posted on May 25, 2006 10:29:58 AM new
Oh you gotta just love poor Fenix. I wish I could give her a lollipop and a pat on the head. I wanna pinch her cheeks, she's so cute with the way that she thinks that we can't see right through her.
posted on May 25, 2006 11:08:23 AM new
Do you have an actual point to address Pi or are you once again just trying to channel Dbl?
Please don't tell me that there are now two of you who find me more important than the actual events in the world today.
The funny thing is, you guys think I have this attitude of self importance, and yet with 7 active threads this morning, the only thing you could comment on was me. Expand your horizons... there is much going on in the nation today, and most of it is a hell of a lot more interesting than me.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
People put their hand on the bible, and swear to uphold the constitution. They do not put their hand on the constitution, and swear to uphold the bible.
[ edited by fenix03 on May 25, 2006 11:09 AM ]
posted on May 25, 2006 11:43:42 AM new
"And those liberals here that NEVER hold the muslim/islamic terrorists, saddam, illegal immigrants, or any enemy of our Nation to blame for THEIR actions are the QUICKEST to use their OWN bigotry and their OWN prejudices when making their 'crystal ball' statements about those of us who DO side with our country against the actions of those that aren't in our Country's best interests."
Talk about a run on and on and on sentance.
"I clearly see who the 'Internationalists' are here. Their posts are quite clear. Others are just against THIS administration [like peepa]. To me, that's much different than those who hold little, if any, alliance/allegiance to this Nation....but rather whose alliances/allegiances are split.
But they're going to 'read' what they want....twist what they want...and nothing going to change that....ever. They're liberals after all."
Just curious, but which of "those liberals here" do you refer to? The last time I checked, you supported the Bush Administration, the same Administration that cares less about holding Osama Bin Laden accountable. The same terrorist who killed thousands of Americans. You also support this government who allowed possible Saudi witnesses to 9/11 to leave the country without any questioning. You also support the Bush Administration who has allowed Iran and North Korea, the real threats to America to continue their Nuclear ambitions, but went after Iraq which was NOT a threat to America. You support the Bush Administration who holds no accountability towards any of their insider cronies. You support the Bush Administration who has yet to account for millions and millions of lost dollars in Iraq. You suppor the Bush Administration that has yet to adequately protect our military with proper gear, but is more interested in no-bid contracts to crony corporations who don't even supply the necessary goods to our military that they are paid to do. You support the Bush Administration who decided to take their eye off the ball in Afghanistan, allowing the Taliban to regroup and take more innocent Afghanistan and US Military lives.
So, if you really want to look at who supports terrorism, you should look directly at the Bush Administration and yourself.
The liberals you love to argue with are the same liberals who have wanted accountability for the Terrorists who struck this country on 9/11, who wanted full investigations done, and who didn't sit in a classroom for 7 minutes with their thumbs up their butt while innocent people were being killed in NYC, the Pentagon, and in Pennsylvania. If we had our way, North Korea and Iran would have been dealt with long before considering attacking Iraq.
posted on May 25, 2006 03:37:25 PM new
lol...classic that's why I spelled it that way....I was TRYING to keep your mind on politics.
-------
Yes, rusty I am the QUEEN of run on sentences. My spelling and grammar also suck. BIG DEAL....I get my points across enough to get your panties all twisted around.
------
And on your last rant.....all is BS...twisting...from a liberal mind that can't keep things straight.
BUT I did get a HUGE chuckle out of your comment about not dealing with NK and Iran. LOL
Where have you been? We HAVE been dealing with them.
And the dems have offered exactly WHAT ideas/solutions for EITHER issue? Let me help you out there....NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING.
They just whine, complain and #*!@ all the time....but they DON'T and HAVEN'T offered ANY solutions on EITHER issue.
They certainly aren't the party of ideas.....nor solutions....just full of whiners who SAY they can do so much better....but as of today have YET to unite as a party and form ANY specific plans.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on May 26, 2006 07:22:16 AM new
::Where have you been? We HAVE been dealing with them.::
How are WE dealing with either one of those nations Linda? We won't even talk to them.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
People put their hand on the bible, and swear to uphold the constitution. They do not put their hand on the constitution, and swear to uphold the bible.
[ edited by fenix03 on May 26, 2006 07:43 AM ]
posted on May 26, 2006 11:29:25 AM new
Isn't it hysterical that people who wouldn't DREAM of asking Robertson or Falwell to rethink this "pro life" thing, spout endlessly on about "negotiating" with religous dictatorships who state that they have to murder us to make their world pure.
posted on May 27, 2006 10:04:21 AM new
I agree.....according to them we need to better 'understand' them, what makes them hate us so much, and work to improve that situation.
When it's clear to most American's...the ONLY way we'd EVER work anything out with 'them' is to go along with what THEY want in every way. And that's just NOT going to happen as long as we don't have a liberal in the WH or a bunch of liberals in Congress, in control. Because, imo, liberals are just DEAF to what the terrorists promise for our future. They appear to me to be in total denial of what THEY promise they're working to do to our Nation. And that's NOTHING buy scary to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on May 27, 2006 10:17:42 AM new
To appease the liberals like you who have mostly whined about everything this President didn't do BEFORE invading Iraq....this time he decided to let the EU work with Iran. For approx. three years now they have been. Has ANYTHING they've done worked? NOPE!!! So now you liberals can see that it's NOT JUST this administration that can't reason with terrorists. No one can.
Then Russian comes in and tried to defuse the situtaion...by offering to 'regulate' their nuclear energy. Nope....another no go.
We've gotten the UN involved with BOTH countries....has the UN been about to change a things? Nope....failure again.
Imo, those are the ways we've worked, by LEADING....by envolving other Nations to try and change both situations....so the liberal left can't say that we're warmongers....can't muster up any support against nuclear weapons these two countries want.
Now the WORLD can see that NO ONE can diplomatically WORK out this issue with nutcases. So IF we need to do something about it, down the road, the liberals can't say we didn't try before we started bombing their NW sights. They will anyway, of course , but again they won't be speaking truthfully.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
