Job Rating in recent national polls
1st numbers after date of poll percent approve,2nd set of numbers present that DISAPPROVE,3rd set not sure
Newsweek 1/24-25/07 30 64 6
.
Time RV 1/22-23/07 37 59 4
.
CNN/Opinion Research Corp. 1/19-21/07 34 63 3
.
CBS 1/18-21/07 28 64 8
.
NBC/Wall Street Journal
1/17-20/07 35 60 5
.
ABC/Washington Post 1/16-19/07 33 65 2
.
Newsweek 1/17-18/07 31 62 7
.
AP/AOL 1/16-18/07 36 61 *
.
Gallup 1/15-18/07 36 61 3
.
FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 1/16-17/07 35 58 7
.
L.A. Times/Bloomberg 1/13-16/07 39 59 2
.
Pew 1/10-15/07 33 59 8
.
USA Today/Gallup 1/12-14/07 34 63 4
.
Diageo/Hotline RV 1/11-14/07 35 62 3
.
CNN/Opinion Research Corp. 1/11/07 35 62 3
.
AP-Ipsos 1/8-10/07 32 65
.
USA Today/Gallup 1/5-7/07 37 59 4
.
CBS 1/1-3/07 30 63 7
.
CNN
[ edited by bigpeepa on Jan 29, 2007 01:23 PM ]
[ edited by bigpeepa on Jan 29, 2007 01:49 PM ]
They gave their FULL support to the new American military leader in Iraq.
NOW....IF so many democrats disagree with the path this President has taken....AND this new Commander in Iraq FULLY supports the Presidents new path....they WHY did ALL the DEMS and ALL the republican's approve his nomination????
Sounds like they DO support BY THEIR VOTES....what this administration has decided to do. EVEN though their 'words' say differently.
LOL LOL LOL
After all...to show their total support AGAINST the war in Iraq....AGAINST the 'surge' they could have voted AGAINST his nomination.
VOTES are so much MORE 'telling' than words.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 29, 2007 02:22:13 PM
AGAIN, old 'waco'peepa CAN'T answer the question.
IF so many of the dems/liberals who have been SO busy writing up and wanting to vote on this 'NON-binding' resolution...that MEANS NOTHING....then why did they vote in SUPPORT of a US Commander who SUPPORTS a 'surge' in Iraq?
Can't answer ANY intelligent questions can't you 'waco'peepa?
NOPE all you CAN do is repetatively spew the same old thing, over and over again.
you just don't 'get it' do you? LOL It's how they VOTE that matters....and right now the senate JUST APPROVED the new commander to do EXACTLY what the CIC wants done. And HE supports it.
Coward dems....can't even vote AGAINST him and his policy. lol lol
Senate approves new Iraq commander
Fri Jan 26, 10:32 AM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Friday confirmed Army Gen. David Petraeus as the next commander of U.S. forces in Iraq even though he supports a boost in American troops that many senators oppose.
Widely regarded as one the army's brightest commanders, Petraeus, who was confirmed on a vote of 81-0, told senators earlier this week that the situation in Iraq was "dire" but not hopeless.
Petraeus, who has already completed two Iraq tours, will be charged with implementing
President George W. Bush's plan to send 21,500 more U.S. troops to Iraq in an effort to halt spiraling insurgent attacks and sectarian violence.
=============
So see....they 'TALK' a much DIFFERENT 'talk' than the 'WALK' they support and VOTE FOR.
Or maybe you, 'waco'peepa are trying to convince us that the senators who OPPOSE the 'surge' couldn't have VOTED AGAINST him????
lol lol lol
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 29, 2007 05:12:05 PM
Liar_K, Answer any of your questions NEVER. I only answer people I respect. I have told you that before so get it through your head.
Because you think you can copy and paste to cover up the number of American troops being killed in Iraq see below.
1/29/07 update on BUSHY'S IRAQ INVASION.
3,080 Dead American Troops in Bushy's Iraq invasion up 13 in two days.
3,080 GOOD AMERICAN LIVES GONE ALL BECAUSE OF OUR COMMANDER AND FAILURE BUSHY's INVASION OF IRAQ.
posted on January 29, 2007 11:50:43 PM
Poor stupid first posts :
"""Linda_K
posted on January 29, 2007 01:05:05 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe we ARE in the 'tiny minority' of Americans.
We're in the majority of Americans who say they'd like to see American WIN this war. [56%]
Then we have approx. 16% undecided - on which road to take.
Then the rest are like you and your ILK.....they want to see American LOSE.
More important is we have the power of our CIC behind us. He is still willing to fight against those who wish to destroy America.....while your 16% want to see our enemies succeed, by giving a victory to our enemies. """"
THEN poor stupid posts:
"""Linda_K
posted on January 29, 2007 01:45:09 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROFLOL....
polls don't MATTER...."""
Poor stupid is in such a downward spiral , just like the bush administration, that she can't keep anything straight
