tomwiii
|
posted on October 5, 2003 06:11:58 AM new
Arnold rebuts his critics: "Hey! It's all a Democratic lie to smear me! BTW: To all those women I was a scumbag to over the years: I apologize!"
Bravely, he tells the LA Times to: "Butt out!"
"Unless, of course, you gotta some nice chickie reporters with cute butts!"
Groping for support, he claims most of his fans are a bunch of boobs!
"Just the vay I like it!"
Leave it to the GOP to actually fawn over some slimer who actually makes Gray Davis look appealing!
Ralphie loves Mr Blonde:
"Are you gonna bark all day little doggie, or are you gonna bite?"
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/vidrat/
[ edited by tomwiii on Oct 5, 2003 06:12 AM ]
|
Twelvepole
|
posted on October 5, 2003 06:15:14 AM new
Wow another "warrior" joins the mix...
Nice ummmm opinions there tom... glad to see your reading ralpies morning droppings for your information....
AIN'T LIFE GRAND... 
|
tomwiii
|
posted on October 5, 2003 06:20:30 AM new
Actually...
It was the Oakland,CA newspaper that DROPPED its support for THE GROPE-INATOR due to a history of possibly criminal assualts against women!
Hey! When a lady says "NO!" THE GROPE-INATOR says...
"I'll be back!"
Ralphie loves Mr Blonde:
"Are you gonna bark all day little doggie, or are you gonna bite?"
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/vidrat/
|
colin
|
posted on October 5, 2003 06:24:57 AM new
I have to believe Arnie had more taste then that.
|
profe51
|
posted on October 5, 2003 01:32:11 PM new
Arnold was a democrat when he did all that stuff, so it doesn't count....
___________________________________
In this world of sin and sorrow, there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican. -- H.L. Mencken
|
Linda_K
|
posted on October 5, 2003 03:13:41 PM new
uh oh - ANOTHER democrat going republican. LOL 
[ edited by Linda_K on Oct 5, 2003 03:14 PM ]
|
ebayauctionguy
|
posted on October 6, 2003 05:02:14 PM new
After seeing photos of some of Arnold's accusers, I may vote against Arnold because of his bad taste in women!
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/031006/ids_photos_en/r1346780462.jpg
[ edited by ebayauctionguy on Oct 6, 2003 05:04 PM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on October 6, 2003 09:36:58 PM new
Late news tonight [Drudge Report] shows one of these 'women' for what they really are. Her statements have been disputed by others. Seems she has a 'rap' sheet 3 pages long and was a prostitute and drug user.
----------
Also funny to me how the Los Angeles Times wouldn't report the accusations of women who worked for Davis when he physically abused them while he was CAs governor. The LA Times wouldn't print their stories. Why is the LA Times so heavily invested in Davis remaining in office, I wonder.
|
davebraun
|
posted on October 6, 2003 10:11:04 PM new
You mean a drug user like Rush?
Let's play smear the victim, which is why many women do not come forward when a crime of a sexual nature is committed.
I hadn't posted anything till now in this thread as I did not consider this to be the issue for not voting for Swartzenegger. I would not vote for him simply based on his lack of any experience and obvious shortcomings in regard to ability the sleze element is moot. It is ludicrous to attack a victim in order to prop up this candidate. Fortunately you will not be voting in our election.
Republican, the other white meat!
|
Linda_K
|
posted on October 6, 2003 10:16:20 PM new
oh dave, you disappoint me.
She has a PROVEN criminal history. If you remember right...nothings been proven on Rush. I know you're hoping.....
And here I thought you were so fair minded. Innocent UNTIL proven guilty. Guess not.
|
davebraun
|
posted on October 6, 2003 10:57:13 PM new
Her criminal history is not material. She is not the first with a criminal history to be victimized. Nor would she be the first drug user to fall prey to another. One does not have to be a straight laced church person in order to have the protection of the rule of law. Regarding Rush I only mention that as an example that many use drugs and that does not and should not bias anyone for or against them (I also did not state any opinion in the Rush thread as I was abstaining from the commentary as I believe drug use should be decriminalized and do not favor prosecuting any user including Rush). If your thought is that Arnold would not play grab a$$ with someone because they are either a prostitute or drug user I reject that as illogical in fact that makes it much easier for him to victimize them and tends to illustrate why they would not come forward immediately. Anyway that is not why many are not voting for Arnold he simply is lacking in ability and experience. Who is the greater fool,the fool or those who follow the fool?
Republican, the other white meat!
|
Linda_K
|
posted on October 7, 2003 12:23:07 AM new
dave - If your thought. No, that wasn't my thought. lol
I find it hypocritical of those who are throwing this 20-30 groping issue at Arnold in the last 5 days of his campaign.....ESPECIALLY when many of those same people dismissed it when clinton was doing the same thing. Their claims were what he was doing while in office in no way affected his ability to govern. But those same people think it will now with Arnold. right.....sure.
I also find it hypocritical that the Davis supporters support him even though his OWN aids have accused him of physical and verbal abuse. Guess that's allowed/different? lol
Mud slinging is all it is. Dirty politics. Typical of Davis' campaigns.
I'll be VERY surprised if Arnold doesn't win tomorrow[today], although as I've said more than once, I personally would be voting for Tom.
|
