AS I SAID....he's a libertarian....whether YOU chose to believe it or NOT. LOL
YOU can stay as ignorant as you wish to.
===========================
In 1988, Dr. Paul re-entered politics when he successfully won the nomination of the Libertarian Party for the U.S. Presidency. He spent much of the year campaigning across the country, promoting the ideals of limited government, low taxes, and personal liberty.
Dr. Paul returned to Congress in 1996 after successfully winning a House seat representing the 14th Congressional district of Texas. He was re-elected in 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2004. He serves on the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, and the International Relations committee. On the Financial Services Committee, Rep. Paul serves as the vice-chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee. He continues to advocate a dramatic reduction in the size of the federal government and a return to constitutional principles.
===========================
While republicans and libertarians hold many of the same political positions....the ones they don't agree upon are many.
[ edited by Linda_K on May 21, 2007 12:59 PM ]
[ edited by Linda_K on May 21, 2007 01:01 PM ]
posted on May 21, 2007 04:42:49 PM newGet with it PLEASE.....I can't TAKE the ignorance that you spout
You are sofa king ignorant Linda. Who was it that believed the people of Canada speak CANADIAN. That's right first it was Bear, and than you came along to defend him for weeks. Only for both of you to be proved WRONG WRONG WRONG.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on May 21, 2007 06:39:11 PM new
"He's a Libertarian - he CAN run with the support of his OWN party"
He may be Libertarian is philosophy, but he is running as a member of the Republican Party. He participated in the Republican debate. As a candidate, no matter how remote his chances of winning, he has the right to participate in debates without interference.
posted on May 21, 2007 07:18:49 PM newand I also posted a link which showed all languages spoken in many countries.
You continue to make an ass out of yourself.
HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU NEED TO BE PROVEN WRONG. Your past links to wikipedia did not prove CANADIAN is a language. English-Canadian and French-Canadian is not a language, just like African American or Chinese American are not languages.
Show me on this list where CANADIAN is a language.
where is the CANADIAN LANGUAGE? It would be right here if it existed
Candoshi-Shapra
Canela
Canichana
Cao Lan
Cao Miao
Capanahua
Capiznon
Cappadocian Greek
Caquinte
Cara
Carabayo
Caramanta
Carapana
Carib
Carib, Island
Carijona
Carolina Algonquian
Carolinian
Carrier
Carrier, Southern
Carútana
Cashibo-Cacataibo
Cashinahua
Catalan-Valencian-Balear
Catalonian Sign Language
Catawba
Cauca
Cavineña
Cayubaba
Cayuga
Cebuano
Cemuhî
Centúúm
Cerma
Chachi
Chácobo
Chadian Sign Language
Chagatai
Chaima
Chak
Chakali
Chakma
Chala
Chaldean Neo-Aramaic
Chalikha
Cham, Eastern
Cham, Western
Chamacoco
Chamalal
Chamari
Chambeali
Chambri
Chamicuro
Chamorro
Chané
Changriwa
Changthang
Chantyal
Chara
Chatino, Eastern Highland
Chatino, Nopala
Chatino, Tataltepec
Chatino, Western Highland
Chatino, Zacatepec
Chatino, Zenzontepec
Chaudangsi
Chaungtha
Chaura
Chavacano
Chayahuita
Che
Chechen
Chehalis, Lower
Chehalis, Upper
Cheke Holo
Chenapian
Chenchu
Chenoua
Chepang
Cherepon
Cherokee
Chetco
Chewong
Cheyenne
Chhattisgarhi
Chhintange
Chhulung
Chiangmai Sign Language
Chiapanec
Chibcha
Chichimeca-Jonaz
Chickasaw
Chicomuceltec
Chiga
Chilcotin
Chilean Sign Language
Chilisso
Chimakum
Chimariko
Chimila
Chin, Asho
Chin, Bawm
Chin, Bualkhaw
Chin, Chinbon
Chin, Daai
Chin, Falam
Chin, Haka
Chin, Khumi
Chin, Khumi Awa
Chin, Mara
Chin, Matu
Chin, Mro
Chin, Mün
Chin, Ngawn
Chin, Paite
Chin, Senthang
Chin, Siyin
Chin, Tawr
Chin, Tedim
Chin, Thado
Chin, Zotung
Chinali
Chinantec, Chiltepec
Chinantec, Comaltepec
Chinantec, Lalana
Chinantec, Lealao
Chinantec, Ojitlán
Chinantec, Ozumacín
Chinantec, Palantla
Chinantec, Quiotepec
Chinantec, Sochiapan
Chinantec, Tepetotutla
Chinantec, Tepinapa
Chinantec, Tlacoatzintepec
Chinantec, Usila
Chinantec, Valle Nacional
Chinese Pidgin English
Chinese Sign Language
Chinese, Gan
Chinese, Hakka
Chinese, Huizhou
Chinese, Jinyu
Chinese, Mandarin
Chinese, Min Bei
Chinese, Min Dong
Chinese, Min Nan
Chinese, Min Zhong
Chinese, Pu-Xian
Chinese, Wu
Chinese, Xiang
Chinese, Yue
Chinook
Chinook Wawa
Chipaya
Chipewyan
Chipiajes
Chippewa
Chiquitano
Chiripá
Chiru
Chitimacha
Chittagonian
Chocangacakha
Chochotec
Choctaw
Chodri
Chokwe
Chol, Tila
Chol, Tumbalá
Cholón
Chong
Choni
Chontal, Highland Oaxaca
Chontal, Lowland Oaxaca
Chontal, Tabasco
Chonyi
Chopi
Chorote, Iyojwa'ja
Chorote, Iyo'wujwa
Chorotega
Ch'orti'
Chrau
Chru
Chuave
Chuj, Ixtatán
Chuj, San Sebastián Coatán
Chuka
Chukot
Chukwa
Chulym
Chumash
Chumburung
Churahi
Chut
Chuukese
Chuvash
Chuwabu
Cia-Cia
Cibak
Cimbrian
Cinda-Regi-Tiyal
Cineni
Cinta Larga
Cishingini
Citak
Citak, Tamnim
Ciwogai
Clallam
C'lela
Cocama-Cocamilla
Cochimi
Cocopa
Coeur d'Alene
Cofán
Cogui
Colombian Sign Language
Colorado
Columbia-Wenatchi
Comanche
Como Karim
Comorian
Comorian, Mwali
Comorian, Ndzwani
Comorian, Ngazidja
Comox
Con
Côông
Coos
Coptic
Coquille
Cora, El Nayar
Cora, Santa Teresa
Cori
Cornish
Corsican
Costa Rican Sign Language
Cowlitz
Coxima
Coyaima
Cree, Moose
Cree, Plains
Cree, Swampy
Cree, Woods
Crimean Turkish
Crioulo, Upper Guinea
Croatia Sign Language
Croatian
Crow
Cruzeño
Cua
Cuba Sign Language
Cubeo
Cuiba
Cuicatec, Tepeuxila
Cuicatec, Teutila
Culina
Cumanagoto
Cumeral
Cun
Cung
Cupeño
Curripaco
Cutchi-Swahili
Cuvok
Cuyonon
Czech
Czech Sign Language
I would like to see Linda provide a link showing the Canadian language exists
ONCE AGAIN LINDA HAS SHOWN HOW MUCH OF A JACK ASS SHE REALLY IS. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU NEED TO BE PROVED WRONG ON THE SAME SUBJECT. DO YOU WANT TO GO FOR #4???
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on May 21, 2007 11:55:09 PM new
My gosh ! Thread after thread, post after post, proving what an immense uneducated lying idiot linduh is ! Amazing !
posted on May 22, 2007 07:14:25 AM new
coincoach
posted on May 21, 2007 06:39:11 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"He's a Libertarian - he CAN run with the support of his OWN party"
He may be Libertarian is philosophy, but he is running as a member of the Republican Party. He participated in the Republican debate. As a candidate, no matter how remote his chances of winning, he has the right to participate in debates without interference.
=================================
I LOVE reading how a liberal wants a libertarian to continue running under the republican party banner - especially IF they don't see him as representing what the party stands for. LOL
It their choice, CC. Not yours. YOu might believe he should be allowed to continue on....and he may be allowed to do so.
But just because liberals think he should be doesn't mean all of a sudden you're in charge of the republican party and what decisions THEY decide to make.
posted on May 22, 2007 07:55:17 AM new
Sorry--I thought you were a strong proponent of free speech. LOL Paul is a member of the Republican Party. When it comes time to select a candidate, they don't have to choose him, but to try to prevent him from debating or speaking about his opinions does smack of censorship.
posted on May 22, 2007 09:03:50 AM new
linduh drools:
""He may be Libertarian is philosophy, but he is running as a member of the Republican Party. He participated in the Republican debate. As a candidate, no matter how remote his chances of winning, he has the right to participate in debates without interference."""
=================================
I LOVE reading how a liberal wants a libertarian to continue running under the republican party banner""""
(WHERE was THAT posted? Answer: NOWHERE. Another lie.)
""" - especially IF they don't see him as representing what the party stands for. LOL
It their choice, CC. Not yours. YOu might believe he should be allowed to continue on....and he may be allowed to do so.
But just because liberals think he should be doesn't mean all of a sudden you're in charge of the republican party and what decisions THEY decide to make."""
(WHO said they were? Answer: NO ONE. Another lie.
Another large squirm around the ISSUE which is the Republicans attempt to squelch free speech....with two whopper lies to add to linduh's llloooonnnggg list!)
posted on May 22, 2007 09:19:18 AM new
linduh, since it's been very obvious that you are uneducated in the extreme you'd be shocked to see how the Republican party has changed in the last few years
Ron Paul is a more TRADITIONAL Republican than most of the candidates.
But it IS old news to show how Republicans treat those who don't goose-step in line....See John McCain(2000) See Gonzalez Attorney Scandal
posted on May 22, 2007 02:20:43 PM new
Linda, If the Republican Party does not agree with Paul's philosophy, all they have to do is persuade the delegates not select him as the candidate. That is how it is usually done. Not every Democrat nor Republican tows the party line on every single issue. If all the candidates think exactly the same for each party, what is the point of having an election?
posted on May 22, 2007 06:09:39 PM new
Once again Linda was proven wrong. She can not back up her so called proof that the Canadian language exists so she drops the topic all together.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on May 22, 2007 06:11:30 PM newI LOVE reading how a liberal wants a libertarian to continue running under the republican party banner - especially IF they don't see him as representing what the party stands for.
Just like Rudy, he is liberal with most of his views, but he is running as Republican. It would seem like the Republicans are the ones that are having a problem identifing who they really are.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on May 22, 2007 06:43:32 PM new
CC - As I read and posted the thread about another enlightened democrat.....I thought of Lieberman.
Did you consider it banning HIS free speech when the democratic party decided, after all the years he'd served them well, that they didn't want to allow him to keep his senate seat because they didn't like his taking a position different than what the dem party wanted him to?
They did all they could to 'out' him. So much so he made the decision to run as an Independent.
Why? Because HIS party didn't like ONE of his positions. Even though they agreed with him, and he with them on just about EVERYTHING else.
I don't see this issue with ron paul as being ANY different than Joe Lieberman.
And I sure didn't read ANY democrats here sharing they were upset about what the dem party did to Lieberman.
So as I said....I don't see it as a 'free speech' issue as much as it's the party's EXPECTING their candidates to stick with/follower/support their party line/positions.
logansdad
posted on May 22, 2007 06:09:39 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once again Linda was proven wrong. She can not back up her so called proof that the Canadian language exists so she drops the topic all together.
=========================
As I've said.....I already DID post the proof - ONE of the many times you've brought up this SAME subject.
I understand YOU cannot GET anything the first time...nor the hundredth time..but I rest reassured that those with brains DID 'get it' the FIRST time.
You obviously need things repeated over and over and over again.
That's YOUR problem, ld
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on May 22, 2007 09:16:21 PM new
"The are circulating a petition. IF enough agree it will stop. IF there are more who see it like you, a liberal, do then it won't happen"
That petition was withdrawn by Saul Anuzis after talking with GOP bigs. He announced it on the Michigan Republican Party Blog.
[ edited by coincoach on May 22, 2007 09:52 PM ]
posted on May 23, 2007 01:54:09 PM newAs I've said.....I already DID post the proof - ONE of the many times you've brought up this SAME subject.
I understand YOU cannot GET anything the first time...nor the hundredth time..but I rest reassured that those with brains DID 'get it' the FIRST time.
It would appear that Linda is once again defending her claim there is a language called CANADIAN, but doesn't have the proof to back it up. It doesn't surprise me that she is lying. Your so-called proof was already dismissed as being WRONG just like most of your so called FACTS.
I guess she wants to be proved wrong for the 5th time. I guess she likes being the JACKASS that she really is. You must really like living in a state of denial. You have been showed time and time again that there is no language called Canadian, but yet you insist there is. I think a parrot has a higher IQ than you do. Linda did you get your brain from a cadaver at the county morgue, because are stupid stupid stupid.
The Constitution of Canada itself recognizes two official languages, English and French
Of the 29.6 million citizens of Canada in 2001 (increasing to roughly 33 million in June 2006), 17.3 million are native English speakers, 6.7 million are native French-speakers and 5.2 million are native speakers of neither of Canada's two official languages. Another 380 thousand reported having more than one mother tongue.
Statistics Canada, 2001
English 17,352,315
French 6,703,325
Chinese 753,745
Vietnamese 631,055
Italian 469,485
German 438,080
Punjabi 271,220
Spanish 245,500
English and a language other than French 219,860
Portuguese 213,815
Polish 208,375
Arabic 199,940
Tagalog 154,060
Ukrainian 148,090
Dutch 128,670
Greek 120,365
English and French 112,575
Russian 94,555
Persian 94,095
Tamil 90,010
Korean 85,070
Urdu 80,895
Hungarian 75,555
Cree 72,800
Gujarati 57,555
Hindi 56,325
Croatian 54,880
Romanian 50,895
Serbian 41,180
French and a language other than English 38,630
Japanese 34,815
Bengali 29,505
Inuktitut 29,005
Armenian 27,350
Serbo-Croatian 26,690
Somali 26,110
Czech 24,790
Finnish 22,405
Ojibway 21,000
Yiddish 19,295
Turkish 18,675
Danish 18,230
Slovak 17,545
Macedonian 16,905
Slovenian 12,800
Hebrew 12,435
Twi 11,070
Estonian 10,848
English, French and another language 10,085
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
posted on May 24, 2007 06:21:53 AM new
Yep Linda was proven wrong for the 5th time on the same subject. She runs and hides becasue she can admit that she was wrong. Where is this so-called proof that she has?
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- The duty of a patriot in this time and place is to ask questions, to demand answers, to understand where our nation is headed and why. If the answers you get do not suit you, or if they frighten you, or if they anger you, it is your duty as a patriot to dissent. Freedom does not begin with blind acceptance and with a flag. Freedom begins when you say 'No.'
