kraftdinner
|
posted on November 20, 2005 05:39:18 PM new
|
davebraun
|
posted on November 20, 2005 05:41:45 PM new
[ edited by davebraun on Nov 20, 2005 06:19 PM ]
|
kraftdinner
|
posted on November 20, 2005 05:47:25 PM new
Dave, this is just meant to be a joke. Now I'm sorry I started it. 
|
classicrock000
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:07:32 PM new
No..my wifes name is Linda and we've been together since Oct 8,1971
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beauty is only a light switch away
|
piinthesky
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:19:50 PM new
Caught in her own web of deceit.
|
classicrock000
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:22:43 PM new
Yea Piin-dave had to erase his reply LOL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beauty is only a light switch away
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:38:04 PM new
I believe that experience or association with someone having a particular name may influence your preference for certain names. But it's silly to say that you dislike a person based only on a name. It's the individual that counts...not the name.
What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.
Shakespeare
|
piinthesky
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:40:22 PM new
Classic, i saw that, i wonder who emailed him and told him to delete his post.
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:52:10 PM new
I doubt that Dave deleted his post because someone "emailed him". He probably saw that KD was unhappy with his response and so he deleted it. What's so unusual about that?
|
piinthesky
|
posted on November 20, 2005 06:55:02 PM new
Unbelievable!
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 20, 2005 07:02:07 PM new
LOL! You're the unbelievable one.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 20, 2005 07:03:34 PM new
I saw and read dave's post....he said 'no, he didn't dislike people named Linda, just Linda_K'
no surprise there...
--------
But KD you ARE the one who REALLY surprised me with this thread.
After we, you and I, had just had a conversation in the other thread about what your intentions really were in starting the 'who has posted the most' thread.
And YOU, KD, SAID - "if you want to believe I started it because I had a hidden agenda to slam you, you're wrong."
And I still gave you the benefit of the doubt...even though my gut feeling was that you had done that intentionally....
So I said: "This is one case where I'd like to be very wrong about your intentions, KD. I sincerely hope I am."
But be very clear now, KD, you have removed ALL doubt I ever had by starting this thread immediately following the above mentioned one. I think your intentions in BOTH threads are VERY clear now.
|
piinthesky
|
posted on November 20, 2005 07:07:50 PM new
No, you are.
|
kiara
|
posted on November 20, 2005 07:16:50 PM new
Kraft started it as a joke...... a take-off on all the paranoia reeking in the other thread. Sheesh!
Lighten up!
A sense of humor... is needed armor. Joy in one's heart and some laughter on one's lips is a sign that the person down deep has a pretty good grasp of life.
~Hugh Sidey
|
davebraun
|
posted on November 20, 2005 07:31:54 PM new
Since my post was seen....
no one emailed me I looked at the thread a few minutes later and found kd had meant it as a joke so I deleted it out of courtesy to her.
Yes I dislike LindaK as well as anyone else who seeks to limit my civil liberties and questions the integrity of those who disagree with her flat earth viewpoint.
|
parklane64
|
posted on November 20, 2005 07:38:41 PM new
I used to kill time in an office by making disgusting phone calls to women with my ex-wife's first name............
It was mildly entertaining, sorta like crank yankers, but more intense.
One time I was drinking beers with an ex-tenant. We crank-called another ex-tenant's 8 month pregnant wife and asked her where Vince was, 'We're waiting with the dancers down at The Web', (his local bar, in LA). She screamed and dropped the phone. A year later we found out she ran three blocks and came through the door of The Web at full tilt and took ***** offen his stool on the fly, with a hot skillet. It's a good thing she was so small. My bad.
__________
The Islamofascist fig-puckers are fighting to spread their culture and religion, and to destroy ours
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 21, 2005 06:40:48 AM new
Dave, just for the record, I admired and agreed with your frank answer. I also failed to see the joke but in consideration of the problems that Linda was having adjusting to a near win in the "who posts the most" thread I decided to try a diplomatic answer instead. We all know that's not my forte but I did the best that I could.
Of course there is truth in my answer. I now dislike the name based on my association with linda and would never name a child or a pet by that name. At the same time, I would not dislike anyone based on my aversion to the name itself. Maybe the joke is that the question is silly, just like the thread which frazzled linda so much. If you read the first two pages of that thread you will see that it started in fun and was quickly diverted to a personal attack by LINDA.
Just as a name doesn't define an individual, the contest for number of posts doesn't define the quality of those posts. Being judged on the number of posts should not bother linda or be seen as an insult. I certainly don't see it that way.
If it does bother linda, she might be comforted by the fact that she has been here almost three years longer than I have and so she posted less frequently over the long haul. Linda joined Jan. 6, 1999 and I joined April 1, 2002. Linda posted 481 posts less that I did. She should be proud of that record and I hope that in the future her goal will be to increase that gap significantly!
|
dblfugger9
|
posted on November 21, 2005 07:01:41 AM new
She should be proud of that record and I hope that in the future her goal will be to increase that gap significantly!
The way you two go at it, it shouldn't be hard!
(What the hell was that yesterday, anyway??/ - Were we all getting contact highs from kraft through our computer?)
.
spelling
[ edited by dblfugger9 on Nov 21, 2005 07:27 AM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 21, 2005 07:36:51 AM new
helen, helen, helen.
Very well written, as usual, but incorrect, as usual...in several ways.
PLEASE learn to speak the 'truth'.
You didn't join in 2002, three years after me....you joined in 1999...under a different userid:
USER ID: HJW
Date Joined: September 17, 1999 03:28:50 PM
Message Center Posts: 4954
"Being judged on the number of posts should not bother linda or be seen as an insult. I certainly don't see it that way."
I didn't either, helen...and stated previously 'and proud of each and everyone of them'.
"If it does bother linda,"
it doesn't
"she might be comforted by the fact that she has been here almost three years longer than I have." nope....that's just not true helen
"and so she posted less frequently over the long haul. Linda joined Jan. 6, 1999"
really before then...if anyone else remembers that on Jan 1, 1999 they [AW] reset all the counters...starting fresh.
"and I joined April 1, 2002."
nope...not true unless you're denying your were HWJ before becoming helenjw
"Linda posted 481 posts less that I did. She should be proud of that record and I hope that in the future her goal will be to increase that gap significantly!"
I AM proud of all of them helen. It's just you and vicious maggie that say differently....or imply differently.
edited to add: What 'bothered' me in that thread was the lack of honesty from maggie once it did turn out you had been here one year less than I, and that it was you who had the most posts in almost a years less time. THAT LACK of being able to accept the FACTS as they truly are...HER denial...her lack of character in the way she was handling herself...IS what I had a problem with. Her right to act as she wishes....but then she decided the end result didn't turn out as she THOUGHT it would....and was 'dancing around the room' about - as she later stated....then she became vicious and THEN decides since she doesn't like the outcome - she's changing the 'rules' SHE set.
Hope that makes clear MY...position on the matter....so no one else has to tell others what I think/feel or why I reacted the way I did.
Have a good day....but TRY to be truthful ...just once in a while.
-------
edited again to address your statement about any 'attack' you saw coming from me.
You MO is to take things said to you in a negative manner, to always assume they're attacks. As I said before...it wasn't an attack....it was me sharing MY version of events in the old days. I didn't tell any lies...didn't mistate anything...and I still see it exactly as I stated.
What saddens me helen is that for whatever your personal reasons are....you just have such difficultly admitting you really cared for krs. Your choice, of course....but for me I guess part of that is what I see as your ability to remain in denial about so many issues you and I see so differently.
And it also saddens me that in those days you did so admire him and he was respected by many posters at that time...I wasn't one of them who felt that way about him, but that doesn't matter. And now you've sunk to admiring/respecting/saying you enjoy the posts of someone like mingotree/crowfarm. I don't know how to say it delicately....but WOW...what a difference in the level of character between those two - it's like an insult to krs's memory here.
There....that might be my last edit. 
[ edited by Linda_K on Nov 21, 2005 08:14 AM ]
|
maggiemuggins
|
posted on November 21, 2005 07:53:12 AM new
No..Spew all you want LindaK...no one comes close to being the huge gas bag you are...ya notice no one is disputing that fact...and the bag of wind award goes to LindaK!
Somebody, pass me another bucket of water will ya..she's still smoldering... LOL LOL
Now. are we going to have another day of you whining and crying and stomping your massive feet around here...get a life...you usually like to win... so you win this one..Queen Gasbag... Congrats!
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:00:26 AM new
Wheeee...there she blows again!!!
Linda, any reasonable person who reads that thread from the beginning will see that it was you...as always who starts the personal attacks.
It started in fun and you turned it into a dumb battle over NOTHING.
[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 21, 2005 09:04 AM ]
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:04:22 AM new
LOl helen.....just stating the truth....as I said before...I know that always been something that's been extremely hard for you to do.
But credibility, integrity and honesty are important values to ME. They always have been....always will be.
So....at times I must correct you.
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:08:04 AM new
How could I forget that I was HJW! That period was the most fun!!!
LOL!
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:14:23 AM new
Oh...so you're acknowledging that sometimes...you forget things. VERY GOOD helen...you're always just so sure you've said something and you KNOW that's how it is....maybe some of those times too, you not only forget things stated YESTERDAY ....but are wrong because of your short-term memory problems on other issues too.
I'm so glad you remembered you were here in 1999....not 2002 as you stated. Good girl!!!
That'a a GREAT beginning for you. YEAH!!! Helen.
|
Helenjw
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:14:27 AM new
"But credibility, integrity and honesty are important values to ME. They always have been....always will be.
So....at times I must correct you.
That's hilarious, linda. If those values are important to you, I suggest that you try using them.
Stop your efforts to lie and smear.
Stop trying to shade the truth with spun tales.
Stop accusing posters of making statements that they never made and ones that you can't back up.
Stop telling everyone here what they think because you don't know.
You take care of linda and stop whining about what others are saying about you.
If you can follow these few suggestions, maybe, just maybe you can live up to your professed ideals.
Right now, you do not in my opinion.
|
kiara
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:15:25 AM new
All the paranoia and allegations and accusations about the intentions or conspiracies of what others are supposedly trying to ‘pull off’ behind the scenes are hilarious and a big joke, especially when lindak gave out her own e-mail address to someone else here a couple of months ago.
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:18:53 AM new
Oh now, helen, don't go getting your panties all bunched up this early in the morning....well afternoon for you I guess.
You and I rarely agree on anything...but they are values that I have and do my best to stick to. I'm human and sometimes I don't live up to them the way I might like to.....but HEY....at least you're coming around. BEGINNING, when reminded with proof to remember more and more.
I think that's just GREAT, helen. I'm so proud of you. Now you can gain back some of the credibility here that you've lost in recent years. I'm just SO proud of you.
|
dblfugger9
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:29:23 AM new
especially when lindak gave out her own e-mail address to someone else here a couple of months ago...
oh cute! Little miss I have been gone for a month ..and I am busy ...I only pop in here ocassionally",.never misses a thing posted here! Can you imagine the time she spends reading and re-reading her mailbox? The more you say the more you reveal about what a sneaky lier you are. ha!
|
Linda_K
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:34:59 AM new
lol, dbl. sooooo true.
Another truth they won't acknowledge....but I think reasonable people DO see it anyway. Because someone is not posting....doesn't mean they're not lurking in the dark corners somewhere.
|
dblfugger9
|
posted on November 21, 2005 09:37:17 AM new
yep, Linda. And sometimes if you stopped to imagine who is really lurking, you might not want to post at all .. But screw em, long as I am entertaining myself here, its my time who cares...
|
