bigpeepa
|
posted on February 28, 2005 05:14:40 PM new
This year the White House did not include in its newest budget the billions of dollars the Pentagon needs for projects and the Iraq war. What do ya think, should this White House make public all the money it plans to spend in its budget? Does the American tax payer need to be fully informed about what this White House plans to really spend?
|
parklane64
|
posted on February 28, 2005 07:02:36 PM new
In your case it should be need to know.
__________
The Islamofascist fig-puckers are fighting to spread their culture and religion, and to destroy ours
|
yellowstone
|
posted on February 28, 2005 07:06:43 PM new
This year the White House did not include in its newest budget the billions of dollars the Pentagon needs for projects and the Iraq war. What do ya think
That's because they are just taking that money out of petty cash.
|
bigpeepa
|
posted on March 1, 2005 04:30:27 AM new
Hey parklane, In my case I do know about this White House. I enjoy pointing out to other American tax payers what this White House is really doing and saying to them.
Hey yellow, what petty cash? Its gone man its long gone. You need to get current we are all living under this White House not a White House of the past where there was a surplus of money.
|
yellowstone
|
posted on March 1, 2005 07:53:18 AM new
Ok [i]man[i/] if you say so. Wow dude that's a farout crazzzzy revelation.
Go smoke another joint, Bigpeepa.
|
dblfugger9
|
posted on March 1, 2005 07:57:48 AM new
rofl yellowstone! Do you picture bigpeepa like the father of dharma in dharma and greg? For some reason though, I picture him a bit more rotund? Must be the 'big' in bigpeepa 
|
Libra63
|
posted on March 1, 2005 07:58:41 AM new
Oh how dumb I am. Here I thought the White House was a place to live..
_________________
|
yellowstone
|
posted on March 1, 2005 08:08:36 AM new
Actually, I picture him as an Indian Chief with a gnarly and aged red face, sitting there with a full feathered headress and a leather beaded shirt with tassles hanging from it. He's sitting there smoking his peaceapipe which causes him to come up with all sorts of dreamworld revelations of the future.
|
BIGPEEPA
|
posted on March 1, 2005 08:05:14 PM new
You can all describe what you think I look like. Like it really matters what I look like. Now step up and tell me and the other readers of this board what you think. Should this White House have told the American tax payer what they REALLY PLAN to spend this year.
Its fun for you to describe what I look like. Its more fun for me watching all of you trying to wiggle out of a question you don't want or know how to answer.
Does any of you want to bet that higher (hidden) taxes, interest rates and inflation is not just around the corner.
|
Libra63
|
posted on March 1, 2005 08:36:03 PM new
What question bigpeepa.
The White House is a place to live..Nothing else...It cannot do anything except look pretty at night with the lights on.
_________________
|
BIGPEEPA
|
posted on March 1, 2005 09:02:12 PM new
Libra63, Sorry your reply doesn't fly. I just don't have time to dummy-down to this kind of nonsense.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 1, 2005 09:11:19 PM new
You all are just going to get ol' bigpeepa hot under the collar by not answering his silly question.
It appears he honestly believes we Americans don't know what the Pentagon nor the Iraq war are costing us, even though they're mentioned all the time in the news. He must be missing it. 
And he forgets, it again appears, that he neglects to notice that even WITH the expense of this war....THIS President was RE-ELECTED.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 1, 2005 09:14:43 PM new
bigpeepa said: not a White House of the past where there was a surplus of money.
CORRECTION:
..not a White House of the past where there was a
pre 9-11-attack PROJECTED surplus of money. We'd have faced the same costs....and there may have been no projected surplus under a democratic administration either.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
|
Libra63
|
posted on March 1, 2005 09:43:34 PM new
Well bigpeepa my answer is about as dumb as your question....
_________________
|
yellowstone
|
posted on March 1, 2005 10:08:23 PM new
Hey Libra, don't knock yourself, I thought your answer was pretty smart.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 1, 2005 11:08:51 PM new
Of course you were correct, Libra, in answering the way you did....to the way BPP worded his post.
The WH doesn't approve budgets....it's tenant, [for FOUR MORE YEARS]  , just suggests a budget to our Congress....and they approve [or not] the recommended budget.
Obviously, bigpeepa doesn't understand just WHO approves what and who lives where.
So much for him "enjoy[ing] pointing out to other American tax payers" things he doesn't understand himself.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
|
bigpeepa
|
posted on March 2, 2005 08:34:34 AM new
Sorry Linda K, your trying to defuse the blundering job this White House is doing isn't working any longer. Your White House POM POMS are getting wet soggy and worn-out under this White House. True or false questions for ya. Does America have a record National Debt and record Trade Deficit under this White House? Are middle class Americans making less money with less benefits under this White House? Linda K are the above economy and wage statements TRUE OR FALSE? YES OR NO? I could go on but I think you and the other people that got duped for their vote are getting the message load and clear about this White House.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 2, 2005 08:55:12 AM new
LOL big, what? You save your questions for ONLY me?
Record Nation Debt? NO!
If you knew what you were talking about....you would know that our deficit, in relation to our GNP, is NOT the highest it's ever been.
We're doing just fine as a Nation when comparisons are made to how other countries are fairing...just take a look at Germany's RECORD HIGH unemployment rate. The trade deficits started a long time before this administration took over. Thank clinton and his "deals" with China for that move.
The dems can't make up their minds what to complain about ...should they complain about the deficit...which will continue to go down...if a lot of the proposed 2006 budget gets approved....AND new spending is kept in check. If our economy continues to improve...which it is still doing...the debt automatically continues to come down....as it always has. Or should the dems, who keep complaining that their programs aren't getting ENOUGH funding increases under the 2006 budget proposals, be taken seriously.
I understand that no matter WHAT this administration does...YOUR not going to like it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 2, 2005 09:14:54 AM new
In 2004, as in previous years, a rising current account deficit may have been bad news to headline writers, but it appears to have accompanied good news for the U.S. economy, its factories, and its workers.
http://www.freetrade.org/pubs/FTBs/FTB-014.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
[ edited by Linda_K on Mar 2, 2005 09:17 AM ]
http://www.cato.org/research/articles/griswold-050225.html
[ edited by Linda_K on Mar 2, 2005 09:41 AM ]
|
bigpeepa
|
posted on March 2, 2005 12:26:08 PM new
O.K. blow hard right wing copy and paste Queen Linda K. Any fool can go to the Internet and copy and paste a view point from any direction or view point. We will all be watching what the Inflation Rate, National Debt, Trade Deficit, and Interest Rates are 6 to 8 months from now. Yes, we will all be watching what this White House does to middle class America. I noticed you couldn't disclaim that the middle class are making less money and getting less benefits under this White House. Yes, Linda K your POM POMS are all wet and saggy. You can copy and paste all the bull roar you want but it just doesn't fly any longer. I guess you must like being nothing but a brain washed old right wing copy and paste Queen. You got duped for your vote and can't admit it. LOL on you. I suppose you don't believe what Allen Greenspan said today about the National Debt. I have said this before you really need to get current and quit living in La La land. Remember your government is in charge and your man is in this White House so we will all be watching and reporting what they do.
|
Libra63
|
posted on March 2, 2005 07:19:30 PM new
Did you read what Greenspan said about SS today? If not you had better check it out.
_________________
|
bigpeepa
|
posted on March 2, 2005 08:05:58 PM new
Below is a copy and paste just like the big girls Linda K and Libra63 do. Read it well Linda K and Libra63. If this White House budget gets passed read what will happen in Pennsylvania alone. Now since neither Linda K or Libra63 could deny that under this White House middle class Americans are making less money and getting less benefits. Lets all watch to see how the L sisters react to the information below.
Pay attention middle class there is a big difference between what this White House said to get your vote and what they are doing now when they don't need you any longer.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stop the devastating cuts in Bush's budget from hurting Pennsylvania. Congress is debating this plan right now, so make your voice heard! Write a letter to the editor of your local paper today.
www.democrats.org/action
Pennsylvania residents are facing severe cuts if George Bush's new budget becomes law -- but you can help stop it in its tracks.
Bush recently unveiled his reckless plan to privatize Social Security, and now he's touting a budget that slashes key programs that help Pennsylvania's working families.
Bush plans devastating cuts to America's top priorities, from homeland security to health care to education to benefits for veterans and much more. Despite these cuts, this budget is a fiscal disaster, with Bush's trademark irresponsibility pushing America deeper into the red with another record deficit.
And this budget is a huge disaster for Pennsylvania. Here are just a few of the cuts Pennsylvania faces under Bush's 2006 budget:
Homeland Security
The Bush 2006 budget cuts $420 million to state and local funding for homeland security, including a $34.7 million cut for Pennsylvania. These cuts will take police and firefighters off your streets.
The Bush budget cuts the COPS program, which has put 3,561 officers on Pennsylvania streets, by 96 percent.
Health Care
The Bush budget cuts $45 billion from Medicaid, enough to provide health care to 1.8 million children. Pennsylvania's share of these cuts is $2.3 billion.
Bush's budget cuts the very same community and rural health care programs he touted during the campaign, even though more than 337,000 Pennsylvania residents have lost their health care coverage since Bush took office due to his failures.
Education
Bush under-funds his own No Child Left Behind Act by $13.1 billion in his budget. In Pennsylvania, that means a shortfall of $425.5 million, leaving behind 107,337 Pennsylvania children.
Bush promised to fund Pell Grants in his State of the Union address, but his budget is $6.6 billion short. That's $216.3 million less than what's needed in Pennsylvania, a real burden for the 170,701 students in Pennsylvania who receive the grants.
Other Priorities
The Bush budget would require many veterans to pay a new $250 annual "user fee" to use the Veterans Administration health care system, and would double the prescription drug co-payment for the 1,280,788 Pennsylvania veterans.
Bush cuts Pennsylvania clean water programs by $15.3 million.
Bush's 2006 budget also cuts the Low Income Heating Energy Assistance Program -- which helps low-income families afford heating fuel in the winter -- by $234.4 million, including $15.7 million cut for Pennsylvania residents.
And Bush's irresponsible budget is a record $427 billion in the red, increasing each Pennsylvania family's share of the federal debt by $37,688.
|
Libra63
|
posted on March 2, 2005 08:51:20 PM new
Started to read it until I got to this part.
www.democrats.org/action
Kind of bias isn't it? Didn't finish it.
When the democrats can come up with a plan, which they can't, then maybe the congress can get going and do something. Everyone is sitting back and critizing but nobody but the President has a plan. It's the same with SS. There is no other plan out there because nobody can come up with one except the President. Did you read what Greenspan said about SS? I did a C/P and put it on this discussion board. That is an important one and if you don't believe it keep living in your la la land and see what happens when you turn 65. Well it will probably be 70 by that time.
I was watching c-span this morning. Two senators were on. 1 from each party. The Democrat said something has to be done but we don't have a plan. How can anything be done if there is no plan. The Republican said we have a plan but it needs an adjustment, but at least they have a plan. Explain that.
This is all we hear - we have no plan but there needs to be changes. What have we got in congress a bunch of dumb congressmen and women. Barbara Boxer even says something has to be done, but we will wait and see what others come up with. Maybe she better get off her butt and start thinking of something.
I noticed you did a C/P and you critize us.
_________________
[ edited by Libra63 on Mar 2, 2005 09:04 PM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 2, 2005 09:08:20 PM new
peepa says: Now since neither Linda K or Libra63 could deny that under this White House middle class Americans are making less money and getting less benefits.
Are you expecting me/us to sit here and prove your all your false statements to be incorrect? Answer each and every question you put forth? Don't. It's your job to prove your statements....not mine/ours.
I haven't checked the DoL website for the last two months....but before then for all the time Bush has been in office wages have INCREASED...never decreased.
And I've already answered your question in regards to:
Lets all watch to see how the L sisters react to the information below.
I'll repeat myself one last time since your weren't able to comprehend it before.
The dems whine about the high deficit....and then they complain about the budget cuts [on average = .06%] to lower spending/to reduce the same deficit they claim to be so worried about.
No surprise there.....they'll complain no matter what he does....they'll never be happy. They're certainly not the party of solutions....they're the party of complainers. And I don't expect to see it change anytime soon.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
|
bigpeepa
|
posted on March 3, 2005 04:20:13 AM new
Linda K and Libra, You are both full of BULL ROAR. Its plan and simple for all to see. YOU BOTH SAY I AM INCORRECT NOW PROVE IT OR KEEP YOUR BIG MOUTHS SHUT. Under this White House middle class America is making less money with less benefits.
HEY MIDDLE CLASS AMERICA YOU BETTER PAY REAL CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT THIS WHITE HOUSE IS DOING TO YA.
|
Libra63
|
posted on March 3, 2005 06:21:46 AM new
Well the screamer is back. It didn't take long. When someone doesn't answer his questions he goes into a hissy fit and tells me to keep my big mouth shut. Now who has the big mouth? Should we take a vote?
Well if you check my posts I have never said anything about a budget as I wouldn't get into that. All I said was the democrats do not have a plan. Show me where their plan is. All I did was ask you a question and you didn't answer that. Linda has answered your questions. Do you need my glasses? Prove your own statement bigpeepa where does it say middle america is making less and getting less benefits and don't take it from the democrats. They like you will say anything to get a riot started. Find a neutral article and then post it here.
_________________
|
bigpeepa
|
posted on March 3, 2005 07:14:04 AM new
Libra63 and Linda K, I really don't have time to dummy-down and play the L sisters LYING games. You are both so transparent it make me sick. Libra, vote all you want that won't change what this White House is doing to middle class America.
HEY MIDDLE CLASS, UNDER THIS WHITE HOUSE YOU TOOK CUTS IN PAY AND BENEFITS. YOU NEED TO WATCH VERY CLOSELY AT WHAT THIS WHITE HOUSE SAYS AND WHAT IT REALLY DOES. GET INVOLVED FOR YOUR OWN GOOD NOT MINE OR THE TWO L SISTERS
|
Linda_K
|
posted on March 3, 2005 07:34:30 AM new
Yep....just like a child who hasn't learned self control....the screaming starts AGAIN...the insults continue...and then he wants to censor statements [shut up] that he doesn't agree with. Poor bigpeepa.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
|
crowfarm
|
posted on March 3, 2005 07:44:42 AM new
DUH! libra says, "Started to read it until I got to this part.
www.democrats.org/action ""
Now she's wants to know the Democrats "plan"......how ?...wait until they call her on the phone.....won't read anything but wants to know the "plan".
Where would one find the democrats "plan" ?On a Republican website? DUH!
If the "plan" you're referring to is about Social Security...the Democrats have a plan...it's called .............................................
Social Security !
|
dblfugger9
|
posted on March 3, 2005 08:20:40 AM new
bigpeepa, you really should change the channel once in a while...
Lou Dobbs is a smart guy, but he's not the only one in the world with an opinion. He is your God though, isnt it??????
test. launch. keylogger aborted. mission accomplished.
|
