Linda_K
|
posted on July 20, 2007 07:09:57 PM new
And as I have ALREADY said....it's only YOUR confused/twisted mind that would draw that false conclusion.
But it's so YOU. Your nonsense...your assumptions....and you proving your own lack of knowledge. Nothing more.
trolling.....baiting....your game.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 20, 2007 07:27:24 PM new
This subject of the candidates spouses defending their mates is becoming a comedy routine - adding to their original slams against one another.
First elizabeth slamming hillary....then bill defending hillary.
Then john defending elizabeth.
LOL LOL
True comedy.
Two for the price of ONE? I say avoid all four at all costs.
Maybe we'll soon see obama promising two for the price of one.....ya think? 
At least the two of them seem to be more in agreement with one another than these other four clowns are.
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 20, 2007 07:31:29 PM new
Think of those Republican candidates(you do have a few )...they have soooo MANY wives to defend !!!
LOLOLOLOL!!!!
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 20, 2007 07:34:42 PM new
"""At least the two of them seem to be more in agreement with one another than these other four clowns are.""
What are Elizabeth and John disagreeing about?
What are Hillary and Bill disagreeing about?
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 20, 2007 07:39:53 PM new
See just how UNinformed you are? You don't even know the answer to those questions....figures. As I've said....the liberals/progressive vote as they do because they're ignornant.
You just proved that point, once again.
|
Bear1949
|
posted on July 22, 2007 09:11:51 AM new
Hillary's manhood
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.George S. Patton
|
profe51
|
posted on July 22, 2007 11:08:04 AM new
ignornant
|
coincoach
|
posted on July 22, 2007 01:06:57 PM new
"the liberals/progressive vote as they do because they're (sic)ignornant."
This is your opinion (and, of course one with which I do not agree)not a statement of fact. I can just as easily say neocons vote as they do because they're ignorant----though I wouldn't because there must be some intelligent neocons out there.
|
davebraun
|
posted on July 22, 2007 03:45:42 PM new
OK CC name one, I dare you to.
|
coincoach
|
posted on July 22, 2007 04:29:58 PM new
Ummm,uhh, let's see now, give me a minute......
|
Helenjw
|
posted on July 22, 2007 05:39:56 PM new
Wolfowitz is an example of an intelligent neocon of the sob persuasion. The problem is that such people take advantage of ignorant and easily manipulated Americans....as we can see here.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 22, 2007 07:19:08 PM new
Nope, the liberals have it all wrong.
They USE the ignorance of others to help them become totally dependent on our federal and state governments. That way they'll always vote for them.....more for those with their hands out all the time.
The republican way....give a helping hand and encourage people to take care of themselves.
The democratic way....give them a hand from cradle to grave. And why we have families that have been on the dole for generations. That will only continue under the dem party platform. They just LOVE raising taxes to take care of those who don't wish to grow up and take care of themselves and those they bring into the world.
Dependence breeds MORE dependence. The liberal way.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack." 
Ann Coulter
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 22, 2007 07:26:37 PM new
Not only is elizabeth edwards slamming hillary......Romney calls her on her own form of socialism....lol
from my way news - today
"Hillary Clinton just gave a speech the other day about her view on the economy. She said we have been an on-your-own society. She said it's time to get rid of that and replace that with shared responsibility and we're-in-it-together society," Romney told the crowd. "That's out with Adam Smith and in with Karl Marx."
And I agree with Romney on THAT issue.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 22, 2007 07:27 PM ]
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 22, 2007 08:00:20 PM new
though I wouldn't because there must be some intelligent neocons out there.
davebraun
posted on July 22, 2007 03:45:42 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK CC name one, I dare you to.
coincoach
posted on July 22, 2007 04:29:58 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ummm,uhh, let's see now, give me a minute......"""
Nope, I can't think of any either
|
mingotree
|
posted on July 22, 2007 08:02:11 PM new
Your meaningless and continuing attacks on Hillary and other successful, strong, intelligent, powerful women who HAVE HUSBANDS is pretty indicative of a broiling jealousy....
|
Linda_K
|
posted on July 22, 2007 08:51:13 PM new
Great pic, Bear.
I'm now waiting for CC to whine about elizabeth edwards statements about hillary 'acting like a man' not being nice and that she must have just crawled out of some cave - and reminding elizabeth how much women have accomplished a long, long time ago.
But come to think of it.....everything the dems have done happened a long, long time ago. But that doesn't keep them from bringing it up over and over as if it was something NEW they've done besides raise our taxes.
So far....no word from her. 
|
kiara
|
posted on July 22, 2007 09:09:49 PM new
I'm now waiting for CC to whine
CC doesn't seem to be the type that whines so you may have to sit there a long time while you wait - of course you can always listen to yourself if you want to truly hear more whining, Linda_K.
|
