posted on January 9, 2007 02:57:51 PM new
I think we all remember the democrat who STOLED classified documents...stuffed them in his pants....lol...and then destroyed some of them.
[ethics obviously aren't important when a democrat doesn't have any]
==========
Press Release
Did the 9/11 Commission receive all the documents it requested? Davis Releases Berger Report
January 9, 2007
By David Marin (202)225-5074
Washington, D.C.
Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Tom Davis (R-VA) released the following statement today on a committee report that sheds important new light on Sandy Berger's theft of classified documents from the National Archives. The report makes it clear that the full extent of Mr. Berger's document removal can never be known, and consequently the Department of Justice could not assure the 9/11 Commission that it received all responsive documents to which Mr. Berger had access.
"My staff's investigation reveals that President Clinton's former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national security much more than originally disclosed," Davis said.
"It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience.
The 9/11 Commission relied on incomplete and misleading information regarding its access to documents Mr. Berger reviewed. No one ever told the Commission that Mr. Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection.
"We now know that Mr. Berger left stolen highly classified documents at a construction site to avoid detection. We know that Mr. Berger insisted on privacy at times to allow him to conceal documents that he stole.
One witness with a very high security clearance believed he saw Berger concealing documents in his socks.
"Mr. Berger's review of documents did not conform to the usual requirements for reviewing classified documents in a secure facility and under strict supervision."
"The Archives staff's failure to contact law enforcement immediately and their contacts with Mr. Berger about the missing documents compromised the law enforcement effort."
"The compromised law enforcement effort contributes to reduced confidence that the 9/11 Commission received all the documents it requested. The execution of a search warrant before Mr. Berger knew there was an investigation would have either located additional documents or enhanced confidence that he stole no others than those he admitted to taking."
"The public statements of the former chief of the public integrity section, Noel Hillman, were incomplete and misleading."
Because Mr. Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection, "we do not know if anything was lost to the public or the process."
"The Justice Department's assertion that Mr. Berger's statements are credible after being caught is misplaced. One wouldn't rely on the fox to be truthful after being nabbed in the hen house. But the Justice Department apparently did."
yep....all that to cover clinton's ass. tsk tsk tsk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 9, 2007 03:00 PM ]
posted on January 9, 2007 03:39:36 PM new
And here's basically the same news coming from a site that kiara continues to refer to as a 'rag'.
LOL....guess they're only RAGS if they're reporting on the UNETHICAL actions of the democrats they wish to protect.
Just like they/SHE feels about the DrudgeReport.com because they broke the story on the STAIN from clinton on Monica's dress. tsk tsk tsk
Can't have ANY news source reporting the TRUTH of their actions, it appears.
Anyway as ANYONE can see....newsmax.com reported the same story before the final report came out about sandy burgers ILLEGAL and UNETHICAL actions.
==============
NewsMax.com
Wednesday, Dec. 20, 2006 5:16 p.m. EST
Report: Sandy Berger Hid Classified Documents
Former national security adviser Sandy Berger removed classified documents from the National Archives in 2003 and hid them under a construction trailer, the Archives inspector general reported Wednesday.
The report was issued more than a year after Berger pleaded guilty and received a criminal sentence for removal of the documents.
Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that when Berger was confronted by Archives officials about the missing documents, he said it was possible he threw them in his office trash.
The report said that when Archives employees first suspected that Berger - who had been President Clinton's national security adviser - was removing classified documents from the Archives in the fall of 2003, they failed to notify any law enforcement agency.
Berger, who pleaded guilty to unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents, was fined $50,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service and was barred from access to classified material for three years.
The report said that when Berger was reviewing the classified documents in the Archives building a few blocks from the Capitol, employees saw him bending down and fiddling with something white, which could have been paper, around his ankle.
However, Archives employees did not feel at the time there was enough information to confront someone of Berger's stature, the report said.
Brachfeld reported that on one visit, Berger took a break to go outside without an escort.
"In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... .
"Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)."
==========
linda's op:
REAL ODD behavior for a man of his stature LOL LOL LOL - HIDING classified documents UNDER a TRAILER??? Doesn't sound 'above board' to me. and it wasn't the behavior of an innocent man either. It was the actions of a THIEF and a LIAR - oh...but I keep forgetting....they accuse the administration of lying...and they can't prove that.
But when proof IS offered about their parties actions....they go silent. Funny how that works.
===========
Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.
Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence. The review was to facilitate Berger's impending testimony before the House and Senate intelligence committees.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
Ann Coulter
[ edited by Linda_K on Jan 9, 2007 03:47 PM ]
posted on January 9, 2007 03:50:40 PM new
Try to pretend that you have a tiny bit of intelligence, mingo.
Yes, sandy berger did steal these documents and hide them outside under a trailer...leaving them there for anyone to pick up and have classified SECURITY info......so the story is from 2003....as all can see.
But the first link is NOT old. It's the final report that was issued on the THEFT and was dated TODAY.
try and get with the program....I know you're easily confused.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 9, 2007 08:06:52 PM new
Is that the best you got Liar_k if so its like WEAK. LOOK BELOW.
Judicial Watch describes itself as "a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, [that] promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law."
This year, according to the group, six of the most corrupt Washington politicians were Republicans whose names are often identified with the scandals widely believed to have contributed to the Democratic victory in the November midterms: Lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-CA), Rep. Tom Delay (R-TX), Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL), Rep. Denny Hastert (R-IL), and Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH).
Plus Liar_K don't forget BUSHY'S friends like (Kenny Boy Enron) who ruined so many peoples lives.
posted on January 10, 2007 09:15:26 AM new
I tried to tell her stoled wasn't a word but she's so upset about the onward march of Democrats that she's reaching and stretching in a wild frenzy...Sandy's big crime ...pretty soon it will be Chappaquidick !
posted on January 10, 2007 09:27:42 AM new
They rant...and they rave...when they find only accusations about this administration.
But when given out and out PROOF....lol....they want to discuss spelling, grammar, etc.
Again, corruption or the hint of same ONLY matters to them when it's been done....or a FALSE accusation has again been throw towards a republican.
hypocrites....
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 10, 2007 09:29:34 AM new
Uh, yoohoo, linduh!
Bigpeepa didn't didn't discuss grammar:
""Judicial Watch describes itself as "a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, [that] promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law."
This year, according to the group, six of the most corrupt Washington politicians were Republicans whose names are often identified with the scandals widely believed to have contributed to the Democratic victory in the November midterms: Lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-CA), Rep. Tom Delay (R-TX), Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL), Rep. Denny Hastert (R-IL), and Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH).
Plus Liar_K don't forget BUSHY'S friends like (Kenny Boy Enron) who ruined so many peoples lives.
"""
posted on January 10, 2007 09:32:46 AM new
The sad part is the clinton administration STILL HOLDS records for all the corruption during his admin.
HE probably will till the end of time.
But that sure didn't bother ONE of his supporters.
But it's all different now....of course....when it's a corrupt liberal...it's ALWAYS different...and they double standards once again shine.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 10, 2007 10:17:30 AM new
clinton's admin. used to make the point of what HYPOCRITES you lefties are.
He STILL holds the records....and most here would still support him again.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 10, 2007 10:31:13 AM new
I don't support ANY corruption....DUH mingo, so I'd never 'defend' it no matter who broke the law.
But the problem with you lifties is you only take PART of any corruption and blame this administration for what YOUR administration did or didn't do. tsk tsk tsk
Here....you and old "waco"peepa should read this. Find out clinton's involvement in Enron.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
And as we see in the above article/investigation report....his administration CONTINUED breaking the law to cover his fannie.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 10, 2007 10:43:59 AM new
A person who thinks "stoled" is a word, or calls lefties "lifties",should not address Bigpeepa as "waco"
Now, let's talk about the PRESENT administration which YOU defend despite the overflow of corruption which leads me to believe you DO defend corruption as long as YOUR side is doing it
posted on January 10, 2007 10:48:55 AM new
'leads you to believe'
I don't care where your twisted thinking takes you.
You just are avoiding admitting that sandy berger BROKE A MAJOR law.....and acted like the criminal he IS....their administration WAS.
He got a slap on the wrist.....and not ONE dem here EVER wanted to discuss it.
typical....change the subject as quickly as you can...that way you don't have to face the CORRUPTION YOU SUPPORTED.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 10, 2007 10:49:23 AM new
[i]Edited to add: It's "Berger," not "Burger." He's not a fast-food sandwich.
[/i]
Actually it sould be spelled Burglar
And in this instance it was Klinton that gave Burglar the authorization to access and trash the ONLY copies of the sealed Millennium report that laid blame on Klinton for 9/11.
Just another cover up in the life of Slick Willie.
"“More Iraqis think things are going well in Iraq than Americans do. I guess they don’t get the New York Times over there.”—Jay Leno".
posted on January 10, 2007 10:52:12 AM new
Diverting the attention on something else....doesn't change the FACTS
"My staff's investigation reveals that President Clinton's former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national security much more than originally disclosed," Davis said.
"It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience.
"While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation": "What would a Democrat president have done at that point?"
"Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack."
posted on January 10, 2007 01:53:46 PM new
They must not have been around when "waco"peepa TRIED to do his best to call ME a wacko....but HE couldn't even get THAT right....and he spelled it wrong. lol
Are YOU a Bunghole?