lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 07:57:29 PM new
One more thread derailed by someone insisting that the thread stay on topic, I'm going to loose my mind!
|
enchanted
|
posted on March 5, 2001 07:59:19 PM new
I'm so sympathetic.
 sympathetic smilie
no comments please.
|
krs
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:00:41 PM new
Lose your mind?
|
lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:02:13 PM new
That was just for you, Krs.
|
stusi
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:02:55 PM new
no one insisted that the thread stay on topic. the problem was that there apparently was no topic, just an inflammatory religious reference.
|
enchanted
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:04:06 PM new
I can see I'm not wanted. Again. You two have too much to say to each other. Again. I'm so affronted I'm going back to the quitting smoking thread.
don't you dare comment. Put me on ignore ASAP.
unwanted and unloved smilie
|
KatyD
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:05:41 PM new
Absolutely there was a topic, Stusi. We were all commenting on it.
KatyD
|
snowyegret
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:05:49 PM new
|
lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:06:43 PM new
Actually, the problem seemed to be that you didn't understand the topic and didn't even bother to read the link provided for your education.
|
Antiquary
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:07:33 PM new
Hmmmmmm. Very interesting.
|
krs
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:07:33 PM new
You're hopeless, Stusi.
Fuzzer smile upon thee.
|
lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:09:10 PM new
snowyegret: Please be assured that had I actually been looking at your post, I would have been offended.
|
stusi
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:12:20 PM new
apparently you did not bother to read that i read the linked page. although it was created by a non-Jewish group its relation to Bush is not obvious as you would have others believe. if there was a clear connection to Bush i would have been offended by him and not by the creator of the thread and other posters.
|
jamesoblivion
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:14:03 PM new
That was the New Revised Standard Edition's translation of the 3rd chapter of Exodus where Moses encounters the manifestation of God in a burning bush, telling him to go to Egypt and free the Israelites from their bondage.
|
jtland
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:14:12 PM new
I can't believe that thread was locked. That's the funniest thing I've seen in a long time.
Lisa
|
Shadowcat
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:15:11 PM new
Apparently, Stusi was in the wrong thread. I coulda sworn there was a topic and it was being discussed in utter earnestness.
|
lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:15:14 PM new
Is that a new AW Policy:
Thou shall not offend stusi.
I'm sorry you didn't understand the subject. As a good member of AW I should have taken the time to draw you a picture to clear up your confusion. Please accept my deepest appoligies.
|
snowyegret
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:15:38 PM new
lotsafuzz, If I didn't have everyone on ignore, I would know that. 
|
stusi
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:21:11 PM new
katyd- what do you think the topic was? who had the better smilies? krs- some people have a problem with topics other than dogruns. we had a serious discussion on that issue and no one accused you of over-reacting! wouldn't you think that topic lends itself more easily to sarcasm?
|
lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:26:57 PM new
wouldn't you think that topic lends itself more easily to sarcasm?
What is the point if it is easy?
I find it really rude that you, stusi, continue to discuss a subject that has been locked (per your request) in MY thread.
|
krs
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:27:10 PM new
About the same on the ridiculous scale, I'd say.
Fuzzy, in case you're not looking--yo make me
|
stockticker
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:27:36 PM new
I hope everyone has me on ignore. I'm an atheist and it is rather embarrassing to admit that I immediately understood the title of Spaz's thread when he posted it this afternoon. 
Irene
|
Shadowcat
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:30:02 PM new
I find that loaning sarcasm is always easy, especially at the interest rates I charge.
|
stusi
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:30:53 PM new
a manifestation of God in a burning "bush"? incredibly original and funny and definitely worth a thread of its own!!!!!! amazing what amuses some people. how many biblical "gore" references can you come up with that might offend Christians?
|
krs
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:31:58 PM new
Stusi,
James just explained what should not be neccessary to explain. Here:-- God as Burning BUSH tells moses to take Jews out of Egypt.
Next time use your ignore button, no, use it now.
|
ubiedaman
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:31:59 PM new
OK...So who do you folks think is going to be the ultimate "Survivor"...Rodger or Elizabeth?
Ooops.....what was the topic again?
(if I use a smiley it means I'm kidding right?)
Keith
I assume full responsibility for my actions, except
the ones that are someone else's fault.
|
therpowen
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:32:06 PM new
Do you think you people could try to stay on topic here!
Hmmm.... But seeing as the topic is being off topic, then being off topic would really be on topic and not off topic at all!
nevermind
therp
|
stockticker
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:32:31 PM new
Christians are offended by the Bible?
|
jamesoblivion
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:32:37 PM new
I am Jewish, and the thread might have offended me on two fronts -- if it were offensive.
|
lotsafuzz
|
posted on March 5, 2001 08:33:11 PM new
Stusi, if you wanted to address the topic, why did you have it locked? Seems a bit silly to me.
Now, I must insist you stay on the topic at hand or I will have to have this thread locked (and then where would you go?).
|
