posted on September 18, 2000 05:07:44 AM new
G'Day,
What about all the buyers that use Paypal to pay for Inventory/Stock they have purchased online? Are they not "business" users? Should they not be forced to "upgrade" to a "business account" and pay fees for using Paypal? Should they not be "honest" and willing to help Paypal make some money?
How can you classify only the Sellers as the "Business" account users and completely ignore all the Buyers that are? Shouldn't the "business" buyers have to share part of the burden?
So if someone in business buys from a part-time/hobby seller, the buyer pays no fees yet the seller has been forced to "upgrade" to a business account and does pay fees?
Just another thought on how lopsided and totally oblivious Paypal is to the whole situation.
posted on September 18, 2000 10:20:03 AM new
Didja really need to give the Great and Powerful PaypalDamon and company another idea on how to double-dip on our funds?
posted on September 18, 2000 11:19:27 AM newDidja really need to give the Great and Powerful PaypalDamon and company another idea on how to double-dip on our funds?
All jokes aside, PayPal isn't constrained by lack of "explanation". They have a schedule to achieve profitability which is constrained by the competition, and constrained by how much they think their customer base will swallow, but is not constrained by "lack of a good story".
posted on September 18, 2000 05:24:16 PM new
I too have thought about this issue but as TRC said I've kept quiet. Besides as a seller I'd get charged, as a buyer I'd get charged, ......is there any money left too charge? My Dollar day auctions are coming to a screaching halt with all these fees.
